Skip to contentSkip to conversation

drivers/i2c: SPDX-License-header information

PATCH In review Mawanda Henry 2 participants 2 messages Jun 21, 2018

Subsystems (2)
lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH 1/1 drivers/i2c: SPDX-License-header information

SPDX License header included to easy developers and machine to know the license governing a particular file

---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c +1 -6
index 4a78c65..d2cc8fc 100644
@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
 /*
  * Linux I2C core slave support code
- *
  * Copyright (C) 2014 by Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
- * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
- * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
- * any later version.
  */
 
 #include <dt-bindings/i2c/i2c.h>
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
#1 lore raw
Quoted 8 lines · Mawanda Henry

SPDX License header included to easy developers and machine to know the license governing a particular file

---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c | 7 +------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)

It is customary to make note of the patch revision in the subject. In your case that would be [PATCH v3] for this patch and [PATCH v4] for the next iteration. Speaking of the subject, a better subject for this message would have been

Subject: [PATCH v3] i2c: slave: use SPDX license information

Also, when doing multiple revisions of a patch it is valuable to record the history of changes, so that reviewers get a reminder of what has happened. For a single patch, this space here, just before the first "diff" line is a good spot for that patch history. For a trivial patch like this, this is not super-important, but still best practice.

drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c line 1

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c +1 -0
index 4a78c65..d2cc8fc 100644
@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+

Apparently, GPL-2.0+ is a thing of the past. Should be GPL-2.0-or-later according to https://spdx.org/licenses/

drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c line 3

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c +0 -1
 /*
  * Linux I2C core slave support code
- *

I said "line", not "lines". The above line should be left as-is.

Cheers,
Peter

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-slave.c +0 -5
  * Copyright (C) 2014 by Wolfram Sang <[email protected]>
- *
- * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
- * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
- * Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
- * any later version.
  */
 
 #include <dt-bindings/i2c/i2c.h>