mdadm test suite improvements
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired.
Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.
I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance,
Mariusz
Quoted 11 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired.
Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?
Hi Mariusz,
Yes IMHO python is more ideal than bash. Personally I am supportive to this idea.
Thanks.
Coly Li
Quoted 7 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired.
Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.
Quoted 8 lines
I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?Thanks in advance,
Mariusz
Hello Mariusz,
Python is a great choice. Good with me.
-Nigel
Mariusz,
Quoted 9 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired.
Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.
Quoted 7 lines
I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?Thanks in advance,
Mariusz
FWIW, Python is the right choice to modernize the framework. I recently ran the test suite and sent out a series [1] addressing issues we found with the test cases. I would agree that python would be more helpful in the wider adoption of the test framework.
[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=165220252031480&w=2
--
Himanshu Madhani Oracle Linux Engineering
Hi Mariusz
Thanks for the effort. Have you init the git project to start this? If so, you can send it, so we can
work together about this.
Best Regards
Xiao
Quoted 16 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired.
Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?Thanks in advance,
Mariusz
A message that is not in the archive (sent off-list or not yet received): -laavsfgtlo10lebdsj460ptakf7ob3swf0up-4xyanlxfob29oebwn0um9140l133r8-rukduq-tekz50-og1qjp-za66of-qnod9a-cdghzt8enrbc-ei4sg9-7sa12trdyicp-e03x62jcjj2j-h0xih6.1652752832458@email.android.com
Hi,
I wanted to add it to the mdadm repo, let say under directory "python_tests". I didn't started work yet. Those tests should stay with mdadm, so we can develop them with Coly using mdadm-ci and later ask Jes to merge the branch.
I don't have any details, I just asked to gather feedback. Seems that there is big interest in this change. If there is any volunteer to take this topic and prepare python API for testing and first tests- I will be pleased to help.
I could take long time before I will start this topic.
Thanks,
Mariusz
Quoted 48 lines · On Tue, 17 May 2022 10:00:32 +0800 Coly Li <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Xiao,
Yes there is a git repo specific for test scripts, to test the mdadm-ci repo. It is located on kernel.org git server, which currently only contains bash scripts copied from mdadm.
Coly
From my phone
-------- 原始邮件 --------
发件人: Xiao Ni <[email protected]>
日期: 2022年5月17日周二 上午9:48
收件人: Mariusz Tkaczyk <[email protected]>
抄送: Nigel Croxon <[email protected]>, Coly Li <[email protected]>, Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>, linux-raid <[email protected]> 主 题: Re: mdadm test suite improvements Hi MariuszQuoted 29 lines
Thanks for the effort. Have you init the git project to start this? If so, you can send it, so we can
work together about this.Best Regards
XiaoQuoted 17 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired. Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?Thanks in advance,
Mariusz
Quoted 5 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hi,
I wanted to add it to the mdadm repo, let say under directory "python_tests". I didn't started work yet. Those tests should stay with mdadm, so we can develop them with Coly using mdadm-ci and later ask Jes to merge the branch.
I am fine and supportive to this idea. mdadm-tests is from the ci testing itself, I can copy python_tests to it time to time.
Quoted 6 lines
I don't have any details, I just asked to gather feedback. Seems that there is big interest in this change. If there is any volunteer to take this topic and prepare python API for testing and first tests- I will be pleased to help.
I could take long time before I will start this topic.
Let's wait for response. If no one response for a while, then the person should be me LOL. I am learning Python now, and the progress might take time anyway.
Thanks.
Coly Li
Quoted 52 lines
Thanks,
MariuszQuoted 45 lines · On Tue, 17 May 2022 10:00:32 +0800 Coly Li <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Xiao,
Yes there is a git repo specific for test scripts, to test the mdadm-ci repo. It is located on kernel.org git server, which currently only contains bash scripts copied from mdadm.
Coly
From my phone
-------- 原始邮件 --------
发件人: Xiao Ni <[email protected]>
日期: 2022年5月17日周二 上午9:48
收件人: Mariusz Tkaczyk <[email protected]>
抄送: Nigel Croxon <[email protected]>, Coly Li <[email protected]>, Jes Sorensen <[email protected]>, linux-raid <[email protected]> 主 题: Re: mdadm test suite improvements Hi MariuszQuoted 26 lines
Thanks for the effort. Have you init the git project to start this? If so, you can send it, so we can
work together about this.Best Regards
XiaoQuoted 16 lines · Mariusz Tkaczyk
Hello All,
I'm working on names handling in mdadm and I need to add some new test to the mdadm scope - to verify that it is working as desired. Bash is not best choice for testing and in current form, our tests are not friendly for developers. I would like to introduce another python based test scope and add it to repository. I will integrate it with current framework.I can see that currently test are not well used and they aren't often updated. I want to bring new life to them. Adopting more modern approach seems to be good start point.
Any thoughts?Thanks in advance,
Mariusz