Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Possible issue with Mellanox be2net/port handling

DISCUSSION Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 1 participant 2 messages Aug 31, 2012

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

Hi,

Commit http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c41b3673759d096106e68bce586f103c51d4119 inserted changes like:

@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port,

        int err;
        struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);

- s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[0];
+ s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];

        mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);

But I fear we missed one part of the deal. Concept patch:

@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port,

        mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);

- if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {

+       if (get_promisc_qp(dev, port - 1, steer, qpn)) {
                err = 0;  /* Noting to do, already exists */
                goto out_mutex;
        }

Because:

static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port,
enum mlx4_steer_type steer, u32 qpn)
{
...
A) s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];

    mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);

    if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {
        err = 0;  /* Noting to do, already exists */
        goto out_mutex;
    }
...
    /* add the new qpn to list of promisc qps */

C) list_add_tail(&pqp->list, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer]);
...
}

static struct mlx4_promisc_qp *get_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 pf_num,
enum mlx4_steer_type steer,
u32 qpn)
{

B)  struct mlx4_steer *s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[pf_num];
    struct mlx4_promisc_qp *pqp;

    list_for_each_entry(pqp, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer], list) {
        if (pqp->qpn == qpn)
            return pqp;
    }
    /* not found */
    return NULL;
}

As far as I can understand, we are changing a list for a port and checking for duplicates on the other list. Points marked as A, B and C for highlighting. Am I missing something? What do you think?

FWIW, this call get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, ...) happens in other places too.

Thank you,
Marcelo.

#1 lore raw

Re: Possible issue with Mellanox mlx4/port handling

Fixed subject, sorry the confusion.

Quoted 73 lines · Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

Hi,

Commit
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commitdiff;h=4c41b3673759d096106e68bce586f103c51d4119
inserted changes like:

(quoted diff) +1 -1
@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8
 port,
 int err;
 struct mlx4_priv *priv = mlx4_priv(dev);
 
- s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[0];
+ s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];
 
 mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);

But I fear we missed one part of the deal. Concept patch:

(quoted diff) +1 -1
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8
 port,
 
 mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);
 
- if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {
+ if (get_promisc_qp(dev, port - 1, steer, qpn)) {

err = 0; /* Noting to do, already exists */
goto out_mutex;
}

Because:

static int add_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 port, enum mlx4_steer_type steer, u32 qpn)
{
...
A) s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[port - 1];

mutex_lock(&priv->mcg_table.mutex);

if (get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, steer, qpn)) {
err = 0; /* Noting to do, already exists */
goto out_mutex;
}
...
/* add the new qpn to list of promisc qps */
C) list_add_tail(&pqp->list, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer]);
...
}

static struct mlx4_promisc_qp *get_promisc_qp(struct mlx4_dev *dev, u8 pf_num,
enum mlx4_steer_type steer,
u32 qpn)
{
B) struct mlx4_steer *s_steer = &mlx4_priv(dev)->steer[pf_num]; struct mlx4_promisc_qp *pqp;

list_for_each_entry(pqp, &s_steer->promisc_qps[steer], list) { if (pqp->qpn == qpn)
return pqp;
}
/* not found */
return NULL;
}

As far as I can understand, we are changing a list for a port and checking for duplicates on the other list. Points marked as A, B and C for highlighting. Am I missing something? What do you think?

FWIW, this call get_promisc_qp(dev, 0, ...) happens in other places too.

Thank you,
Marcelo.