bonding: alb: fix UAF in rlb_arp_recv during bond up/down
Subsystems (3)
PATCH v2 1/1 bonding: alb: fix UAF in rlb_arp_recv during bond up/down
The ALB RX path may access rx_hashtbl concurrently with bond teardown. During rapid bond up/down cycles, rlb_deinitialize() frees rx_hashtbl while RX handlers are still running, leading to a use-after-free detected by KASAN.
[ 214.174138] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000001d: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI [ 214.186478] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000e8-0x00000000000000ef] [ 214.194933] CPU: 30 UID: 0 PID: 2375 Comm: ping Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.19.0-rc8+ #2 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 214.205907] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.14.0 01/14/2022 [ 214.214357] RIP: 0010:rlb_arp_recv+0x505/0xab0 [bonding] [ 214.220320] Code: 0f 85 2b 05 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 40 0f b6 ed 48 c1 e5 06 49 03 ad 78 01 00 00 48 8d 7d 28 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 06 0f 8e 12 05 00 00 80 7d 28 00 0f 84 8c 00 [ 214.241280] RSP: 0018:ffffc900073d8870 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 214.247116] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888168556822 RCX: ffff88816855681e [ 214.255082] RDX: 000000000000001d RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: 00000000000000e8 [ 214.263048] RBP: 00000000000000c0 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: ffffed11192021c8 [ 214.271013] R10: ffff8888c9010e43 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 1ffff92000e7b119 [ 214.278978] R13: ffff8888c9010e00 R14: ffff888168556822 R15: ffff888168556810 [ 214.286943] FS: 00007f85d2d9cb80(0000) GS:ffff88886ccb3000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 214.295966] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 214.302380] CR2: 00007f0d047b5e34 CR3: 00000008a1c2e002 CR4: 00000000001726f0 [ 214.310347] Call Trace: [ 214.313070] <IRQ> [ 214.315318] ? __pfx_rlb_arp_recv+0x10/0x10 [bonding] [ 214.320975] bond_handle_frame+0x166/0xb60 [bonding] [ 214.326537] ? __pfx_bond_handle_frame+0x10/0x10 [bonding] [ 214.332680] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x576/0x2710 [ 214.339199] ? __pfx_arp_process+0x10/0x10 [ 214.343775] ? sched_balance_find_src_group+0x98/0x630 [ 214.349513] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 [ 214.356513] ? arp_rcv+0x307/0x690 [ 214.360311] ? __pfx_arp_rcv+0x10/0x10 [ 214.364499] ? __lock_acquire+0x58c/0xbd0 [ 214.368975] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xae/0x1b0 [ 214.374518] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10 [ 214.380743] ? lock_acquire+0x10b/0x140 [ 214.385026] process_backlog+0x3f1/0x13a0 [ 214.389502] ? process_backlog+0x3aa/0x13a0 [ 214.394174] __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x9f/0x370 [ 214.399233] net_rx_action+0x8c1/0xe60 [ 214.403423] ? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10 [ 214.408193] ? lock_acquire.part.0+0xbd/0x260 [ 214.413058] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x6c/0x540 [ 214.417540] ? mark_held_locks+0x40/0x70 [ 214.421920] handle_softirqs+0x1fd/0x860 [ 214.426302] ? __pfx_handle_softirqs+0x10/0x10 [ 214.431264] ? __neigh_event_send+0x2d6/0xf50 [ 214.436131] do_softirq+0xb1/0xf0 [ 214.439830] </IRQ>
The issue is reproducible by looping ip link set bond0 up/down, where rlb_arp_recv() can race with rlb_deinitialize() and dereference a freed rx_hashtbl entry.
Fix this by setting recv_probe to NULL, and then calling synchronize_net() to wait for any concurrent RX processing to finish. This ensures that no RX handler can access rx_hashtbl after it is freed in bond_alb_deinitialize().
---
v2: make the description more clear (Suggested by Jay)
--- drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +5 -1
@@ -4314,9 +4314,13 @@ static int bond_close(struct net_device *bond_dev)bond_work_cancel_all (bond); bond->send_peer_notif =0 ; + bond->recv_probe =NULL ; + +/* Wait for any in-flight RX handlers */ +synchronize_net (); +if (bond_is_lb (bond))bond_alb_deinitialize (bond); - bond->recv_probe =NULL ;if (BOND_MODE (bond) ==BOND_MODE_8023AD && bond->params.broadcast_neighbor)
Signature · 1 line
2.50.1
Quoted 49 lines · Hangbin Liu
The ALB RX path may access
rx_hashtblconcurrently with bond teardown. During rapid bond up/down cycles,rlb_deinitialize()freesrx_hashtblwhile RX handlers are still running, leading to a use-after-free detected by KASAN.[ 214.174138] Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc000000001d: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN PTI [ 214.186478] KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x00000000000000e8-0x00000000000000ef] [ 214.194933] CPU: 30 UID: 0 PID: 2375 Comm: ping Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.19.0-rc8+ #2 PREEMPT(voluntary) [ 214.205907] Hardware name: Dell Inc. PowerEdge R730/0WCJNT, BIOS 2.14.0 01/14/2022 [ 214.214357] RIP: 0010:rlb_arp_recv+0x505/0xab0 [bonding] [ 214.220320] Code: 0f 85 2b 05 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 40 0f b6 ed 48 c1 e5 06 49 03 ad 78 01 00 00 48 8d 7d 28 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 04 02 84 c0 74 06 0f 8e 12 05 00 00 80 7d 28 00 0f 84 8c 00 [ 214.241280] RSP: 0018:ffffc900073d8870 EFLAGS: 00010206 [ 214.247116] RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888168556822 RCX: ffff88816855681e [ 214.255082] RDX: 000000000000001d RSI: dffffc0000000000 RDI: 00000000000000e8 [ 214.263048] RBP: 00000000000000c0 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: ffffed11192021c8 [ 214.271013] R10: ffff8888c9010e43 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: 1ffff92000e7b119 [ 214.278978] R13: ffff8888c9010e00 R14: ffff888168556822 R15: ffff888168556810 [ 214.286943] FS: 00007f85d2d9cb80(0000) GS:ffff88886ccb3000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 [ 214.295966] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 [ 214.302380] CR2: 00007f0d047b5e34 CR3: 00000008a1c2e002 CR4: 00000000001726f0 [ 214.310347] Call Trace: [ 214.313070] <IRQ> [ 214.315318] ? __pfx_rlb_arp_recv+0x10/0x10 [bonding] [ 214.320975] bond_handle_frame+0x166/0xb60 [bonding] [ 214.326537] ? __pfx_bond_handle_frame+0x10/0x10 [bonding] [ 214.332680] __netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x576/0x2710 [ 214.339199] ? __pfx_arp_process+0x10/0x10 [ 214.343775] ? sched_balance_find_src_group+0x98/0x630 [ 214.349513] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_core.constprop.0+0x10/0x10 [ 214.356513] ? arp_rcv+0x307/0x690 [ 214.360311] ? __pfx_arp_rcv+0x10/0x10 [ 214.364499] ? __lock_acquire+0x58c/0xbd0 [ 214.368975] __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0xae/0x1b0 [ 214.374518] ? __pfx___netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x10/0x10 [ 214.380743] ? lock_acquire+0x10b/0x140 [ 214.385026] process_backlog+0x3f1/0x13a0 [ 214.389502] ? process_backlog+0x3aa/0x13a0 [ 214.394174] __napi_poll.constprop.0+0x9f/0x370 [ 214.399233] net_rx_action+0x8c1/0xe60 [ 214.403423] ? __pfx_net_rx_action+0x10/0x10 [ 214.408193] ? lock_acquire.part.0+0xbd/0x260 [ 214.413058] ? sched_clock_cpu+0x6c/0x540 [ 214.417540] ? mark_held_locks+0x40/0x70 [ 214.421920] handle_softirqs+0x1fd/0x860 [ 214.426302] ? __pfx_handle_softirqs+0x10/0x10 [ 214.431264] ? __neigh_event_send+0x2d6/0xf50 [ 214.436131] do_softirq+0xb1/0xf0 [ 214.439830] </IRQ>
Quoted 8 lines
The issue is reproducible by looping ip link set bond0 up/down, where
rlb_arp_recv()can race withrlb_deinitialize()and dereference a freedrx_hashtblentry.Fix this by setting
recv_probeto NULL, and then callingsynchronize_net()to wait for any concurrent RX processing to finish. This ensures that no RX handler can accessrx_hashtblafter it is freed inbond_alb_deinitialize().
This is much clearer, thanks.
Quoted 4 lines
Reported-by Liang Li <[email protected]>Fixes e53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table")Reviewed-by Nikolay Aleksandrov <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
Quoted 30 lines
---
v2: make the description more clear (Suggested by Jay)
---
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c| 6 +++++-1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +5
-1@@ -4314,9 +4314,13 @@ static int bond_close(struct net_device *bond_dev)bond_work_cancel_all (bond); bond->send_peer_notif =0 ; + bond->recv_probe =NULL ; + +/* Wait for any in-flight RX handlers */ +synchronize_net (); +if (bond_is_lb (bond))bond_alb_deinitialize (bond); - bond->recv_probe =NULL ;if (BOND_MODE (bond) ==BOND_MODE_8023AD && bond->params.broadcast_neighbor)Signature · 1 line
2.50.1
Jakub Kicinski
maintainerdrivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c static int bond_close(struct net_device *bond_dev) · line 4317
Quoted 1 line · On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:15:41 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +1
-0+ bond->recv_probe =NULL ;
nit: WRITE_ONCE()? It's READ_ONCE() in the handler.
Signature · 1 line
pw-bot: cr
Jakub Kicinski
maintainerQuoted 1 line · On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:15:41 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Fixes e53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table")
Ah, also AI says the issue existed already in 3aba891dde38 ("bonding: move processing of recv handlers into handle_frame()")
not the exact trapping instruction but the hash table was used from recv_probe so at least a UAF would happen.
Quoted 8 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 1 line · On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:15:41 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Fixes e53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table")Ah, also AI says the issue existed already in
3aba891dde38("bonding: move processing of recv handlers intohandle_frame()")
not the exact trapping instruction but the hash table was used fromrecv_probeso at least a UAF would happen.
Not sure if I understand correctly. Do you mean we still able to access rlb_arp_recv() after setting recv_probe to NULL?
OK, that also count as UAF, even though not crash would happen.
Thanks
Hangbin
Jakub Kicinski
maintainerQuoted 4 lines · On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 04:36:24 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Quoted 3 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 1 line · On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:15:41 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Fixes e53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table")
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Ah, also AI says the issue existed already in
3aba891dde38("bonding: move processing of recv handlers intohandle_frame()")
not the exact trapping instruction but the hash table was used fromrecv_probeso at least a UAF would happen.Not sure if I understand correctly. Do you mean we still able to access
rlb_arp_recv()after settingrecv_probeto NULL?
Simply put -- wasn't there a case where rx_hashtbl was accessed after being freed in 3aba891dde38 already? That commit is a year and a half older than the commit you had under Fixes.
Quoted 11 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 10 lines · On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 04:36:24 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Quoted 8 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 1 line · On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:15:41 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Fixes e53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table")Ah, also AI says the issue existed already in
3aba891dde38("bonding: move processing of recv handlers intohandle_frame()")
not the exact trapping instruction but the hash table was used fromrecv_probeso at least a UAF would happen.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Not sure if I understand correctly. Do you mean we still able to access
rlb_arp_recv()after settingrecv_probeto NULL?Simply put -- wasn't there a case where
rx_hashtblwas accessed after being freed in3aba891dde38already? That commit is a year and a half older than the commit you had under Fixes.
AFAIK, the UAF/null-ptr-deref issue for rx_hashtble is introduced by 53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table"), which added rlb_purge_src_ip() in rlb_arp_recv().
In 3aba891dde38 ("bonding: move processing of recv handlers into handle_frame()") it only let other CPU still able to access rlb_arp_recv() after we set recv_probe to NULL. But it doesn't trigger a null-ptr-deref.
Thanks
Hangbin
Quoted 19 lines · Hangbin Liu
Quoted 11 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 10 lines · On Wed, 18 Feb 2026 04:36:24 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Quoted 8 lines · Jakub Kicinski
Quoted 1 line · On Sat, 14 Feb 2026 09:15:41 +0000 Hangbin Liu wrote:
Fixes e53665c6eaa6 ("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table")Ah, also AI says the issue existed already in
3aba891dde38("bonding: move processing of recv handlers intohandle_frame()")
not the exact trapping instruction but the hash table was used fromrecv_probeso at least a UAF would happen.Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Not sure if I understand correctly. Do you mean we still able to access
rlb_arp_recv()after settingrecv_probeto NULL?Simply put -- wasn't there a case where
rx_hashtblwas accessed after being freed in3aba891dde38already? That commit is a year and a half older than the commit you had under Fixes.
Quoted 7 lines
AFAIK, the UAF/null-ptr-deref issue for
rx_hashtbleis introduced by53665c6eaa6("bonding: delete migrated IP addresses from the rlb hash table"), which addedrlb_purge_src_ip()inrlb_arp_recv().In
3aba891dde38("bonding: move processing of recv handlers intohandle_frame()") it only let other CPU still able to accessrlb_arp_recv()after we setrecv_probeto NULL. But it doesn't trigger a null-ptr-deref.
Oh, I remember now. rlb_arp_recv() also calls rlb_update_entry_from_arp(), which could access rx_hashtbl. You are right, the fixes tag should be 3aba891dde38 ("bonding: move processing of recv handlers into handle_frame()")
Thanks
Hangbin