Skip to contentSkip to conversation

Add thermal control driver for Sunplus SoC

PATCH Superseded Li-hao Kuo 4 participants 7 messages May 3, 2022

Subsystems (2)

v8 of 11 Superseded Latest is v11 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Li-hao Kuo

author
#0 lore raw

v8 cover Add thermal control driver for Sunplus SoC

This is a patch series for thermal driver for Sunplus SoC.

Sunplus SP7021 is an ARM Cortex A7 (4 cores) based SoC. It integrates many peripherals (ex: UART, I2C, SPI, SDIO, eMMC, USB, SD card and etc.) into a single chip. It is designed for industrial control.

Refer to:
https://sunplus-tibbo.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/doc/overview
https://tibbo.com/store/plus1.html

Li-hao Kuo (2):
thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus
dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema

 .../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml          |  43 +++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                        |   7 ++
 drivers/thermal/Kconfig                            |  10 ++
 drivers/thermal/Makefile                           |   1 +
 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c                  | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 196 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v8 1/2 thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus

Add thermal driver for Sunplus.

---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable

 MAINTAINERS                       |   6 ++
 drivers/thermal/Kconfig           |  10 +++
 drivers/thermal/Makefile          |   1 +
 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 152 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
MAINTAINERS +6 -0
index edc96cd..82143ff 100644
@@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S:	Maintained
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
 F:	drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
 
+SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER
+M:	Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+L:	[email protected]
+S:	Maintained
+F:	drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
+
 SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
 M:	Hammer Hsieh <[email protected]>
 S:	Maintained
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +10 -0
index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644
@@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL
 	  If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled
 	  by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards.
 
+config SUNPLUS_THERMAL
+	tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers"
+	depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive
+	  temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
+
+	  If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option
+	  to have support for thermal management
+
 endif
drivers/thermal/Makefile +1 -0
index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644
@@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL)	+= uniphier_thermal.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL)     += amlogic_thermal.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL)	+= sprd_thermal.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL)	+= khadas_mcu_fan.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL)	+= sunplus_thermal.o
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +135 -0

135 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus

Hi,

Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit :

Quoted 161 lines

Add thermal driver for Sunplus.

---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable

  MAINTAINERS                       |   6 ++
  drivers/thermal/Kconfig           |  10 +++
  drivers/thermal/Makefile          |   1 +
  drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 152 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c

MAINTAINERS +6 -0
index edc96cd..82143ff 100644
@@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S:	Maintained
  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
  F:	drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
 
+SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER
+M:	Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+L:	[email protected]
+S:	Maintained
+F:	drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
+
  SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
  M:	Hammer Hsieh <[email protected]>
  S:	Maintained
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +10 -0
index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644
@@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL
  	  If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled
  	  by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards.
 
+config SUNPLUS_THERMAL
+	tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers"
+	depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive
+	  temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
+
+	  If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option
+	  to have support for thermal management
+
  endif
drivers/thermal/Makefile +1 -0
index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644
@@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL)	+= uniphier_thermal.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL)     += amlogic_thermal.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL)	+= sprd_thermal.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL)	+= khadas_mcu_fan.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL)	+= sunplus_thermal.o
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +92 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d4e22fc
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc.
+ * Author: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <linux/thermal.h>
+
+#define ENABLE_THERMAL		BIT(31)
+#define SP_THERMAL_MASK		GENMASK(10, 0)
+
+#define TEMP_RATE		608
+#define TEMP_BASE		3500
+#define TEMP_OTP_BASE		1518
+
+#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG	0x0000
+#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG	0x0030
+
+/* common data structures */
+struct sp_thermal_data {
+	struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz;
+	void __iomem *regs;
+	int *otp_temp0;
+};
+
+static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data, struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+	ssize_t otp_l;
+
+	cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "calib");
+	if (IS_ERR(cell))
+		return PTR_ERR(cell);
+
+	sp_data->otp_temp0 = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);
+	nvmem_cell_put(cell);
+
+	if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 == 0)
+		*sp_data->otp_temp0 = TEMP_OTP_BASE;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc
+ * T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor
+ * T_CODE : 11 digits in total
+ * When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell.
+ * otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell
+ * The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration.
+ * TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope.
+ */
+
+static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temp)
+{
+	struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data;
+	int t_code;
+
+	t_code = readl(sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG);
+	t_code = FIELD_GET(SP_THERMAL_MASK, t_code);
+	*temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) * 10000 / TEMP_RATE) + TEMP_BASE;
+	*temp *= 10;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = {
+	.get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp,
+};
+
+static int sunplus_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data;
+	int ret;
+
+	sp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!sp_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	sp_data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(sp_data->regs)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource get fail\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(sp_data->regs);
+	}
+

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 102

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10 -0
+	writel(ENABLE_THERMAL, sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG);
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sp_data);
+	ret = sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(sp_data, &pdev->dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	sp_data->pcb_tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
+							    0,
+							    sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops);

sp_data->pcb_tz is the result of devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() and devm_ functions usually don't need any clean-up. It is done automagically by the kernel itself.

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 113

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +11 -0
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sp_data->pcb_tz))
+		return PTR_ERR(sp_data->pcb_tz);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	thermal_zone_device_unregister(sp_data->pcb_tz);

But here it is unregistered.

1) I would have expected that no unregister function is needed.
2) Should one be there, based on naming, thermal_zone_of_sensor_unregister() would look more consistent.

I know nothing about the thermal API, so don't take this comment too seriously. It just look odd to me when I gave it a look.

Just my 2c,

CJ

Quoted 22 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +22 -0
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "sunplus,thermal" },
+	{ /* sentinel */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = {
+	.probe	= sunplus_thermal_probe,
+	.remove = sunplus_thermal_remove,
+	.driver	= {
+		.name	= "sunplus-thermal",
+		.of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids,
+		},
+};
+module_platform_driver(sunplus_thermal_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v8 1/2] thermal: Add thermal driver for Sunplus

In reply to Li-hao Kuo

Hi,

below, some additional nitpick.

CJ

Le 03/05/2022 à 04:13, Li-hao Kuo a écrit :

Quoted 40 lines

Add thermal driver for Sunplus.

---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable

  MAINTAINERS                       |   6 ++
  drivers/thermal/Kconfig           |  10 +++
  drivers/thermal/Makefile          |   1 +
  drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  4 files changed, 152 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c

MAINTAINERS +6 -0
index edc96cd..82143ff 100644
@@ -18896,6 +18896,12 @@ S:	Maintained
  F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.yaml
  F:	drivers/spi/spi-sunplus-sp7021.c
 
+SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER
+M:	Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+L:	[email protected]
+S:	Maintained
+F:	drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
+
  SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
  M:	Hammer Hsieh <[email protected]>
  S:	Maintained
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +0 -0
index 0e5cc94..595f507 100644

drivers/thermal/Kconfig config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL · line 511

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +5 -0
@@ -504,4 +504,14 @@ config KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL
  	  If you say yes here you get support for the FAN controlled
  	  by the Microcontroller found on the Khadas VIM boards.
 
+config SUNPLUS_THERMAL
+	tristate "Sunplus thermal drivers"
+	depends on SOC_SP7021 || COMPILE_TEST
+	help
+	  This the Sunplus SP7021 thermal driver, which supports the primitive

Missing word?
This *enables* the... ?

Quoted 64 lines
drivers/thermal/Kconfig +5 -0
+	  temperature sensor embedded in Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
+
+	  If you have a Sunplus SP7021 platform say Y here and enable this option
+	  to have support for thermal management
+
  endif
drivers/thermal/Makefile +1 -0
index f0c36a1..38a76f9 100644
@@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UNIPHIER_THERMAL)	+= uniphier_thermal.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_AMLOGIC_THERMAL)     += amlogic_thermal.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_SPRD_THERMAL)	+= sprd_thermal.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_KHADAS_MCU_FAN_THERMAL)	+= khadas_mcu_fan.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_THERMAL)	+= sunplus_thermal.o
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +43 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..d4e22fc
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) Sunplus Inc.
+ * Author: Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/bitfield.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <linux/thermal.h>
+
+#define ENABLE_THERMAL		BIT(31)
+#define SP_THERMAL_MASK		GENMASK(10, 0)
+
+#define TEMP_RATE		608
+#define TEMP_BASE		3500
+#define TEMP_OTP_BASE		1518
+
+#define SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG	0x0000
+#define SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG	0x0030
+
+/* common data structures */
+struct sp_thermal_data {
+	struct thermal_zone_device *pcb_tz;
+	void __iomem *regs;
+	int *otp_temp0;
+};
+
+static int sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data, struct device *dev)
+{
+	struct nvmem_cell *cell;
+	ssize_t otp_l;
+
+	cell = nvmem_cell_get(dev, "calib");
+	if (IS_ERR(cell))
+		return PTR_ERR(cell);
+
+	sp_data->otp_temp0 = nvmem_cell_read(cell, &otp_l);

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 53

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10 -0
+	nvmem_cell_put(cell);
+
+	if (*sp_data->otp_temp0 == 0)
+		*sp_data->otp_temp0 = TEMP_OTP_BASE;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * There is a thermal sensor instance for SUNPLUS Soc

I don't know what is the best, but if you want to be consistent, other places are about Sunplus, not SUNPLUS.

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 59

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +6 -0
+ * T_CODE is the ADC of the thermal sensor
+ * T_CODE : 11 digits in total
+ * When remanufacturing, the 35 degree T_CODE will be read and stored in nvcell.
+ * otp_temp0 is the 35 degree T_CODE obtained from nvcell
+ * The function will get 35 degree T_CODE for thermal calibration.
+ * TEMP_RATE is the SUNPLUS thermal temperature slope.

Same here.

Quoted 34 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +34 -0
+ */
+
+static int sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp(void *data, int *temp)
+{
+	struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = data;
+	int t_code;
+
+	t_code = readl(sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_STS0_REG);
+	t_code = FIELD_GET(SP_THERMAL_MASK, t_code);
+	*temp = ((*sp_data->otp_temp0 - t_code) * 10000 / TEMP_RATE) + TEMP_BASE;
+	*temp *= 10;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops sp_of_thermal_ops = {
+	.get_temp = sp_thermal_get_sensor_temp,
+};
+
+static int sunplus_thermal_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data;
+	int ret;
+
+	sp_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*sp_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!sp_data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	sp_data->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
+	if (IS_ERR(sp_data->regs)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "resource get fail\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(sp_data->regs);
+	}
+
+	writel(ENABLE_THERMAL, sp_data->regs + SP_THERMAL_CTL0_REG);

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 103

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10 -0
+
+	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, sp_data);
+	ret = sunplus_get_otp_temp_coef(sp_data, &pdev->dev);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	sp_data->pcb_tz = devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register(&pdev->dev,
+							    0,
+							    sp_data, &sp_of_thermal_ops);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(sp_data->pcb_tz))

I don't think that devm_thermal_zone_of_sensor_register() can return NULL.

Quoted 16 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +16 -0
+		return PTR_ERR(sp_data->pcb_tz);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int sunplus_thermal_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct sp_thermal_data *sp_data = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+
+	thermal_zone_device_unregister(sp_data->pcb_tz);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id of_sunplus_thermal_ids[] = {
+	{ .compatible = "sunplus,thermal" },
+	{ /* sentinel */ }

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 129

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +10 -0
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_sunplus_thermal_ids);
+
+static struct platform_driver sunplus_thermal_driver = {
+	.probe	= sunplus_thermal_probe,
+	.remove = sunplus_thermal_remove,
+	.driver	= {
+		.name	= "sunplus-thermal",
+		.of_match_table = of_sunplus_thermal_ids,
+		},

The }, should be aligned on .driver (1 less tabulation)

drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c line 134

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +5 -0
+};
+module_platform_driver(sunplus_thermal_driver);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Thermal driver for sunplus SoC");

Other places are about Sunplus, not sunplus

Quoted 1 line
drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c new file +1 -0
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
author
#4 lore raw

PATCH v8 2/2 dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema

In reply to Li-hao Kuo

Add bindings for Sunplus thermal driver

---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable

 .../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml          | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                        |  1 +
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +43 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ecf6f6
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd.
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sunplus Thermal controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - sunplus,thermal
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  nvmem-cells:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  nvmem-cell-names:
+    const: calib
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - nvmem-cells
+  - nvmem-cell-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    thermal@9c000280 {
+        compatible = "sunplus,thermal";
+        reg = <0x9c000280 0xc>;
+        nvmem-cells = <&calib>;
+        nvmem-cell-names = "calib";
+    };
+...
MAINTAINERS +1 -0
index 82143ff..ff49023 100644
@@ -18900,6 +18900,7 @@ SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER
 M:	Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
 L:	[email protected]
 S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
 F:	drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
 
 SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema

Quoted 28 lines · Li-hao Kuo

Add bindings for Sunplus thermal driver

---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable

 .../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml          | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                        |  1 +
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +6 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ecf6f6
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd.
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml line 16

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +10 -0
+
+title: Sunplus Thermal controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - sunplus,thermal

This is a very surprising change and was never requested by me or other reviewers. It is also not correct. Previous compatible was correct.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v8 2/2] dt-bindings:thermal: Add Sunplus schema

In reply to Li-hao Kuo
Quoted 28 lines · Li-hao Kuo

Add bindings for Sunplus thermal driver

---
Changes in v8:
- Modify yaml file.
modify the setting compatible
- Change yaml file name.
- Modify driver.
mosdify and simply the nvmem setting and remove valiable

 .../bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml          | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 MAINTAINERS                                        |  1 +
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +6 -0
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1ecf6f6
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd.
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml line 16

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +10 -0
+
+title: Sunplus Thermal controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    enum:
+      - sunplus,thermal

I don't think is is what was suggested. This must be SoC specific.

Quoted 43 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml new file +27 -0
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  nvmem-cells:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  nvmem-cell-names:
+    const: calib
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - nvmem-cells
+  - nvmem-cell-names
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    thermal@9c000280 {
+        compatible = "sunplus,thermal";
+        reg = <0x9c000280 0xc>;
+        nvmem-cells = <&calib>;
+        nvmem-cell-names = "calib";
+    };
+...
MAINTAINERS +1 -0
index 82143ff..ff49023 100644
@@ -18900,6 +18900,7 @@ SUNPLUS THERMAL DRIVER
 M:	Li-hao Kuo <[email protected]>
 L:	[email protected]
 S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/sunplus,thermal.yaml
 F:	drivers/thermal/sunplus_thermal.c
 
 SUNPLUS UART DRIVER
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4