KVM: arm64: PMUv3 Event Counter Tests
v2 cover KVM: arm64: PMUv3 Event Counter Tests
This series implements tests exercising the PMUv3 event counters. It tests both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Overflow interrupts also are checked. Those tests only are written for arm64.
It allowed to reveal some issues related to SW_INCR implementation (esp. related to 64-bit implementation), some problems related to 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions and consistency of enabled states of odd and event counters (See [1]).
Overflow interrupt testing relies of one patch from Andre ("arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions") to enable the PPI 23, coming from "arm: gic: Test SPIs and interrupt groups"
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11234975/). Drew kindly provided "arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s".
All PMU tests can be launched with:
./run_tests.sh -g pmu
Tests also can be launched individually. For example:
./arm-run arm/pmu.flat -append 'chained-sw-incr'
With KVM:
- chain-promotion and chained-sw-incr are known to be failing.
[1] proposed a fix.
- On TX2, I have some random failures due to MEM_ACCESS event measured with a great disparity. This is not observed on other machines I have access to.
With TCG:
- all new tests are skipped
The series can be found at:
https://github.com/eauger/kut/tree/pmu_event_counters_v2
References:
[1] [PATCH 0/4] KVM/ARM: Misc PMU fixes
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm-arm/msg38886.html)
History:
- Took into account Andre's comments except I did not use cnbz in the mem_access_loop() and I did not use @loop directly. Those changes had side effects I cannot explain on the tests. Anyway I think this can be improved later on.
- removed [kvm-unit-tests PATCH 09/10] arm/arm64: gic:
Introduce setup_irq() helper
RFC -> v1:
- Use new report() proto
- Style cleanup
- do not warn about ARM spec recommendations
- add a comment about PMCEID0/1 splits
Andre Przywara (1):
arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions
Andrew Jones (1):
arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s
Eric Auger (7):
arm: pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter
arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct
arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
arm: pmu: Test chained counter
arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions
arm: pmu: Test overflow interrupts
arm/pmu.c | 786 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- arm/unittests.cfg | 55 ++- lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h | 2 + lib/arm/asm/gic.h | 9 + lib/arm/gic.c | 90 +++++ lib/arm64/asm/sysreg.h | 11 + 6 files changed, 936 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v2 1/9 arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s
From: Andrew Jones <[email protected]>
Sometimes we need to test access to system registers which are missing assembler mnemonics.
--- lib/arm64/asm/sysreg.h | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
lib/arm64/asm/sysreg.h +11 -0
@@ -38,6 +38,17 @@ asm volatile("msr " xstr(r) ", %x0" : : "rZ" (__val)); \ } while (0) +#define read_sysreg_s (r) ({ \ + u64 __val; \ + asm volatile("mrs_s %0, " xstr(r) : "=r" (__val)); \ + __val; \ +}) + +#define write_sysreg_s (v, r) do { \ + u64 __val = (u64)v; \ + asm volatile("msr_s " xstr(r) ", %x0" : : "rZ" (__val));\ +} while (0) + asm(" .irp num,0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30\n" " .equ .L__reg_num_x\\num, \\num\n"
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v2 2/9 arm: pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter
In reply to Eric AugerAs we intend to introduce more PMU tests, let's add a sub-test parameter that will allow to categorize them. Existing tests are in the cycle-counter category.
--- arm/pmu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- arm/unittests.cfg | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
arm/pmu.c +15 -9
@@ -287,22 +287,28 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {int cpi =0 ; -if (argc >1 ) - cpi =atol (argv[1 ]); -if (!pmu_probe ()) {printf ("No PMU found, test skipped...\n" );return report_summary (); } +if (argc <2 ) +report_abort ("no test specified" ); +report_prefix_push ("pmu" ); -report (check_pmcr (),"Control register" ); -report (check_cycles_increase (), -"Monotonically increasing cycle count" ); -report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" ); - -pmccntr64_test (); +if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"cycle-counter" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +if (argc >2 ) + cpi =atol (argv[2 ]); +report (check_pmcr (),"Control register" ); +report (check_cycles_increase (), +"Monotonically increasing cycle count" ); +report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" ); +pmccntr64_test (); + }else { +report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); + }return report_summary (); }
arm/unittests.cfg +4 -3
@@ -61,21 +61,22 @@ file = pci-test.flat groups = pci # Test PMU support -[pmu] +[pmu-cycle-counter] file = pmu.flat groups = pmu +extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat -#extra_params = -icount 0 -append '1' +#extra_params = -icount 0 -append 'cycle-counter 1' #groups = pmu #accel = tcg # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=256 #[pmu-tcg-icount-256] #file = pmu.flat -#extra_params = -icount 8 -append '256' +#extra_params = -icount 8 -append 'cycle-counter 256' #groups = pmu #accel = tcg
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] arm: pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:25:03 +0100 Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote:
As we intend to introduce more PMU tests, let's add a sub-test parameter that will allow to categorize them. Existing tests are in the cycle-counter category.
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>
Did you change anything? Or just forgot to add my previous R-b?
Anyway,
Cheers,
Andre
Quoted 77 lines
--- arm/pmu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- arm/unittests.cfg | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)arm/pmu.c +15
-9@@ -287,22 +287,28 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {int cpi =0 ; -if (argc >1 ) - cpi =atol (argv[1 ]); -if (!pmu_probe ()) {printf ("No PMU found, test skipped...\n" );return report_summary (); } +if (argc <2 ) +report_abort ("no test specified" ); +report_prefix_push ("pmu" ); -report (check_pmcr (),"Control register" ); -report (check_cycles_increase (), -"Monotonically increasing cycle count" ); -report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" ); - -pmccntr64_test (); +if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"cycle-counter" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +if (argc >2 ) + cpi =atol (argv[2 ]); +report (check_pmcr (),"Control register" ); +report (check_cycles_increase (), +"Monotonically increasing cycle count" ); +report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" ); +pmccntr64_test (); + }else { +report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); + }return report_summary (); }arm/unittests.cfg +4
-3@@ -61,21 +61,22 @@ file = pci-test.flat groups = pci # Test PMU support -[pmu] +[pmu-cycle-counter] file = pmu.flat groups = pmu +extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat -#extra_params = -icount 0 -append '1' +#extra_params = -icount 0 -append 'cycle-counter 1' #groups = pmu #accel = tcg # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=256 #[pmu-tcg-icount-256] #file = pmu.flat -#extra_params = -icount 8 -append '256' +#extra_params = -icount 8 -append 'cycle-counter 256' #groups = pmu #accel = tcg
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/9] arm: pmu: Let pmu tests take a sub-test parameter
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 36 lines · Eric Auger
As we intend to introduce more PMU tests, let's add a sub-test parameter that will allow to categorize them. Existing tests are in the cycle-counter category.
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>--- arm/pmu.c | 24 +++++++++++++++--------- arm/unittests.cfg | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)arm/pmu.c +3
-8@@ -287,22 +287,28 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {int cpi =0 ; -if (argc >1 ) - cpi =atol (argv[1 ]); -if (!pmu_probe ()) {printf ("No PMU found, test skipped...\n" );return report_summary (); } +if (argc <2 ) +report_abort ("no test specified" ); +report_prefix_push ("pmu" ); -report (check_pmcr (),"Control register" ); -report (check_cycles_increase (), -"Monotonically increasing cycle count" ); -report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" ); -
arm/pmu.c int main(int argc, char *argv[]) · line 308
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-1-pmccntr64_test (); +if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"cycle-counter" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +if (argc >2 ) + cpi =atol (argv[2 ]); +report (check_pmcr (),"Control register" ); +report (check_cycles_increase (), +"Monotonically increasing cycle count" ); +report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" ); +pmccntr64_test ();
Could put a report_prefix_pop here to balance things.
Quoted 40 lines
arm/pmu.c +3
-0+ }else { +report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); + }return report_summary (); }arm/unittests.cfg +4
-3@@ -61,21 +61,22 @@ file = pci-test.flat groups = pci # Test PMU support -[pmu] +[pmu-cycle-counter] file = pmu.flat groups = pmu +extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat -#extra_params = -icount 0 -append '1' +#extra_params = -icount 0 -append 'cycle-counter 1' #groups = pmu #accel = tcg # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=256 #[pmu-tcg-icount-256] #file = pmu.flat -#extra_params = -icount 8 -append '256' +#extra_params = -icount 8 -append 'cycle-counter 256' #groups = pmu #accel = tcgSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
PATCH v2 3/9 arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct
In reply to Eric AugerThis struct aims at storing information potentially used by all tests such as the pmu version, the read-only part of the PMCR, the number of implemented event counters, ...
--- arm/pmu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
arm/pmu.c +25 -5
@@ -33,7 +33,14 @@#define NR_SAMPLES 10 -static unsigned int pmu_version; +struct pmu { +unsigned int version; +unsigned int nb_implemented_counters; +uint32_t pmcr_ro; +}; + +static struct pmu pmu; +#if defined(__arm__)#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf
@@ -265,7 +272,7 @@ static bool check_cpi(int cpi)static void pmccntr64_test (void ) {#ifdef __arm__ -if (pmu_version ==0x3 ) { +if (pmu.version ==0x3 ) {if (ERRATA (9e3f7a296940 )) {write_sysreg (0xdead ,PMCCNTR64 );report (read_sysreg (PMCCNTR64 ) ==0xdead ,"pmccntr64" );
@@ -278,9 +285,22 @@ static void pmccntr64_test(void)/* Return FALSE if no PMU found, otherwise return TRUE */ static bool pmu_probe (void ) { - pmu_version =get_pmu_version (); -report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu_version); -return pmu_version !=0 && pmu_version !=0xf ; +uint32_t pmcr; + + pmu.version =get_pmu_version (); +report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu.version); + +if (pmu.version ==0 || pmu.version ==0xF ) +return false; + + pmcr =get_pmcr (); + pmu.pmcr_ro = pmcr &0xFFFFFF80 ; + pmu.nb_implemented_counters = + (pmcr >>PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT ) &PMU_PMCR_N_MASK ; +report_info ("Implements %d event counters" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); + +return true; }int main (int argc,char *argv[])
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:25:04 +0100 Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote:
This struct aims at storing information potentially used by all tests such as the pmu version, the read-only part of the PMCR, the number of implemented event counters, ...
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>
As I stated already in v1:
Cheers,
Andre
Quoted 59 lines
--- arm/pmu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)arm/pmu.c +25
-5@@ -33,7 +33,14 @@#define NR_SAMPLES 10 -static unsigned int pmu_version; +struct pmu { +unsigned int version; +unsigned int nb_implemented_counters; +uint32_t pmcr_ro; +}; + +static struct pmu pmu; +#if defined(__arm__)#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf@@ -265,7 +272,7 @@ static bool check_cpi(int cpi)static void pmccntr64_test (void ) {#ifdef __arm__ -if (pmu_version ==0x3 ) { +if (pmu.version ==0x3 ) {if (ERRATA (9e3f7a296940 )) {write_sysreg (0xdead ,PMCCNTR64 );report (read_sysreg (PMCCNTR64 ) ==0xdead ,"pmccntr64" );@@ -278,9 +285,22 @@ static void pmccntr64_test(void)/* Return FALSE if no PMU found, otherwise return TRUE */ static bool pmu_probe (void ) { - pmu_version =get_pmu_version (); -report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu_version); -return pmu_version !=0 && pmu_version !=0xf ; +uint32_t pmcr; + + pmu.version =get_pmu_version (); +report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu.version); + +if (pmu.version ==0 || pmu.version ==0xF ) +return false; + + pmcr =get_pmcr (); + pmu.pmcr_ro = pmcr &0xFFFFFF80 ; + pmu.nb_implemented_counters = + (pmcr >>PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT ) &PMU_PMCR_N_MASK ; +report_info ("Implements %d event counters" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); + +return true; }int main (int argc,char *argv[])
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct
Hi Andre,
Quoted 10 lines · Andre Przywara
Quoted 5 lines · On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:25:04 +0100 Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote:
This struct aims at storing information potentially used by all tests such as the pmu version, the read-only part of the PMCR, the number of implemented event counters, ...
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>As I stated already in v1:
Hum that's an oversight. Please forgive for the 2 R-b's I have forgotten.
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 68 lines
Reviewed-by Andre Przywara <[email protected]>Cheers,
AndreQuoted 59 lines
--- arm/pmu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)arm/pmu.c +25
-5@@ -33,7 +33,14 @@#define NR_SAMPLES 10 -static unsigned int pmu_version; +struct pmu { +unsigned int version; +unsigned int nb_implemented_counters; +uint32_t pmcr_ro; +}; + +static struct pmu pmu; +#if defined(__arm__)#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf@@ -265,7 +272,7 @@ static bool check_cpi(int cpi)static void pmccntr64_test (void ) {#ifdef __arm__ -if (pmu_version ==0x3 ) { +if (pmu.version ==0x3 ) {if (ERRATA (9e3f7a296940 )) {write_sysreg (0xdead ,PMCCNTR64 );report (read_sysreg (PMCCNTR64 ) ==0xdead ,"pmccntr64" );@@ -278,9 +285,22 @@ static void pmccntr64_test(void)/* Return FALSE if no PMU found, otherwise return TRUE */ static bool pmu_probe (void ) { - pmu_version =get_pmu_version (); -report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu_version); -return pmu_version !=0 && pmu_version !=0xf ; +uint32_t pmcr; + + pmu.version =get_pmu_version (); +report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu.version); + +if (pmu.version ==0 || pmu.version ==0xF ) +return false; + + pmcr =get_pmcr (); + pmu.pmcr_ro = pmcr &0xFFFFFF80 ; + pmu.nb_implemented_counters = + (pmcr >>PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT ) &PMU_PMCR_N_MASK ; +report_info ("Implements %d event counters" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); + +return true; }int main (int argc,char *argv[])
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/9] arm: pmu: Add a pmu struct
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 45 lines · Eric Auger
This struct aims at storing information potentially used by all tests such as the pmu version, the read-only part of the PMCR, the number of implemented event counters, ...
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>--- arm/pmu.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)arm/pmu.c +9
-5@@ -33,7 +33,14 @@#define NR_SAMPLES 10 -static unsigned int pmu_version; +struct pmu { +unsigned int version; +unsigned int nb_implemented_counters; +uint32_t pmcr_ro; +}; + +static struct pmu pmu; +#if defined(__arm__)#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 24#define ID_DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf@@ -265,7 +272,7 @@ static bool check_cpi(int cpi)static void pmccntr64_test (void ) {#ifdef __arm__ -if (pmu_version ==0x3 ) { +if (pmu.version ==0x3 ) {if (ERRATA (9e3f7a296940 )) {write_sysreg (0xdead ,PMCCNTR64 );report (read_sysreg (PMCCNTR64 ) ==0xdead ,"pmccntr64" );@@ -278,9 +285,22 @@ static void pmccntr64_test(void)/* Return FALSE if no PMU found, otherwise return TRUE */ static bool pmu_probe (void ) { - pmu_version =get_pmu_version (); -report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu_version); -return pmu_version !=0 && pmu_version !=0xf ;
arm/pmu.c static void pmccntr64_test(void) · line 297
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+uint32_t pmcr; + + pmu.version =get_pmu_version (); +report_info ("PMU version: %d" , pmu.version); + +if (pmu.version ==0 || pmu.version ==0xF ) +return false; + + pmcr =get_pmcr (); + pmu.pmcr_ro = pmcr &0xFFFFFF80 ;
I'd prefer we spell out what fields we consider RO. Also this mask doesn't seem right to me. BIT[7] isn't RO, is it?
Quoted 13 lines
arm/pmu.c +6
-0+ pmu.nb_implemented_counters = + (pmcr >>PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT ) &PMU_PMCR_N_MASK ; +report_info ("Implements %d event counters" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); + +return true; }int main (int argc,char *argv[])Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v2 4/9 arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
In reply to Eric AugerIf event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (SW_INCR, CPU_CYCLES, either INST_RETIRED or INST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.
Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither INST_RETIRED or INST_SPEC are supported.
---
v1 -> v2:
- fix is_event_supported()
- fix boolean condition for PMU v4
- fix PMCEID0 definition
RFC ->v1:
- add a comment to explain the PMCEID0/1 splits
--- arm/pmu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 +++++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
arm/pmu.c +62 -0
@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0) : "cc"); } + +/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ +static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf
@@ -139,6 +143,61 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr) : "cc"); } + +#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) + +static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported; +uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe +* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F ) + reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 ); +else if (n >=0x4000 && n <=0x403F ) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); +else +abort (); + + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F )); + +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n); +return supported; +} + +static void test_event_introspection (void ) +{ +bool required_events; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */ + required_events =is_event_supported (0x0 , true)/* SW_INCR */ && +is_event_supported (0x11 , true)/* CPU_CYCLES */ && + (is_event_supported (0x8 , true)/* INST_RETIRED */ || +is_event_supported (0x1B , true)/* INST_PREC */ ); + +if (pmu.version ==0x4 ) { +/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */ + required_events = required_events && +is_event_supported (0x23 , true) && +is_event_supported (0x24 , true); + } + +report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); +} +#endif /*
@@ -326,6 +385,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) "Monotonically increasing cycle count");report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" );pmccntr64_test (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_introspection (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }
arm/unittests.cfg +6 -0
@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ file = pmu.flat groups = pmu extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' +[pmu-event-introspection] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Auger
If event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (
SW_INCR,CPU_CYCLES, eitherINST_RETIREDorINST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither
INST_RETIREDorINST_SPECare supported.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 157
Quoted 9 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0+static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported; +uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe
"respectively"
Quoted 24 lines
arm/pmu.c +24
-0+* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F ) + reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 ); +else if (n >=0x4000 && n <=0x403F ) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); +else +abort (); + + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F )); + +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n); +return supported; +} + +static void test_event_introspection (void ) +{ +bool required_events; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." );
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 191
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+return ; + } + +/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */ + required_events =is_event_supported (0x0 , true)/* SW_INCR */ && +is_event_supported (0x11 , true)/* CPU_CYCLES */ && + (is_event_supported (0x8 , true)/* INST_RETIRED */ || +is_event_supported (0x1B , true)/* INST_PREC */ ); + +if (pmu.version ==0x4 ) {
This condition will only test for v8.1-required events if the PMU is exactly 8.1, so you lose coverage if the implementation happens to support ARMv8.4-PMU. Hopefully you have already bailed out for "ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer == 0xf" which means "non-standard IMPDEF PMU", in which case you can just check >= 0x4.
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 201
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0+/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */ + required_events = required_events && +is_event_supported (0x23 , true) && + is_event_supported(0x24, true); + } + +report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); +} +#endif
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
Hi Peter,
Quoted 63 lines · Peter Maydell
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Auger
If event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (
SW_INCR,CPU_CYCLES, eitherINST_RETIREDorINST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither
INST_RETIREDorINST_SPECare supported.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 157
Quoted 9 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0+static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported; +uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe "respectively"
Quoted 32 lines
arm/pmu.c +32
-0+* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F ) + reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 ); +else if (n >=0x4000 && n <=0x403F ) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); +else +abort (); + + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F )); + +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n); +return supported; +} + +static void test_event_introspection (void ) +{ +bool required_events; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */ + required_events =is_event_supported (0x0 , true)/* SW_INCR */ && +is_event_supported (0x11 , true)/* CPU_CYCLES */ && + (is_event_supported (0x8 , true)/* INST_RETIRED */ || +is_event_supported (0x1B , true)/* INST_PREC */ );
Quoted 8 lines
Review
Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +2
-0+ + if (pmu.version == 0x4) {This condition will only test for v8.1-required events if the PMU is exactly 8.1, so you lose coverage if the implementation happens to support ARMv8.4-PMU. Hopefully you have already bailed out for "ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.PMUVer ==
0xf" which means "non-standard IMPDEF PMU", in which case you can just check >=0x4.
OK thanks
Eric
Quoted 15 lines
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 201
Quoted 11 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0+/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */ + required_events = required_events && +is_event_supported (0x23 , true) && + is_event_supported(0x24, true); + } + +report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); +} +#endif thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 30 lines · Eric Auger
If event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (
SW_INCR,CPU_CYCLES, eitherINST_RETIREDorINST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither
INST_RETIREDorINST_SPECare supported.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>arm/pmu.c +14
-0+static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported; +uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe +* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F )
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 172
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 ); + else if (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); + else +abort (); + + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F )); + +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n);
As with satisfy_prerequisites(), printing this with "0x%x" would probably be more helpful to most users.
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
Hi Peter,
Quoted 36 lines · Peter Maydell
Quoted 35 lines · Eric Auger
If event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (
SW_INCR,CPU_CYCLES, eitherINST_RETIREDorINST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither
INST_RETIREDorINST_SPECare supported.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>arm/pmu.c +19
-0+static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported; +uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe +* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F ) + reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 ); +else if (n >=0x4000 && n <=0x403F ) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); +else +abort ();
Quoted 8 lines
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 172
Quoted 5 lines
arm/pmu.c +5
-0+ + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F )); + +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n);As with
satisfy_prerequisites(), printing this with "0x%x" would probably be more helpful to most users.
OK
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 4 lines
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
In reply to Eric AugerOn Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:25:05 +0100
Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Quoted 83 lines
If event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (
SW_INCR,CPU_CYCLES, eitherINST_RETIREDorINST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither
INST_RETIREDorINST_SPECare supported.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixis_event_supported()
- fix boolean condition for PMU v4
- fix PMCEID0 definitionRFC ->v1:
- add a comment to explain the PMCEID0/1 splits--- arm/pmu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 +++++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +40
-0@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0) : "cc"); } + +/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ +static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf@@ -139,6 +143,61 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr) : "cc"); } + +#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) + +static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported; +uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe +* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F ) + reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 ); +else if (n >=0x4000 && n <=0x403F ) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); +else +abort (); + + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F )); + +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n); +return supported; +} + +static void test_event_introspection (void ) +{ +bool required_events; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." );
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 191
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+return ; + } + +/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */ + required_events =is_event_supported (0x0 , true)/* SW_INCR */ && +is_event_supported (0x11 , true)/* CPU_CYCLES */ && + (is_event_supported (0x8 , true)/* INST_RETIRED */ || +is_event_supported (0x1B , true)/* INST_PREC */ ); + +if (pmu.version ==0x4 ) {
I think this should read >= 0x4, since those requirements are stacked on top of the prevision revision's requirements. Even better with some symbolic name.
With that fixed:
Cheers,
Andre
Quoted 39 lines
arm/pmu.c +12
-0+/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */ + required_events = required_events && +is_event_supported (0x23 , true) && + is_event_supported(0x24, true); + } + +report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); +} +#endif /* @@ -326,6 +385,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) "Monotonically increasing cycle count");report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" );pmccntr64_test (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_introspection (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +6
-0@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ file = pmu.flat groups = pmu extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' +[pmu-event-introspection] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 55 lines · Eric Auger
If event counters are implemented check the common events required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
Some are unconditionally required (
SW_INCR,CPU_CYCLES, eitherINST_RETIREDorINST_SPEC). Some others only are required if the implementation implements some other features.Check those wich are unconditionally required.
This test currently fails on TCG as neither
INST_RETIREDorINST_SPECare supported.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixis_event_supported()
- fix boolean condition for PMU v4
- fix PMCEID0 definitionRFC ->v1:
- add a comment to explain the PMCEID0/1 splits--- arm/pmu.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 +++++ 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +12
-0@@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0) : "cc"); } + +/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ +static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_MASK 0xf@@ -139,6 +143,61 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) : [pmcr] "r" (pmcr) : "cc"); } + +#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) + +static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) +{ +uint64_t pmceid0 =read_sysreg (pmceid0_el0); +uint64_t pmceid1 =read_sysreg_s (PMCEID1_EL0 ); +bool supported;
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 163
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+uint64_t reg; + +/* +* The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe +* event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High +* 32-bits describe support for extended events +* starting at 0x4000, using the same split. +*/ +if (n >=0x0 && n <=0x3F ) + reg = (pmceid0 &0xFFFFFFFF ) | ((pmceid1 &0xFFFFFFFF ) <<32 );
Maybe it's time to add
#define upper_32_bits(n) ((u32)(((n) >> 16) >> 16)) #define lower_32_bits(n) ((u32)(n))
to the kvm-unit-tests framework.
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 167
Quoted 4 lines
arm/pmu.c +4
-0+else if (n >=0x4000 && n <=0x403F ) + reg = (pmceid0 >>32 ) | ((pmceid1 >>32 ) <<32 ); +else +abort ();
assert(0) ensure we get a dump_stack() (although I haven't fixed dump_stack for arm64 yet...). Could also do the assert first
assert((n >= 0x0 && n <= 0x3F) || (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F)) if (n <= 0x3F)
...
else
...
What about defines for these hex numbers?
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 169
Quoted 2 lines
arm/pmu.c +2
-0+ + supported = reg & (1UL << (n &0x3F ));
^ extra space
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ +if (!supported && warn) +report_info ("event %d is not supported" , n); +return supported; +} + +static void test_event_introspection (void ) +{ +bool required_events; +
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 189
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */ + required_events =is_event_supported (0x0 , true)/* SW_INCR */ && +is_event_supported (0x11 , true)/* CPU_CYCLES */ && + (is_event_supported (0x8 , true)/* INST_RETIRED */ || +is_event_supported (0x1B , true)/* INST_PREC */ );
If defines are created then the comments can go away
required_events = is_event_supported(SW_INCR, true) && is_event_supported(CPU_CYCLES, true) && (is_event_supported(INST_RETIRED, true) || is_event_supported(INST_PREC, true));
Quoted 15 lines
arm/pmu.c +11
-0+ +if (pmu.version ==0x4 ) { +/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */ + required_events = required_events && +is_event_supported (0x23 , true) && +is_event_supported (0x24 , true); + } + + report(required_events, "Check required events are implemented"); +} +#endif /*
arm/pmu.c int main(int argc, char *argv[]) · line 390
Quoted 6 lines
arm/pmu.c +3
-0@@ -326,6 +385,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) "Monotonically increasing cycle count");report (check_cpi (cpi),"Cycle/instruction ratio" );pmccntr64_test (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_introspection ();
prefix pop
Quoted 24 lines
arm/pmu.c +0
-0}else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +6
-0@@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ file = pmu.flat groups = pmu extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0' +[pmu-event-introspection] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
Thanks,
drew
PATCH v2 5/9 arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
In reply to Eric AugerAdds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp. CPU_CYCLES and INST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: counts MEM_ACCESS event on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.
---
v1 -> v2:
- fix PMCNTENSET_EL0 and PMCNTENCLR_EL0 op0
- print PMEVTYPER SH
- properly clobber used regs and add "cc"
- simplify mem_access_loop
--- arm/pmu.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 18 ++++ 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+)
arm/pmu.c +269 -0
@@ -18,9 +18,15 @@#include "asm/barrier.h" #include "asm/sysreg.h" #include "asm/processor.h" +#include <bitops.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> #define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0) +#define PMU_PMCR_P (1 << 1)#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2) +#define PMU_PMCR_D (1 << 3) +#define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4) +#define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f
@@ -104,6 +110,9 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {} +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {} +static void test_mem_access (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
@@ -145,6 +154,33 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) }#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) +#define PMCNTENSET_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 1) +#define PMCNTENCLR_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 2) + +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL1 (1 << 31) +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 (1 << 30) + +#define regn_el0 (__reg, __n) __reg ## __n ## _el0 +#define write_regn (__reg, __n, __val) \ + write_sysreg((__val), __reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define read_regn (__reg, __n) \ + read_sysreg(__reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define print_pmevtyper (__s, __n) do { \ + uint32_t val; \ + val = read_regn(pmevtyper, __n);\ + report_info("%s pmevtyper%d=0x%x, eventcount=0x%x (p=%ld, u=%ld nsk=%ld, nsu=%ld, nsh=%ld m=%ld, mt=%ld, sh=%ld)", \ + (__s), (__n), val, val & 0xFFFF, \ + (BIT_MASK(31) & val) >> 31, \ + (BIT_MASK(30) & val) >> 30, \ + (BIT_MASK(29) & val) >> 29, \ + (BIT_MASK(28) & val) >> 28, \ + (BIT_MASK(27) & val) >> 27, \ + (BIT_MASK(26) & val) >> 26, \ + (BIT_MASK(25) & val) >> 25); \ + (BIT_MASK(24) & val) >> 24); \ + } while (0)static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) {
@@ -198,6 +234,230 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void) report(required_events, "Check required events are implemented"); } +/* +* Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate +* for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses +* to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure +* pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed +* in the controlled block. Loads @loop times the data at @address into x9. +*/ +static void mem_access_loop (void *addr,int loop,uint32_t pmcr) +{ +asmvolatile ( +" msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n" +" isb\n" +" mov x10, %[loop]\n" +"1: sub x10, x10, #1\n" +" ldr x9, [%[addr]]\n" +" cmp x10, #0x0\n" +" b.gt 1b\n" +" msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n" +" isb\n" + : + : [addr]"r" (addr), [pmcr]"r" (pmcr), [loop]"r" (loop) + :"x9" ,"x10" ,"cc" ); +} + +static void pmu_reset (void ) +{ +/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +/* Disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +/* clear overflow reg */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +isb (); +} + +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) +{ +int i; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +pmu_reset (); + +/* +* Test setting through PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER and PMEVTYPERn read, +* select counter 0 +*/ +write_sysreg (1 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (0xEA ,PMXEVTYPER_EL0 ); +write_sysreg (0xdeadbeef ,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report ((read_regn (pmevtyper,1 ) &0xFFF ) ==0xEA , +"PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER/PMEVTYPERn" ); +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0xdeadbeef ), +"PMESELR/PMXEVCNTR/PMEVCNTRn" ); + +/* try to configure an unsupported event within the range [0x0, 0x3F] */ +for (i =0 ; i <=0x3F ; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (i, false)) +break ; + } +if (i >0x3F ) { +report_skip ("pmevtyper: all events within [0x0, 0x3F] are supported" ); +return ; + } + +/* select counter 0 */ +write_sysreg (0 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (i,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +/* read the counter value */ +read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report (read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ) == i, +"read of a counter programmed with unsupported event" ); + +} + +static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]); +return false; + } + } +return true; +} + +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) +{ +uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask; +uint32_t counter_mask; +uint32_t events[] = { +0x11 ,/* CPU_CYCLES */ +0x8 ,/* INST_RETIRED */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + + implemented_counter_mask =BIT (pmu.nb_implemented_counters) -1 ; + non_implemented_counter_mask = ~(BIT (31 ) | implemented_counter_mask); + counter_mask = implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask; + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); + +/* disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report (!read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ) && !read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ), +"pmcntenclr: disable all counters" ); + +/* +* clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement +* through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1. +*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +isb (); +report (get_pmcr () == (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC ),"pmcr: reset counters" ); + +/* Preset counter #0 to 0xFFFFFFF0 to trigger an overflow interrupt */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"counter #0 preset to 0xFFFFFFF0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"counter #1 is 0" ); + +/* +* Enable all implemented counters and also attempt to enable +* not supported counters. Counting still is disabled by !PMCR.E +*/ +write_sysreg_s (counter_mask,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* check only those implemented are enabled */ +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) == implemented_counter_mask), +"pmcntenset: enabled implemented_counters" ); + +/* Disable all counters but counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (~0x3 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==0x3 ), +"pmcntenset: just enabled #0 and #1" ); + +/* clear overflow register */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check overflow reg is 0" ); + +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters*/ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +report (!read_sysreg (pmintenclr_el1), +"pmintenclr_el1=0, all interrupts disabled" ); + +/* enable overflow interrupts on all event counters */ +write_sysreg (implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask, + pmintenset_el1); +report (read_sysreg (pmintenset_el1) == implemented_counter_mask, +"overflow interrupts enabled on all implemented counters" ); + +/* Set PMCR.E, execute asm code and unset PMCR.E */ +precise_instrs_loop (20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report_info ("counter #0 is 0x%lx (CPU_CYCLES)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is 0x%lx (INST_RETIRED)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) &0x1 , +"check overflow happened on #0 only" ); +} + +static void test_mem_access (void ) +{ +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +uint32_t events[] = { +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +/* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */ +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) >=20 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"Ran 20 mem accesses" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFFA ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x3 , +"Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters" ); +report_info ("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /*
@@ -388,6 +648,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_event_introspection (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-counter-config" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_counter_config (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"basic-event-count" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_basic_event_count (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_mem_access (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }
arm/unittests.cfg +18 -0
@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' +[pmu-event-counter-config] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-counter-config' + +[pmu-basic-event-count] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'basic-event-count' + +[pmu-mem-access] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'mem-access' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
Quoted 18 lines · Eric Auger
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>arm/pmu.c +4
-0+static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; +
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 332
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]);
Event numbers are given in hex in the Arm ARM and also specified in hex in your test source code. I think it would be more helpful if the message here used "0x%x", to save the reader having to do the decimal-to-hex conversion to find the event in the spec or the test case.
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
Hi Peter,
Quoted 27 lines · Peter Maydell
Quoted 26 lines · Eric Auger
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>arm/pmu.c +12
-0+static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) {
Quoted 8 lines
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 332
Quoted 2 lines
arm/pmu.c +2
-0+report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]);Event numbers are given in hex in the Arm ARM and also specified in hex in your test source code. I think it would be more helpful if the message here used "0x%x", to save the reader having to do the decimal-to-hex conversion to find the event in the spec or the test case.
Sure I will fix that
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 4 lines
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 56 lines · On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:25:06 +0100 Eric Auger <[email protected]> wrote:
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixPMCNTENSET_EL0andPMCNTENCLR_EL0op0
- print PMEVTYPER SH
- properly clobber used regs and add "cc"
- simplifymem_access_loop--- arm/pmu.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 18 ++++ 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +9
-0@@ -18,9 +18,15 @@#include "asm/barrier.h" #include "asm/sysreg.h" #include "asm/processor.h" +#include <bitops.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> #define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0) +#define PMU_PMCR_P (1 << 1)#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2) +#define PMU_PMCR_D (1 << 3) +#define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4) +#define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f@@ -104,6 +110,9 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {} +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {} +static void test_mem_access (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 161
Quoted 8 lines
arm/pmu.c +5
-0@@ -145,6 +154,33 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) }#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) +#define PMCNTENSET_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 1) +#define PMCNTENCLR_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 2) + +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL1 (1 << 31) +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 (1 << 30)
Please use 1U << or BIT() ;-)
Rest looks OK now:
Quoted 301 lines
arm/pmu.c +255
-0+ +#define regn_el0 (__reg, __n) __reg ## __n ## _el0 +#define write_regn (__reg, __n, __val) \ + write_sysreg((__val), __reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define read_regn (__reg, __n) \ + read_sysreg(__reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define print_pmevtyper (__s, __n) do { \ + uint32_t val; \ + val = read_regn(pmevtyper, __n);\ + report_info("%s pmevtyper%d=0x%x, eventcount=0x%x (p=%ld, u=%ld nsk=%ld, nsu=%ld, nsh=%ld m=%ld, mt=%ld, sh=%ld)", \ + (__s), (__n), val, val & 0xFFFF, \ + (BIT_MASK(31) & val) >> 31, \ + (BIT_MASK(30) & val) >> 30, \ + (BIT_MASK(29) & val) >> 29, \ + (BIT_MASK(28) & val) >> 28, \ + (BIT_MASK(27) & val) >> 27, \ + (BIT_MASK(26) & val) >> 26, \ + (BIT_MASK(25) & val) >> 25); \ + (BIT_MASK(24) & val) >> 24); \ + } while (0)static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) {@@ -198,6 +234,230 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void) report(required_events, "Check required events are implemented"); } +/* +* Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate +* for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses +* to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure +* pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed +* in the controlled block. Loads @loop times the data at @address into x9. +*/ +static void mem_access_loop (void *addr,int loop,uint32_t pmcr) +{ +asmvolatile ( +" msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n" +" isb\n" +" mov x10, %[loop]\n" +"1: sub x10, x10, #1\n" +" ldr x9, [%[addr]]\n" +" cmp x10, #0x0\n" +" b.gt 1b\n" +" msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n" +" isb\n" + : + : [addr]"r" (addr), [pmcr]"r" (pmcr), [loop]"r" (loop) + :"x9" ,"x10" ,"cc" ); +} + +static void pmu_reset (void ) +{ +/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +/* Disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +/* clear overflow reg */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +isb (); +} + +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) +{ +int i; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +pmu_reset (); + +/* +* Test setting through PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER and PMEVTYPERn read, +* select counter 0 +*/ +write_sysreg (1 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (0xEA ,PMXEVTYPER_EL0 ); +write_sysreg (0xdeadbeef ,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report ((read_regn (pmevtyper,1 ) &0xFFF ) ==0xEA , +"PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER/PMEVTYPERn" ); +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0xdeadbeef ), +"PMESELR/PMXEVCNTR/PMEVCNTRn" ); + +/* try to configure an unsupported event within the range [0x0, 0x3F] */ +for (i =0 ; i <=0x3F ; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (i, false)) +break ; + } +if (i >0x3F ) { +report_skip ("pmevtyper: all events within [0x0, 0x3F] are supported" ); +return ; + } + +/* select counter 0 */ +write_sysreg (0 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (i,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +/* read the counter value */ +read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report (read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ) == i, +"read of a counter programmed with unsupported event" ); + +} + +static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]); +return false; + } + } +return true; +} + +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) +{ +uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask; +uint32_t counter_mask; +uint32_t events[] = { +0x11 ,/* CPU_CYCLES */ +0x8 ,/* INST_RETIRED */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + + implemented_counter_mask =BIT (pmu.nb_implemented_counters) -1 ; + non_implemented_counter_mask = ~(BIT (31 ) | implemented_counter_mask); + counter_mask = implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask; + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); + +/* disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report (!read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ) && !read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ), +"pmcntenclr: disable all counters" ); + +/* +* clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement +* through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1. +*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +isb (); +report (get_pmcr () == (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC ),"pmcr: reset counters" ); + +/* Preset counter #0 to 0xFFFFFFF0 to trigger an overflow interrupt */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"counter #0 preset to 0xFFFFFFF0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"counter #1 is 0" ); + +/* +* Enable all implemented counters and also attempt to enable +* not supported counters. Counting still is disabled by !PMCR.E +*/ +write_sysreg_s (counter_mask,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* check only those implemented are enabled */ +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) == implemented_counter_mask), +"pmcntenset: enabled implemented_counters" ); + +/* Disable all counters but counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (~0x3 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==0x3 ), +"pmcntenset: just enabled #0 and #1" ); + +/* clear overflow register */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check overflow reg is 0" ); + +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters*/ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +report (!read_sysreg (pmintenclr_el1), +"pmintenclr_el1=0, all interrupts disabled" ); + +/* enable overflow interrupts on all event counters */ +write_sysreg (implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask, + pmintenset_el1); +report (read_sysreg (pmintenset_el1) == implemented_counter_mask, +"overflow interrupts enabled on all implemented counters" ); + +/* Set PMCR.E, execute asm code and unset PMCR.E */ +precise_instrs_loop (20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report_info ("counter #0 is 0x%lx (CPU_CYCLES)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is 0x%lx (INST_RETIRED)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) &0x1 , +"check overflow happened on #0 only" ); +} + +static void test_mem_access (void ) +{ +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +uint32_t events[] = { +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +/* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */ +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) >=20 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"Ran 20 mem accesses" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFFA ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x3 , +"Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters" ); +report_info ("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /* @@ -388,6 +648,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_event_introspection (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-counter-config" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_counter_config (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"basic-event-count" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_basic_event_count (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_mem_access (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +18
-0@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' +[pmu-event-counter-config] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-counter-config' + +[pmu-basic-event-count] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'basic-event-count' + +[pmu-mem-access] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'mem-access' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 61 lines · Eric Auger
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixPMCNTENSET_EL0andPMCNTENCLR_EL0op0
- print PMEVTYPER SH
- properly clobber used regs and add "cc"
- simplifymem_access_loop--- arm/pmu.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 18 ++++ 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +11
-0@@ -18,9 +18,15 @@#include "asm/barrier.h" #include "asm/sysreg.h" #include "asm/processor.h" +#include <bitops.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> #define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0) +#define PMU_PMCR_P (1 << 1)#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2) +#define PMU_PMCR_D (1 << 3) +#define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4) +#define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f@@ -104,6 +110,9 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {} +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {} +static void test_mem_access (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -145,6 +154,33 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) }#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) +#define PMCNTENSET_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 1) +#define PMCNTENCLR_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 2)
arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 168
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL1 (1 << 31) +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 (1 << 30) + +#define regn_el0 (__reg, __n) __reg ## __n ## _el0 +#define write_regn (__reg, __n, __val) \ + write_sysreg((__val), __reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define read_regn (__reg, __n) \ + read_sysreg(__reg ## __n ## _el0)
You can delete regn_el0() since you don't use it anyway.
The el0 should probably be in the macro names,
write_regn_el0()read_regn_el0()
Also they could go in lib/arm64/asm/sysreg.h
Quoted 27 lines
arm/pmu.c +20
-0+ +#define print_pmevtyper (__s, __n) do { \ + uint32_t val; \ + val = read_regn(pmevtyper, __n);\ + report_info("%s pmevtyper%d=0x%x, eventcount=0x%x (p=%ld, u=%ld nsk=%ld, nsu=%ld, nsh=%ld m=%ld, mt=%ld, sh=%ld)", \ + (__s), (__n), val, val & 0xFFFF, \ + (BIT_MASK(31) & val) >> 31, \ + (BIT_MASK(30) & val) >> 30, \ + (BIT_MASK(29) & val) >> 29, \ + (BIT_MASK(28) & val) >> 28, \ + (BIT_MASK(27) & val) >> 27, \ + (BIT_MASK(26) & val) >> 26, \ + (BIT_MASK(25) & val) >> 25); \ + (BIT_MASK(24) & val) >> 24); \ + } while (0)static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) {@@ -198,6 +234,230 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void)report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); } +/* +* Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate +* for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses +* to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure +* pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 251
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+* in the controlled block. Loads @loop times the data at @address into x9. +*/ +static void mem_access_loop (void *addr,int loop,uint32_t pmcr) +{ +asmvolatile ( +" msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n" +" isb\n" +" mov x10, %[loop]\n" +"1: sub x10, x10, #1\n" + " ldr x9, [%[addr]]\n"
indent is wrong for line above
Quoted 85 lines
arm/pmu.c +85
-0+" cmp x10, #0x0\n" +" b.gt 1b\n" +" msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n" +" isb\n" + : + : [addr] "r" (addr), [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [loop] "r" (loop) + : "x9", "x10", "cc"); +} + +static void pmu_reset(void) +{ +/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +/* Disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +/* clear overflow reg */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +isb (); +} + +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) +{ +int i; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +pmu_reset (); + +/* +* Test setting through PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER and PMEVTYPERn read, +* select counter 0 +*/ +write_sysreg (1 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (0xEA ,PMXEVTYPER_EL0 ); +write_sysreg (0xdeadbeef ,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report ((read_regn (pmevtyper,1 ) &0xFFF ) ==0xEA , +"PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER/PMEVTYPERn" ); +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0xdeadbeef ), +"PMESELR/PMXEVCNTR/PMEVCNTRn" ); + +/* try to configure an unsupported event within the range [0x0, 0x3F] */ +for (i =0 ; i <=0x3F ; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (i, false)) +break ; + } +if (i >0x3F ) { +report_skip ("pmevtyper: all events within [0x0, 0x3F] are supported" ); +return ; + } + +/* select counter 0 */ +write_sysreg (0 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (i,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +/* read the counter value */ +read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report (read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ) == i, +"read of a counter programmed with unsupported event" ); + +} + +static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]); +return false; + } + } +return true;
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 346
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+} + +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) +{ +uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask; +uint32_t counter_mask; +uint32_t events[] = { +0x11 ,/* CPU_CYCLES */ +0x8 ,/* INST_RETIRED */ + };
#define CPU_CYCLES 0x11
#define INST_RETIRED 0x8
then no need for the comments and ...
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 356
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + + implemented_counter_mask =BIT (pmu.nb_implemented_counters) -1 ; + non_implemented_counter_mask = ~(BIT (31 ) | implemented_counter_mask); + counter_mask = implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask; + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 );
... here we can see what we're doing more clearing using the defines instead of array members.
Quoted 23 lines
arm/pmu.c +23
-0+ +/* disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report (!read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ) && !read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ), +"pmcntenclr: disable all counters" ); + +/* +* clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement +* through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1. +*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +isb (); +report (get_pmcr () == (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC ),"pmcr: reset counters" ); + +/* Preset counter #0 to 0xFFFFFFF0 to trigger an overflow interrupt */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"counter #0 preset to 0xFFFFFFF0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"counter #1 is 0" ); + +/* +* Enable all implemented counters and also attempt to enable +* not supported counters. Counting still is disabled by !PMCR.E
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 389
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+*/ +write_sysreg_s (counter_mask,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* check only those implemented are enabled */ +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) == implemented_counter_mask), +"pmcntenset: enabled implemented_counters" ); + +/* Disable all counters but counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (~0x3 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 );
First time you've used ~ to define a mask. I prefer this to all the 0xFFF..'s, but I prefer consistency and defines even more.
Quoted 29 lines
arm/pmu.c +29
-0+report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==0x3 ), +"pmcntenset: just enabled #0 and #1" ); + +/* clear overflow register */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check overflow reg is 0" ); + +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters*/ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +report (!read_sysreg (pmintenclr_el1), +"pmintenclr_el1=0, all interrupts disabled" ); + +/* enable overflow interrupts on all event counters */ +write_sysreg (implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask, + pmintenset_el1); +report (read_sysreg (pmintenset_el1) == implemented_counter_mask, +"overflow interrupts enabled on all implemented counters" ); + +/* Set PMCR.E, execute asm code and unset PMCR.E */ +precise_instrs_loop (20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report_info ("counter #0 is 0x%lx (CPU_CYCLES)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is 0x%lx (INST_RETIRED)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) & 0x1,
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 428
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ "check overflow happened on #0 only"); +} + +static void test_mem_access (void ) +{ +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +uint32_t events[] = { +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ + };
#define MEM_ACCESS 0x13
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 430
Quoted 2 lines
arm/pmu.c +2
-0+ +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events)))
No need to check the same event twice. Just call satisfy_prerequisites with ((uint32_t []){ MEM_ACCESS }, 1)
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 436
Quoted 6 lines
arm/pmu.c +6
-0+return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 );
Same comment on using defines rather than array members.
Quoted 30 lines
arm/pmu.c +24
-0+write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +/* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */ +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) >=20 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"Ran 20 mem accesses" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFFA ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x3 , +"Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters" ); +report_info ("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), + read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /* @@ -388,6 +648,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);
arm/pmu.c int main(int argc, char *argv[]) · line 659
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0test_event_introspection (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-counter-config" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_counter_config (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"basic-event-count" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_basic_event_count (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_mem_access ();
missing the pops. I know they're not necessary since we finish the tests afterwards, but the universe must stay balanced. Where there's a yin, we should put a yang.
Quoted 36 lines
arm/pmu.c +0
-0}else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +18
-0@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' +[pmu-event-counter-config] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-counter-config' + +[pmu-basic-event-count] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'basic-event-count' + +[pmu-mem-access] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'mem-access' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
I only skimmed this looking for style/framework issues. I'd prefer more defines in general to all the hex, but I won't insist on that.
Thanks,
drew
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
Hi Drew,
Quoted 316 lines · Andrew Jones
Quoted 61 lines · Eric Auger
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixPMCNTENSET_EL0andPMCNTENCLR_EL0op0
- print PMEVTYPER SH
- properly clobber used regs and add "cc"
- simplifymem_access_loop--- arm/pmu.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 18 ++++ 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +11
-0@@ -18,9 +18,15 @@#include "asm/barrier.h" #include "asm/sysreg.h" #include "asm/processor.h" +#include <bitops.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> #define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0) +#define PMU_PMCR_P (1 << 1)#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2) +#define PMU_PMCR_D (1 << 3) +#define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4) +#define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f@@ -104,6 +110,9 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {} +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {} +static void test_mem_access (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -145,6 +154,33 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) }#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) +#define PMCNTENSET_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 1) +#define PMCNTENCLR_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 2)arm/pmu.c static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) · line 168
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL1 (1 << 31) +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 (1 << 30) + +#define regn_el0 (__reg, __n) __reg ## __n ## _el0 +#define write_regn (__reg, __n, __val) \ + write_sysreg((__val), __reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define read_regn (__reg, __n) \ + read_sysreg(__reg ## __n ## _el0)You can delete
regn_el0()since you don't use it anyway.The el0 should probably be in the macro names,
write_regn_el0()read_regn_el0()Also they could go in
lib/arm64/asm/sysreg.hQuoted 27 lines
arm/pmu.c +20
-0+ +#define print_pmevtyper (__s, __n) do { \ + uint32_t val; \ + val = read_regn(pmevtyper, __n);\ + report_info("%s pmevtyper%d=0x%x, eventcount=0x%x (p=%ld, u=%ld nsk=%ld, nsu=%ld, nsh=%ld m=%ld, mt=%ld, sh=%ld)", \ + (__s), (__n), val, val & 0xFFFF, \ + (BIT_MASK(31) & val) >> 31, \ + (BIT_MASK(30) & val) >> 30, \ + (BIT_MASK(29) & val) >> 29, \ + (BIT_MASK(28) & val) >> 28, \ + (BIT_MASK(27) & val) >> 27, \ + (BIT_MASK(26) & val) >> 26, \ + (BIT_MASK(25) & val) >> 25); \ + (BIT_MASK(24) & val) >> 24); \ + } while (0)static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) {@@ -198,6 +234,230 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void)report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); } +/* +* Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate +* for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses +* to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure +* pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 251
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+* in the controlled block. Loads @loop times the data at @address into x9. +*/ +static void mem_access_loop (void *addr,int loop,uint32_t pmcr) +{ +asmvolatile ( +" msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n" +" isb\n" +" mov x10, %[loop]\n" +"1: sub x10, x10, #1\n" + " ldr x9, [%[addr]]\n"indent is wrong for line above
Quoted 85 lines
arm/pmu.c +85
-0+" cmp x10, #0x0\n" +" b.gt 1b\n" +" msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n" +" isb\n" + : + : [addr] "r" (addr), [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [loop] "r" (loop) + : "x9", "x10", "cc"); +} + +static void pmu_reset(void) +{ +/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +/* Disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +/* clear overflow reg */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +isb (); +} + +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) +{ +int i; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +pmu_reset (); + +/* +* Test setting through PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER and PMEVTYPERn read, +* select counter 0 +*/ +write_sysreg (1 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (0xEA ,PMXEVTYPER_EL0 ); +write_sysreg (0xdeadbeef ,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report ((read_regn (pmevtyper,1 ) &0xFFF ) ==0xEA , +"PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER/PMEVTYPERn" ); +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0xdeadbeef ), +"PMESELR/PMXEVCNTR/PMEVCNTRn" ); + +/* try to configure an unsupported event within the range [0x0, 0x3F] */ +for (i =0 ; i <=0x3F ; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (i, false)) +break ; + } +if (i >0x3F ) { +report_skip ("pmevtyper: all events within [0x0, 0x3F] are supported" ); +return ; + } + +/* select counter 0 */ +write_sysreg (0 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (i,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +/* read the counter value */ +read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report (read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ) == i, +"read of a counter programmed with unsupported event" ); + +} + +static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]); +return false; + } + } +return true;arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 346
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+} + +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) +{ +uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask; +uint32_t counter_mask; +uint32_t events[] = { +0x11 ,/* CPU_CYCLES */ +0x8 ,/* INST_RETIRED */ + };#define
CPU_CYCLES0x11
#defineINST_RETIRED0x8then no need for the comments and ...
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 356
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + + implemented_counter_mask =BIT (pmu.nb_implemented_counters) -1 ; + non_implemented_counter_mask = ~(BIT (31 ) | implemented_counter_mask); + counter_mask = implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask; + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 );... here we can see what we're doing more clearing using the defines instead of array members.
Quoted 23 lines
arm/pmu.c +23
-0+ +/* disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report (!read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ) && !read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ), +"pmcntenclr: disable all counters" ); + +/* +* clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement +* through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1. +*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +isb (); +report (get_pmcr () == (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC ),"pmcr: reset counters" ); + +/* Preset counter #0 to 0xFFFFFFF0 to trigger an overflow interrupt */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"counter #0 preset to 0xFFFFFFF0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"counter #1 is 0" ); + +/* +* Enable all implemented counters and also attempt to enable +* not supported counters. Counting still is disabled by !PMCR.E arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 389
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+*/ +write_sysreg_s (counter_mask,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* check only those implemented are enabled */ +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) == implemented_counter_mask), +"pmcntenset: enabled implemented_counters" ); + +/* Disable all counters but counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (~0x3 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 );First time you've used ~ to define a mask. I prefer this to all the 0xFFF..'s, but I prefer consistency and defines even more.
Quoted 29 lines
arm/pmu.c +29
-0+report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==0x3 ), +"pmcntenset: just enabled #0 and #1" ); + +/* clear overflow register */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check overflow reg is 0" ); + +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters*/ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +report (!read_sysreg (pmintenclr_el1), +"pmintenclr_el1=0, all interrupts disabled" ); + +/* enable overflow interrupts on all event counters */ +write_sysreg (implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask, + pmintenset_el1); +report (read_sysreg (pmintenset_el1) == implemented_counter_mask, +"overflow interrupts enabled on all implemented counters" ); + +/* Set PMCR.E, execute asm code and unset PMCR.E */ +precise_instrs_loop (20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report_info ("counter #0 is 0x%lx (CPU_CYCLES)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is 0x%lx (INST_RETIRED)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + report(read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0) & 0x1,arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 428
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ "check overflow happened on #0 only"); +} + +static void test_mem_access (void ) +{ +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +uint32_t events[] = { +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ + };#define
MEM_ACCESS0x13
Quoted 5 lines
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 430
Quoted 2 lines
arm/pmu.c +2
-0+ +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events)))No need to check the same event twice. Just call
satisfy_prerequisiteswith ((uint32_t[]){MEM_ACCESS}, 1)
satisfy_prerequisites also test the number of implemented counters match the ARRAY_SIZE.
In Practice most of my tests use 2 counters. I could skip the tests if we don't have 2 counters.
But well ...
Eric
Quoted 98 lines
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 436
Quoted 7 lines
arm/pmu.c +6
-0+return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 );Same comment on using defines rather than array members.
Quoted 30 lines
arm/pmu.c +24
-0+write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +/* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */ +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) >=20 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"Ran 20 mem accesses" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFFA ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x3 , +"Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters" ); +report_info ("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), + read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /* @@ -388,6 +648,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);arm/pmu.c int main(int argc, char *argv[]) · line 659
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0test_event_introspection (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-counter-config" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_counter_config (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"basic-event-count" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_basic_event_count (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_mem_access ();missing the pops. I know they're not necessary since we finish the tests afterwards, but the universe must stay balanced. Where there's a yin, we should put a yang.
Quoted 36 lines
arm/pmu.c +0
-0}else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +18
-0@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' +[pmu-event-counter-config] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-counter-config' + +[pmu-basic-event-count] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'basic-event-count' + +[pmu-mem-access] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'mem-access' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1I only skimmed this looking for style/framework issues. I'd prefer more defines in general to all the hex, but I won't insist on that.
Thanks,
drew
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 118 lines · Eric Auger
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixPMCNTENSET_EL0andPMCNTENCLR_EL0op0
- print PMEVTYPER SH
- properly clobber used regs and add "cc"
- simplifymem_access_loop--- arm/pmu.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 18 ++++ 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +61
-0@@ -18,9 +18,15 @@#include "asm/barrier.h" #include "asm/sysreg.h" #include "asm/processor.h" +#include <bitops.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> #define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0) +#define PMU_PMCR_P (1 << 1)#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2) +#define PMU_PMCR_D (1 << 3) +#define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4) +#define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f@@ -104,6 +110,9 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {} +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {} +static void test_mem_access (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -145,6 +154,33 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) }#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) +#define PMCNTENSET_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 1) +#define PMCNTENCLR_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 2) + +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL1 (1 << 31) +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 (1 << 30) + +#define regn_el0 (__reg, __n) __reg ## __n ## _el0 +#define write_regn (__reg, __n, __val) \ + write_sysreg((__val), __reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define read_regn (__reg, __n) \ + read_sysreg(__reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define print_pmevtyper (__s, __n) do { \ + uint32_t val; \ + val = read_regn(pmevtyper, __n);\ + report_info("%s pmevtyper%d=0x%x, eventcount=0x%x (p=%ld, u=%ld nsk=%ld, nsu=%ld, nsh=%ld m=%ld, mt=%ld, sh=%ld)", \ + (__s), (__n), val, val & 0xFFFF, \ + (BIT_MASK(31) & val) >> 31, \ + (BIT_MASK(30) & val) >> 30, \ + (BIT_MASK(29) & val) >> 29, \ + (BIT_MASK(28) & val) >> 28, \ + (BIT_MASK(27) & val) >> 27, \ + (BIT_MASK(26) & val) >> 26, \ + (BIT_MASK(25) & val) >> 25); \ + (BIT_MASK(24) & val) >> 24); \ + } while (0)static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) {@@ -198,6 +234,230 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void)report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); } +/* +* Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate +* for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses +* to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure +* pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed +* in the controlled block. Loads @loop times the data at @address into x9. +*/ +static void mem_access_loop (void *addr,int loop,uint32_t pmcr) +{ +asmvolatile ( +" msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n" +" isb\n" +" mov x10, %[loop]\n" +"1: sub x10, x10, #1\n" +" ldr x9, [%[addr]]\n" +" cmp x10, #0x0\n" +" b.gt 1b\n" +" msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n" +" isb\n" + : + : [addr]"r" (addr), [pmcr]"r" (pmcr), [loop]"r" (loop) + :"x9" ,"x10" ,"cc" ); +} + +static void pmu_reset (void )
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 271
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+{ +/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +/* Disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +/* clear overflow reg */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +isb ();
Is there a test we can do here to ensure the PMU was succesfully reset and assert if not? Reset is a critical part of each test prep, so we should be sure it has been done.
Quoted 241 lines
arm/pmu.c +198
-0+} + +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) +{ +int i; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +pmu_reset (); + +/* +* Test setting through PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER and PMEVTYPERn read, +* select counter 0 +*/ +write_sysreg (1 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (0xEA ,PMXEVTYPER_EL0 ); +write_sysreg (0xdeadbeef ,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report ((read_regn (pmevtyper,1 ) &0xFFF ) ==0xEA , +"PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER/PMEVTYPERn" ); +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0xdeadbeef ), +"PMESELR/PMXEVCNTR/PMEVCNTRn" ); + +/* try to configure an unsupported event within the range [0x0, 0x3F] */ +for (i =0 ; i <=0x3F ; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (i, false)) +break ; + } +if (i >0x3F ) { +report_skip ("pmevtyper: all events within [0x0, 0x3F] are supported" ); +return ; + } + +/* select counter 0 */ +write_sysreg (0 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (i,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +/* read the counter value */ +read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report (read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ) == i, +"read of a counter programmed with unsupported event" ); + +} + +static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]); +return false; + } + } +return true; +} + +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) +{ +uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask; +uint32_t counter_mask; +uint32_t events[] = { +0x11 ,/* CPU_CYCLES */ +0x8 ,/* INST_RETIRED */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + + implemented_counter_mask =BIT (pmu.nb_implemented_counters) -1 ; + non_implemented_counter_mask = ~(BIT (31 ) | implemented_counter_mask); + counter_mask = implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask; + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); + +/* disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report (!read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ) && !read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ), +"pmcntenclr: disable all counters" ); + +/* +* clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement +* through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1. +*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +isb (); +report (get_pmcr () == (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC ),"pmcr: reset counters" ); + +/* Preset counter #0 to 0xFFFFFFF0 to trigger an overflow interrupt */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"counter #0 preset to 0xFFFFFFF0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"counter #1 is 0" ); + +/* +* Enable all implemented counters and also attempt to enable +* not supported counters. Counting still is disabled by !PMCR.E +*/ +write_sysreg_s (counter_mask,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* check only those implemented are enabled */ +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) == implemented_counter_mask), +"pmcntenset: enabled implemented_counters" ); + +/* Disable all counters but counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (~0x3 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==0x3 ), +"pmcntenset: just enabled #0 and #1" ); + +/* clear overflow register */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check overflow reg is 0" ); + +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters*/ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +report (!read_sysreg (pmintenclr_el1), +"pmintenclr_el1=0, all interrupts disabled" ); + +/* enable overflow interrupts on all event counters */ +write_sysreg (implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask, + pmintenset_el1); +report (read_sysreg (pmintenset_el1) == implemented_counter_mask, +"overflow interrupts enabled on all implemented counters" ); + +/* Set PMCR.E, execute asm code and unset PMCR.E */ +precise_instrs_loop (20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report_info ("counter #0 is 0x%lx (CPU_CYCLES)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is 0x%lx (INST_RETIRED)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) &0x1 , +"check overflow happened on #0 only" ); +} + +static void test_mem_access (void ) +{ +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +uint32_t events[] = { +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +/* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */ +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) >=20 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"Ran 20 mem accesses" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFFA ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x3 , +"Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters" ); +report_info ("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /* @@ -388,6 +648,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_event_introspection (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-counter-config" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_counter_config (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"basic-event-count" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_basic_event_count (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_mem_access (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +18
-0@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' +[pmu-event-counter-config] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-counter-config' + +[pmu-basic-event-count] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'basic-event-count' + +[pmu-mem-access] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'mem-access' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 5/9] arm: pmu: Basic event counter Tests
Hi Drew,
Quoted 125 lines · Andrew Jones
Quoted 124 lines · Eric Auger
Adds the following tests:
- event-counter-config: test event counter configuration
- basic-event-count:
- programs counters #0 and #1 to count 2 required events (resp.CPU_CYCLESandINST_RETIRED). Counter #0 is preset to a value close enough to the 32b
overflow limit so that we check the overflow bit is set after the execution of the asm loop.
- mem-access: countsMEM_ACCESSevent on counters #0 and #1 with and without 32-bit overflow.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- fixPMCNTENSET_EL0andPMCNTENCLR_EL0op0
- print PMEVTYPER SH
- properly clobber used regs and add "cc"
- simplifymem_access_loop--- arm/pmu.c | 269 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 18 ++++ 2 files changed, 287 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +67
-0@@ -18,9 +18,15 @@#include "asm/barrier.h" #include "asm/sysreg.h" #include "asm/processor.h" +#include <bitops.h> +#include <asm/gic.h> #define PMU_PMCR_E (1 << 0) +#define PMU_PMCR_P (1 << 1)#define PMU_PMCR_C (1 << 2) +#define PMU_PMCR_D (1 << 3) +#define PMU_PMCR_X (1 << 4) +#define PMU_PMCR_DP (1 << 5)#define PMU_PMCR_LC (1 << 6)#define PMU_PMCR_N_SHIFT 11#define PMU_PMCR_N_MASK 0x1f@@ -104,6 +110,9 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */ static void test_event_introspection (void ) {} +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {} +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {} +static void test_mem_access (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -145,6 +154,33 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr) }#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7) +#define PMCNTENSET_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 1) +#define PMCNTENCLR_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 2) + +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL1 (1 << 31) +#define PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 (1 << 30) + +#define regn_el0 (__reg, __n) __reg ## __n ## _el0 +#define write_regn (__reg, __n, __val) \ + write_sysreg((__val), __reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define read_regn (__reg, __n) \ + read_sysreg(__reg ## __n ## _el0) + +#define print_pmevtyper (__s, __n) do { \ + uint32_t val; \ + val = read_regn(pmevtyper, __n);\ + report_info("%s pmevtyper%d=0x%x, eventcount=0x%x (p=%ld, u=%ld nsk=%ld, nsu=%ld, nsh=%ld m=%ld, mt=%ld, sh=%ld)", \ + (__s), (__n), val, val & 0xFFFF, \ + (BIT_MASK(31) & val) >> 31, \ + (BIT_MASK(30) & val) >> 30, \ + (BIT_MASK(29) & val) >> 29, \ + (BIT_MASK(28) & val) >> 28, \ + (BIT_MASK(27) & val) >> 27, \ + (BIT_MASK(26) & val) >> 26, \ + (BIT_MASK(25) & val) >> 25); \ + (BIT_MASK(24) & val) >> 24); \ + } while (0)static bool is_event_supported (uint32_t n,bool warn) {@@ -198,6 +234,230 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void)report (required_events,"Check required events are implemented" ); } +/* +* Extra instructions inserted by the compiler would be difficult to compensate +* for, so hand assemble everything between, and including, the PMCR accesses +* to start and stop counting. isb instructions are inserted to make sure +* pmccntr read after this function returns the exact instructions executed +* in the controlled block. Loads @loop times the data at @address into x9. +*/ +static void mem_access_loop (void *addr,int loop,uint32_t pmcr) +{ +asmvolatile ( +" msr pmcr_el0, %[pmcr]\n" +" isb\n" +" mov x10, %[loop]\n" +"1: sub x10, x10, #1\n" +" ldr x9, [%[addr]]\n" +" cmp x10, #0x0\n" +" b.gt 1b\n" +" msr pmcr_el0, xzr\n" +" isb\n" + : + : [addr]"r" (addr), [pmcr]"r" (pmcr), [loop]"r" (loop) + :"x9" ,"x10" ,"cc" ); +} + +static void pmu_reset (void ) +{ +/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +/* Disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +/* clear overflow reg */
Quoted 8 lines
arm/pmu.c static void test_event_introspection(void) · line 271
Quoted 4 lines
arm/pmu.c +4
-0+write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +isb ();Is there a test we can do here to ensure the PMU was succesfully reset and assert if not? Reset is a critical part of each test prep, so we should be sure it has been done.
we can read the regs we have just written (?). In case the reset were to fail, the subsequent test would fail anyway.
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 242 lines
Quoted 242 lines
arm/pmu.c +198
-0+} + +static void test_event_counter_config (void ) +{ +int i; + +if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) { +report_skip ("No event counter, skip ..." ); +return ; + } + +pmu_reset (); + +/* +* Test setting through PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER and PMEVTYPERn read, +* select counter 0 +*/ +write_sysreg (1 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (0xEA ,PMXEVTYPER_EL0 ); +write_sysreg (0xdeadbeef ,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report ((read_regn (pmevtyper,1 ) &0xFFF ) ==0xEA , +"PMESELR/PMXEVTYPER/PMEVTYPERn" ); +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0xdeadbeef ), +"PMESELR/PMXEVCNTR/PMEVCNTRn" ); + +/* try to configure an unsupported event within the range [0x0, 0x3F] */ +for (i =0 ; i <=0x3F ; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (i, false)) +break ; + } +if (i >0x3F ) { +report_skip ("pmevtyper: all events within [0x0, 0x3F] are supported" ); +return ; + } + +/* select counter 0 */ +write_sysreg (0 ,PMSELR_EL0 ); +/* program this counter to count unsupported event */ +write_sysreg (i,PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +/* read the counter value */ +read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ); +report (read_sysreg (PMXEVCNTR_EL0 ) == i, +"read of a counter programmed with unsupported event" ); + +} + +static bool satisfy_prerequisites (uint32_t *events,unsigned int nb_events) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu.nb_implemented_counters < nb_events) { +report_skip ("Skip test as number of counters is too small (%d)" , + pmu.nb_implemented_counters); +return false; + } + +for (i =0 ; i < nb_events; i++) { +if (!is_event_supported (events[i], false)) { +report_skip ("Skip test as event %d is not supported" , + events[i]); +return false; + } + } +return true; +} + +static void test_basic_event_count (void ) +{ +uint32_t implemented_counter_mask, non_implemented_counter_mask; +uint32_t counter_mask; +uint32_t events[] = { +0x11 ,/* CPU_CYCLES */ +0x8 ,/* INST_RETIRED */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + + implemented_counter_mask =BIT (pmu.nb_implemented_counters) -1 ; + non_implemented_counter_mask = ~(BIT (31 ) | implemented_counter_mask); + counter_mask = implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask; + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); + +/* disable all counters */ +write_sysreg_s (0xFFFFFFFF ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report (!read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ) && !read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ), +"pmcntenclr: disable all counters" ); + +/* +* clear cycle and all event counters and allow counter enablement +* through PMCNTENSET. LC is RES1. +*/ +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC |PMU_PMCR_C |PMU_PMCR_P ); +isb (); +report (get_pmcr () == (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_LC ),"pmcr: reset counters" ); + +/* Preset counter #0 to 0xFFFFFFF0 to trigger an overflow interrupt */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"counter #0 preset to 0xFFFFFFF0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"counter #1 is 0" ); + +/* +* Enable all implemented counters and also attempt to enable +* not supported counters. Counting still is disabled by !PMCR.E +*/ +write_sysreg_s (counter_mask,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* check only those implemented are enabled */ +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) == implemented_counter_mask), +"pmcntenset: enabled implemented_counters" ); + +/* Disable all counters but counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (~0x3 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +report ((read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENCLR_EL0 )) && + (read_sysreg_s (PMCNTENSET_EL0 ) ==0x3 ), +"pmcntenset: just enabled #0 and #1" ); + +/* clear overflow register */ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check overflow reg is 0" ); + +/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters*/ +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +report (!read_sysreg (pmintenclr_el1), +"pmintenclr_el1=0, all interrupts disabled" ); + +/* enable overflow interrupts on all event counters */ +write_sysreg (implemented_counter_mask | non_implemented_counter_mask, + pmintenset_el1); +report (read_sysreg (pmintenset_el1) == implemented_counter_mask, +"overflow interrupts enabled on all implemented counters" ); + +/* Set PMCR.E, execute asm code and unset PMCR.E */ +precise_instrs_loop (20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report_info ("counter #0 is 0x%lx (CPU_CYCLES)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is 0x%lx (INST_RETIRED)" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) &0x1 , +"check overflow happened on #0 only" ); +} + +static void test_mem_access (void ) +{ +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +uint32_t events[] = { +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ +0x13 ,/* MEM_ACCESS */ + }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("counter #1 is %ld (MEM_ACCESS)" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +/* We may measure more than 20 mem access depending on the core */ +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) >=20 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"Ran 20 mem accesses" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFFA ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x3 , +"Ran 20 mem accesses with expected overflows on both counters" ); +report_info ("cnt#0 = %ld cnt#1=%ld overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /* @@ -388,6 +648,15 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-introspection" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_event_introspection (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"event-counter-config" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_event_counter_config (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"basic-event-count" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_basic_event_count (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_mem_access (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +18
-0@@ -72,6 +72,24 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'event-introspection' +[pmu-event-counter-config] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'event-counter-config' + +[pmu-basic-event-count] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'basic-event-count' + +[pmu-mem-access] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'mem-access' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
PATCH v2 6/9 arm: pmu: Test chained counter
In reply to Eric AugerAdd 2 tests exercising chained counters. The first one uses CPU_CYCLES and the second one uses SW_INCR.
--- arm/pmu.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 12 +++++ 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)
arm/pmu.c +128 -0
@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void) {}static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {}static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {}static void test_mem_access (void ) {} +static void test_chained_counters (void ) {} +static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
@@ -458,6 +460,126 @@ static void test_mem_access(void) read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0)); } +static void test_chained_counters (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +/* enable counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +/* preset counter #0 at 0xFFFFFFF0 */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); + +precise_instrs_loop (22 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ,"CHAIN counter #1 incremented" ); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check no overflow is recorded" ); + +/* test 64b overflow */ + +pmu_reset (); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0x1 ); +precise_instrs_loop (22 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==2 ,"CHAIN counter #1 incremented" ); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check no overflow is recorded" ); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFFF ); + +precise_instrs_loop (22 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"CHAIN counter #1 wrapped" ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x2 , +"check no overflow is recorded" ); +} + +static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x0 /* SW_INCR */ ,0x0 /* SW_INCR */ }; +int i; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +/* enable counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* preset counter #0 at 0xFFFFFFF0 */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); + +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x1 , pmswinc_el0); + +report_info ("SW_INCR counter #0 has value %ld" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"PWSYNC does not increment if PMCR.E is unset" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==84 ,"counter #1 after + 100 SW_INCR" ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==100 , +"counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR" ); +report_info ("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=%ld #1=%ld" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x1 , +"overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR" ); + +/* 64b SW_INCR */ +pmu_reset (); + + events[1 ] =0x1E /* CHAIN */ ; +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) && (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ), +"overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN" ); +report_info ("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +/* 64b SW_INCR and overflow on CHAIN counter*/ +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFFF ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +report ((read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x2 ) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0 ) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==84 ), +"overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN" ); +report_info ("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +} +#endif /*
@@ -657,6 +779,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_mem_access (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chained-counters" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_chained_counters (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chained-sw-incr" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_chained_sw_incr (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }
arm/unittests.cfg +12 -0
@@ -90,6 +90,18 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'mem-access' +[pmu-chained-counters] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'chained-counters' + +[pmu-chained-sw-incr] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'chained-sw-incr' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arm: pmu: Test chained counter
arm/pmu.c static void test_mem_access(void) · line 508
Quoted 8 lines · Eric Auger
Add 2 tests exercising chained counters. The first one uses
CPU_CYCLESand the second one usesSW_INCR.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>arm/pmu.c +3
-0+static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x0 /* SW_INCR */ ,0x0 /* SW_INCR */ };
Cut-n-paste error? This test relies on the CHAIN event but it isn't present in this list of events to pass to satisfy_prerequisites(), so I suspect the second element should be "0x1e /* CHAIN */" ?
(This makes the test fail on QEMU TCG, because we don't implement CHAIN.)
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arm: pmu: Test chained counter
Hi Peter,
Quoted 5 lines · Peter Maydell
Quoted 4 lines · Eric Auger
Add 2 tests exercising chained counters. The first one uses
CPU_CYCLESand the second one usesSW_INCR.
Quoted 8 lines
arm/pmu.c static void test_mem_access(void) · line 508
Quoted 4 lines
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>arm/pmu.c +3
-0+static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x0 /* SW_INCR */ ,0x0 /* SW_INCR */ };Cut-n-paste error? This test relies on the CHAIN event but it isn't present in this list of events to pass to
satisfy_prerequisites(), so I suspect the second element should be "0x1e/* CHAIN */" ?
No that's not a cut-n-paste error. I may rename the test into test_sw_incr.
It starts by testing unchained SW_INCR.
chained SW_INCR testing start with
/* 64b SW_INCR */
Quoted 3 lines
(This makes the test fail on QEMU TCG, because we don't implement CHAIN.)
OK
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 4 lines
thanks
-- PMM
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 6/9] arm: pmu: Test chained counter
In reply to Eric AugerQuoted 189 lines · Eric Auger
Add 2 tests exercising chained counters. The first one uses
CPU_CYCLESand the second one usesSW_INCR.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>--- arm/pmu.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 12 +++++ 2 files changed, 140 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +128
-0@@ -113,6 +113,8 @@ static void test_event_introspection(void) {}static void test_event_counter_config (void ) {}static void test_basic_event_count (void ) {}static void test_mem_access (void ) {} +static void test_chained_counters (void ) {} +static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -458,6 +460,126 @@ static void test_mem_access(void) read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0)); } +static void test_chained_counters (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ }; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +/* enable counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +/* preset counter #0 at 0xFFFFFFF0 */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); + +precise_instrs_loop (22 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ,"CHAIN counter #1 incremented" ); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check no overflow is recorded" ); + +/* test 64b overflow */ + +pmu_reset (); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0x1 ); +precise_instrs_loop (22 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==2 ,"CHAIN counter #1 incremented" ); +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0),"check no overflow is recorded" ); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFFF ); + +precise_instrs_loop (22 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("overflow reg = 0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),"CHAIN counter #1 wrapped" ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x2 , +"check no overflow is recorded" ); +} + +static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x0 /* SW_INCR */ ,0x0 /* SW_INCR */ }; +int i; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +/* enable counters #0 and #1 */ +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +/* preset counter #0 at 0xFFFFFFF0 */ +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); + +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x1 , pmswinc_el0); + +report_info ("SW_INCR counter #0 has value %ld" ,read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==0xFFFFFFF0 , +"PWSYNC does not increment if PMCR.E is unset" ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); + +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==84 ,"counter #1 after + 100 SW_INCR" ); +report (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==100 , +"counter #0 after + 100 SW_INCR" ); +report_info ("counter values after 100 SW_INCR #0=%ld #1=%ld" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x1 , +"overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR" ); + +/* 64b SW_INCR */ +pmu_reset (); + + events[1 ] =0x1E /* CHAIN */ ; +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +report (!read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) && (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ), +"overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN" ); +report_info ("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +/* 64b SW_INCR and overflow on CHAIN counter*/ +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFFF ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +report ((read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x2 ) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==0 ) && + (read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ) ==84 ), +"overflow reg after 100 SW_INCR/CHAIN" ); +report_info ("overflow=0x%lx, #0=%ld #1=%ld" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +} +#endif /* @@ -657,6 +779,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"mem-access" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_mem_access (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chained-counters" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_chained_counters (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chained-sw-incr" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_chained_sw_incr (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +12
-0@@ -90,6 +90,18 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'mem-access' +[pmu-chained-counters] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'chained-counters' + +[pmu-chained-sw-incr] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'chained-sw-incr' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
Same comments as previous patch
Thanks,
drew
PATCH v2 7/9 arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions
In reply to Eric AugerTest configurations where we transit from 32b to 64b counters and conversely. Also tests configuration where chain counters are configured but only one counter is enabled.
--- arm/pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 142 insertions(+)
arm/pmu.c +136 -0
@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ static void test_basic_event_count(void) {}static void test_mem_access (void ) {}static void test_chained_counters (void ) {}static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) {} +static void test_chain_promotion (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
@@ -580,6 +581,138 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(void) read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1)); } +static void test_chain_promotion (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ }; +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +/* Only enable CHAIN counter */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x2 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ), +"chain counter not counting if even counter is disabled" ); + +/* Only enable even counter */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x1 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) && (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x1 ), +"odd counter did not increment on overflow if disabled" ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value %ld" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("CHAIN counter #1 has value %ld" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +report_info ("overflow counter %ld" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +/* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN enabled, +20 with CHAIN disabled */ +pmu_reset (); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +/* disable the CHAIN event */ +write_sysreg_s (0x2 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x1 , +"should have triggered an overflow on #0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +"CHAIN counter #1 shouldn't have incremented" ); + +/* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN disabled, +20 with CHAIN enabled */ + +pmu_reset (); +write_sysreg_s (0x1 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +isb (); +report_info ("counter #0 = 0x%lx, counter #1 = 0x%lx overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +/* enable the CHAIN event */ +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"CHAIN counter #1 should have incremented and no overflow expected" ); + +report_info ("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +/* start as MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES and move to CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 ,0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +/* 0 becomes CHAINED */ +write_sysreg_s (0x0 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0x0 ); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"CHAIN counter #1 should have incremented and no overflow expected" ); + +report_info ("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +/* start as CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS and move to MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 ,0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +write_sysreg_s (0x0 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==1 , +"overflow is expected on counter 0" ); +report_info ("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /*
@@ -785,6 +918,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chained-sw-incr" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_chained_sw_incr (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chain-promotion" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_chain_promotion (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }
arm/unittests.cfg +6 -0
@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'chained-sw-incr' +[pmu-chain-promotion] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'chain-promotion' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 7/9] arm: pmu: test 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions
Quoted 193 lines · Eric Auger
Test configurations where we transit from 32b to 64b counters and conversely. Also tests configuration where chain counters are configured but only one counter is enabled.
Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>--- arm/pmu.c | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 142 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +136
-0@@ -115,6 +115,7 @@ static void test_basic_event_count(void) {}static void test_mem_access (void ) {}static void test_chained_counters (void ) {}static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) {} +static void test_chain_promotion (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -580,6 +581,138 @@ static void test_chained_sw_incr(void) read_regn(pmevcntr, 0), read_regn(pmevcntr, 1)); } +static void test_chain_promotion (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ }; +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +/* Only enable CHAIN counter */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x2 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ), +"chain counter not counting if even counter is disabled" ); + +/* Only enable even counter */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x1 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) && (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x1 ), +"odd counter did not increment on overflow if disabled" ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value %ld" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report_info ("CHAIN counter #1 has value %ld" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); +report_info ("overflow counter %ld" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +/* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN enabled, +20 with CHAIN disabled */ +pmu_reset (); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +/* disable the CHAIN event */ +write_sysreg_s (0x2 ,PMCNTENCLR_EL0 ); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==0x1 , +"should have triggered an overflow on #0" ); +report (!read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +"CHAIN counter #1 shouldn't have incremented" ); + +/* start at 0xFFFFFFDC, +20 with CHAIN disabled, +20 with CHAIN enabled */ + +pmu_reset (); +write_sysreg_s (0x1 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +isb (); +report_info ("counter #0 = 0x%lx, counter #1 = 0x%lx overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +/* enable the CHAIN event */ +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"CHAIN counter #1 should have incremented and no overflow expected" ); + +report_info ("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +/* start as MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES and move to CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 ,0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +/* 0 becomes CHAINED */ +write_sysreg_s (0x0 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0x0 ); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("MEM_ACCESS counter #0 has value 0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 )); + +report ((read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ) ==1 ) && !read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0), +"CHAIN counter #1 should have incremented and no overflow expected" ); + +report_info ("CHAIN counter #1 = 0x%lx, overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ),read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); + +/* start as CHAIN/MEM_ACCESS and move to MEM_ACCESS/CPU_CYCLES */ +pmu_reset (); +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 ,0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x1E /* CHAIN */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFDC ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report_info ("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 )); + +write_sysreg_s (0x0 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 ,0x11 /* CPU_CYCLES */ |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); + +mem_access_loop (addr,20 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0) ==1 , +"overflow is expected on counter 0" ); +report_info ("counter #0=0x%lx, counter #1=0x%lx overflow=0x%lx" , +read_regn (pmevcntr,0 ),read_regn (pmevcntr,1 ), +read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +} +#endif /* @@ -785,6 +918,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chained-sw-incr" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_chained_sw_incr (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chain-promotion" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_chain_promotion (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +6
-0@@ -102,6 +102,12 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'chained-sw-incr' +[pmu-chain-promotion] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'chain-promotion' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
same comments as previous patches
Thanks,
drew
PATCH v2 8/9 arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions
In reply to Eric AugerFrom: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
A common theme when accessing per-IRQ parameters in the GIC distributor is to set fields of a certain bit width in a range of MMIO registers. Examples are the enabled status (one bit per IRQ), the level/edge configuration (2 bits per IRQ) or the priority (8 bits per IRQ).
Add a generic helper function which is able to mask and set the respective number of bits, given the IRQ number and the MMIO offset. Provide wrappers using this function to easily allow configuring an IRQ.
For now assume that private IRQ numbers always refer to the current CPU. In a GICv2 accessing the "other" private IRQs is not easily doable (the registers are banked per CPU on the same MMIO address), so we impose the same limitation on GICv3, even though those registers are not banked there anymore.
---
initialize reg
--- lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h | 2 + lib/arm/asm/gic.h | 9 +++++ lib/arm/gic.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)
lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h +2 -0
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@#define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1A (1U << 1)#define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1 (1U << 0) +#define GICD_IROUTER 0x6000 +/* Re-Distributor registers, offsets from RD_base */ #define GICR_TYPER 0x0008
lib/arm/asm/gic.h +9 -0
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#define GICD_IIDR 0x0008#define GICD_IGROUPR 0x0080#define GICD_ISENABLER 0x0100 +#define GICD_ICENABLER 0x0180#define GICD_ISPENDR 0x0200#define GICD_ICPENDR 0x0280#define GICD_ISACTIVER 0x0300
@@ -73,5 +74,13 @@ extern void gic_write_eoir(u32 irqstat);extern void gic_ipi_send_single (int irq,int cpu);extern void gic_ipi_send_mask (int irq,const cpumask_t *dest); +void gic_set_irq_bit (int irq,int offset); +void gic_enable_irq (int irq); +void gic_disable_irq (int irq); +void gic_set_irq_priority (int irq,u8 prio); +void gic_set_irq_target (int irq,int cpu); +void gic_set_irq_group (int irq,int group); +int gic_get_irq_group (int irq); +#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _ASMARM_GIC_H_ */
lib/arm/gic.c +90 -0
93 lines not on this page · raw message
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/9] arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Auger
From: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
A common theme when accessing per-IRQ parameters in the GIC distributor is to set fields of a certain bit width in a range of MMIO registers. Examples are the enabled status (one bit per IRQ), the level/edge configuration (2 bits per IRQ) or the priority (8 bits per IRQ).
Add a generic helper function which is able to mask and set the respective number of bits, given the IRQ number and the MMIO offset. Provide wrappers using this function to easily allow configuring an IRQ.
Quoted 7 lines
For now assume that private IRQ numbers always refer to the current CPU. In a GICv2 accessing the "other" private IRQs is not easily doable (the registers are banked per CPU on the same MMIO address), so we impose the same limitation on GICv3, even though those registers are not banked there anymore.
Signed-off-by Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
Missing Eric's s-b.
Quoted 151 lines
---
initialize reg
--- lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h | 2 + lib/arm/asm/gic.h | 9 +++++ lib/arm/gic.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h +2
-0@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@#define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1A (1U << 1)#define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1 (1U << 0) +#define GICD_IROUTER 0x6000 +/* Re-Distributor registers, offsets from RD_base */ #define GICR_TYPER 0x0008lib/arm/asm/gic.h +9
-0@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#define GICD_IIDR 0x0008#define GICD_IGROUPR 0x0080#define GICD_ISENABLER 0x0100 +#define GICD_ICENABLER 0x0180#define GICD_ISPENDR 0x0200#define GICD_ICPENDR 0x0280#define GICD_ISACTIVER 0x0300@@ -73,5 +74,13 @@ extern void gic_write_eoir(u32 irqstat);extern void gic_ipi_send_single (int irq,int cpu);extern void gic_ipi_send_mask (int irq,const cpumask_t *dest); +void gic_set_irq_bit (int irq,int offset); +void gic_enable_irq (int irq); +void gic_disable_irq (int irq); +void gic_set_irq_priority (int irq,u8 prio); +void gic_set_irq_target (int irq,int cpu); +void gic_set_irq_group (int irq,int group); +int gic_get_irq_group (int irq); +#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _ASMARM_GIC_H_ */ lib/arm/gic.c +90
-0@@ -146,3 +146,93 @@ void gic_ipi_send_mask(int irq, const cpumask_t *dest)assert (gic_common_ops && gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask); gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask (irq, dest); } + +enum gic_bit_access { +ACCESS_READ , +ACCESS_SET , +ACCESS_RMW +}; + +static u8 gic_masked_irq_bits (int irq,int offset,int bits,u8 value, +enum gic_bit_access access) +{ +void *base; +int split =32 / bits; +int shift = (irq % split) * bits; +u32 reg =0 , mask = ((1U << bits) -1 ) << shift; + +switch (gic_version ()) { +case 2 : + base =gicv2_dist_base (); +break ; +case 3 : +if (irq <32 ) + base =gicv3_sgi_base (); +else + base =gicv3_dist_base (); +break ; +default : +return 0 ; + } + base += offset + (irq / split) *4 ; + +switch (access) { +case ACCESS_READ : +return (readl (base) & mask) >> shift; +case ACCESS_SET : + reg =0 ; +break ; +case ACCESS_RMW : + reg =readl (base) & ~mask; +break ; + } + +writel (reg | ((u32 )value << shift), base); + +return 0 ; +} + +void gic_set_irq_bit (int irq,int offset) +{ +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq, offset,1 ,1 ,ACCESS_SET ); +} + +void gic_enable_irq (int irq) +{ +gic_set_irq_bit (irq,GICD_ISENABLER ); +} + +void gic_disable_irq (int irq) +{ +gic_set_irq_bit (irq,GICD_ICENABLER ); +} + +void gic_set_irq_priority (int irq,u8 prio) +{ +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_IPRIORITYR ,8 , prio,ACCESS_RMW ); +} + +void gic_set_irq_target (int irq,int cpu) +{ +if (irq <32 ) +return ; + +if (gic_version () ==2 ) { +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_ITARGETSR ,8 ,1U << cpu, +ACCESS_RMW ); + +return ; + } + +writeq (cpus[cpu],gicv3_dist_base () +GICD_IROUTER + irq *8 ); +} + +void gic_set_irq_group (int irq,int group) +{ +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_IGROUPR ,1 , group,ACCESS_RMW ); +} + +int gic_get_irq_group (int irq) +{ +return gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_IGROUPR ,1 ,0 ,ACCESS_READ ); +}Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
drew
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 8/9] arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions
Hi,
I'm going to reiterate the comments I posted on this exact same patch sent by Andre [1], and add a few new ones.
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg767690.html
Quoted 114 lines · Andrew Jones
Quoted 11 lines · Eric Auger
From: Andre Przywara <[email protected]>
A common theme when accessing per-IRQ parameters in the GIC distributor is to set fields of a certain bit width in a range of MMIO registers. Examples are the enabled status (one bit per IRQ), the level/edge configuration (2 bits per IRQ) or the priority (8 bits per IRQ).
Add a generic helper function which is able to mask and set the respective number of bits, given the IRQ number and the MMIO offset. Provide wrappers using this function to easily allow configuring an IRQ.
Quoted 7 lines
For now assume that private IRQ numbers always refer to the current CPU. In a GICv2 accessing the "other" private IRQs is not easily doable (the registers are banked per CPU on the same MMIO address), so we impose the same limitation on GICv3, even though those registers are not banked there anymore.
Signed-off-by Andre Przywara <[email protected]>Missing Eric's s-b.
Quoted 93 lines
---
initialize reg
--- lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h | 2 + lib/arm/asm/gic.h | 9 +++++ lib/arm/gic.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 3 files changed, 101 insertions(+)lib/arm/asm/gic-v3.h +2
-0@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@#define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1A (1U << 1)#define GICD_CTLR_ENABLE_G1 (1U << 0) +#define GICD_IROUTER 0x6000 +/* Re-Distributor registers, offsets from RD_base */ #define GICR_TYPER 0x0008lib/arm/asm/gic.h +9
-0@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@#define GICD_IIDR 0x0008#define GICD_IGROUPR 0x0080#define GICD_ISENABLER 0x0100 +#define GICD_ICENABLER 0x0180#define GICD_ISPENDR 0x0200#define GICD_ICPENDR 0x0280#define GICD_ISACTIVER 0x0300@@ -73,5 +74,13 @@ extern void gic_write_eoir(u32 irqstat);extern void gic_ipi_send_single (int irq,int cpu);extern void gic_ipi_send_mask (int irq,const cpumask_t *dest); +void gic_set_irq_bit (int irq,int offset); +void gic_enable_irq (int irq); +void gic_disable_irq (int irq); +void gic_set_irq_priority (int irq,u8 prio); +void gic_set_irq_target (int irq,int cpu); +void gic_set_irq_group (int irq,int group); +int gic_get_irq_group (int irq); +#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */ #endif /* _ASMARM_GIC_H_ */ lib/arm/gic.c +37
-0@@ -146,3 +146,93 @@ void gic_ipi_send_mask(int irq, const cpumask_t *dest)assert (gic_common_ops && gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask); gic_common_ops->ipi_send_mask (irq, dest); } + +enum gic_bit_access { +ACCESS_READ , +ACCESS_SET , +ACCESS_RMW +}; + +static u8 gic_masked_irq_bits (int irq,int offset,int bits,u8 value, +enum gic_bit_access access) +{ +void *base; +int split =32 / bits; +int shift = (irq % split) * bits; +u32 reg =0 , mask = ((1U << bits) -1 ) << shift; + +switch (gic_version ()) { +case 2 : + base =gicv2_dist_base (); +break ; +case 3 : +if (irq <32 ) + base =gicv3_sgi_base (); +else + base =gicv3_dist_base (); +break ; +default : +return 0 ; + } + base += offset + (irq / split) *4 ; + +switch (access) { +case ACCESS_READ : +return (readl (base) & mask) >> shift; +case ACCESS_SET : + reg =0 ; +break ; +case ACCESS_RMW :
Quoted 8 lines
lib/arm/gic.c void gic_ipi_send_mask(int irq, const cpumask_t *dest) · line 193
Quoted 8 lines
lib/arm/gic.c +8
-0+ reg =readl (base) & ~mask; +break ; + } + +writel (reg | ((u32 )value << shift), base); + +return 0 ; +}
This function looks a bit out of place:
- the function name has a verb in the past tense ('masked'), which makes me think it should return a bool, but the function actually performs an access to a GIC register.
- the return value is an u8, but it returns an u32 on a read, because readl returns an u32.
- the semantics of the function and the return value change based on the access parameter; worse yet, the return value on a write is completely ignored by the callers and the value parameter is ignored on reads.
And a few new niggles:
- the accessor functions are hard to read: git_masked_irq_bits(irq, offset, 1, 1, ACCESS_SET). What the 1's represent is not obvious without reading the gic_masked_irq_bits functions.
- Andrew introduced a function to check the IRQ state at the GIC level [2]. The function is clear and nice to read because it has no indirection. How about we follow this pattern for all the accessors below and we remove the calls to gic_masked_irq_bits entirely?
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg207073.html
Thanks,
Alex
Quoted 54 lines
Quoted 49 lines
lib/arm/gic.c +45
-0+ +void gic_set_irq_bit (int irq,int offset) +{ +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq, offset,1 ,1 ,ACCESS_SET ); +} + +void gic_enable_irq (int irq) +{ +gic_set_irq_bit (irq,GICD_ISENABLER ); +} + +void gic_disable_irq (int irq) +{ +gic_set_irq_bit (irq,GICD_ICENABLER ); +} + +void gic_set_irq_priority (int irq,u8 prio) +{ +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_IPRIORITYR ,8 , prio,ACCESS_RMW ); +} + +void gic_set_irq_target (int irq,int cpu) +{ +if (irq <32 ) +return ; + +if (gic_version () ==2 ) { +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_ITARGETSR ,8 ,1U << cpu, +ACCESS_RMW ); + +return ; + } + +writeq (cpus[cpu],gicv3_dist_base () +GICD_IROUTER + irq *8 ); +} + +void gic_set_irq_group (int irq,int group) +{ +gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_IGROUPR ,1 , group,ACCESS_RMW ); +} + +int gic_get_irq_group (int irq) +{ +return gic_masked_irq_bits (irq,GICD_IGROUPR ,1 ,0 ,ACCESS_READ ); +}Signature · 1 line
2.20.1Looks good to me.
Thanks,
drew
PATCH v2 9/9 arm: pmu: Test overflow interrupts
In reply to Eric AugerTest overflows for MEM_ACCESS and SW_INCR events. Also tests overflows with 64-bit events.
---
v1 -> v2:
- inline setup_irq() code
--- arm/pmu.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 143 insertions(+)
arm/pmu.c +137 -0
@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ struct pmu {uint32_t pmcr_ro; }; +struct pmu_stats { +unsigned long bitmap; +uint32_t interrupts[32 ]; +}; +static struct pmu pmu;#if defined(__arm__)
@@ -116,6 +121,7 @@ static void test_mem_access(void) {}static void test_chained_counters (void ) {}static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) {}static void test_chain_promotion (void ) {} +static void test_overflow_interrupt (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
@@ -261,6 +267,44 @@ asm volatile( : "x9", "x10", "cc"); } +static struct pmu_stats pmu_stats; + +static void irq_handler (struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +uint32_t irqstat, irqnr; + + irqstat =gic_read_iar (); + irqnr =gic_iar_irqnr (irqstat); +gic_write_eoir (irqstat); + +if (irqnr ==23 ) { +unsigned long overflows =read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0); +int i; + +report_info ("--> PMU overflow interrupt %d (counter bitmask 0x%lx)" , + irqnr, overflows); +for (i =0 ; i <32 ; i++) { +if (test_and_clear_bit (i, &overflows)) { + pmu_stats.interrupts[i]++; + pmu_stats.bitmap |=1 << i; + } + } +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); + }else { +report_info ("Unexpected interrupt: %d\n" , irqnr); + } +} + +static void pmu_reset_stats (void ) +{ +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <32 ; i++) + pmu_stats.interrupts[i] =0 ; + + pmu_stats.bitmap =0 ; +} +static void pmu_reset (void ) {/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/
@@ -271,6 +315,7 @@ static void pmu_reset(void)write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0);/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +pmu_reset_stats ();isb (); }
@@ -713,6 +758,95 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(void) read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0)); } +static bool expect_interrupts (uint32_t bitmap) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu_stats.bitmap ^ bitmap) +return false; + +for (i =0 ; i <32 ; i++) { +if (test_and_clear_bit (i, &pmu_stats.bitmap)) +if (pmu_stats.interrupts[i] !=1 ) +return false; + } +return true; +} + +static void test_overflow_interrupt (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ ,0x00 /* SW_INCR */ }; +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +int i; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +gic_enable_defaults (); +install_irq_handler (EL1H_IRQ , irq_handler); +local_irq_enable (); +gic_enable_irq (23 ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +isb (); + +/* interrupts are disabled */ + +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (expect_interrupts (0 ),"no overflow interrupt received" ); + +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x2 , pmswinc_el0); + +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro); +report (expect_interrupts (0 ),"no overflow interrupt received" ); + +/* enable interrupts */ + +pmu_reset_stats (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenset_el1); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro); +report_info ("overflow=0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (expect_interrupts (0x3 ), +"overflow interrupts expected on #0 and #1" ); + +/* promote to 64-b */ + +pmu_reset_stats (); + + events[1 ] =0x1E /* CHAIN */ ; +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (expect_interrupts (0 ), +"no overflow interrupt expected on 32b boundary" ); + +/* overflow on odd counter */ +pmu_reset_stats (); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFFF ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,400 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (expect_interrupts (0x2 ), +"expect overflow interrupt on odd counter" ); +}#endif /*
@@ -921,6 +1055,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chain-promotion" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_chain_promotion (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"overflow-interrupt" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_overflow_interrupt (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }
arm/unittests.cfg +6 -0
@@ -108,6 +108,12 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'chain-promotion' +[overflow-interrupt] +file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'overflow-interrupt' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flat
Signature · 1 line
2.20.1
Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 9/9] arm: pmu: Test overflow interrupts
Quoted 41 lines · Eric Auger
Test overflows for
MEM_ACCESSandSW_INCRevents. Also tests overflows with 64-bit events.Signed-off-by Eric Auger <[email protected]>---
v1 -> v2:
- inlinesetup_irq()code--- arm/pmu.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arm/unittests.cfg | 6 ++ 2 files changed, 143 insertions(+)arm/pmu.c +6
-0@@ -45,6 +45,11 @@ struct pmu {uint32_t pmcr_ro; }; +struct pmu_stats { +unsigned long bitmap; +uint32_t interrupts[32 ]; +}; +static struct pmu pmu;#if defined(__arm__)@@ -116,6 +121,7 @@ static void test_mem_access(void) {}static void test_chained_counters (void ) {}static void test_chained_sw_incr (void ) {}static void test_chain_promotion (void ) {} +static void test_overflow_interrupt (void ) {}#elif defined(__aarch64__)#define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8@@ -261,6 +267,44 @@ asm volatile( : "x9", "x10", "cc"); }
arm/pmu.c asm volatile( · line 278
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +9
-0+static struct pmu_stats pmu_stats; + +static void irq_handler (struct pt_regs *regs) +{ +uint32_t irqstat, irqnr; + + irqstat =gic_read_iar (); + irqnr =gic_iar_irqnr (irqstat); +gic_write_eoir (irqstat);
Should we clear the overflows before EOIRing? Otherwise I think it may be possible for another interrupt to be delivered. See
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11368853/
for a similar issue.
arm/pmu.c asm volatile( · line 280
Quoted 2 lines
arm/pmu.c +2
-0+ +if (irqnr ==23 ) {
Why 23? And how about a define?
Quoted 4 lines
arm/pmu.c +4
-0+unsigned long overflows =read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0); +int i; + + report_info("--> PMU overflow interrupt %d (counter bitmask 0x%lx)",
arm/pmu.c asm volatile( · line 294
Quoted 10 lines
arm/pmu.c +10
-0+ irqnr, overflows); +for (i =0 ; i <32 ; i++) { +if (test_and_clear_bit (i, &overflows)) { + pmu_stats.interrupts[i]++; + pmu_stats.bitmap |=1 << i; + } + } +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0); + }else { +report_info ("Unexpected interrupt: %d\n" , irqnr);
We should probably avoid calling any print functions from interrupt handlers. I see the timer test irq handler has this too, though. Also the pl031 test has a bunch of reporting in its irq handler. We do better with the gic tests where we only write results to arrays and then report later.
Quoted 135 lines
arm/pmu.c +106
-0+ } +} + +static void pmu_reset_stats (void ) +{ +int i; + +for (i =0 ; i <32 ; i++) + pmu_stats.interrupts[i] =0 ; + + pmu_stats.bitmap =0 ; +} +static void pmu_reset (void ) {/* reset all counters, counting disabled at PMCR level*/ @@ -271,6 +315,7 @@ static void pmu_reset(void)write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmovsclr_el0);/* disable overflow interrupts on all counters */ write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenclr_el1); +pmu_reset_stats ();isb (); }@@ -713,6 +758,95 @@ static void test_chain_promotion(void) read_sysreg(pmovsclr_el0)); } +static bool expect_interrupts (uint32_t bitmap) +{ +int i; + +if (pmu_stats.bitmap ^ bitmap) +return false; + +for (i =0 ; i <32 ; i++) { +if (test_and_clear_bit (i, &pmu_stats.bitmap)) +if (pmu_stats.interrupts[i] !=1 ) +return false; + } +return true; +} + +static void test_overflow_interrupt (void ) +{ +uint32_t events[] = {0x13 /* MEM_ACCESS */ ,0x00 /* SW_INCR */ }; +void *addr =malloc (PAGE_SIZE ); +int i; + +if (!satisfy_prerequisites (events,ARRAY_SIZE (events))) +return ; + +gic_enable_defaults (); +install_irq_handler (EL1H_IRQ , irq_handler); +local_irq_enable (); +gic_enable_irq (23 ); + +pmu_reset (); + +write_regn (pmevtyper,0 , events[0 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_sysreg_s (0x3 ,PMCNTENSET_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +isb (); + +/* interrupts are disabled */ + +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (expect_interrupts (0 ),"no overflow interrupt received" ); + +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x2 , pmswinc_el0); + +set_pmcr (pmu.pmcr_ro); +report (expect_interrupts (0 ),"no overflow interrupt received" ); + +/* enable interrupts */ + +pmu_reset_stats (); + +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_sysreg (0xFFFFFFFF , pmintenset_el1); +isb (); + +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +for (i =0 ; i <100 ; i++) +write_sysreg (0x3 , pmswinc_el0); + +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro); +report_info ("overflow=0x%lx" ,read_sysreg (pmovsclr_el0)); +report (expect_interrupts (0x3 ), +"overflow interrupts expected on #0 and #1" ); + +/* promote to 64-b */ + +pmu_reset_stats (); + + events[1 ] =0x1E /* CHAIN */ ; +write_regn (pmevtyper,1 , events[1 ] |PMEVTYPER_EXCLUDE_EL0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,200 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (expect_interrupts (0 ), +"no overflow interrupt expected on 32b boundary" ); + +/* overflow on odd counter */ +pmu_reset_stats (); +write_regn (pmevcntr,0 ,0xFFFFFFF0 ); +write_regn (pmevcntr,1 ,0xFFFFFFFF ); +isb (); +mem_access_loop (addr,400 , pmu.pmcr_ro |PMU_PMCR_E ); +report (expect_interrupts (0x2 ), +"expect overflow interrupt on odd counter" ); +}#endif /* @@ -921,6 +1055,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"chain-promotion" ) ==0 ) {report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]);test_chain_promotion (); + }else if (strcmp (argv[1 ],"overflow-interrupt" ) ==0 ) { +report_prefix_push (argv[1 ]); +test_overflow_interrupt (); }else {report_abort ("Unknown sub-test '%s'" , argv[1 ]); }arm/unittests.cfg +0
-0
arm/unittests.cfg groups = pmu · line 111
Quoted 4 lines
arm/unittests.cfg +1
-0@@ -108,6 +108,12 @@ groups = pmu arch = arm64 extra_params = -append 'chain-promotion' +[overflow-interrupt]
Need "pmu-" prefix on this name, like the others, otherwise its standalone test won't have an appropriate name.
Quoted 12 lines
arm/unittests.cfg +5
-0+file = pmu.flat +groups = pmu +arch = arm64 +extra_params = -append 'overflow-interrupt' + # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1 #[pmu-tcg-icount-1] #file = pmu.flatSignature · 1 line
2.20.1
also same comments as previous patches
Thanks,
drew
Quoted 21 lines · Eric Auger
This series implements tests exercising the PMUv3 event counters. It tests both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Overflow interrupts also are checked. Those tests only are written for arm64.
It allowed to reveal some issues related to
SW_INCRimplementation (esp. related to 64-bit implementation), some problems related to 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions and consistency of enabled states of odd and event counters (See [1]).Overflow interrupt testing relies of one patch from Andre ("arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions") to enable the PPI 23, coming from "arm: gic: Test SPIs and interrupt groups"
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11234975/). Drew kindly provided "arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s".All PMU tests can be launched with:
./run_tests.sh -g pmu
Tests also can be launched individually. For example:
./arm-run arm/pmu.flat -append 'chained-sw-incr'
Quoted 8 lines
With KVM:
- chain-promotion and chained-sw-incr are known to be failing.
[1] proposed a fix.
- On TX2, I have some random failures due toMEM_ACCESSevent measured with a great disparity. This is not observed on other machines I have access to.
With TCG:
- all new tests are skipped
I'm having a go at using this patchset to test the support I'm adding for TCG for the v8.1 and v8.4 PMU extensions...
Q1: how can I get run_tests.sh to pass extra arguments to QEMU ? The PMU events check will fail unless QEMU gets the '-icount 8' to enable cycle-counting, but although the underlying ./arm/run lets you add arbitrary extra arguments to QEMU, run_tests.sh doesn't seem to. Trying to pass them in via "QEMU=/path/to/qemu -icount 8" doesn't work either.
Q2: do you know why arm/pmu.c:check_pmcr() insists that PMCR.IMP is non-zero? The comment says "simple sanity check", but architecturally a zero IMP field is permitted (meaning "go look at MIDR_EL1 instead"). This causes TCG to fail this test on '-cpu max', because in that case we set PMCR.IMP to the same thing as MIDR_EL1.Implementer which is 0 ("software use", since QEMU is software...)
thanks
-- PMM
Quoted 34 lines · Peter Maydell
Quoted 21 lines · Eric Auger
This series implements tests exercising the PMUv3 event counters. It tests both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Overflow interrupts also are checked. Those tests only are written for arm64.
It allowed to reveal some issues related to
SW_INCRimplementation (esp. related to 64-bit implementation), some problems related to 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions and consistency of enabled states of odd and event counters (See [1]).Overflow interrupt testing relies of one patch from Andre ("arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions") to enable the PPI 23, coming from "arm: gic: Test SPIs and interrupt groups"
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11234975/). Drew kindly provided "arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s".All PMU tests can be launched with:
./run_tests.sh -g pmu
Tests also can be launched individually. For example:
./arm-run arm/pmu.flat -append 'chained-sw-incr'Quoted 8 lines
With KVM:
- chain-promotion and chained-sw-incr are known to be failing.
[1] proposed a fix.
- On TX2, I have some random failures due toMEM_ACCESSevent measured with a great disparity. This is not observed on other machines I have access to.
With TCG:
- all new tests are skippedI'm having a go at using this patchset to test the support I'm adding for TCG for the v8.1 and v8.4 PMU extensions...
Quoted 7 lines
Q1: how can I get
run_tests.shto pass extra arguments to QEMU ? The PMU events check will fail unless QEMU gets the '-icount 8' to enable cycle-counting, but although the underlying ./arm/run lets you add arbitrary extra arguments to QEMU,run_tests.shdoesn't seem to. Trying to pass them in via "QEMU=/path/to/qemu -icount 8" doesn't work either.
Alex Bennee once submit a patch[*] allowing that to work, but it never got merged. I just rebased it and tried it, but it doesn't work now. Too much has changed in the run scripts since his posting. I can try to rework it though.
[*] https://github.com/rhdrjones/kvm-unit-tests/commit/9a8574bfd924f3e865611688e26bb12e53821747
Quoted 8 lines
Q2: do you know why arm/pmu.c:check_pmcr() insists that PMCR.IMP is non-zero? The comment says "simple sanity check", but architecturally a zero IMP field is permitted (meaning "go look at
MIDR_EL1instead"). This causes TCG to fail this test on '-cpu max', because in that case we set PMCR.IMP to the same thing as MIDR_EL1.Implementer which is 0 ("software use", since QEMU is software...)
Probably just a misunderstanding on the part of the author (and reviewers). Maybe Eric can fix that while preparing this series.
Thanks,
drew
Quoted 35 lines · Andrew Jones
Quoted 34 lines · Peter Maydell
Quoted 21 lines · Eric Auger
This series implements tests exercising the PMUv3 event counters. It tests both the 32-bit and 64-bit versions. Overflow interrupts also are checked. Those tests only are written for arm64.
It allowed to reveal some issues related to
SW_INCRimplementation (esp. related to 64-bit implementation), some problems related to 32-bit <-> 64-bit transitions and consistency of enabled states of odd and event counters (See [1]).Overflow interrupt testing relies of one patch from Andre ("arm: gic: Provide per-IRQ helper functions") to enable the PPI 23, coming from "arm: gic: Test SPIs and interrupt groups"
(https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/11234975/). Drew kindly provided "arm64: Provide read/write_sysreg_s".All PMU tests can be launched with:
./run_tests.sh -g pmu
Tests also can be launched individually. For example:
./arm-run arm/pmu.flat -append 'chained-sw-incr'Quoted 8 lines
With KVM:
- chain-promotion and chained-sw-incr are known to be failing.
[1] proposed a fix.
- On TX2, I have some random failures due toMEM_ACCESSevent measured with a great disparity. This is not observed on other machines I have access to.
With TCG:
- all new tests are skippedI'm having a go at using this patchset to test the support I'm adding for TCG for the v8.1 and v8.4 PMU extensions...
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Q1: how can I get
run_tests.shto pass extra arguments to QEMU ? The PMU events check will fail unless QEMU gets the '-icount 8' to enable cycle-counting, but although the underlying ./arm/run lets you add arbitrary extra arguments to QEMU,run_tests.shdoesn't seem to. Trying to pass them in via "QEMU=/path/to/qemu -icount 8" doesn't work either.
int arm/unittests.cfg
there are tests related to TCG that are commented.
# Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=256 #[pmu-tcg-icount-256]
#file = pmu.flat
#extra_params = -icount 8 -append 'cycle-counter 256' #groups = pmu
#accel = tcg
I wondered why we kept those and commented. Should we start with separate tests for KVM and TCG?
Quoted 16 lines
Alex Bennee once submit a patch[*] allowing that to work, but it never got merged. I just rebased it and tried it, but it doesn't work now. Too much has changed in the run scripts since his posting. I can try to rework it though.
[*] https://github.com/rhdrjones/kvm-unit-tests/commit/9a8574bfd924f3e865611688e26bb12e53821747
Quoted 8 lines
Q2: do you know why arm/pmu.c:check_pmcr() insists that PMCR.IMP is non-zero? The comment says "simple sanity check", but architecturally a zero IMP field is permitted (meaning "go look at
MIDR_EL1instead"). This causes TCG to fail this test on '-cpu max', because in that case we set PMCR.IMP to the same thing as MIDR_EL1.Implementer which is 0 ("software use", since QEMU is software...)
indeed
Quoted 3 lines
Probably just a misunderstanding on the part of the author (and reviewers). Maybe Eric can fix that while preparing this series.
Yes I can definitively fix that
Thanks
Eric
Quoted 4 lines
Thanks,
drew