FIX for dcache_disable() for ARM926ej-s
PATCH 1/1 FIX for dcache_disable() for ARM926ej-s
the cache also needs to be invalidated, not just flushed, Since re-enabling it, can cause inconsistent data without invalidation. See example below.
in c-file:
static int num = 1;
void test() {
num = 1;
dcache_enable();
printf("Cache on, num=%d\n", num);
num = 2;
dcache_disable();
printf("Cache off, num=%d\n", num);
num = 1;
dcache_enable();
printf("Cache on, num=%d\n", num); // -> prints 2 instead of 1!!
dcache_disable();
printf("Cache off, num=%d\n", num);
}
---
arch/arm/lib/cache.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/lib/cache.c +2 -0
@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ void __flush_cache(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) asm("0: mrc p15, 0, r15, c7, c10, 3\n\t" "bne 0b\n" : : :"memory" );/* disable write buffer as well (page 2-22) */ asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4" : :"r" (0 )); +/* Invalidate dcache as well */ + asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c6, 0" : :"r" (0 ));#endif return ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.0.4
PATCH 1/1 FIX for dcache_disable() for ARM926ej-s
Hello.
Quoted 28 lines · Bas van den Berg
the cache also needs to be invalidated, not just flushed, Since re-enabling it, can cause inconsistent data without invalidation. See example below.
in c-file:
static int num = 1;void test() { num = 1; dcache_enable(); printf("Cache on, num=%d\n", num); num = 2; dcache_disable(); printf("Cache off, num=%d\n", num); num = 1; dcache_enable(); printf("Cache on, num=%d\n", num); // -> prints 2 instead of 1!! dcache_disable(); printf("Cache off, num=%d\n", num); } --- arch/arm/lib/cache.c | 2 ++ 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)arch/arm/lib/cache.c +0
-0
arch/arm/lib/cache.c void __flush_cache(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) · line 41
Quoted 5 lines
arch/arm/lib/cache.c +2
-0@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@ void __flush_cache(unsigned long start, unsigned long size) asm("0: mrc p15, 0, r15, c7, c10, 3\n\t" "bne 0b\n" : : :"memory" );/* disable write buffer as well (page 2-22) */ asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c10, 4" : :"r" (0 )); +/* Invalidate dcache as well */ + asm("mcr p15, 0, %0, c7, c6, 0" : :"r" (0 ));
Please indent with tabs as above.
WBR, Sergei
PATCH 1/1 FIX for dcache_disable() for ARM926ej-s
In reply to Bas van den BergHi Bas,
Le 21/10/2011 08:44, Bas van den Berg a ?crit :
Quoted 6 lines
the cache also needs to be invalidated, not just flushed, Since re-enabling it, can cause inconsistent data without invalidation. See example below.
in c-file:
static int num = 1;
Quoted 13 lines
void test() {
num = 1;
dcache_enable();
printf("Cache on, num=%d\n", num);
num = 2;
dcache_disable();
printf("Cache off, num=%d\n", num);
num = 1;
dcache_enable();
printf("Cache on, num=%d\n", num); // -> prints 2 instead of 1!!
dcache_disable();
printf("Cache off, num=%d\n", num);
}This part of the patch is what will stay in the GIT tree as the commit message. Here it is too verbose. Remove useless example.
Amicalement,
Signature · 1 line
Albert.