spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first · linked by author and title
- v5 Latest posting 3/30 of 6 patches 0 repliesNew
- v5 posting 2/30 of 6 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
- v5 posting 1/30 of 6 patches 0 repliesSuperseded
Patches in v5 posting 3/3 No applies recorded yet
None of the 6 patches the cover letter announces are in this archive.
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v5 yet.
Cover letter [PATCH v5 0/6] spi: s3c64xx: add support for device tree
Quoted 10 lines · Thomas Abraham
Quoted 5 lines · Mark Brown
Well, simple conflicts aren't that big a deal... However, Thomas mentioned that in order to test this he merged the SPI tree into your tree so perhaps there is also a dependency on the SPI tree? If that was just for good practice testing then I agree that the best thing is to merge via your tree, otherwise we might need to think harder.
There were no dependency on Grant's spi/next branch. It was merged just to ensure that nothing is broken.
OK, great - then the Samsung tree it is.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20120712/d20848c7/attachment.sig>