s390 (8/8): export sys_wait4.
Quoted 1 line
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_wait4);
Martin, hold on just a second. Last I checked, sys_wait4 was used ONLY by a moronic code in ipvs, _and_ there was a comment by the author above it "we are too lazy to do it properly". Do you have a better reason to export it?
-- Pete
Quoted 6 lines · Pete Zaitcev
Quoted 1 line
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_wait4);
Martin, hold on just a second. Last I checked,
sys_wait4was used ONLY by a moronic code in ipvs, _and_ there was a comment by the author above it "we are too lazy to do it properly". Do you have a better reason to export it?
Guess I'm the malefactor this time since I've sent this patch to Martin after some email exchanges with a guy that wanted LVS to work on a s390. I reckon I will fix the said moronic code to use a syscall wrapper for sys_wait4() so we don't step on anyone's toes.
Regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
Signature · 1 line
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc
Quoted 10 lines
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 22:19:21 +0100
From: Roberto Nibali <[email protected]>Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_wait4);
Martin, hold on just a second. Last I checked,
sys_wait4was used ONLY by a moronic code in ipvs, _and_ there was a comment by the author above it "we are too lazy to do it properly". Do you have a better reason to export it?
Quoted 4 lines
Guess I'm the malefactor this time since I've sent this patch to Martin after some email exchanges with a guy that wanted LVS to work on a s390. I reckon I will fix the said moronic code to use a syscall wrapper for
sys_wait4()so we don't step on anyone's toes.
I should not have called it moronic. Everyone has schedule constraints. I am wondering though, if the LVS and ipvs module are maintained actively. Perhaps I owe them a patch.
-- Pete
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(sys_wait4);
Martin, hold on just a second. Last I checked,
sys_wait4was used ONLY by a moronic code in ipvs, _and_ there was a comment by the author above it "we are too lazy to do it properly". Do you have a better reason to export it?Guess I'm the malefactor this time since I've sent this patch to Martin after some email exchanges with a guy that wanted LVS to work on a s390. I reckon I will fix the said moronic code to use a syscall wrapper for
sys_wait4()so we don't step on anyone's toes.I should not have called it moronic. Everyone has schedule
Don't worry about it. We haven't always been too kind with lost RH piranha users in the past either ;).
Quoted 2 lines
constraints. I am wondering though, if the LVS and ipvs module are maintained actively. Perhaps I owe them a patch.
LVS and its kernel modules are definitely actively maintained all the way from 2.2.x to 2.5.x kernels and if you want I'll make you a 2.0.x kernel version too. It's just that recently everybody got a bit busy and thus new releases tend to follow each other in increasing time intervals.
A patch would always be very welcome of course.
Best regards,
Roberto Nibali, ratz
Signature · 1 line
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln256%Pln256/snlbx]sb3135071790101768542287578439snlbxq'|dc