clean up usage of FOO_RELEASE_NAME
PATCH 1/1 clean up usage of FOO_RELEASE_NAME
Hi guys,
just a minor cleanup patch:
lots of subsystems use SUBSYSTEM_RELEASE_NAME=RELEASE as defined in make/defines.mk.
The patch does:
cleanup all the subsystems to use RELEASE_VERSION from defines.mk cleanup all Makefiles to not define SUBSYSTEM_RELEASE_VERSION. update configure to generate proper entries in defines.mk
as side effect:
fix rgmanager/src/utils/ to be consistent with RELEASE_VERSION (it used to have PACKAGE_VERSION)
fix gfs2/fsck/ that was using GFS_RELEASE_NAME instead of GFS2_RELEASE_NAME.
Note those are all cosmetic changes. Nothing was really fixed here if not to make everything consistent.
Please apply or ACK and I will apply.
Fabio
PS and yes i was really bothered this morning :P
Signature · 5 lines
I'm going to make him an offer he can't refuse. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cleanup-release.diff URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/attachments/20070821/fe4345c9/attachment.ksh>
PATCH 1/1 clean up usage of FOO_RELEASE_NAME
Quoted 15 lines · Fabio Massimo Di Nitto
Hi guys,
just a minor cleanup patch:
lots of subsystems use SUBSYSTEM_RELEASE_NAME=RELEASE as defined in
make/defines.mk.The patch does:
cleanup all the subsystems to use
RELEASE_VERSIONfrom defines.mk cleanup all Makefiles to not defineSUBSYSTEM_RELEASE_VERSION. update configure to generate proper entries in defines.mkas side effect:
Quoted 8 lines
fix rgmanager/src/utils/ to be consistent with
RELEASE_VERSION(it used to havePACKAGE_VERSION)
fix gfs2/fsck/ that was usingGFS_RELEASE_NAMEinstead ofGFS2_RELEASE_NAME.Note those are all cosmetic changes. Nothing was really fixed here if not to make everything consistent.
Please apply or ACK and I will apply.
ACK for the rgmanager parts at least.
-- Lon
Signature · 1 line
Lon Hohberger - Software Engineer - Red Hat, Inc.