Skip to contentSkip to conversation

New: systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken

Buildroot bugzilla at busybox.net 3 participants 5 messages Oct 30, 2019 – Oct 23, 2020

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301

Bug ID: 12301
Summary: systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken
Product: buildroot
Version: 2019.08
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: posted at heine.so
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---

Hi,

I updated my systemd system build to BR 2019.08 and noticed that systemd-journal-gatewayd was missing in the resulting image.

Commit 2dbce34b3a2c8fc1a854395f6c33df658371eae4 added a config option BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE to enable the systemd-journal-remote service.

If it is selected the -Dremote=true flag gets explicitly set. If not it is explicitly set to false.

But as defined in the systemd config (see [0]) -Dremote=true is used to enable systemd-journal-remote as well as systemd-journal-gatewayd. There is no switch to only build one of them.

Further the default value of the -Dremote flag is true (see [1]).

So previous to this commit both binaries are already built and installed when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY is set. I verfied this in my built 2019.05.1 image. Both binaries are there.

As with this commit, when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY=Y and BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE=N is set -Dremote=false is explicitly set and systemd builds neither of the binaries.

So I would suggest to revert this commit as it breaks configs and adds no functionality.
Also I would suggest to extend the description of BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY to include a mention of "systemd-journal-remote".

Regards,
Michael

[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L2207
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L1253

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
#1 lore raw
Quoted 1 line · bugzilla at busybox.net

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301

[snip]

Quoted 10 lines

Commit 2dbce34b3a2c8fc1a854395f6c33df658371eae4 added a config option BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE to enable the systemd-journal-remote service.

If it is selected the -Dremote=true flag gets explicitly set. If not it is explicitly set to false.

But as defined in the systemd config (see [0]) -Dremote=true is used to enable systemd-journal-remote as well as systemd-journal-gatewayd. There is no switch to only build one of them.

This is probably fallout from the bump to 243. James, could you have a look?

Regards,
Arnout

Quoted 27 lines

Further the default value of the -Dremote flag is true (see [1]).

So previous to this commit both binaries are already built and installed when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY is set. I verfied this in my built 2019.05.1 image. Both binaries are there.

As with this commit, when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY=Y and BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE=N is set -Dremote=false is explicitly set and systemd builds neither of the binaries.

So I would suggest to revert this commit as it breaks configs and adds no functionality.
Also I would suggest to extend the description of BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY to include a mention of "systemd-journal-remote".

Regards,
Michael

[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L2207
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L1253

#2 lore raw

I don't think it's a fallout of v243, i think it's a bug when adding that option.

the -Dremote option enables all three binaries (-upload, -gatwayd, -remote) and I don't see any way to enable them separately.
* -upload allows the target to push log files to an http server
* -gatewayd provides an http server on the target to provide the logs
* -remote is used on the host to pull logs from the target or accept pushes from the target

the description of the option is pretty clear : 'support for "journal over the network"'

It does make sense to enable those three separately, but upstream does not support this. So we can
1) drop the commit and stay with upstream granularity
2) add our own patch to separate the three options

I would recommend 1) for the next stable release, but i'm not sure how to deal with the long term

The best approach is probably to push upstream to provide more granularity for the build system, but that is going to be quite a bit of work...

Le mer. 30 oct. 2019 ? 22:07, Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> a ?crit :

Quoted 59 lines · bugzilla at busybox.net
Quoted 1 line

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301

[snip]

Quoted 5 lines

Commit 2dbce34b3a2c8fc1a854395f6c33df658371eae4 added a config option BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE to enable the systemd-journal-remote service.

If it is selected the -Dremote=true flag gets explicitly set. If not it

is

Quoted 3 lines

explicitly set to false.

But as defined in the systemd config (see [0]) -Dremote=true is used to

enable

Quoted 1 line

systemd-journal-remote as well as systemd-journal-gatewayd. There is no

switch

Quoted 1 line

to only build one of them.

This is probably fallout from the bump to 243. James, could you have a
look?

Regards,
Arnout

Quoted 4 lines

Further the default value of the -Dremote flag is true (see [1]).

So previous to this commit both binaries are already built and installed

when

Quoted 6 lines

BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY is set. I verfied this in my built 2019.05.1 image. Both binaries are there.

As with this commit, when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY=Y and BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE=N is set -Dremote=false is explicitly

set

Quoted 11 lines

and systemd builds neither of the binaries.

So I would suggest to revert this commit as it breaks configs and adds no functionality.
Also I would suggest to extend the description of BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY to include a mention of "systemd-journal-remote".

Quoted 6 lines

Regards,
Michael

[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L2207
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L1253

_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot

Signature · 21 lines
[image: SMILE]  <http://www.smile.eu/>

20 rue des Jardins
92600 Asni?res-sur-Seine
*J?r?my ROSEN*
Architecte technique

[image: email] jeremy.rosen at smile.fr
[image: phone]  +33 6 88 25 87 42
[image: url] http://www.smile.eu

[image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/GroupeSmile> [image: Facebook]
<https://www.facebook.com/smileopensource> [image: LinkedIn]
<https://www.linkedin.com/company/smile> [image: Github]
<https://github.com/Smile-SA>

[image: D?couvrez l?univers Smile, rendez-vous sur smile.eu]
<https://www.smile.eu/fr/publications/livres-blancs/yocto?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20191118/367feb80/attachment.html>
#3 lore raw

[Buildroot] [Bug 12301] systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken

In reply to bugzilla at busybox.net

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301

--- Comment #1 from Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> --- Thanks for your bug report, I replied to the original author of the problematic patch, and also added one of our systemd experts in the loop:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2019-November/267243.html.

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
#4 lore raw

[Buildroot] [Bug 12301] systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken

In reply to bugzilla at busybox.net

https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301

Michael Nosthoff <[email protected]> changed:

What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

         Resolution|---                         |FIXED
   Target Milestone|---                         |2020.11
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #2 from Michael Nosthoff <[email protected]> --- fixed by
https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/commit/?id=e46fe9a6f2b7cef9789f5172332067cac5ff03bd

Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.