rework IRQ handling in mtk_eth_soc
Subsystems (4)
v3 cover rework IRQ handling in mtk_eth_soc
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
This series introduces named IRQs while keeping the index based way for older dts.
Further it makes some cleanup like adding consts for index access and avoids loading first IRQ which was not used on non SHARED_INT SoCs.
Frank Wunderlich (3):
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: change code to skip first IRQ completely
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 56 ++++++++++++++------- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 5 ++ 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v3 1/3 net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Add named interrupts and keep index based fallback for exiting devicetrees.
Currently only rx and tx IRQs are defined to be used with mt7988, but later extended with RSS/LRO support.
---
v2:
- move irqs loading part into own helper function
- reduce indentation
- place mtk_get_irqs helper before the irq_handler (note for simon)
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 39 +++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +28 -11
@@ -3336,6 +3336,30 @@ static void mtk_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txqueue)schedule_work (ð->pending_work); } +static int mtk_get_irqs (struct platform_device *pdev,struct mtk_eth *eth) +{ +int i; + + eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) +return 0 ; + +for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; +else + eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); + +if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i); +return -ENXIO ; + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +static irqreturn_t mtk_handle_irq_rx (int irq,void *_eth) {struct mtk_eth *eth = _eth;
@@ -5105,17 +5129,10 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } } -for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; -else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); -if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i); - err = -ENXIO ; - goto err_wed_exit; - } - } + err =mtk_get_irqs (pdev, eth); +if (err) + goto err_wed_exit; +for (i =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (eth->clks); i++) { eth->clks[i] =devm_clk_get (eth->dev, mtk_clks_source_name[i]);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v3 2/3 net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index
In reply to Frank WunderlichFrom: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Use consts instead of fixed integers for accessing IRQ array.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 22 ++++++++++----------- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 5 +++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +11 -11
@@ -3340,14 +3340,14 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth) {int i; - eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); - eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); -if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX ] >=0 && eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX ] >=0 )return 0 ; -for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { +for (i =0 ; i <MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX ; i++) {if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ];else eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i);
@@ -3413,7 +3413,7 @@ static void mtk_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)mtk_tx_irq_disable (eth,MTK_TX_DONE_INT );mtk_rx_irq_disable (eth, eth->soc->rx.irq_done_mask); -mtk_handle_irq_rx (eth->irq[2 ], dev); +mtk_handle_irq_rx (eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX ], dev);mtk_tx_irq_enable (eth,MTK_TX_DONE_INT );mtk_rx_irq_enable (eth, eth->soc->rx.irq_done_mask); }
@@ -4899,7 +4899,7 @@ static int mtk_add_mac(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct device_node *np) eth->netdev[id]->features |= eth->soc->hw_features; eth->netdev[id]->ethtool_ops = &mtk_ethtool_ops; - eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[0 ]; + eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; eth->netdev[id]->dev.of_node = np;if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SOC_MT7628 ))
@@ -5176,17 +5176,17 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[0 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ], mtk_handle_irq,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth); }else { - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[1 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX ], mtk_handle_irq_tx,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth);if (err) goto err_free_dev; - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[2 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX ], mtk_handle_irq_rx,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth); }
@@ -5232,7 +5232,7 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }else netif_info (eth, probe, eth->netdev[i],"mediatek frame engine at 0x%08lx, irq %d\n" , - eth->netdev[i]->base_addr, eth->irq[0 ]); + eth->netdev[i]->base_addr, eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]); }/* we run 2 devices on the same DMA ring so we need a dummy device
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +5 -0
@@ -642,6 +642,11 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100)) +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3 +struct mtk_rx_dma {unsigned int rxd1;unsigned int rxd2;
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v3 3/3 net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: change code to skip first IRQ completely
In reply to Frank WunderlichFrom: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +8 -3
@@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)return 0 ;for (i =0 ; i <MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { +if (i ==0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +else + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; + }else if (i <2 )//skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT + eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i +1 );else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +continue ;if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i);
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +2 -2
@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0 -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1 -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3struct mtk_rx_dma {
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [net-next v3 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: change code to skip first IRQ completely
Quoted 17 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without
MTK_SHARED_INTcapability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +0
-0@@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)return 0 ;
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth) · line 3354
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +6
-2for (i =0 ; i <MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { +if (i ==0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +else + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; + }else if (i <2 )//skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT
Please use conformant comment style, ie. do not use '//' but always use '/* ... */' instead, on a dedicated line.
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +2
-1+ eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i +1 ); else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); + continue;if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i);drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +0
-0
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h line 648
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +2
-2@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0 -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1 -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3
Shouldn't MAX be 1 now?
Re: [net-next v3 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: change code to skip first IRQ completely
Am 15. Juni 2025 21:49:43 MESZ schrieb Daniel Golle <[email protected]>:
Quoted 19 lines · Frank Wunderlich
Quoted 18 lines
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without
MTK_SHARED_INTcapability (mt7621 + mt7628) the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) was read but never used. Skip reading it now too.Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 11 ++++++++--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +0
-0@@ -3346,10 +3346,15 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)return 0 ;
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth) · line 3354
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +6
-2for (i =0 ; i <MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { +if (i ==0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +else + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED ]; + }else if (i <2 )//skip the 1st and 4th IRQ on !MTK_SHARED_INT Please use conformant comment style, ie. do not use '//' but always use '/* ... */' instead, on a dedicated line.
Ok,not sure if the comment should stay :) It was a comment for me and i forgot to remove it.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +2
-1+ eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i +1 ); else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); + continue;if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i);drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +0
-0@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h line 648
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +2
-2#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED 0 -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 1 -#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX 0 +#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX 1#define MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX 3Shouldn't MAX be 1 now?
No as we still need to loop over the first 3 irqs on the older devicetrees. Or was the MAX intented for anything else (e.g. array size for storing the sw irqs - not changed this yet,but imho thi should be 2 now if SHARED_INT does not need 3 entries)?
regards Frank
Quoted 2 lines
Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. Juni 2025 um 17:03
Von: "Frank Wunderlich" <[email protected]>
sorry, missed the changelog:
v3:
added patches
- #2 (add constants for irq index)
- #3 (skip first IRQ on ! MTK_SHARED_INT)
to the v2 non-series patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/[email protected]/
Tested on BPI-R4/mt7988 with IRQ names and BPI-R2/mt7623 and BPI-R3/mt7986 with upstreamed dts via index-mode.
I do not have any MTK_SHARED_INT (mt7621/mt7628) boards to testing.