Skip to contentSkip to conversation

samples/damon: handle damon_{start,stop}() failures

RFC PATCH Superseded SeongJae Park 2 participants 9 messages Jun 10

Subsystems (3)

v3 of 4 Superseded Latest is v4 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

SeongJae Park

author maintainer
#0 lore raw

v3 cover samples/damon: handle damon_{start,stop}() failures

All DAMON sample modules are not correctly handling failures from damon_start(). Among those, mtier also has an additional problem for handling of damon_stop() failures. As a result, memory leaks, next DAMON operation disruptions, and use-after-free can happen. Fix those.

Changes from RFC v2
- RFC v2: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
- Add damon_start() failure handling fix for wsse and prcl. Changes from RFC v1
- RFC v1: https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]
- Add damon_stop() failure handling fix to the series.

SeongJae Park (4):
samples/damon/wsse: handle damon_start() failure samples/damon/prcl: handle damon_start() failure samples/damon/mtier: handle damon_start() failure samples/damon/mtier: handle damon_stop() failure

 samples/damon/mtier.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
 samples/damon/prcl.c  |  4 +++-
 samples/damon/wsse.c  |  4 +++-
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

base-commit: e38932476396c4da618a9e904ba4e45f1891d910

Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
author maintainer
#1 lore raw

RFC PATCH v3 1/4 samples/damon/wsse: handle damon_start() failure

damon_sample_wsse_start() callers assume it will clean up resources when it fails. And the function does the cleanup for context buildup failures. However, it is not doing the cleanup for damon_start() failure. As a result, when damon_start() fails, it leaks the memory for DAMON context. Free the context in case of the failure to fix the issues.

Note that the issue can reliably be reproduced because the module calls damon_start() in the exclusive mode. For example,

    $ sudo damo start
    $ echo $$ | sudo tee /sys/module/damon_sample_wsse/parameters/target_pid
    $ echo Y | sudo tee /sys/module/damon_sample_wsse/parameters/enabled
    $ sudo cat /proc/allocinfo | grep damon_new_ctx

Because the first command is running another DAMON instance, the third command fails the damon_start() call because the new DAMON instance cannot exclusively run. And without this fix, by repeating the third and the fourth commands above, we can show the memory consumption is only increasing due to the leaks. It requires the sudo permission though.

The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]

Fixes b757c6cfc696 ("samples/damon/wsse: start and stop DAMON as the user requests")
Cc <[email protected]> # 6.14.x
---
 samples/damon/wsse.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
samples/damon/wsse.c +3 -1
index 799ad44439434..bbd9392ab5b36 100644
@@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void)
 	target->pid = target_pidp;
 
 	err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, true);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return err;
+	}
 	repeat_call_control.data = ctx;
 	return damon_call(ctx, &repeat_call_control);
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
#2 lore raw

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] samples/damon/wsse: handle damon_start() failure

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unhandled failure of damon_call() leads to a permanent memory leak of the DAMON context.
- [High] Concurrent execution of module_init and sysfs store causes Use-After-Free and Double Free on the global ctx. --

commit 6215f97f729272927aafd065cdad15da2af100a8
Author: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>

samples/damon/wsse: handle damon_start() failure

This commit fixes a memory leak in damon_sample_wsse_start() by explicitly freeing the DAMON context if damon_start() fails.

samples/damon/wsse.c static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void) · line 93

Quoted 13 lines
samples/damon/wsse.c +3 -1
index 799ad44439434..bbd9392ab5b36 100644
@@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void)
 	target->pid = target_pidp;
 
 	err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, true);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return err;
+	}

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this new error path leave the global ctx pointer dangling?

If the module is loaded with enabled=1, damon_sample_wsse_init() calls damon_sample_wsse_start(). Concurrently, user space can write 0 to the enabled sysfs parameter, which triggers damon_sample_wsse_stop().

If damon_start() encounters an error, this new path calls damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) but ctx is not set to NULL. A concurrent damon_sample_wsse_stop() would see ctx != NULL and call damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) again, leading to a double free.

Similarly, if damon_sample_wsse_stop() executes while damon_sample_wsse_start() is running, stop() could call damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) while start() is actively using it, causing a use-after-free.

samples/damon/wsse.c static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void) · line 96

Quoted 3 lines
samples/damon/wsse.c +0 -0
 	repeat_call_control.data = ctx;
 	return damon_call(ctx, &repeat_call_control);
 }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this return path leak the newly created ctx if damon_call() fails?

If damon_call() returns an error (for example, -ECANCELED if the kdamond thread exits immediately and sets ctx->call_controls_obsolete to true), the error is returned directly to the caller.

Because the kdamond thread does not free the context itself when exiting, is damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) also needed here to prevent leaking the DAMON context and its associated objects?

Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=1
author maintainer
#3 lore raw

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/4] samples/damon/wsse: handle damon_start() failure

Quoted 44 lines · On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:29:12 +0000 [email protected] wrote:

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Unhandled failure of damon_call() leads to a permanent memory leak of the DAMON context.
- [High] Concurrent execution of module_init and sysfs store causes Use-After-Free and Double Free on the global ctx. --

commit 6215f97f729272927aafd065cdad15da2af100a8
Author: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>

samples/damon/wsse: handle damon_start() failure

This commit fixes a memory leak in damon_sample_wsse_start() by explicitly freeing the DAMON context if damon_start() fails.

samples/damon/wsse.c static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void) · line 93

Quoted 13 lines
samples/damon/wsse.c +3 -1
index 799ad44439434..bbd9392ab5b36 100644
@@ -87,8 +87,10 @@ static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void)
 	target->pid = target_pidp;
 
 	err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, true);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return err;
+	}

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this new error path leave the global ctx pointer dangling?

If the module is loaded with enabled=1, damon_sample_wsse_init() calls damon_sample_wsse_start(). Concurrently, user space can write 0 to the enabled sysfs parameter, which triggers damon_sample_wsse_stop().

If damon_start() encounters an error, this new path calls damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) but ctx is not set to NULL. A concurrent damon_sample_wsse_stop() would see ctx != NULL and call damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) again, leading to a double free.

Quoted 4 lines

Similarly, if damon_sample_wsse_stop() executes while damon_sample_wsse_start() is running, stop() could call damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) while start() is actively using it, causing a use-after-free.

damon_sample_wsse cannot be dynamically loaded, so this issue cannot happen.

Quoted 9 lines

samples/damon/wsse.c static int damon_sample_wsse_start(void) · line 96

Quoted 4 lines
samples/damon/wsse.c +0 -0
 	repeat_call_control.data = ctx;
 	return damon_call(ctx, &repeat_call_control);
 }

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this return path leak the newly created ctx if damon_call() fails?

Quoted 7 lines

If damon_call() returns an error (for example, -ECANCELED if the kdamond thread exits immediately and sets ctx->call_controls_obsolete to true), the error is returned directly to the caller.

Because the kdamond thread does not free the context itself when exiting, is damon_destroy_ctx(ctx) also needed here to prevent leaking the DAMON context and its associated objects?

Good finding. I will fix this with another patch.

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

author maintainer
#4 lore raw

RFC PATCH v3 2/4 samples/damon/prcl: handle damon_start() failure

In reply to SeongJae Park

damon_sample_prcl_start() callers assume it will clean up resources when it fails. And the function does the cleanup for context buildup failures. However, it is not doing the cleanup for damon_start() failure. As a result, when damon_start() fails, it leaks the memory for DAMON context. Free the context in case of the failure to fix the issues.

Note that the issue can reliably be reproduced because the module calls damon_start() in the exclusive mode. For example,

    $ sudo damo start
    $ echo $$ | sudo tee /sys/module/damon_sample_prcl/parameters/target_pid
    $ echo Y | sudo tee /sys/module/damon_sample_prcl/parameters/enabled
    $ sudo cat /proc/allocinfo | grep damon_new_ctx

Because the first command is running another DAMON instance, the third command fails the damon_start() call because the new DAMON instance cannot exclusively run. And without this fix, by repeating the third and the fourth commands above, we can show the memory consumption is only increasing due to the leaks. It requires the sudo permission though.

The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]

Fixes 2aca254620a8 ("samples/damon: introduce a skeleton of a smaple DAMON module for proactive reclamation")
Cc <[email protected]> # 6.14.x
---
 samples/damon/prcl.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
samples/damon/prcl.c +3 -1
index b7c50f2656ce7..0db2598946911 100644
@@ -106,8 +106,10 @@ static int damon_sample_prcl_start(void)
 	damon_set_schemes(ctx, &scheme, 1);
 
 	err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, true);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	repeat_call_control.data = ctx;
 	return damon_call(ctx, &repeat_call_control);
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
#5 lore raw

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] samples/damon/prcl: handle damon_start() failure

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Loading the module dynamically with the enabled=Y parameter causes a permanent DAMON thread and context leak.
- [Medium] The DAMON context, targets, and schemes are leaked if damon_call() fails in damon_sample_prcl_start(). --

commit 66049e90074b43852fd5c6e982d320d3e8718fb4
Author: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>

samples/damon/prcl: handle damon_start() failure

This commit fixes a memory leak in damon_sample_prcl_start() by destroying the Damon context if damon_start() fails. This addresses an issue where the context is leaked when the module fails to start in exclusive mode.

Quoted 6 lines
samples/damon/prcl.c +0 -0
index b7c50f2656ce7..0db2598946911 100644
@@ -106,8 +106,10 @@ static int damon_sample_prcl_start(void)
 	damon_set_schemes(ctx, &scheme, 1);

samples/damon/prcl.c static int damon_sample_prcl_start(void) · line 115

Quoted 10 lines
samples/damon/prcl.c +3 -1
 
 	err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, true);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	repeat_call_control.data = ctx;
 	return damon_call(ctx, &repeat_call_control);

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function also leak the Damon context, targets, and schemes if damon_call() fails?

If damon_start() succeeds, it spawns the kdamond thread. If the newly spawned thread terminates early, for example due to a memory allocation failure for regions_score_histogram in kdamond_fn(), it sets call_controls_obsolete.

If this happens before damon_call() acquires the call_controls_lock:

mm/damon/core.c:damon_call() {
    ...
	mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
	if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) {
		mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
		return -ECANCELED;
	}
    ...
}

Because damon_sample_prcl_start() returns this error directly to the caller without cleanup, the caller receives the error and disables the module. This permanently bypasses damon_sample_prcl_stop(), meaning damon_destroy_ctx() is never executed.

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does loading the module dynamically with the enabled=Y parameter cause a permanent Damon thread and context leak?

During module load, the kernel parses parameters and invokes the module's parameter callback before executing the init function. If enabled=Y is passed, the callback successfully calls damon_sample_prcl_start(), which allocates the context and starts the kdamond thread in exclusive mode.

Then, do_init_module() executes damon_sample_prcl_init():

samples/damon/prcl.c:damon_sample_prcl_init() {
    ...
	if (enabled) {
		err = damon_sample_prcl_start();
		if (err)
			return err;
	}
    ...
}

Because the enabled flag is still true, damon_sample_prcl_init() erroneously calls damon_sample_prcl_start() a second time. This unconditionally allocates a new ctx, overwriting the global ctx pointer and losing the reference to the original context.

The second damon_start() call fails with -EBUSY because the first thread is already running in exclusive mode. The original kdamond thread is left running forever and its context pointer is permanently lost, locking out any other Damon instances on the system until reboot.

Signature · 1 line
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/[email protected]?part=2
author maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 2/4] samples/damon/prcl: handle damon_start() failure

Quoted 55 lines · On Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:29:48 +0000 [email protected] wrote:

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Loading the module dynamically with the enabled=Y parameter causes a permanent DAMON thread and context leak.
- [Medium] The DAMON context, targets, and schemes are leaked if damon_call() fails in damon_sample_prcl_start(). --

commit 66049e90074b43852fd5c6e982d320d3e8718fb4
Author: SeongJae Park <[email protected]>

samples/damon/prcl: handle damon_start() failure

This commit fixes a memory leak in damon_sample_prcl_start() by destroying the Damon context if damon_start() fails. This addresses an issue where the context is leaked when the module fails to start in exclusive mode.

Quoted 6 lines
samples/damon/prcl.c +0 -0
index b7c50f2656ce7..0db2598946911 100644
@@ -106,8 +106,10 @@ static int damon_sample_prcl_start(void)
 	damon_set_schemes(ctx, &scheme, 1);

samples/damon/prcl.c static int damon_sample_prcl_start(void) · line 115

Quoted 10 lines
samples/damon/prcl.c +3 -1
 
 	err = damon_start(&ctx, 1, true);
-	if (err)
+	if (err) {
+		damon_destroy_ctx(ctx);
 		return err;
+	}
 
 	repeat_call_control.data = ctx;
 	return damon_call(ctx, &repeat_call_control);

[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function also leak the Damon context, targets, and schemes if damon_call() fails?

If damon_start() succeeds, it spawns the kdamond thread. If the newly spawned thread terminates early, for example due to a memory allocation failure for regions_score_histogram in kdamond_fn(), it sets call_controls_obsolete.

If this happens before damon_call() acquires the call_controls_lock:

mm/damon/core.c:damon_call() {
    ...
	mutex_lock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
	if (ctx->call_controls_obsolete) {
		mutex_unlock(&ctx->call_controls_lock);
		return -ECANCELED;
	}
    ...
}
Quoted 4 lines

Because damon_sample_prcl_start() returns this error directly to the caller without cleanup, the caller receives the error and disables the module. This permanently bypasses damon_sample_prcl_stop(), meaning damon_destroy_ctx() is never executed.

Good catch, I will fix this with another patch.

Quoted 27 lines

[Severity: High]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does loading the module dynamically with the enabled=Y parameter cause a permanent Damon thread and context leak?

During module load, the kernel parses parameters and invokes the module's parameter callback before executing the init function. If enabled=Y is passed, the callback successfully calls damon_sample_prcl_start(), which allocates the context and starts the kdamond thread in exclusive mode.

Then, do_init_module() executes damon_sample_prcl_init():

samples/damon/prcl.c:damon_sample_prcl_init() {
    ...
	if (enabled) {
		err = damon_sample_prcl_start();
		if (err)
			return err;
	}
    ...
}

Because the enabled flag is still true, damon_sample_prcl_init() erroneously calls damon_sample_prcl_start() a second time. This unconditionally allocates a new ctx, overwriting the global ctx pointer and losing the reference to the original context.

Quoted 4 lines

The second damon_start() call fails with -EBUSY because the first thread is already running in exclusive mode. The original kdamond thread is left running forever and its context pointer is permanently lost, locking out any other Damon instances on the system until reboot.

prcl cannot dynamiclly loaded, so this issue cannot happen.

Thanks,
SJ

[...]

author maintainer
#7 lore raw

RFC PATCH v3 3/4 samples/damon/mtier: handle damon_start() failure

In reply to SeongJae Park

damon_sample_mtier_start() callers assume it will clean up resources when it fails. And the function does the cleanup for context buildup failures. However, it is not doing the cleanup for damon_start() failure.

As a result, when damon_start() fails, it could leak the memory for DAMON context. Also, if damon_start() fails for only the second context, the first context will indefinitely run, and avoid starting other DAMON contexts since it is running in the exclusive mode. Stop possibly started DAMON context and free the contexts in case of the failure to fix the issues.

Note that the issue can reliably be reproduced because the module calls damon_start() in the exclusive mode. For example,

    $ sudo damo start
    $ echo Y | sudo tee /sys/module/damon_sample_mtier/parameters/enabled
    $ sudo cat /proc/allocinfo | grep damon_new_ctx

Because the first command is running another DAMON instance, the second command fails the damon_start() call because the new DAMON instance cannot exclusively run. And without this fix, by repeating the second and the third commands above, we can show the memory consumption is only increasing due to the leaks. It requires the sudo permission though.

The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]

Fixes 82a08bde3cf7 ("samples/damon: implement a DAMON module for memory tiering")
Cc <[email protected]> # 6.16.x
---
 samples/damon/mtier.c | 11 ++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
samples/damon/mtier.c +10 -1
index eb1143de8df17..66b591f2180fa 100644
@@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ static struct damon_ctx *damon_sample_mtier_build_ctx(bool promote)
 static int damon_sample_mtier_start(void)
 {
 	struct damon_ctx *ctx;
+	int err;
 
 	ctx = damon_sample_mtier_build_ctx(true);
 	if (!ctx)
@@ -185,7 +186,15 @@ static int damon_sample_mtier_start(void)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 	ctxs[1] = ctx;
-	return damon_start(ctxs, 2, true);
+	err = damon_start(ctxs, 2, true);
+	if (!err)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (damon_is_running(ctxs[0]))
+		damon_stop(ctxs, 1);
+	damon_destroy_ctx(ctxs[0]);
+	damon_destroy_ctx(ctxs[1]);
+	return err;
 }
 
 static void damon_sample_mtier_stop(void)
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3
author maintainer
#8 lore raw

RFC PATCH v3 4/4 samples/damon/mtier: handle damon_stop() failure

In reply to SeongJae Park

damon_sample_mtier_stop() assumes its damon_stop() call will always successfully stops the two DAMON contexts. Hence it deallocates the two DAMON contexts after the damon_stop() call. However, if a given context is already stopped, damon_stop() fails and returns an error while letting the DAMON contexts that have not yet stopped keep running. This kind of unexpected early DAMON context stops could happen due to memory allocation failures in kdamond_fn(). Because damon_sample_mtier_stop() just deallocates all DAMON contexts with damon_target and damon_region objects that are linked to the contexts, the execution of the unstopped DAMON context (kdamond) ends up using the memory that freed (use-after-free). Fix the issue by separating the damon_stop() to be invoked per context.

Note that DAMON_SYSFS also allows multiple DAMON contexts execution. But, it calls damon_stop() for each context one by one. Hence this issue is only in mtier.

For the long term, it would be better to refactor damon_stop() to always ensure stopping all contexts regardless of the failures in the middle. Make this fix in the current way, though, to keep it simple and easy to backport. I will do the refactoring later.

The issue was discovered [1] by Sashiko.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/[email protected]

Fixes 82a08bde3cf7 ("samples/damon: implement a DAMON module for memory tiering")
Cc <[email protected]> # 6.16.x
---
 samples/damon/mtier.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
samples/damon/mtier.c +2 -1
index 66b591f2180fa..faaaaa12e6206 100644
@@ -199,7 +199,8 @@ static int damon_sample_mtier_start(void)
 
 static void damon_sample_mtier_stop(void)
 {
-	damon_stop(ctxs, 2);
+	damon_stop(ctxs, 1);
+	damon_stop(&ctxs[1], 1);
 	damon_destroy_ctx(ctxs[0]);
 	damon_destroy_ctx(ctxs[1]);
 }
Signature · 1 line
2.47.3