Fixes to kms_addfb_basic + RFC IGT buf alloc
Get series with b4
b4 am [email protected]Versions newest first
- v1 Latest3 patches 6 repliesIn review
Patches in v1 No applies recorded yet
| # | Subject and files | Size | Replies | Applied |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1/3 | igt/kms_addfb_basic: Call dumb destroy in case have dumb buffertests/ | +52 | 0 replies | |
| 2/3 | igt/kms_addfb_basic: Call igt_require_gem for gem specific tilingtests/ | +8 | 6 replies | |
| 3/3 | igt/kms_addfb_basic: Add missing calls to gem_closetests/ | +11 | 0 replies |
Reviews trailers per patch
No Reviewed-by, Acked-by or Tested-by trailers for v1 yet.
Cover letter [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t 0/3] Fixes to kms_addfb_basic + RFC IGT buf alloc
Hi,
Sending a few fixes to kms_addfb_basic which are mainly for vmwgfx to run without error. These are really shortsighted fix and with this I would like to get feedback from community regarding BO allocation for drivers like vmwgfx which have private IOCTL for allocation. My end goal is to add vmwgfx BO support which creating igt_fb.
Currently igt_fb is somewhat tied to handle. I didn't looked into much detail but my fist thought was to separate out handle, is_dumb, etc from igt_fb and have a separate struct for BO. Similarly distinct API for BO create/destroy. Or is this unnecessary and simply adding a new API igt_destroy_bo should be enough to solve problems where igt_create_bo_with_dimensions() was used.
I would like to know if anyone else looked into this or it's in their TODO list.
Thanks,
Deepak
Deepak Rawat (3):
igt/kms_addfb_basic: Call dumb destroy in case have dumb buffer igt/kms_addfb_basic: Call igt_require_gem for gem specific tiling igt/kms_addfb_basic: Add missing calls to gem_close
tests/kms_addfb_basic.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
Signature · 6 lines
2.17.1 _______________________________________________ igt-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/igt-dev