fscache: put reference of parent's usage and n_children
Subsystems (3)
PATCH 1/1 fscache: put reference of parent's usage and n_children
If netfs exist, fscache must put the reference of parent's usage and n_children, otherwise, never be decreased.
--- fs/fscache/netfs.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
fs/fscache/netfs.c +1 -2
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ already_registered:up_write (&fscache_addremove_sem);if (ret <0 ) { - netfs->primary_index->parent =NULL ; -__fscache_cookie_put (netfs->primary_index); +fscache_relinquish_cookie (netfs->primary_index,0 ); netfs->primary_index =NULL ; }
Signature · 6 lines
2.3.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 2 lines · Kinglong Mee
If netfs exist, fscache must put the reference of parent's usage and
n_children, otherwise, never be decreased.
Good catch. Though it might be preferable to only increment the counters if the list_add() is done.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Quoted 7 lines · David Howells
Quoted 2 lines · Kinglong Mee
If netfs exist, fscache must put the reference of parent's usage and
n_children, otherwise, never be decreased.Good catch. Though it might be preferable to only increment the counters if the
list_add()is done.
Thanks for your comments, that's great.
I will update and resend those two patch.
Thanks,
Kinglong Mee
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Quoted 5 lines · Kinglong Mee
Quoted 2 lines
Good catch. Though it might be preferable to only increment the counters if the
list_add()is done.Thanks for your comments, that's great.
I will update and resend those two patch.
In fact, kmem_cache_free() can be called instead of fscache_relinquish_cookie() in that case.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): 32264.1428929064-S6HVgzuS8uM4Awkfq6JHfwNdhmdF6hFW@public.gmane.org
PATCH v2 1/2 FSCACHE: Increase reference of parent after registering netfs success
If netfs exist, fscache should not increase the reference of parent's usage and n_children, otherwise, never be decreased.
v2: thanks David's suggest,
move increasing reference of parent if success use kmem_cache_free() freeing primary_index directly
--- fs/fscache/netfs.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
fs/fscache/netfs.c +5 -6
@@ -43,13 +43,9 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs)atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->n_active,1 ); netfs->primary_index->def = &fscache_fsdef_netfs_def; - netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; netfs->primary_index->netfs_data = netfs; netfs->primary_index->flags =1 <<FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED ; -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); -spin_lock_init (&netfs->primary_index->lock);INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&netfs->primary_index->backing_objects);
@@ -62,6 +58,10 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) goto already_registered; } + netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; +atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); +atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); +list_add (&netfs->link, &fscache_netfs_list); ret =0 ;
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ already_registered:up_write (&fscache_addremove_sem);if (ret <0 ) { - netfs->primary_index->parent =NULL ; -__fscache_cookie_put (netfs->primary_index); +kmem_cache_free (fscache_cookie_jar, netfs->primary_index); netfs->primary_index =NULL ; }
Signature · 6 lines
2.3.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH v2 2/2 FSCACHE: Don't override netfs's primary_index if registering failed
In reply to David HowellsOnly override netfs->primary_index when registering success.
v2: according to the change of 1/2
--- fs/fscache/netfs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
fs/fscache/netfs.c +17 -18
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(fscache_netfs_list);int __fscache_register_netfs (struct fscache_netfs *netfs) {struct fscache_netfs *ptr; +struct fscache_cookie *cookie;int ret;_enter ("{%s}" , netfs->name);
@@ -29,25 +30,24 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs)INIT_LIST_HEAD (&netfs->link);/* allocate a cookie for the primary index */ - netfs->primary_index = -kmem_cache_zalloc (fscache_cookie_jar,GFP_KERNEL ); + cookie =kmem_cache_zalloc (fscache_cookie_jar,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!netfs->primary_index) { +if (!cookie) {_leave (" = -ENOMEM" );return -ENOMEM ; }/* initialise the primary index cookie */ -atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->usage,1 ); -atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->n_children,0 ); -atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->n_active,1 ); +atomic_set (&cookie->usage,1 ); +atomic_set (&cookie->n_children,0 ); +atomic_set (&cookie->n_active,1 ); - netfs->primary_index->def = &fscache_fsdef_netfs_def; - netfs->primary_index->netfs_data = netfs; - netfs->primary_index->flags =1 <<FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED ; + cookie->def = &fscache_fsdef_netfs_def; + cookie->netfs_data = netfs; + cookie->flags =1 <<FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED ; -spin_lock_init (&netfs->primary_index->lock); -INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&netfs->primary_index->backing_objects); +spin_lock_init (&cookie->lock); +INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&cookie->backing_objects);/* check the netfs type is not already present */ down_write (&fscache_addremove_sem);
@@ -58,10 +58,11 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) goto already_registered; } - netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); + cookie->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; +atomic_inc (&cookie->parent->usage); +atomic_inc (&cookie->parent->n_children); + netfs->primary_index = cookie;list_add (&netfs->link, &fscache_netfs_list); ret =0 ;
@@ -70,10 +71,8 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) already_registered:up_write (&fscache_addremove_sem); -if (ret <0 ) { -kmem_cache_free (fscache_cookie_jar, netfs->primary_index); - netfs->primary_index =NULL ; - } +if (ret <0 ) +kmem_cache_free (fscache_cookie_jar, cookie);_leave (" = %d" , ret);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.3.5
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): [email protected]
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] FSCACHE: Increase reference of parent after registering netfs success
Review
Quoted 1 line · Kinglong Mee
(quoted diff) +0
-1- netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index;
fscache_fsdef_index is a static variable so leave this where it is.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
PATCH v3 1/2 FSCACHE: Increase reference of parent after registering, netfs success
If netfs exist, fscache should not increase the reference of parent's usage and n_children, otherwise, never be decreased.
v2: thanks David's suggest,
move increasing reference of parent if success use kmem_cache_free() freeing primary_index directly
v3: don't move "netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index;"
--- fs/fscache/netfs.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
fs/fscache/netfs.c +4 -5
@@ -47,9 +47,6 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) netfs->primary_index->netfs_data = netfs; netfs->primary_index->flags =1 <<FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED ; -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); -spin_lock_init (&netfs->primary_index->lock);INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&netfs->primary_index->backing_objects);
@@ -62,6 +59,9 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) goto already_registered; } +atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); +atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); +list_add (&netfs->link, &fscache_netfs_list); ret =0 ;
@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ already_registered:up_write (&fscache_addremove_sem);if (ret <0 ) { - netfs->primary_index->parent =NULL ; -__fscache_cookie_put (netfs->primary_index); +kmem_cache_free (fscache_cookie_jar, netfs->primary_index); netfs->primary_index =NULL ; }
Signature · 1 line
2.3.5
Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] FSCACHE: Increase reference of parent after registering, netfs success
PATCH v3 2/2 FSCACHE: Don't override netfs's primary_index if registering failed
In reply to David HowellsOnly override netfs->primary_index when registering success.
v2,v3: according to the change of [PATH 1/2]
--- fs/fscache/netfs.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
fs/fscache/netfs.c +17 -18
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ static LIST_HEAD(fscache_netfs_list);int __fscache_register_netfs (struct fscache_netfs *netfs) {struct fscache_netfs *ptr; +struct fscache_cookie *cookie;int ret;_enter ("{%s}" , netfs->name);
@@ -29,26 +30,25 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs)INIT_LIST_HEAD (&netfs->link);/* allocate a cookie for the primary index */ - netfs->primary_index = -kmem_cache_zalloc (fscache_cookie_jar,GFP_KERNEL ); + cookie =kmem_cache_zalloc (fscache_cookie_jar,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!netfs->primary_index) { +if (!cookie) {_leave (" = -ENOMEM" );return -ENOMEM ; }/* initialise the primary index cookie */ -atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->usage,1 ); -atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->n_children,0 ); -atomic_set (&netfs->primary_index->n_active,1 ); +atomic_set (&cookie->usage,1 ); +atomic_set (&cookie->n_children,0 ); +atomic_set (&cookie->n_active,1 ); - netfs->primary_index->def = &fscache_fsdef_netfs_def; - netfs->primary_index->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; - netfs->primary_index->netfs_data = netfs; - netfs->primary_index->flags =1 <<FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED ; + cookie->def = &fscache_fsdef_netfs_def; + cookie->parent = &fscache_fsdef_index; + cookie->netfs_data = netfs; + cookie->flags =1 <<FSCACHE_COOKIE_ENABLED ; -spin_lock_init (&netfs->primary_index->lock); -INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&netfs->primary_index->backing_objects); +spin_lock_init (&cookie->lock); +INIT_HLIST_HEAD (&cookie->backing_objects);/* check the netfs type is not already present */ down_write (&fscache_addremove_sem);
@@ -59,9 +59,10 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) goto already_registered; } -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->usage); -atomic_inc (&netfs->primary_index->parent->n_children); +atomic_inc (&cookie->parent->usage); +atomic_inc (&cookie->parent->n_children); + netfs->primary_index = cookie;list_add (&netfs->link, &fscache_netfs_list); ret =0 ;
@@ -70,10 +71,8 @@ int __fscache_register_netfs(struct fscache_netfs *netfs) already_registered:up_write (&fscache_addremove_sem); -if (ret <0 ) { -kmem_cache_free (fscache_cookie_jar, netfs->primary_index); - netfs->primary_index =NULL ; - } +if (ret <0 ) +kmem_cache_free (fscache_cookie_jar, cookie);_leave (" = %d" , ret);return ret;
Signature · 1 line
2.3.5