New: systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken
https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301
Bug ID: 12301
Summary: systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken
Product: buildroot
Version: 2019.08
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Other
Assignee: unassigned at buildroot.uclibc.org
Reporter: posted at heine.so
CC: buildroot at uclibc.org
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
I updated my systemd system build to BR 2019.08 and noticed that systemd-journal-gatewayd was missing in the resulting image.
Commit 2dbce34b3a2c8fc1a854395f6c33df658371eae4 added a config option BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE to enable the systemd-journal-remote service.
If it is selected the -Dremote=true flag gets explicitly set. If not it is explicitly set to false.
But as defined in the systemd config (see [0]) -Dremote=true is used to enable systemd-journal-remote as well as systemd-journal-gatewayd. There is no switch to only build one of them.
Further the default value of the -Dremote flag is true (see [1]).
So previous to this commit both binaries are already built and installed when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY is set. I verfied this in my built 2019.05.1 image. Both binaries are there.
As with this commit, when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY=Y and BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE=N is set -Dremote=false is explicitly set and systemd builds neither of the binaries.
So I would suggest to revert this commit as it breaks configs and adds no functionality.
Also I would suggest to extend the description of BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY to include a mention of "systemd-journal-remote".
Regards,
Michael
[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L2207
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L1253
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Quoted 1 line · bugzilla at busybox.net
[snip]
Quoted 10 lines
Commit
2dbce34b3a2c8fc1a854395f6c33df658371eae4added a config optionBR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTEto enable the systemd-journal-remote service.If it is selected the -Dremote=true flag gets explicitly set. If not it is explicitly set to false.
But as defined in the systemd config (see [0]) -Dremote=true is used to enable systemd-journal-remote as well as systemd-journal-gatewayd. There is no switch to only build one of them.
This is probably fallout from the bump to 243. James, could you have a look?
Regards,
Arnout
Quoted 27 lines
Further the default value of the -Dremote flag is true (see [1]).
So previous to this commit both binaries are already built and installed when
BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAYis set. I verfied this in my built 2019.05.1 image. Both binaries are there.As with this commit, when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY=Y and BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE=N is set -Dremote=false is explicitly set and systemd builds neither of the binaries.
So I would suggest to revert this commit as it breaks configs and adds no functionality.
Also I would suggest to extend the description ofBR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAYto include a mention of "systemd-journal-remote".Regards,
Michael[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L2207
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L1253
I don't think it's a fallout of v243, i think it's a bug when adding that option.
the -Dremote option enables all three binaries (-upload, -gatwayd, -remote) and I don't see any way to enable them separately.
* -upload allows the target to push log files to an http server
* -gatewayd provides an http server on the target to provide the logs
* -remote is used on the host to pull logs from the target or accept pushes from the target
the description of the option is pretty clear : 'support for "journal over the network"'
It does make sense to enable those three separately, but upstream does not support this. So we can
1) drop the commit and stay with upstream granularity
2) add our own patch to separate the three options
I would recommend 1) for the next stable release, but i'm not sure how to deal with the long term
The best approach is probably to push upstream to provide more granularity for the build system, but that is going to be quite a bit of work...
Le mer. 30 oct. 2019 ? 22:07, Arnout Vandecappelle <[email protected]> a ?crit :
Quoted 59 lines · bugzilla at busybox.net
Quoted 1 line
[snip]
Quoted 5 lines
Commit
2dbce34b3a2c8fc1a854395f6c33df658371eae4added a config optionBR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTEto enable the systemd-journal-remote service.If it is selected the -Dremote=true flag gets explicitly set. If not it
is
Quoted 3 lines
explicitly set to false.
But as defined in the systemd config (see [0]) -Dremote=true is used to
enable
Quoted 1 line
systemd-journal-remote as well as systemd-journal-gatewayd. There is no
switch
Quoted 1 line
to only build one of them.
This is probably fallout from the bump to 243. James, could you have a
look?Regards,
ArnoutQuoted 4 lines
Further the default value of the -Dremote flag is true (see [1]).
So previous to this commit both binaries are already built and installed
when
Quoted 6 lines
BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAYis set. I verfied this in my built 2019.05.1 image. Both binaries are there.As with this commit, when BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAY=Y and BR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_REMOTE=N is set -Dremote=false is explicitly
set
Quoted 11 lines
and systemd builds neither of the binaries.
So I would suggest to revert this commit as it breaks configs and adds no functionality.
Also I would suggest to extend the description ofBR2_PACKAGE_SYSTEMD_JOURNAL_GATEWAYto include a mention of "systemd-journal-remote".Quoted 6 lines
Regards,
Michael[0] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L2207
[1] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/blob/master/meson.build#L1253_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot at busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
Signature · 21 lines
[image: SMILE] <http://www.smile.eu/> 20 rue des Jardins 92600 Asni?res-sur-Seine *J?r?my ROSEN* Architecte technique [image: email] jeremy.rosen at smile.fr [image: phone] +33 6 88 25 87 42 [image: url] http://www.smile.eu [image: Twitter] <https://twitter.com/GroupeSmile> [image: Facebook] <https://www.facebook.com/smileopensource> [image: LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/smile> [image: Github] <https://github.com/Smile-SA> [image: D?couvrez l?univers Smile, rendez-vous sur smile.eu] <https://www.smile.eu/fr/publications/livres-blancs/yocto?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=signature> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/attachments/20191118/367feb80/attachment.html>
[Buildroot] [Bug 12301] systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken
In reply to bugzilla at busybox.nethttps://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Petazzoni <[email protected]> --- Thanks for your bug report, I replied to the original author of the problematic patch, and also added one of our systemd experts in the loop:
http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/buildroot/2019-November/267243.html.
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Buildroot] [Bug 12301] systemd-journal-gatewayd: config options broken
In reply to bugzilla at busybox.nethttps://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=12301
Michael Nosthoff <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |2020.11
Status|NEW |RESOLVED--- Comment #2 from Michael Nosthoff <[email protected]> --- fixed by
https://git.busybox.net/buildroot/commit/?id=e46fe9a6f2b7cef9789f5172332067cac5ff03bd
Signature · 2 lines
You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.