libata: cosmetic updates
PATCH 1/2 libata: cosmetic updates
We're about to add more SATA_* and ATA_ACPI_FILTER_* constants. Reformat them in preparation.
--- drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c | 12 ++++++------ include/linux/ata.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
drivers/ata/libata-acpi.c +6 -6
@@ -21,13 +21,13 @@#include <acpi/acpi_bus.h> enum { -ATA_ACPI_FILTER_SETXFER =1 <<0 , -ATA_ACPI_FILTER_LOCK =1 <<1 , -ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DIPM =1 <<2 , +ATA_ACPI_FILTER_SETXFER =1 <<0 , +ATA_ACPI_FILTER_LOCK =1 <<1 , +ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DIPM =1 <<2 , -ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DEFAULT =ATA_ACPI_FILTER_SETXFER | -ATA_ACPI_FILTER_LOCK | -ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DIPM , +ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DEFAULT =ATA_ACPI_FILTER_SETXFER | +ATA_ACPI_FILTER_LOCK | +ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DIPM , };static unsigned int ata_acpi_gtf_filter =ATA_ACPI_FILTER_DEFAULT ;
include/linux/ata.h +2 -2
@@ -304,8 +304,8 @@ enum {SETFEATURES_SATA_DISABLE =0x90 ,/* Disable use of SATA feature */ /* SETFEATURE Sector counts for SATA features */ -SATA_AN =0x05 ,/* Asynchronous Notification */ -SATA_DIPM =0x03 ,/* Device Initiated Power Management */ +SATA_DIPM =0x03 ,/* Device Initiated Power Management */ +SATA_AN =0x05 ,/* Asynchronous Notification */ /* feature values for SET_MAX */ ATA_SET_MAX_ADDR = 0x00,
Quoted 4 lines · Tejun Heo
We're about to add more SATA_* and ATA_ACPI_FILTER_* constants. Reformat them in preparation.
Signed-off-by Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
I was about to send the second patch which filters out the offending commands by default but now that I think more about it I think it would be better to specifically blacklist the machine. So, please don't commit the first patch. I'll re-post later along with updated patch.
Thanks.
Signature · 1 line
tejun
Quoted 11 lines · Tejun Heo
Quoted 4 lines · Tejun Heo
We're about to add more SATA_* and ATA_ACPI_FILTER_* constants. Reformat them in preparation.
Signed-off-by Tejun Heo <[email protected]>I was about to send the second patch which filters out the offending commands by default but now that I think more about it I think it would be better to specifically blacklist the machine. So, please don't commit the first patch. I'll re-post later along with updated patch.
Will do...