Add thermal control driver for Sunplus SoC
Subsystems (2)
v8 cover Add thermal control driver for Sunplus SoC
This is a patch series for thermal driver for Sunplus SoC.
Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 (4 cores) based SoC. It integrates many peripherals (ex: UART, I2C, SPI, SDIO, eMMC, USB, SD card and etc.) into a single chip. It is designed for industrial control.
Refer to:
https://sunplus-tibbo.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/doc/overview
https://tibbo.com/store/plus1.html
Li-hao Kuo (2):
thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema
.../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml | 43 +++++++ MAINTAINERS | 7 ++ drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 ++ drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++ 5 files changed, 196 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v8 1/2 thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
Add thermal driver for Sunplus.
---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable
MAINTAINERS | 6 ++ drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++ drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
MAINTAINERS +6 -0
@@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER +M: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> +L: [email protected] +S: Maintained +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c + SUNPLUS UART DRIVER M: Hammer Hsieh <[email protected]> S: Maintained
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +10 -0
@@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards. +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers" + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST + help + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive + temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC. + + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option + to have support for thermal management + endif
drivers/thermal/Makefile +1 -0
@@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.o
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +135 -0
135 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
Hi,
Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit :
Quoted 161 lines
Add thermal driver for Sunplus.
Signed-off-by Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiableMAINTAINERS | 6 ++ drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++ drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+)create mode 100644
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.cMAINTAINERS +6
-0@@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER +M: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> +L: [email protected] +S: Maintained +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c + SUNPLUS UART DRIVER M: Hammer Hsieh <[email protected]> S: Maintaineddrivers/thermal/Kconfig +10
-0@@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards. +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers" + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST + help + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive + temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC. + + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option + to have support for thermal management + endifdrivers/thermal/Makefile +1
-0@@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.odrivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +92
-0@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* +* Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc. +* Author: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> +*/ + +#include <linux/bitfield.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> +#include <linux/thermal.h> + +#define ENABLE_THERMAL BIT(31) +#define SP_THERMAL_MASK GENMASK(10, 0) + +#define TEMP_RATE 608 +#define TEMP_BASE 3500 +#define TEMP_OTP_BASE 1518 + +#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG 0x0000 +#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG 0x0030 + +/* common data structures */ +struct sp_thermal_data { +struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz; +void __iomem *regs; +int *otp_temp0; +}; + +static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef (struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data,struct device *dev) +{ +struct nvmem_cell *cell; +ssize_t otp_l; + + cell =nvmem_cell_get (dev,"calib" ); +if (IS_ERR (cell)) +return PTR_ERR (cell); + + sp_data->otp_temp0 =nvmem_cell_read (cell, &otp_l); +nvmem_cell_put (cell); + +if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 ==0 ) + *sp_data->otp_temp0 =TEMP_OTP_BASE ; + +return 0 ; +} + +/* +* There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc +* T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor +* T_CODE : 11 digits in total +* When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell. +* otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell +* The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration. +* TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope. +*/ + +static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp (void *data,int *temp) +{ +struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data; +int t_code; + + t_code =readl (sp_data->regs +SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG ); + t_code =FIELD_GET (SP_THERMAL_MASK , t_code); + *temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) *10000 /TEMP_RATE ) +TEMP_BASE ; + *temp *=10 ; +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = { + .get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp, +}; + +static int sunplus_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data; +int ret; + + sp_data =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*sp_data),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!sp_data) +return -ENOMEM ; + + sp_data->regs =devm_platform_ioremap_resource (pdev,0 ); +if (IS_ERR (sp_data->regs)) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"resource get fail\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (sp_data->regs); + } +
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 102
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10
-0+writel (ENABLE_THERMAL , sp_data->regs +SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG ); + +platform_set_drvdata (pdev, sp_data); + ret =sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef (sp_data, &pdev->dev); +if (ret) +return ret; + + sp_data->pcb_tz =devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register (&pdev->dev, +0 , + sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops);
sp_data->pcb_tz is the result of devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() and devm_ functions usually don't need any clean-up. It is done automagically by the kernel itself.
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 113
Quoted 11 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +11
-0+if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (sp_data->pcb_tz)) +return PTR_ERR (sp_data->pcb_tz); + +return ret; +} + +static int sunplus_thermal_remove (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data =platform_get_drvdata (pdev); + +thermal_zone_device_unregister (sp_data->pcb_tz);
But here it is unregistered.
1) I would have expected that no unregister function is needed.
2) Should one be there, based on naming, thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister() would look more consistent.
I know nothing about the thermal API, so don't take this comment too seriously. It just look odd to me when I gave it a look.
Just my 2c,
CJ
Quoted 22 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +22
-0+return 0 ; +} + +static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = { + { .compatible ="sunplus,thermal" }, + {/* sentinel */ } +}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids); + +static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = { + .probe = sunplus_thermal_probe, + .remove = sunplus_thermal_remove, + .driver = { + .name ="sunplus-thermal" , + .of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids, + }, +}; +module_platform_driver (sunplus_thermal_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC" ); +MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" );
Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
In reply to Li-hao KuoHi,
below, some additional nitpick.
CJ
Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit :
Quoted 40 lines
Add thermal driver for Sunplus.
Signed-off-by Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiableMAINTAINERS | 6 ++ drivers/thermal/Kconfig | 10 +++ drivers/thermal/Makefile | 1 + drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+)create mode 100644
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.cMAINTAINERS +6
-0@@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S: Maintained F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml F: drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c +SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER +M: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> +L: [email protected] +S: Maintained +F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c + SUNPLUS UART DRIVER M: Hammer Hsieh <[email protected]> S: Maintaineddrivers/thermal/Kconfig +0
-0
drivers/thermal/Kconfig config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL · line 511
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +5
-0@@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards. +config SUNPLUS_THERMAL + tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers" + depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST + help + This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive
Missing word?
This *enables* the... ?
Quoted 64 lines
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +5
-0+ temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC. + + If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option + to have support for thermal management + endifdrivers/thermal/Makefile +1
-0@@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL) += uniphier_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL) += amlogic_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL) += sprd_thermal.o obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL) += khadas_mcu_fan.o +obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL) += sunplus_thermal.odrivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +43
-0@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* +* Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc. +* Author: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> +*/ + +#include <linux/bitfield.h> +#include <linux/clk.h> +#include <linux/delay.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h> +#include <linux/platform_device.h> +#include <linux/reset.h> +#include <linux/thermal.h> + +#define ENABLE_THERMAL BIT(31) +#define SP_THERMAL_MASK GENMASK(10, 0) + +#define TEMP_RATE 608 +#define TEMP_BASE 3500 +#define TEMP_OTP_BASE 1518 + +#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG 0x0000 +#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG 0x0030 + +/* common data structures */ +struct sp_thermal_data { +struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz; +void __iomem *regs; +int *otp_temp0; +}; + +static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef (struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data,struct device *dev) +{ +struct nvmem_cell *cell; +ssize_t otp_l; + + cell =nvmem_cell_get (dev,"calib" ); +if (IS_ERR (cell)) +return PTR_ERR (cell); + + sp_data->otp_temp0 =nvmem_cell_read (cell, &otp_l);
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 53
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10
-0+nvmem_cell_put (cell); + +if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 ==0 ) + *sp_data->otp_temp0 =TEMP_OTP_BASE ; + +return 0 ; +} + +/* +* There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc
I don't know what is the best, but if you want to be consistent, other places are about Sunplus, not SUNPLUS.
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 59
Quoted 6 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +6
-0+* T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor +* T_CODE : 11 digits in total +* When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell. +* otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell +* The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration. +* TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope.
Same here.
Quoted 34 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +34
-0+*/ + +static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp (void *data,int *temp) +{ +struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data; +int t_code; + + t_code =readl (sp_data->regs +SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG ); + t_code =FIELD_GET (SP_THERMAL_MASK , t_code); + *temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) *10000 /TEMP_RATE ) +TEMP_BASE ; + *temp *=10 ; +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = { + .get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp, +}; + +static int sunplus_thermal_probe (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data; +int ret; + + sp_data =devm_kzalloc (&pdev->dev,sizeof (*sp_data),GFP_KERNEL ); +if (!sp_data) +return -ENOMEM ; + + sp_data->regs =devm_platform_ioremap_resource (pdev,0 ); +if (IS_ERR (sp_data->regs)) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"resource get fail\n" ); +return PTR_ERR (sp_data->regs); + } + +writel (ENABLE_THERMAL , sp_data->regs +SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG );
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 103
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10
-0+ +platform_set_drvdata (pdev, sp_data); + ret =sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef (sp_data, &pdev->dev); +if (ret) +return ret; + + sp_data->pcb_tz =devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register (&pdev->dev, +0 , + sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops); +if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL (sp_data->pcb_tz))
I don't think that devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() can return NULL.
Quoted 16 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +16
-0+return PTR_ERR (sp_data->pcb_tz); + +return ret; +} + +static int sunplus_thermal_remove (struct platform_device *pdev) +{ +struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data =platform_get_drvdata (pdev); + +thermal_zone_device_unregister (sp_data->pcb_tz); +return 0 ; +} + +static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = { + { .compatible ="sunplus,thermal" }, + {/* sentinel */ }
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 129
Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10
-0+}; +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE (of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids); + +static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = { + .probe = sunplus_thermal_probe, + .remove = sunplus_thermal_remove, + .driver = { + .name ="sunplus-thermal" , + .of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids, + },
The }, should be aligned on .driver (1 less tabulation)
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 134
Quoted 5 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +5
-0+}; +module_platform_driver (sunplus_thermal_driver); + +MODULE_AUTHOR ("Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>" ); +MODULE_DESCRIPTION ("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC" );
Other places are about Sunplus, not sunplus
Quoted 1 line
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +1
-0+MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL" );
PATCH v8 2/2 dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema
In reply to Li-hao KuoAdd bindings for Sunplus thermal driver
---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable
.../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +43 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) +# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd. +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# + +title: Sunplus Thermal controller + +maintainers: + - Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> + +properties: + compatible: + enum: + - sunplus,thermal + + reg: + maxItems: 1 + + nvmem-cells: + maxItems: 1 + + nvmem-cell-names: + const: calib + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - nvmem-cells + - nvmem-cell-names + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + thermal@9c000280 { + compatible = "sunplus,thermal"; + reg = <0x9c000280 0xc>; + nvmem-cells = <&calib>; + nvmem-cell-names = "calib"; + }; +...
MAINTAINERS +1 -0
@@ -18900,6 +18900,7 @@ SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER M: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> L: [email protected] S: Maintained +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema
Quoted 28 lines · Li-hao Kuo
Add bindings for Sunplus thermal driver
Signed-off-by Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable.../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yamlDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) +# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd. +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml line 16
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +10
-0+ +title: Sunplus Thermal controller + +maintainers: + - Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> + +properties: + compatible: + enum: + - sunplus,thermal
This is a very surprising change and was never requested by me or other reviewers. It is also not correct. Previous compatible was correct.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Rob Herring
maintainerRe: [PATCH v8 2/2] dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema
In reply to Li-hao KuoQuoted 28 lines · Li-hao Kuo
Add bindings for Sunplus thermal driver
Signed-off-by Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable.../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++ MAINTAINERS | 1 + 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yamlDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +6
-0@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause) +# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd. +%YAML 1.2 +--- +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml# +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml line 16
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +10
-0+ +title: Sunplus Thermal controller + +maintainers: + - Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> + +properties: + compatible: + enum: + - sunplus,thermal
I don't think is is what was suggested. This must be SoC specific.
Quoted 43 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +27
-0+ + reg: + maxItems: 1 + + nvmem-cells: + maxItems: 1 + + nvmem-cell-names: + const: calib + +required: + - compatible + - reg + - nvmem-cells + - nvmem-cell-names + +additionalProperties: false + +examples: + - | + thermal@9c000280 { + compatible = "sunplus,thermal"; + reg = <0x9c000280 0xc>; + nvmem-cells = <&calib>; + nvmem-cell-names = "calib"; + }; +...MAINTAINERS +1
-0@@ -18900,6 +18900,7 @@ SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER M: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]> L: [email protected] S: Maintained +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml F: drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c SUNPLUS UART DRIVERSignature · 1 line
2.7.4