Skip to contentSkip to conversation

pinctrl: sunxi: fix pin numbers passed to register offset helpers

PATCH New Chen-Yu Tsai 4 participants 5 messages May 22, 2014 – May 27, 2014

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pinctrl: sunxi: fix pin numbers passed to register offset helpers

The pin numbers passed to sunxi_*_reg helpers to get the correct registers should be the pin offset for the PIO block, not the absolute number we use that is based on the alphanumeric labels Allwinner uses.

This patch subtracts .pin_base from the pin number passed to these functions, so the driver accesses the correct registers.

---

Hi,

This patch fixes the pinctrl driver failing to set pinmuxes for the R_PIO block found on the A31 and A23. The problem was found while working on bringing up the A23 SoC. The R_UART pins weren't properly muxed when the bootloader didn't use them.

A thank you to Boris who also verified the issue.

Cheers,
ChenYu

---
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +14 -12
index f6522b5..59962fa 100644
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ static int sunxi_pconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
 	struct sunxi_pinctrl_group *g = &pctl->groups[group];
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned pin = g->pin - pctl->desc->pin_base;
 	u32 val, mask;
 	u16 strength;
 	u8 dlevel;
@@ -303,23 +304,23 @@ static int sunxi_pconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 			 *   3: 40mA
 			 */
 			dlevel = strength / 10 - 1;
-			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(g->pin));
-			mask = DLEVEL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_dlevel_offset(g->pin);
+			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(pin));
+			mask = DLEVEL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_dlevel_offset(pin);
 			writel((val & ~mask)
-				| dlevel << sunxi_dlevel_offset(g->pin),
-				pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(g->pin));
+				| dlevel << sunxi_dlevel_offset(pin),
+				pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(pin));
 			break;
 		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
-			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
-			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin);
-			writel((val & ~mask) | 1 << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin),
-				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
+			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
+			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(pin);
+			writel((val & ~mask) | 1 << sunxi_pull_offset(pin),
+				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
 			break;
 		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
-			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
-			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin);
-			writel((val & ~mask) | 2 << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin),
-				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
+			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
+			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(pin);
+			writel((val & ~mask) | 2 << sunxi_pull_offset(pin),
+				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
 			break;
 		default:
 			break;
@@ -376,6 +377,7 @@ static void sunxi_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
 
+	pin -= pctl->desc->pin_base;
 	val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_mux_reg(pin));
 	mask = MUX_PINS_MASK << sunxi_mux_offset(pin);
 	writel((val & ~mask) | config << sunxi_mux_offset(pin),
Signature · 1 line
2.0.0.rc2
#1 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pinctrl: sunxi: fix pin numbers passed to register offset helpers

Hello Chen-Yu,

Quoted 7 lines · Chen-Yu Tsai

The pin numbers passed to sunxi_*_reg helpers to get the correct registers should be the pin offset for the PIO block, not the absolute number we use that is based on the alphanumeric labels Allwinner uses.

This patch subtracts .pin_base from the pin number passed to these functions, so the driver accesses the correct registers.

Thanks for fixing this bug.

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 75 lines

---

Hi,

This patch fixes the pinctrl driver failing to set pinmuxes for the R_PIO block found on the A31 and A23. The problem was found while working on bringing up the A23 SoC. The R_UART pins weren't properly muxed when the bootloader didn't use them.

A thank you to Boris who also verified the issue.

Cheers,
ChenYu

---
 drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c +14 -12
index f6522b5..59962fa 100644
@@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ static int sunxi_pconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 	struct sunxi_pinctrl *pctl = pinctrl_dev_get_drvdata(pctldev);
 	struct sunxi_pinctrl_group *g = &pctl->groups[group];
 	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned pin = g->pin - pctl->desc->pin_base;
 	u32 val, mask;
 	u16 strength;
 	u8 dlevel;
@@ -303,23 +304,23 @@ static int sunxi_pconf_group_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 			 *   3: 40mA
 			 */
 			dlevel = strength / 10 - 1;
-			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(g->pin));
-			mask = DLEVEL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_dlevel_offset(g->pin);
+			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(pin));
+			mask = DLEVEL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_dlevel_offset(pin);
 			writel((val & ~mask)
-				| dlevel << sunxi_dlevel_offset(g->pin),
-				pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(g->pin));
+				| dlevel << sunxi_dlevel_offset(pin),
+				pctl->membase + sunxi_dlevel_reg(pin));
 			break;
 		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP:
-			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
-			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin);
-			writel((val & ~mask) | 1 << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin),
-				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
+			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
+			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(pin);
+			writel((val & ~mask) | 1 << sunxi_pull_offset(pin),
+				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
 			break;
 		case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_DOWN:
-			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
-			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin);
-			writel((val & ~mask) | 2 << sunxi_pull_offset(g->pin),
-				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(g->pin));
+			val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
+			mask = PULL_PINS_MASK << sunxi_pull_offset(pin);
+			writel((val & ~mask) | 2 << sunxi_pull_offset(pin),
+				pctl->membase + sunxi_pull_reg(pin));
 			break;
 		default:
 			break;
@@ -376,6 +377,7 @@ static void sunxi_pmx_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&pctl->lock, flags);
 
+	pin -= pctl->desc->pin_base;
 	val = readl(pctl->membase + sunxi_mux_reg(pin));
 	mask = MUX_PINS_MASK << sunxi_mux_offset(pin);
 	writel((val & ~mask) | config << sunxi_mux_offset(pin),
Signature · 3 lines
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
#2 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pinctrl: sunxi: fix pin numbers passed to register offset helpers

In reply to Chen-Yu Tsai
Quoted 9 lines · Chen-Yu Tsai

The pin numbers passed to sunxi_*_reg helpers to get the correct registers should be the pin offset for the PIO block, not the absolute number we use that is based on the alphanumeric labels Allwinner uses.

This patch subtracts .pin_base from the pin number passed to these functions, so the driver accesses the correct registers.

Maxime, can I have your ACK on this patch, too?

Yours,
Linus Walleij

#3 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pinctrl: sunxi: fix pin numbers passed to register offset helpers

Quoted 7 lines · Linus Walleij
Quoted 5 lines · Chen-Yu Tsai

The pin numbers passed to sunxi_*_reg helpers to get the correct registers should be the pin offset for the PIO block, not the absolute number we use that is based on the alphanumeric labels Allwinner uses.

Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 4 lines

This patch subtracts .pin_base from the pin number passed to these functions, so the driver accesses the correct registers.

Maxime, can I have your ACK on this patch, too?

You have it!

Thanks,
Maxime

Signature · 10 lines
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140523/63b4a976/attachment.sig>
#4 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 pinctrl: sunxi: fix pin numbers passed to register offset helpers

In reply to Chen-Yu Tsai
Quoted 9 lines · Chen-Yu Tsai

The pin numbers passed to sunxi_*_reg helpers to get the correct registers should be the pin offset for the PIO block, not the absolute number we use that is based on the alphanumeric labels Allwinner uses.

This patch subtracts .pin_base from the pin number passed to these functions, so the driver accesses the correct registers.

Patch applied with Boris' and Maximes Reviewd/ACK tags.

Yours,
Linus Walleij