audit by executable name
cover audit by executable name
This is a continuation of Peter Moody, my and Eric Paris' work to implement audit by executable name.
Some of these are obvious. Some demonstrate my lack of understanding of the problem and of the services of fs/notify because they put needless restrictions due to the orthogonal nature of the features involved or attempt to solve problems that don't exist. Posting this now to clarify some of that and move on...
Eric Paris (3):
audit: implement audit by executable
audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
Richard Guy Briggs (11):
fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: put rule existence check in canonical order fixup! audit: implement audit by executable fixup! audit: implement audit by executable fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe
audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
include/linux/audit.h | 2 + include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 42 +++++++ kernel/audit_exe.c | 50 +++++++++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 257 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 +- kernel/audit_watch.c | 2 +- kernel/auditfilter.c | 74 ++++++++++++- kernel/auditsc.c | 16 +++ 10 files changed, 442 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_exe.c create mode 100644 kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
PATCH 1/14 audit: implement audit by executable
From: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This patch implements the ability to filter on the executable. It is clearly incomplete! This patch adds the inode/dev of the executable at the moment the rule is loaded. It does not update if the executable is updated/moved/whatever. That should be added. But at this moment, this patch works.
--- include/linux/audit.h | 1 + include/uapi/linux/audit.h | 2 + kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 27 ++++++++++ kernel/audit_exe.c | 113 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++ kernel/auditsc.c | 16 ++++++ 7 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_exe.c
include/linux/audit.h +1 -0
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ struct audit_krule {struct audit_field *inode_f;/* quick access to an inode field */ struct audit_watch *watch;/* associated watch */ struct audit_tree *tree;/* associated watched tree */ +struct audit_exe *exe;struct list_head rlist;/* entry in audit_{watch,tree}.rules list */ struct list_head list;/* for AUDIT_LIST* purposes only */ u64 prio;
include/uapi/linux/audit.h +2 -0
@@ -266,6 +266,8 @@#define AUDIT_OBJ_UID 109#define AUDIT_OBJ_GID 110#define AUDIT_FIELD_COMPARE 111 +#define AUDIT_EXE 112 +#define AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN 113#define AUDIT_ARG0 200#define AUDIT_ARG1 (AUDIT_ARG0+1)
kernel/Makefile +1 -1
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o +obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE) += audit_tree.o obj-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += gcov/ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o
kernel/audit.h +27 -0
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ; +struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;
@@ -280,6 +281,13 @@ extern int audit_add_watch(struct audit_krule *krule, struct list_head **list);extern void audit_remove_watch_rule (struct audit_krule *krule);extern char *audit_watch_path (struct audit_watch *watch);extern int audit_watch_compare (struct audit_watch *watch,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); + +int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op); +void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule); +char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe); +int audit_dup_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old); +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe); +#else #define audit_put_watch (w) {}#define audit_get_watch (w) {}
@@ -289,6 +297,25 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev#define audit_watch_path (w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) { +return -EINVAL ; +} +static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) { +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) { +BUG (); +return "" ; +} +static inline int audit_dup_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) { +BUG (); + return -EINVAL +} +static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) { +BUG (); +return 0 ; +}#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE
kernel/audit_exe.c new file +113 -0
113 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditfilter.c +43 -0
79 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditsc.c +16 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@#include <asm/types.h> #include <linux/atomic.h> #include <linux/fs.h> +#include <linux/dcache.h> #include <linux/namei.h> #include <linux/mm.h> #include <linux/export.h>
@@ -70,6 +71,7 @@#include <linux/capability.h> #include <linux/fs_struct.h> #include <linux/compat.h> +#include <linux/sched.h> #include <linux/ctype.h> #include "audit.h"
@@ -471,6 +473,20 @@ static int audit_filter_rules(struct task_struct *tsk, result =audit_comparator (ctx->ppid, f->op, f->val); }break ; +case AUDIT_EXE : + result =audit_exe_compare (tsk, rule->exe); +break ; +case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : + { +struct task_struct *ptsk; +for (ptsk = tsk; ptsk->parent->pid >0 ; ptsk =find_task_by_vpid (ptsk->parent->pid)) { +if (audit_exe_compare (ptsk, rule->exe)) { + ++result; +break ; + } + } + } +break ;case AUDIT_UID : result =audit_uid_comparator (cred->uid, f->op, f->uid);break ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 2/14 audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsFrom: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
This is to be used to audit by executable rules, but audit watches should be able to share this code eventually.
At the moment the audit watch code is a lot more complex, that code only creates one fsnotify watch per parent directory. That 'audit_parent' in turn has a list of 'audit_watches' which contain the name, ino, dev of the specific object we care about. This just creates one fsnotify watch per object we care about. So if you watch 100 inodes in /etc this code will create 100 fsnotify watches on /etc. The audit_watch code will instead create 1 fsnotify watch on /etc (the audit_parent) and then 100 individual watches chained from that fsnotify mark.
We should be able to convert the audit_watch code to do one fsnotify mark per watch and simplify things/remove a whole lot of code. After that conversion we should be able to convert the audit_fsnotify code to support that hierarchy if the optomization is necessary.
--- kernel/Makefile | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 29 ++++++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 282 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) create mode 100644 kernel/audit_fsnotify.c
kernel/Makefile +1 -1
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SMP) += stop_machine.o obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES_SANITY_TEST) += test_kprobes.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT) += audit.o auditfilter.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL) += auditsc.o -obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o +obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH) += audit_watch.o audit_exe.o audit_fsnotify.o obj-$(CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE) += audit_tree.o obj-$(CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL) += gcov/ obj-$(CONFIG_KPROBES) += kprobes.o
kernel/audit.h +29 -0
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark ;struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;
@@ -267,6 +268,7 @@ struct audit_net {extern int selinux_audit_rule_update (void );extern struct mutex audit_filter_mutex; +extern int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *);extern void audit_free_rule_rcu (struct rcu_head *);extern struct list_head audit_filter_list[];
@@ -282,6 +284,11 @@ extern void audit_remove_watch_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);extern char *audit_watch_path (struct audit_watch *watch);extern int audit_watch_compare (struct audit_watch *watch,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (char *pathname,int len,struct audit_krule *krule); +char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); +void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); +int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op);void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule);char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe);
@@ -297,6 +304,28 @@ int audit_exe_compare(struct task_struct *tsk, struct audit_exe *exe);#define audit_watch_path (w) ""#define audit_watch_compare (w, i, d) 0 +static inline struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (char *pathname,int len,struct audit_krule *krule) +{ +return ERR_PTR (-EINVAL ); +} + +static inline char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) +{ +BUG (); +return "" ; +} + +static inline void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +{ +BUG (); +} + +static inline int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev) +{ +BUG (); +return 0 ; +} +static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) {return -EINVAL ; }
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c new file +251 -0
251 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditfilter.c +1 -1
@@ -977,7 +977,7 @@ error: }/* Remove an existing rule from filterlist. */ -static inline int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) +int audit_del_rule (struct audit_entry *entry) {struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_watch *watch = entry->rule.watch;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 3/14 audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsFrom: Eric Paris <[email protected]>
Instead of just hard coding the ino and dev of the executable we care about at the moment the rule is inserted into the kernel, use the new audit_fsnotify infrastructure. This means that if the inode in question is unlinked and creat'd (aka updated) the rule will just continue to work.
--- include/linux/audit.h | 2 +- kernel/audit.h | 31 ++++------------- kernel/audit_exe.c | 87 +++++++------------------------------------------ kernel/auditfilter.c | 18 ++++++---- 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)
include/linux/audit.h +1 -1
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ struct audit_krule {struct audit_field *inode_f;/* quick access to an inode field */ struct audit_watch *watch;/* associated watch */ struct audit_tree *tree;/* associated watched tree */ -struct audit_exe *exe; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe;struct list_head rlist;/* entry in audit_{watch,tree}.rules list */ struct list_head list;/* for AUDIT_LIST* purposes only */ u64 prio;
kernel/audit.h +7 -24
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ enum audit_state {/* Rule lists */ struct audit_watch ;struct audit_fsnotify_mark ; -struct audit_exe ;struct audit_tree ;struct audit_chunk ;
@@ -289,11 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); -int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op); -void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule); -char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe);int audit_dup_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old); -int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe); +int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);#else #define audit_put_watch (w) {}
@@ -320,31 +316,18 @@ static inline void audit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) BUG(); } -static inline int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev) +static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark) {BUG (); -return 0 ; -} - -static inline int audit_make_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len,u32 op) {return -EINVAL ; } -static inline void audit_remove_exe_rule (struct audit_krule *krule) { -BUG (); -return 0 ; -} -static inline char *audit_exe_path (struct audit_exe *exe) { -BUG (); -return "" ; -} -static inline int audit_dup_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) { -BUG (); - return -EINVAL -} -static inline int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_exe *exe) { + +static inline int audit_dup_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old) +{BUG (); -return 0 ; +return -EINVAL ; } +#endif /* CONFIG_AUDIT_WATCH */ #ifdef CONFIG_AUDIT_TREE
kernel/audit_exe.c +12 -75
105 lines not on this page · raw message
kernel/auditfilter.c +11 -7
@@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,size_t remain = datasz -sizeof (struct audit_rule_data );int i;char *str; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; entry =audit_to_entry_common (data);if (IS_ERR (entry))
@@ -550,6 +551,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,break ;case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : +if (entry->rule.exe || f->val >PATH_MAX ) goto exit_free; str =audit_unpack_string (&bufp, &remain, f->val);
@@ -559,11 +561,13 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, } entry->rule.buflen += f->val; - err =audit_make_exe_rule (&entry->rule, str, f->val, f->op); -if (err) { -kfree (str); + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (str, f->val, &entry->rule); +kfree (str); +if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { + err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } + entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; } }
@@ -646,7 +650,7 @@ static struct audit_rule_data *audit_krule_to_data(struct audit_krule *krule)case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : data->buflen += data->values[i] = -audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_exe_path (krule->exe)); +audit_pack_string (&bufp,audit_mark_path (krule->exe));break ;default : data->values[i] = f->val;
@@ -706,8 +710,8 @@ static int audit_compare_rule(struct audit_krule *a, struct audit_krule *b)case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN :/* both paths exist based on above type compare */ -if (strcmp (audit_exe_path (a->exe), -audit_exe_path (b->exe))) +if (strcmp (audit_mark_path (a->exe), +audit_mark_path (b->exe)))return 1 ;break ;case AUDIT_UID :
@@ -1008,7 +1012,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)audit_remove_tree_rule (&e->rule);if (e->rule.exe) -audit_remove_exe_rule (&e->rule); +audit_remove_mark (e->rule.exe);list_del_rcu (&e->list);list_del (&e->rule.list);call_rcu (&e->rcu, audit_free_rule_rcu);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 4/14 fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsRemove unnecessary space.
--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
kernel/auditfilter.c +0 -1
@@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data,break ;case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : -if (entry->rule.exe || f->val >PATH_MAX ) goto exit_free; str =audit_unpack_string (&bufp, &remain, f->val);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Eric Paris
maintainerRe: [PATCH 04/14] fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
Quoted 17 lines · On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:39 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote:
Remove unnecessary space.
--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-1@@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, break;case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : -if (entry->rule.exe || f->val >PATH_MAX ) goto exit_free; str = audit_unpack_string(&bufp, &remain,
Quoted 1 line
f->val);
For patches like these, would you rather I just fold it into my patch to keep a clean history, or would you rather I apply this little whitespace change? (obviously fixing things like the subject)
Re: [PATCH 04/14] fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
Quoted 17 lines · Eric Paris
Quoted 14 lines · On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:39 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote:
Remove unnecessary space.
--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-1@@ -551,7 +551,6 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, break;case AUDIT_EXE :case AUDIT_EXE_CHILDREN : -
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0if (entry->rule.exe || f->val >PATH_MAX ) goto exit_free; str = audit_unpack_string(&bufp, &remain,
f->val);For patches like these, would you rather I just fold it into my patch to keep a clean history, or would you rather I apply this little whitespace change? (obviously fixing things like the subject)
Well, it was labelled to simply be --autosquash(ed) by git rebase -i, so I'll just let git do that work later.
I was intending to shepherd this patchset through...
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
PATCH 5/14 fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsRename several "watch" references to "mark".
--- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +6 -6
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ out:return audit_mark; } -static void audit_watch_log_rule_change (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark,char *op) +static void audit_mark_log_rule_change (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark,char *op) {struct audit_buffer *ab;struct audit_krule *rule = audit_mark->rule;
@@ -194,12 +194,12 @@ static void audit_remove_rule(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)struct audit_krule *rule = audit_mark->rule; struct audit_entry *entry = container_of(rule, struct audit_entry, rule); -audit_watch_log_rule_change (audit_mark,"remove rule" ); +audit_mark_log_rule_change (audit_mark,"remove rule" );audit_del_rule (entry); }/* Update watch data in audit rules based on fsnotify events. */ -static int audit_watch_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, +static int audit_mark_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group, struct inode *to_tell, struct fsnotify_mark *inode_mark, struct fsnotify_mark *vfsmount_mark,
@@ -235,13 +235,13 @@ static int audit_watch_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,return 0 ; } -static const struct fsnotify_ops audit_watch_fsnotify_ops = { - .handle_event = audit_watch_handle_event, +static const struct fsnotify_ops audit_mark_fsnotify_ops = { + .handle_event = audit_mark_handle_event, };static int __init audit_fsnotify_init (void ) { - audit_fsnotify_group =fsnotify_alloc_group (&audit_watch_fsnotify_ops); + audit_fsnotify_group =fsnotify_alloc_group (&audit_mark_fsnotify_ops);if (IS_ERR (audit_fsnotify_group)) { audit_fsnotify_group =NULL ;audit_panic ("cannot create audit fsnotify group" );
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 6/14 audit: avoid double copying the audit_exe path string
In reply to Richard Guy Briggs--- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 12 ++---------- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +2 -10
@@ -99,7 +99,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(char *pathname, int len, struct audstruct dentry *dentry;struct inode *inode;unsigned long ino; -char *local_pathname;dev_t dev;int ret;
@@ -120,20 +119,13 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(char *pathname, int len, struct aud ino = dentry->d_inode->i_ino; } - audit_mark =ERR_PTR (-ENOMEM ); - local_pathname =kstrdup (pathname,GFP_KERNEL ); -if (!local_pathname) - goto out; - audit_mark =kzalloc (sizeof (*audit_mark),GFP_KERNEL ); -if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) { -kfree (local_pathname); +if (unlikely (!audit_mark)) goto out; - }fsnotify_init_mark (&audit_mark->mark, audit_free_fsnotify_mark); audit_mark->mark.mask =AUDIT_FS_EVENTS ; - audit_mark->path = local_pathname; + audit_mark->path = pathname; audit_mark->ino = ino; audit_mark->dev = dev; audit_mark->rule = krule;
kernel/auditfilter.c +1 -1
@@ -561,8 +561,8 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, entry->rule.buflen += f->val; audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (str, f->val, &entry->rule); -kfree (str);if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) { +kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 7/14 fixup! audit: convert audit_exe to audit_fsnotify
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsPut audit_alloc_mark() arguments in same order as watch, tree and inode.
--- kernel/audit.h | 2 +- kernel/audit_exe.c | 2 +- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 2 +- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/audit.h +1 -1
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ extern void audit_remove_watch_rule(struct audit_krule *krule);extern char *audit_watch_path (struct audit_watch *watch);extern int audit_watch_compare (struct audit_watch *watch,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); -struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (char *pathname,int len,struct audit_krule *krule); +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len);char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev);
kernel/audit_exe.c +1 -1
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ int audit_dup_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old) pathname =audit_mark_path (old->exe); - audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (pathname,strlen (pathname), new); + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (new, pathname,strlen (pathname));if (IS_ERR (audit_mark))return PTR_ERR (audit_mark); new->exe = audit_mark;
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1 -1
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ int audit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_ (mark->dev == dev)); } -struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (char *pathname,int len,struct audit_krule *krule) +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len) {struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark;struct path path;
kernel/auditfilter.c +1 -1
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, } entry->rule.buflen += f->val; - audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (str, f->val, &entry->rule); + audit_mark =audit_alloc_mark (&entry->rule, str, f->val);if (IS_ERR (audit_mark)) {kfree (str); err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 8/14 fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsRemove redundant goto.
--- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 1 - 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +0 -1
@@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *paif (ret <0 ) {audit_free_mark (audit_mark); audit_mark =ERR_PTR (ret); - goto out; } out:dput (dentry);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 9/14 audit: put rule existence check in canonical order
In reply to Richard Guy Briggs--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
kernel/auditfilter.c +1 -1
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline int audit_to_inode(struct audit_krule *krule, struct audit_field *f) {if (krule->listnr !=AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || - krule->watch || krule->inode_f || krule->tree || + krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->tree || (f->op != Audit_equal && f->op != Audit_not_equal))return -EINVAL ;
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 10/14 fixup! audit: implement audit by executable
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsCheck for existence of exe rule.
--- kernel/audit_tree.c | 2 +- kernel/audit_watch.c | 2 +- kernel/auditfilter.c | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
kernel/audit_tree.c +1 -1
@@ -632,7 +632,7 @@ int audit_make_tree(struct audit_krule *rule, char *pathname, u32 op)if (pathname[0 ] !='/' || rule->listnr !=AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || op != Audit_equal || - rule->inode_f || rule->watch || rule->tree) + rule->inode_f || rule->watch || rule->exe || rule->tree)return -EINVAL ; rule->tree =alloc_tree (pathname);if (!rule->tree)
kernel/audit_watch.c +1 -1
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ int audit_to_watch(struct audit_krule *krule, char *path, int len, u32 op)if (path[0 ] !='/' || path[len-1 ] =='/' || krule->listnr !=AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || op != Audit_equal || - krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->tree) + krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->exe || krule->tree)return -EINVAL ; watch =audit_init_watch (path);
kernel/auditfilter.c +2 -2
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ static inline int audit_to_inode(struct audit_krule *krule, struct audit_field *f) {if (krule->listnr !=AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT || - krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->tree || + krule->inode_f || krule->watch || krule->exe || krule->tree || (f->op != Audit_equal && f->op != Audit_not_equal))return -EINVAL ;
@@ -1423,7 +1423,7 @@ static int update_lsm_rule(struct audit_krule *r)list_del_rcu (&entry->list);list_del (&r->list); }else { -if (r->watch || r->tree) +if (r->watch || r->exe || r->tree)list_replace_init (&r->rlist, &nentry->rule.rlist);list_replace_rcu (&entry->list, &nentry->list);list_replace (&r->list, &nentry->rule.list);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 11/14 fixup! audit: implement audit by executable
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsAdd space for consistency.
--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
kernel/auditfilter.c +1 -0
@@ -1012,6 +1012,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)if (e->rule.exe)audit_remove_mark (e->rule.exe); +list_del_rcu (&e->list);list_del (&e->rule.list);call_rcu (&e->rcu, audit_free_rule_rcu);
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 12/14 fixup! audit: clean simple fsnotify implementation
In reply to Richard Guy BriggsRename audit_remove_rule() to audit_remove_mark_rule().
--- kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +2 -2
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ void audit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark)fsnotify_put_mark (&audit_mark->mark); } -static void audit_remove_rule (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +static void audit_remove_mark_rule (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {struct audit_krule *rule = audit_mark->rule; struct audit_entry *entry = container_of(rule, struct audit_entry, rule);
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ static int audit_mark_handle_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,return 0 ;audit_update_mark (audit_mark, inode); }else if (mask & (FS_DELETE_SELF |FS_UNMOUNT |FS_MOVE_SELF )) -audit_remove_rule (audit_mark); +audit_remove_mark_rule (audit_mark);return 0 ; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
PATCH 13/14 audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe
In reply to Richard Guy Briggs--- include/linux/audit.h | 1 + kernel/audit.h | 1 + kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
include/linux/audit.h +1 -0
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct mq_attr;struct mqstat ;struct audit_watch ;struct audit_tree ; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark ;struct sk_buff ;struct audit_krule {
kernel/audit.h +1 -0
@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, devstruct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark (struct audit_krule *krule,char *pathname,int len);char *audit_mark_path (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); +int audit_add_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,struct list_head **list);void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev);
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +15 -0
@@ -161,6 +161,21 @@ static void audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark, caudit_log_end (ab); } +int audit_add_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,struct list_head **list) +{ +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +int h, ret =0 ; + +if (krule->exe) + audit_mark = krule->exe; +else +return -EINVAL ;//XXX + + h =audit_hash_ino ((u32 )audit_mark->ino); + *list = &audit_inode_hash[h]; +return ret; +} +static int audit_update_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark,struct inode *inode) {
kernel/auditfilter.c +20 -1
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@#include <net/net_namespace.h> #include <net/sock.h> #include "audit.h" +#include <linux/fsnotify_backend.h> /* * Locking model:
@@ -79,6 +80,8 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e)/* some rules don't have associated watches */ if (erule->watch)audit_put_watch (erule->watch); +if (erule->exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (erule->exe->mark);if (erule->fields)for (i =0 ; i < erule->field_count; i++) {struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];
@@ -566,6 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } +fsnotify_get_mark (audit_mark->mark); entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; }
@@ -582,6 +586,8 @@ exit_free:audit_put_watch (entry->rule.watch);/* matches initial get */ if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (entry->rule.exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (entry->rule.exe->mark);/* matches initial get */ audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }
@@ -866,7 +872,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_find_rule(struct audit_entry *entry,if (entry->rule.inode_f) { h =audit_hash_ino (entry->rule.inode_f->val); *p = list = &audit_inode_hash[h]; - }else if (entry->rule.watch) { + }else if (entry->rule.watch || entry->rule.exe) {/* we don't know the inode number, so must walk entire hash */ for (h =0 ; h <AUDIT_INODE_BUCKETS ; h++) { list = &audit_inode_hash[h];
@@ -900,6 +906,7 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_watch *watch = entry->rule.watch;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe = entry->rule.exe;struct list_head *list;int err;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
@@ -943,6 +950,13 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) goto error; } } +if (exe) { + err =audit_add_mark_rule (&entry->rule, &list); +if (err) { +mutex_unlock (&audit_filter_mutex); + goto error; + } + } entry->rule.prio = ~0ULL ;if (entry->rule.listnr ==AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT ) {
@@ -976,6 +990,8 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) error:if (watch)audit_put_watch (watch);/* tmp watch, matches initial get */ +if (exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ return err; }
@@ -985,6 +1001,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_watch *watch = entry->rule.watch;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe = entry->rule.exe;struct list_head *list;int ret =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
@@ -1031,6 +1048,8 @@ out:audit_put_watch (watch);/* match initial get */ if (tree)audit_put_tree (tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* match initial get */ return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Eric Paris
maintainerRe: [PATCH 13/14] audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe
Whew, lot going on in here....
Quoted 43 lines · On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:48 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote:
--- include/linux/audit.h | 1 + kernel/audit.h | 1 + kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ kernel/auditfilter.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++++- 4 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)include/linux/audit.h +1
-0@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ struct mq_attr;struct mqstat ;struct audit_watch ;struct audit_tree ; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark ;struct sk_buff ;struct audit_krule {kernel/audit.h +0
-0@@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ extern int audit_watch_compare(struct audit_watch *watch, unsigned long ino, dev struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_alloc_mark(struct audit_krule *krule, char *pathname, int len); char *audit_mark_path(struct
audit_fsnotify_mark*mark); +intaudit_add_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, struct list_head **list); voidaudit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); intaudit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev); diff --gita/kernel/audit_fsnotify.cb/kernel/audit_fsnotify.cindex efefa16..cc4175a 100644kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +3
-0@@ -161,6 +161,21 @@ static void audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark, c audit_log_end(ab); } +int audit_add_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,struct list_head **list) +{ +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +int h, ret =0 ;
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c static void audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct · line 177
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +10
-0+ +if (krule->exe) + audit_mark = krule->exe; +else +return -EINVAL ;//XXX + + h =audit_hash_ino ((u32 )audit_mark->ino); + *list = &audit_inode_hash[h]; +return ret; +}
This would mean that audit_exe rules would trigger at the same times audit_watch rules trigger. Not sure if that is the semantics we are after...
Quoted 18 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +1
-0+static int audit_update_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark,struct inode *inode) {kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@#include <net/net_namespace.h> #include <net/sock.h> #include "audit.h" +#include <linux/fsnotify_backend.h> /* * Locking model: @@ -79,6 +80,8 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct
audit_entry*e) /* some rules don't have associated watches */
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e) · line 84
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0if (erule->watch)audit_put_watch (erule->watch); +if (erule->exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (erule->exe->mark);
Now this might be a good idea... This is how marks would get cleaned up in some error cases, whereas I believe it would get cleaned up from rule removal in audit_remove_mark()
kernel/auditfilter.c static struct audit_entry · line 572
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0if (erule->fields)for (i =0 ; i < erule->field_count; i++) {struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];@@ -566,6 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err = PTR_ERR(audit_mark); goto exit_free; } +fsnotify_get_mark (audit_mark->mark);
So this just took a reference on the mark, so now the refcnt is 2. Even though there is only 1 user... (what else references audit_mark other than entry->rule.exe?)
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; }@@ -582,6 +586,8 @@ exit_free:audit_put_watch (entry->rule.watch);/* matches initial get */ if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0+if (entry->rule.exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (entry->rule.exe->mark);/* matches initial get */
audit_free_rule(entry);
ok, so maybe this doesn't panic, since you took and extra reference above you can put a reference here and then again inside audit_free_rule(). But the code is still wrong...
kernel/auditfilter.c static struct audit_entry *audit_find_rule(struct · line 875
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-1return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -866,7 +872,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_find_rule(struct audit_entry *entry, if (entry->rule.inode_f) { h =audit_hash_ino (entry->rule.inode_f->val); *p = list = &audit_inode_hash[h]; - } else if (entry->rule.watch) { + } else if (entry->rule.watch || entry->rule.exe) {
nope
Quoted 12 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0/* we don't know the inode number, so must walk entire hash */ for (h =0 ; h <AUDIT_INODE_BUCKETS ; h++) { list = &audit_inode_hash[h];@@ -900,6 +906,7 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_watch *watch = entry->rule.watch;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe = entry->rule.exe;struct list_head *list;int err;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline int audit_add_rule(struct · line 959
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +7
-0@@ -943,6 +950,13 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) goto error; } } +if (exe) { + err =audit_add_mark_rule (&entry->rule, &list); +if (err) { +mutex_unlock (&audit_filter_mutex); + goto error; + } + }
naah, we don't want to find exe rules when we are looking for watch rules. This is the list of things we are watching for FS operations like open, chmod, chown, etc. Not things we are exec'ing...
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0entry->rule.prio = ~0ULL ;if (entry->rule.listnr ==AUDIT_FILTER_EXIT ) {@@ -976,6 +990,8 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct
audit_entry*entry) error:kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0if (watch)audit_put_watch (watch);/* tmp watch, matches initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0+if (exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ return err;
I'm not so sure the 'watch' code is right here, since any failure is going to call audit_free_rule(), which will free the watch (and which you 'fixed' to put the exe...
Quoted 17 lines
}
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0@@ -985,6 +1001,7 @@ int audit_del_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)struct audit_entry *e;struct audit_watch *watch = entry->rule.watch;struct audit_tree *tree = entry->rule.tree; +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *exe = entry->rule.exe;struct list_head *list;int ret =0 ;#ifdef CONFIG_AUDITSYSCALL @@ -1031,6 +1048,8 @@ out:audit_put_watch (watch);/* match initial get */ if (tree)audit_put_tree (tree);/* that's the temporary one */
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0+if (exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* match
Quoted 1 line
initial get */
So audit_del_rule() frees both the rule that was in the kernel being used on a filter list and the rule that is passed to it used to find the rule on the filter list? This is a crap interface and needs rewritten...
I'm pretty sure that's a bug in my code.
audit_del_rule() has 2 callers.
1) audit_rule_change - which takes userspace input, creates a new rule, then passes that new rule to audit_del_rule() which find the rule on the filter list and frees both of them (kinda sorta...)
2) audit_remove_rule() (which badly needs renamed) which actually finds the rule ON the filter list and passes that to audit_del_rule(). Which finds itself and then frees itself twice (kinda sorta)
Yeah, refcounting on marks/trees seems really off to me...
Re: [PATCH 13/14] audit: continue fleshing out audit by exe
Quoted 1 line · Eric Paris
Whew, lot going on in here....
Yeah, overloaded that commit... I've split it...
(more below...)
Quoted 18 lines
Quoted 16 lines · On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:48 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote:
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +9
-0@@ -161,6 +161,21 @@ static void audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark, c audit_log_end(ab); } +int audit_add_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,struct list_head **list) +{ +struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark; +int h, ret =0 ; + +if (krule->exe) + audit_mark = krule->exe; +else +return -EINVAL ;//XXX +
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c static void audit_mark_log_rule_change(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark, c · line 177
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +4
-0+ h =audit_hash_ino ((u32 )audit_mark->ino); + *list = &audit_inode_hash[h]; +return ret; +}This would mean that
audit_exerules would trigger at the same timesaudit_watchrules trigger. Not sure if that is the semantics we are after...
Yeah, I suspected I had misunderstood and was going down the wrong path...
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0@@ -79,6 +80,8 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e)/* some rules don't have associated watches */
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e) · line 84
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0if (erule->watch)audit_put_watch (erule->watch); +if (erule->exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (erule->exe->mark);Now this might be a good idea... This is how marks would get cleaned up in some error cases, whereas I believe it would get cleaned up from rule removal in
audit_remove_mark()
In fact, it looks to me like this should be audit_remove_mark(erule->exe), and get rid of the audit_remove_mark() from audit_del_rule().
This way, rules that get purged due to a watch disappearing will have the mark properly cleaned up rather than orphaned.
Quoted 9 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, · line 572
Quoted 5 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0@@ -566,6 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } +fsnotify_get_mark (audit_mark->mark);So this just took a reference on the mark, so now the refcnt is 2. Even though there is only 1 user... (what else references
audit_markother thanentry->rule.exe?)
Actually, it was already 2 because of the call to fsnotify_add_mark() which is bumped up for g_list and i_list (freed by the fsnotify_mark_destroy thread), but yeah, this is unnecessary, I agree.
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c exit_free: · line 591
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0@@ -582,6 +586,8 @@ exit_free:audit_put_watch (entry->rule.watch);/* matches initial get */ if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (entry->rule.exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (entry->rule.exe->mark);/* matches initial get */ audit_free_rule (entry);ok, so maybe this doesn't panic, since you took and extra reference above you can put a reference here and then again inside
audit_free_rule(). But the code is still wrong...
Agreed.
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static struct audit_entry *audit_find_rule(struct audit_entry *entry, · line 875
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-1@@ -866,7 +872,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_find_rule(struct audit_entry *entry,if (entry->rule.inode_f) { h =audit_hash_ino (entry->rule.inode_f->val); *p = list = &audit_inode_hash[h]; - }else if (entry->rule.watch) { + }else if (entry->rule.watch || entry->rule.exe) {nope
Agreed.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +3
-0@@ -943,6 +950,13 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) goto error; } } +if (exe) { + err =audit_add_mark_rule (&entry->rule, &list); +if (err) {
Quoted 8 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) · line 959
Quoted 4 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +4
-0+mutex_unlock (&audit_filter_mutex); + goto error; + } + }naah, we don't want to find exe rules when we are looking for watch rules. This is the list of things we are watching for FS operations like open, chmod, chown, etc. Not things we are exec'ing...
Understood now.
Quoted 10 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry) · line 994
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-0@@ -976,6 +990,8 @@ static inline int audit_add_rule(struct audit_entry *entry)error:
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0if (watch)audit_put_watch (watch);/* tmp watch, matches initial get */ +if (exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ I'm not so sure the 'watch' code is right here, since any failure is going to call
audit_free_rule(), which will free the watch (and which you 'fixed' to put the exe...
I am starting to suspect that myself. Fixing that is a seperate patch, but understanding that will help get this one right.
Quoted 11 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c out: · line 1052
Quoted 6 lines
kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-0@@ -1031,6 +1048,8 @@ out:audit_put_watch (watch);/* match initial get */ if (tree)audit_put_tree (tree);/* that's the temporary one */ +if (exe) +fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* match initial get */ So
audit_del_rule()frees both the rule that was in the kernel being used on a filter list and the rule that is passed to it used to find the rule on the filter list? This is a crap interface and needs rewritten...
Agreed. So it should free the rule it is seeking in audit_del_rule() and the rule passed to it should be freed after it returns.
Quoted 10 lines
I'm pretty sure that's a bug in my code.
audit_del_rule()has 2 callers.
1)audit_rule_change- which takes userspace input, creates a new rule, then passes that new rule toaudit_del_rule()which find the rule on the filter list and frees both of them (kinda sorta...)2)
audit_remove_rule()(which badly needs renamed) which actually finds the rule ON the filter list and passes that toaudit_del_rule(). Which finds itself and then frees itself twice (kinda sorta)
Yes, this was renamed to audit_remove_mark_rule(). In there, the entry should be sent to audit_free_rule() after returning from audit_del_rule().
Along the way, I was thinking that fsnotify_destroy_mark_locked() should call fsnotify_put_mark() as well, but I think I've convinced myself that is a bad idea because either there is no other holder of that mark reference, or the reference is still needed for other cleanup.
Quoted 1 line
Yeah, refcounting on marks/trees seems really off to me...
Suspecting that helps to understand this...
I'll look at the watch and tree count structures somewhat seperately.
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545
PATCH 14/14 audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
In reply to Richard Guy Briggs--- kernel/audit.h | 2 ++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 6 +++--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
kernel/audit.h +2 -0
@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);int audit_add_mark_rule (struct audit_krule *krule,struct list_head **list);void audit_remove_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);int audit_mark_compare (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark,unsigned long ino,dev_t dev); +void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);int audit_dup_exe (struct audit_krule *new,struct audit_krule *old);int audit_exe_compare (struct task_struct *tsk,struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark);
kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +3 -3
@@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ static void audit_free_fsnotify_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark)audit_free_mark (audit_mark); } -#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */ -static void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +#if 1 /* not sure if we need these... */ +void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {if (likely (audit_mark))fsnotify_get_mark (&audit_mark->mark); } -static void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {if (likely (audit_mark))fsnotify_put_mark (&audit_mark->mark);
kernel/auditfilter.c +5 -5
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e)if (erule->watch)audit_put_watch (erule->watch);if (erule->exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (erule->exe->mark); +audit_put_mark (erule->exe);if (erule->fields)for (i =0 ; i < erule->field_count; i++) {struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];
@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err =PTR_ERR (audit_mark); goto exit_free; } -fsnotify_get_mark (audit_mark->mark); +audit_get_mark (audit_mark); entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; }
@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ exit_free:if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ if (entry->rule.exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (entry->rule.exe->mark);/* matches initial get */ +audit_put_mark (entry->rule.exe);/* matches initial get */ audit_free_rule (entry);return ERR_PTR (err); }
@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ error:if (watch)audit_put_watch (watch);/* tmp watch, matches initial get */ if (exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ +audit_put_mark (exe);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ return err; }
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ out:if (tree)audit_put_tree (tree);/* that's the temporary one */ if (exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* match initial get */ +audit_put_mark (exe);/* match initial get */ return ret; }
Signature · 1 line
1.7.1
Eric Paris
maintainerRe: [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
Aside from the refcounting in the previous patch being bad, which you likely didn't make any better here, I think I'm ok with audit_put_mark/audit_get_mark being exposed and used instead of the fsnotify_* calls being used directly...
Quoted 93 lines · On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:49 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote:
--- kernel/audit.h | 2 ++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 6 +++--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)kernel/audit.h +0
-0@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); int audit_add_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, struct
list_head**list); voidaudit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); intaudit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev); +voidaudit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +voidaudit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);
intaudit_dup_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old); int audit_exe_compare(structtask_struct*tsk, structaudit_fsnotify_mark*mark); diff --gita/kernel/audit_fsnotify.cb/kernel/audit_fsnotify.cindex cc4175a..f5789e1 100644kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +3
-3@@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ static void audit_free_fsnotify_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark) audit_free_mark(audit_mark); } -#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */ -static void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +#if 1 /* not sure if we need these... */ +void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {if (likely (audit_mark))fsnotify_get_mark (&audit_mark->mark); } -static void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {if (likely (audit_mark))fsnotify_put_mark (&audit_mark->mark);kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-3@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e) if (erule->watch)audit_put_watch (erule->watch);if (erule->exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (erule->exe->mark); +audit_put_mark (erule->exe);if (erule->fields)for (i =0 ; i < erule->field_count; i++) {struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err = PTR_ERR(audit_mark); goto exit_free; } -fsnotify_get_mark (audit_mark->mark); +audit_get_mark (audit_mark); entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; }@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ exit_free:if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ if (entry->rule.exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (entry->rule.exe->mark);/* matches initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0+audit_put_mark (entry->rule.exe);/* matches initial get */
audit_free_rule(entry);kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-1return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ error:if (watch)audit_put_watch (watch);/* tmp watch, matches initial get */ if (exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0+audit_put_mark (exe);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ return err;
}kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-1@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ out:if (tree)audit_put_tree (tree);/* that's the temporary one */ if (exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* match initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0+audit_put_mark (exe);/* match initial get */ return ret; }
Re: [PATCH 14/14] audit: enable audit_get/put_mark()
Quoted 4 lines · Eric Paris
Aside from the refcounting in the previous patch being bad, which you likely didn't make any better here, I think I'm ok with audit_put_mark/audit_get_mark being exposed and used instead of the fsnotify_* calls being used directly...
I still need to convince myself they are needed, but I'll figure that out after I read more carefully your comments to the previous patch.
Quoted 93 lines
Quoted 91 lines · On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 23:09:49 -0400 Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]> wrote:
--- kernel/audit.h | 2 ++ kernel/audit_fsnotify.c | 6 +++--- kernel/auditfilter.c | 10 +++++----- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)kernel/audit.h +0
-0@@ -288,6 +288,8 @@ char *audit_mark_path(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark); int audit_add_mark_rule(struct audit_krule *krule, struct
list_head**list); voidaudit_remove_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); intaudit_mark_compare(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *mark, unsigned long ino, dev_t dev); +voidaudit_get_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark); +voidaudit_put_mark(struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark);
intaudit_dup_exe(struct audit_krule *new, struct audit_krule *old); int audit_exe_compare(structtask_struct*tsk, structaudit_fsnotify_mark*mark); diff --gita/kernel/audit_fsnotify.cb/kernel/audit_fsnotify.cindex cc4175a..f5789e1 100644kernel/audit_fsnotify.c +3
-3@@ -65,14 +65,14 @@ static void audit_free_fsnotify_mark(struct fsnotify_mark *mark) audit_free_mark(audit_mark); } -#if 0 /* not sure if we need these... */ -static void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +#if 1 /* not sure if we need these... */ +void audit_get_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {if (likely (audit_mark))fsnotify_get_mark (&audit_mark->mark); } -static void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) +void audit_put_mark (struct audit_fsnotify_mark *audit_mark) {if (likely (audit_mark))fsnotify_put_mark (&audit_mark->mark);kernel/auditfilter.c +2
-3@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static inline void audit_free_rule(struct audit_entry *e) if (erule->watch)audit_put_watch (erule->watch);if (erule->exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (erule->exe->mark); +audit_put_mark (erule->exe);if (erule->fields)for (i =0 ; i < erule->field_count; i++) {struct audit_field *f = &erule->fields[i];@@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static struct audit_entry *audit_data_to_entry(struct audit_rule_data *data, err = PTR_ERR(audit_mark); goto exit_free; } -fsnotify_get_mark (audit_mark->mark); +audit_get_mark (audit_mark); entry->rule.exe = audit_mark;break ; }@@ -587,7 +587,7 @@ exit_free:if (entry->rule.tree)audit_put_tree (entry->rule.tree);/* that's the temporary one */ if (entry->rule.exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (entry->rule.exe->mark);/* matches initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0+audit_put_mark (entry->rule.exe);/* matches initial get */
audit_free_rule(entry);kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-1return ERR_PTR (err); }@@ -991,7 +991,7 @@ error:if (watch)audit_put_watch (watch);/* tmp watch, matches initial get */ if (exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0+audit_put_mark (exe);/* tmp mark, matches initial get */ return err;
}kernel/auditfilter.c +0
-1@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@ out:if (tree)audit_put_tree (tree);/* that's the temporary one */ if (exe) -fsnotify_put_mark (exe->mark);/* match initial get */
kernel/auditfilter.c +1
-0+audit_put_mark (exe);/* match initial get */
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 2 lines
return ret;
}
- RGB
--
Richard Guy Briggs <[email protected]>
Senior Software Engineer, Kernel Security, AMER ENG Base Operating Systems, Red Hat Remote, Ottawa, Canada
Voice: +1.647.777.2635, Internal: (81) 32635, Alt: +1.613.693.0684x3545