mm/fs: don't keep pages when receiving a pending SIGKILL in __get_user_pages()
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 mm/fs: don't keep pages when receiving a pending SIGKILL in __get_user_pages()
In the process IO direction, dio_refill_pages will call get_user_pages_fast to map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter __get_user_pages function, if other processes send process A SIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches
/* * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting * pages and potentially allocating memory. */ if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receive SIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find no blocks_available and return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.
--- mm/memory.c | 10 ++++++++-- 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/memory.c +8 -2
@@ -1799,8 +1799,14 @@ long __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,* If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting * pages and potentially allocating memory. */ -if (unlikely (fatal_signal_pending (current))) -return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS ; +if (unlikely (fatal_signal_pending (current))) { +int j; +for (j =0 ; j < i; j++) { +put_page (pages[j]); + pages[j] =NULL ; + } +return -ERESTARTSYS ; + }cond_resched (); while (!(page = follow_page_mask(vma, start,
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 15 lines · Xishi Qiu
In the process IO direction,
dio_refill_pageswill callget_user_pages_fastto map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter__get_user_pagesfunction, if other processes send process ASIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches/* * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting * pages and potentially allocating memory. */ if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
Quoted 8 lines
Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receiveSIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find noblocks_availableand return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.Signed-off-by Xishi Qiu <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Bin Yang <[email protected]>
It's scary to change the behavior of gup when some callers may want the exact opposite of what you're intending here, which is sane fallback by mapping the zero page. In fact, gup never does put_page() itself and __get_user_pages() always returns the number of pages pinned and may not equal what is passed.
So, this definitely isn't the right solution for a special-case direct IO. Instead, it would be better to code this directly in the caller and compare the return value with nr_pages in dio_refill_pages() and then do the put_page() itself before falling back to ZERO_PAGE().
Quoted 32 lines · David Rientjes
Quoted 15 lines · Xishi Qiu
In the process IO direction,
dio_refill_pageswill callget_user_pages_fastto map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter__get_user_pagesfunction, if other processes send process ASIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches/* * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting * pages and potentially allocating memory. */ if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;Quoted 8 lines
Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receiveSIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find noblocks_availableand return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.Signed-off-by Xishi Qiu <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Bin Yang <[email protected]>It's scary to change the behavior of gup when some callers may want the exact opposite of what you're intending here, which is sane fallback by mapping the zero page. In fact, gup never does
put_page()itself and__get_user_pages()always returns the number of pages pinned and may not equal what is passed.
Quoted 4 lines
So, this definitely isn't the right solution for a special-case direct IO. Instead, it would be better to code this directly in the caller and compare the return value with
nr_pagesindio_refill_pages()and then do theput_page()itself before falling back toZERO_PAGE().
Hi Rientjes,
You are right, we should not change the behavior of gup.
I have a question, if we only get a part of the pages from get_user_pages_fast(), shall we write them to the disk? or add a check before write?
I'm not familiar with fs.
dio_refill_pages()
get_user_pages_fast()
Thanks,
Xishi Qiu
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>
Jan Kara
reviewerQuoted 39 lines · Xishi Qiu
Quoted 32 lines · David Rientjes
Quoted 15 lines · Xishi Qiu
In the process IO direction,
dio_refill_pageswill callget_user_pages_fastto map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter__get_user_pagesfunction, if other processes send process ASIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches/* * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting * pages and potentially allocating memory. */ if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;Quoted 8 lines
Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receiveSIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find noblocks_availableand return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.Signed-off-by Xishi Qiu <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Bin Yang <[email protected]>It's scary to change the behavior of gup when some callers may want the exact opposite of what you're intending here, which is sane fallback by mapping the zero page. In fact, gup never does
put_page()itself and__get_user_pages()always returns the number of pages pinned and may not equal what is passed.Quoted 4 lines
So, this definitely isn't the right solution for a special-case direct IO. Instead, it would be better to code this directly in the caller and compare the return value with
nr_pagesindio_refill_pages()and then do theput_page()itself before falling back toZERO_PAGE().
Quoted 5 lines
Hi Rientjes,
You are right, we should not change the behavior of gup.
I have a question, if we only get a part of the pages fromget_user_pages_fast(), shall we write them to the disk? or add a check before write?
I'm not familiar with fs.
It is OK to write as many pages as you get and then bail out from direct
IO. OTOH if you are sending a SIGKILL to an application, you probably want to kill it as soon as possible and sending IO can take some time. So in my opinion it is more desirable to just drop page references we've got in dio_refill_pages() and bail out immediately.
Honza
Signature · 8 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>