Skip to contentSkip to conversation

mm/fs: don't keep pages when receiving a pending SIGKILL in __get_user_pages()

PATCH Superseded Xishi Qiu 3 participants 4 messages Jan 15, 2014 – Jan 27, 2014

Subsystems (3)

v1 of 2 Superseded Latest is v2 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Xishi Qiu

author
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 mm/fs: don't keep pages when receiving a pending SIGKILL in __get_user_pages()

In the process IO direction, dio_refill_pages will call get_user_pages_fast to map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter __get_user_pages function, if other processes send process A SIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches

		/*
		 * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting
		 * pages and potentially allocating memory.
		 */
		if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
			return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;

Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receive SIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find no blocks_available and return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.

---
 mm/memory.c |   10 ++++++++--
 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
mm/memory.c +8 -2
index 6768ce9..0568faa 100644
@@ -1799,8 +1799,14 @@ long __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
 			 * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting
 			 * pages and potentially allocating memory.
 			 */
-			if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
-				return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
+			if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current))) {
+				int j;
+				for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
+					put_page(pages[j]);
+					pages[j] = NULL;
+				}
+				return  -ERESTARTSYS;
+			}
 
 			cond_resched();
 			while (!(page = follow_page_mask(vma, start,
Signature · 7 lines
1.7.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
#1 lore raw
Quoted 15 lines · Xishi Qiu

In the process IO direction, dio_refill_pages will call get_user_pages_fast to map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter __get_user_pages function, if other processes send process A SIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches

		/*
		 * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting
		 * pages and potentially allocating memory.
		 */
		if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
			return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
Quoted 8 lines

Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receive SIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find no blocks_available and return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.

It's scary to change the behavior of gup when some callers may want the exact opposite of what you're intending here, which is sane fallback by mapping the zero page. In fact, gup never does put_page() itself and __get_user_pages() always returns the number of pages pinned and may not equal what is passed.

So, this definitely isn't the right solution for a special-case direct IO. Instead, it would be better to code this directly in the caller and compare the return value with nr_pages in dio_refill_pages() and then do the put_page() itself before falling back to ZERO_PAGE().

author
#2 lore raw
Quoted 32 lines · David Rientjes
Quoted 15 lines · Xishi Qiu

In the process IO direction, dio_refill_pages will call get_user_pages_fast to map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter __get_user_pages function, if other processes send process A SIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches

		/*
		 * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting
		 * pages and potentially allocating memory.
		 */
		if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
			return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
Quoted 8 lines

Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receive SIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find no blocks_available and return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.

It's scary to change the behavior of gup when some callers may want the exact opposite of what you're intending here, which is sane fallback by mapping the zero page. In fact, gup never does put_page() itself and __get_user_pages() always returns the number of pages pinned and may not equal what is passed.

Quoted 4 lines

So, this definitely isn't the right solution for a special-case direct IO. Instead, it would be better to code this directly in the caller and compare the return value with nr_pages in dio_refill_pages() and then do the put_page() itself before falling back to ZERO_PAGE().

Hi Rientjes,
You are right, we should not change the behavior of gup.
I have a question, if we only get a part of the pages from get_user_pages_fast(), shall we write them to the disk? or add a check before write?
I'm not familiar with fs.

dio_refill_pages()
get_user_pages_fast()

Thanks,
Xishi Qiu

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to [email protected]. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>

reviewer
#3 lore raw
Quoted 39 lines · Xishi Qiu
Quoted 32 lines · David Rientjes
Quoted 15 lines · Xishi Qiu

In the process IO direction, dio_refill_pages will call get_user_pages_fast to map the page from user space. If ret is less than 0 and IO is write, the function will create a zero page to fill data. This may work for some file system, but in some device operate we prefer whole write or fail, not half data half zero, e.g. fs metadata, like inode, identy.
This happens often when kill a process which is doing direct IO. Consider the following cases, the process A is doing IO process, may enter __get_user_pages function, if other processes send process A SIG_KILL, A will enter the following branches

		/*
		 * If we have a pending SIGKILL, don't keep faulting
		 * pages and potentially allocating memory.
		 */
		if (unlikely(fatal_signal_pending(current)))
			return i ? i : -ERESTARTSYS;
Quoted 8 lines

Return current pages. direct IO will write the pages, the subsequent pages which can’t get will use zero page instead.
This patch will modify this judgment, if receive SIG_KILL, release pages and return an error. Direct IO will find no blocks_available and return error direct, rather than half IO data and half zero page.

It's scary to change the behavior of gup when some callers may want the exact opposite of what you're intending here, which is sane fallback by mapping the zero page. In fact, gup never does put_page() itself and __get_user_pages() always returns the number of pages pinned and may not equal what is passed.

Quoted 4 lines

So, this definitely isn't the right solution for a special-case direct IO. Instead, it would be better to code this directly in the caller and compare the return value with nr_pages in dio_refill_pages() and then do the put_page() itself before falling back to ZERO_PAGE().

Quoted 5 lines

Hi Rientjes,
You are right, we should not change the behavior of gup.
I have a question, if we only get a part of the pages from get_user_pages_fast(), shall we write them to the disk? or add a check before write?
I'm not familiar with fs.

It is OK to write as many pages as you get and then bail out from direct
IO. OTOH if you are sending a SIGKILL to an application, you probably want to kill it as soon as possible and sending IO can take some time. So in my opinion it is more desirable to just drop page references we've got in dio_refill_pages() and bail out immediately.

Honza

Signature · 8 lines
Jan Kara <[email protected]>
SUSE Labs, CR

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to [email protected].  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"[email protected]"> [email protected] </a>