mtip32xx: various fixes
cover mtip32xx: various fixes
Hi Jens,
This patchset includes few changes to align with recent kernel changes, few fixes and cleanup
Asai Thambi S P (9):
mtip32xx: fix rmmod issue
mtip32xx: remove unused variable 'port->allocated'
mtip32xx: fix incorrectly setting MTIP_DDF_SEC_LOCK_BIT
mtip32xx: Abort I/O during secure erase operation
mtip32xx: fix crash on surprise removal of the drive
mtip32xx: remove unnecessary sleep in mtip_ftl_rebuild_poll()
mtip32xx: fix minor number
mtip32xx: abort secure erase operation if the device is mounted
mtip32xx: increase wait time for hba reset
drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.c | 223 ++++++++++++++++--------------------- drivers/block/mtip32xx/mtip32xx.h | 8 +- 2 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
Quoted 5 lines · Asai Thambi SP
Hi Jens,
This patchset includes few changes to align with recent kernel changes, few fixes and cleanup
Quoted 10 lines
Asai Thambi S P (9):
mtip32xx: fix rmmod issue
mtip32xx: remove unused variable 'port->allocated'
mtip32xx: fix incorrectly settingMTIP_DDF_SEC_LOCK_BIT
mtip32xx: Abort I/O during secure erase operation
mtip32xx: fix crash on surprise removal of the drive
mtip32xx: remove unnecessary sleep inmtip_ftl_rebuild_poll()
mtip32xx: fix minor number
mtip32xx: abort secure erase operation if the device is mounted
mtip32xx: increase wait time for hba reset
Have these been through one of your qual cycles? Just wondering if I should attempt to squeeze this into the current series, or wait for 4.2.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Quoted 17 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 5 lines · Asai Thambi SP
Hi Jens,
This patchset includes few changes to align with recent kernel changes, few fixes and cleanup
Quoted 10 lines
Asai Thambi S P (9):
mtip32xx: fix rmmod issue
mtip32xx: remove unused variable 'port->allocated'
mtip32xx: fix incorrectly settingMTIP_DDF_SEC_LOCK_BIT
mtip32xx: Abort I/O during secure erase operation
mtip32xx: fix crash on surprise removal of the drive
mtip32xx: remove unnecessary sleep inmtip_ftl_rebuild_poll()
mtip32xx: fix minor number
mtip32xx: abort secure erase operation if the device is mounted
mtip32xx: increase wait time for hba reset
Quoted 2 lines
Have these been through one of your qual cycles? Just wondering if I should attempt to squeeze this into the current series, or wait for 4.2.
Yes, we have tested. You can include in the current series.
--
Regards,
Asai
Quoted 18 lines · Asai Thambi SP
Quoted 17 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 15 lines · Asai Thambi SP
Hi Jens,
This patchset includes few changes to align with recent kernel changes, few fixes and cleanup
Asai Thambi S P (9):
mtip32xx: fix rmmod issue
mtip32xx: remove unused variable 'port->allocated'
mtip32xx: fix incorrectly settingMTIP_DDF_SEC_LOCK_BIT
mtip32xx: Abort I/O during secure erase operation
mtip32xx: fix crash on surprise removal of the drive
mtip32xx: remove unnecessary sleep inmtip_ftl_rebuild_poll()
mtip32xx: fix minor number
mtip32xx: abort secure erase operation if the device is mounted
mtip32xx: increase wait time for hba reset
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Have these been through one of your qual cycles? Just wondering if I should attempt to squeeze this into the current series, or wait for 4.2.
Yes, we have tested. You can include in the current series.
I will apply 1-7, and 9. 8 you promised you'd look into a cleaner solution.
Signature · 1 line
Jens Axboe
Quoted 19 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 18 lines · Asai Thambi SP
Quoted 17 lines · Jens Axboe
Quoted 15 lines · Asai Thambi SP
Hi Jens,
This patchset includes few changes to align with recent kernel changes, few fixes and cleanup
Asai Thambi S P (9):
mtip32xx: fix rmmod issue
mtip32xx: remove unused variable 'port->allocated'
mtip32xx: fix incorrectly settingMTIP_DDF_SEC_LOCK_BIT
mtip32xx: Abort I/O during secure erase operation
mtip32xx: fix crash on surprise removal of the drive
mtip32xx: remove unnecessary sleep inmtip_ftl_rebuild_poll()
mtip32xx: fix minor number
mtip32xx: abort secure erase operation if the device is mounted
mtip32xx: increase wait time for hba reset
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Have these been through one of your qual cycles? Just wondering if I should attempt to squeeze this into the current series, or wait for 4.2.
Yes, we have tested. You can include in the current series.
I will apply 1-7, and 9. 8 you promised you'd look into a cleaner solution.
Thanks Jens. We made a cleaner solution for 8 and testing it.
--
Regards,
Asai