x86/entry64: remove unused audit related macros
Subsystems (2)
PATCH 1/1 x86/entry64: remove unused audit related macros
which are ocured in the 86a1c34a929f commit (x86_64 syscall audit fast-path by Roland McGrath <[email protected]>) and now they are not used anymore.
--- arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S +0 -6
@@ -38,12 +38,6 @@ #include <asm/export.h> #include <linux/err.h> -/* Avoid __ASSEMBLER__'ifying <linux/audit.h> just for this. */ -#include <linux/elf-em.h> -#define AUDIT_ARCH_X86_64 (EM_X86_64|__AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT|__AUDIT_ARCH_LE) -#define __AUDIT_ARCH_64BIT 0x80000000 -#define __AUDIT_ARCH_LE 0x40000000 - .code64 .section .entry.text, "ax"
Signature · 1 line
2.8.0.rc3.1353.gea9bdc0
Borislav Petkov
maintainerQuoted 3 lines · Alexander Kuleshov
which are ocured in the
86a1c34a929fcommit (x86_64syscall audit fast-path by Roland McGrath <[email protected]>) and now they are not used anymore.
I'd prefer it if you said which patch *removed* them and made those defines unused again.
What would be even better is if your commit message explained *why* they were removed in that patch and that because of <insert reason here> we don't need them here anymore.
This should give people looking at your patch the warm and fuzzy feeling they need in order to apply it. :-)
Thanks.
Signature · 4 lines
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.Hello Borislav,
Quoted 9 lines · Borislav Petkov
I'd prefer it if you said which patch *removed* them and made those defines unused again.
What would be even better is if your commit message explained *why* they were removed in that patch and that because of <insert reason here> we don't need them here anymore.
This should give people looking at your patch the warm and fuzzy feeling they need in order to apply it. :-)
I will describe this in V2.
Thanks.