Possible issue with Mellanox be2net/port handling
Subsystems (2)
Hi,
Commit http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c41b3673759d096106e68bce586f103c51d4119 inserted changes like:
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port,
int err;
struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);- s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[0];
+ s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];
mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);
But I fear we missed one part of the deal. Concept patch:
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port,
mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);
- if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {
+ if (get_promisc_qp(dev, port - 1, steer, qpn)) {
err = 0; /* Noting to do, already exists */
goto out_mutex;
}Because:
static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port,
enum mlx4_steer_type steer, u32 qpn)
{
...
A) s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];
mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);
if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {
err = 0; /* Noting to do, already exists */
goto out_mutex;
}
...
/* add the new qpn to list of promisc qps */C) list_add_tail(&pqp->list, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer]);
...
}
static struct mlx4_promisc_qp *get_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 pf_num,
enum mlx4_steer_type steer,
u32 qpn)
{
B) struct mlx4_steer *s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[pf_num];
struct mlx4_promisc_qp *pqp;
list_for_each_entry(pqp, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer], list) {
if (pqp->qpn == qpn)
return pqp;
}
/* not found */
return NULL;
}As far as I can understand, we are changing a list for a port and checking for duplicates on the other list. Points marked as A, B and C for highlighting. Am I missing something? What do you think?
FWIW, this call get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, ...) happens in other places too.
Thank you,
Marcelo.
Re: Possible issue with Mellanox mlx4/port handling
Fixed subject, sorry the confusion.
Quoted 73 lines · Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
Hi,
Commit
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c41b3673759d096106e68bce586f103c51d4119
inserted changes like:(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port, int err; struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev); - s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[0]; + s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1]; mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);But I fear we missed one part of the deal. Concept patch:
(quoted diff) +1
-1@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port, mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex); - if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) { + if (get_promisc_qp(dev, port - 1, steer, qpn)) {err = 0; /* Noting to do, already exists */
gotoout_mutex;
}Because:
static int
add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port, enum mlx4_steer_type steer, u32 qpn)
{
...
A)s_steer= &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];
mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);if (
get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {
err = 0; /* Noting to do, already exists */
gotoout_mutex;
}
...
/* add the new qpn to list of promisc qps */
C)list_add_tail(&pqp->list, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer]);
...
}static struct
mlx4_promisc_qp*get_promisc_qp(structmlx4_dev*dev, u8pf_num,
enummlx4_steer_typesteer,
u32 qpn)
{
B) structmlx4_steer*s_steer= &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[pf_num]; structmlx4_promisc_qp*pqp;
list_for_each_entry(pqp, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer], list){ if (pqp->qpn== qpn)
return pqp;
}
/* not found */
return NULL;
}As far as I can understand, we are changing a list for a port and checking for duplicates on the other list. Points marked as A, B and C for highlighting. Am I missing something? What do you think?
FWIW, this call
get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, ...)happens in other places too.Thank you,
Marcelo.