staging: vboxvideo: Remove chekpatch issues
cover staging: vboxvideo: Remove chekpatch issues
This series cleans the following checkpatch.pl issues:
CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over 'uint32_t'
CHECK: Avoid using bool structure members because of possible alignment issues
Shayenne da Luz Moura (2):
staging: vboxvideo: Change uint32_t to u32
staging: vboxvideo: Use unsigned int instead bool
drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.h | 14 +++++++------- drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_mode.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vboxvideo_guest.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.19.1
Hi,
Quoted 8 lines · Shayenne da Luz Moura
This series cleans the following checkpatch.pl issues:
CHECK: Prefer kernel type 'u32' over '
uint32_t'
CHECK: Avoid using bool structure members because of possible alignment issuesShayenne da Luz Moura (2):
staging: vboxvideo: Changeuint32_tto u32
staging: vboxvideo: Use unsigned int instead bool
Why am I receiving only the cover letter of this series? Please resend so that I get all the patches.
Also at least the first patch is wrong, the drm headers use uint32_t in the prototype definition of the callback functions we are defining, so the vboxvideo code should use the same even if the compiler does not warn about the callback implementation having different parameter types in this case.
Regards,
Hans
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_drv.h | 14 +++++++------- drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vbox_mode.c | 2 +- drivers/staging/vboxvideo/vboxvideo_guest.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)