modules problems with 2.6.0
Hi,
I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but I get this error on my logs:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not enabled.
Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x family?
The kernel does boot, but not having any modules I can't do much, and also, I never get to really see the messages on screen, on logs I have this line:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: Video mode to be used for restore is ffff
What does it mean?
I disabled all the framebuffer things so I can just use vga, on lilo, vga mode is set to normal, but still can't see anything.
TIA,
Signature · 2 lines
Fernando Sanchez Dpto. Sistemas USFQ
On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:09:19 -0500 Fernando Sanchez <[email protected]> wrote:
| Hi, | | I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but | I get this error on my logs: | | Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel | modules not enabled. | | Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x | family?
Yes, they are at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/
Also, a summary of 2.5/2.6 changes is very worthwhile reading. See:
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
for which config options that you really need to enable.
| The kernel does boot, but not having any modules I can't do much, and | also, I never get to really see the messages on screen, on logs I have | this line: | | Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: Video mode to be used for restore is ffff | | What does it mean?
Dunno. Anyone?
| I disabled all the framebuffer things so I can just use vga, on lilo, | vga mode is set to normal, but still can't see anything.
--
~Randy
| http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/ | http://www.xenotime.net/linux/ |
Re: modules problems with 2.6.0 (module-init-tools-0.9.12)
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 15:22, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
I heard that if you install the new module-init-tools package in /sbin that you would be able to boot old kernels. Is that true?
I installed the module-init-tools package and it went to /usr/local. First I changed the kernel Makefile to point to /usr/local then I had module problems and tried copying the cmds to /sbin and renamed the the old commands like implied in the script:
generate-modprobe.conf
Yesterday I heard I better move them back or I won't be able to boot my old kernels. It's hard to believe that these tools aren't backward compatible.
Moving the module-init-tools to /sbin didn't help my problem; is it necessary/helpful. Perhaps they are only needed for building the new kernels.
-piet
Quoted 42 lines · On Tue, 15 Jul 2003 17:09:19 -0500 Fernando Sanchez…
| Hi, | | I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but | I get this error on my logs: | | Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel | modules not enabled. | | Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x | family?Yes, they are at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rusty/modules/Also, a summary of 2.5/2.6 changes is very worthwhile reading. See:
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
for which config options that you really need to enable.| The kernel does boot, but not having any modules I can't do much, and | also, I never get to really see the messages on screen, on logs I have | this line: | | Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: Video mode to be used for restore is ffff | | What does it mean?Dunno. Anyone?
| I disabled all the framebuffer things so I can just use vga, on lilo, | vga mode is set to normal, but still can't see anything.
--
~Randy
| http://developer.osdl.org/rddunlap/ | http://www.xenotime.net/linux/ | -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 1 line
[email protected]
Re: modules problems with 2.6.0 (module-init-tools-0.9.12)
Quoted 4 lines · El 15 Jul 2003 16:53:12 -0700 Piet Delaney <[email protected]> escribió:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 15:22, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
I heard that if you install the new module-init-tools package in /sbin that you would be able to boot old kernels. Is that true?
It works here.
i've a debian distro, i apt-get'ed module-init-tools. Man modprobe says:
BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
This version of insmod is for kernels 2.5.48 and above. If it
detects a kernel with support for old-style modules (for which much of the work was done in userspace), it will attempt to run insmod.modu- tils in its place, so it is completely transparent to the user.
diego@estel:~$ ls -l /sbin/insmod* -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5072 2003-06-15 12:27 /sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod_ksymoops_clean -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 95372 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod.modutils
Looking at the size, insmod.modutils seems the 2.4 insmod loader.
Re: modules problems with 2.6.0 (module-init-tools-0.9.12)
Gentoo works too, with 2.5 and 2.6, 2.4 works as expected, like before installing the devel kernels
:-)
Im going for the first day of uptime with 2.6, and no problem at all
Max
Quoted 28 lines · Diego Calleja García
Quoted 4 lines · El 15 Jul 2003 16:53:12 -0700 Piet Delaney <[email protected]> escribió:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 15:22, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
I heard that if you install the new module-init-tools package in /sbin that you would be able to boot old kernels. Is that true?
It works here.
i've a debian distro, i apt-get'ed module-init-tools. Man modprobe says:BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
This version of insmod is for kernels 2.5.48 and above. If it
detects a kernel with support for old-style modules (for which much of the work was done in userspace), it will attempt to run insmod.modu- tils in its place, so it is completely transparent to the user.diego@estel:~$ ls -l /sbin/insmod*(quoted diff) +0
-3-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5072 2003-06-15 12:27 /sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod_ksymoops_clean -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 95372 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod.modutilsLooking at the size, insmod.modutils seems the 2.4 insmod loader. -
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Signature · 6 lines
Linux garaged 2.4.22-pre3-ac1 #5 SMP Wed Jul 9 07:01:52 CDT 2003 i686 Pentium III (Coppermine) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GS/ d-s:a-28C++ILHA+++P+L++>+++E---W++N*o--K-w++++O-M--V--PS+PEY--PGP++t5XRtv++b++DI--D-G++e++h-r+y** ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ gpg-key: http://garaged.homeip.net/gpg-key.txt
Re: modules problems with 2.6.0 (module-init-tools-0.9.12)
In reply to Diego Calleja GarcíaQuoted 17 lines · Diego Calleja García
Quoted 4 lines · El 15 Jul 2003 16:53:12 -0700 Piet Delaney <[email protected]> escribió:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 15:22, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
I heard that if you install the new module-init-tools package in /sbin that you would be able to boot old kernels. Is that true?
It works here.
i've a debian distro, i apt-get'ed module-init-tools. Man modprobe says:BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
This version of insmod is for kernels 2.5.48 and above. If it
detects a kernel with support for old-style modules (for which much of the work was done in userspace), it will attempt to run insmod.modu- tils in its place, so it is completely transparent to the user.diego@estel:~$ ls -l /sbin/insmod*
Review
Quoted 3 lines
(quoted diff) +0
-3-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5072 2003-06-15 12:27 /sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod_ksymoops_clean -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 95372 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod.modutils
Funny, I don't see insmod.modutils installed in /usr/local/sbin:
ls -l /usr/local/sbin/insmod*
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28834 Jul 9 14:36 /usr/local/sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 461564 Jul 9 14:36 /usr/local/sbin/insmod.static
I also didn't find insmod.modutils in the module-init-tools-0.9.12 src:
[root@www src]# find module-init-tools-0.9.12 -name "*insmod*" -print module-init-tools-0.9.12/doc/insmod.sgml module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.c module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.8 module-init-tools-0.9.12/.deps/insmod.Po module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.o module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.static
[root@www src]#
Quoted 3 lines
Looking at the size, insmod.modutils seems the 2.4 insmod loader.
I think I missed something.
Signature · 1 line
[email protected]
Re: modules problems with 2.6.0 (module-init-tools-0.9.12)
Quoted 10 lines · Diego Calleja García
Quoted 9 lines · El 15 Jul 2003 16:53:12 -0700 Piet Delaney <[email protected]> escribió:
Quoted 4 lines · Randy.Dunlap
I heard that if you install the new module-init-tools package in /sbin
that you would be able to boot old kernels. Is that true?
It works here.
i've a debian distro, i apt-get'ed module-init-tools. Man modprobe says:
I don't use the debian or RH packages. I just download and follow the instructions in the nice README file. I get insmod, insmod.old, depmod, depmod.old, etc.
Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 10 lines
BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
This version of insmod is for kernels 2.5.48 and above. If
it detects a kernel with support for old-style modules (for which much of the work was done in userspace), it will attempt to run insmod.modu- tils in its place, so it is completely transparent to the user.diego@estel:~$ ls -l /sbin/insmod*(quoted diff) +0
-2-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5072 2003-06-15 12:27 /sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359 2003-03-06 15:50Quoted 2 lines
/sbin/insmod_ksymoops_clean-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 95372
2003-03-06 15:50/sbin/insmod.modutilsFunny, I don't see insmod.modutils installed in
/usr/local/sbin:ls -l
/usr/local/sbin/insmod*-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 28834 Jul 9 14:36 /usr/local/sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 461564 Jul 9 14:36 /usr/local/sbin/insmod.staticI also didn't find insmod.modutils in the module-init-tools-0.9.12 src:
[root@www src]# find module-init-tools-0.9.12 -name "*insmod*" -printmodule-init-tools-0.9.12/doc/insmod.sgml
module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.c
module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.8
module-init-tools-0.9.12/.deps/insmod.Po
module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.o
module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod
module-init-tools-0.9.12/insmod.static
[root@www src]#Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 1 line
Looking at the size, insmod.modutils seems the 2.4 insmod loader.
I think I missed something.
I don't think that I have that one either. Could be a result of using one of the packages instead of building it from source.
~Randy
Re: modules problems with 2.6.0 (module-init-tools-0.9.12)
In reply to Diego Calleja GarcíaQuoted 22 lines · Diego Calleja García
Quoted 4 lines · El 15 Jul 2003 16:53:12 -0700 Piet Delaney <[email protected]> escribió:
On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 15:22, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
I heard that if you install the new module-init-tools package in /sbin that you would be able to boot old kernels. Is that true?
It works here.
i've a debian distro, i apt-get'ed module-init-tools. Man modprobe says:BACKWARDS COMPATIBILITY
This version of insmod is for kernels 2.5.48 and above. If it
detects a kernel with support for old-style modules (for which much of the work was done in userspace), it will attempt to run insmod.modu- tils in its place, so it is completely transparent to the user.diego@estel:~$ ls -l /sbin/insmod*(quoted diff) +0
-3-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 5072 2003-06-15 12:27 /sbin/insmod -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 359 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod_ksymoops_clean -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 95372 2003-03-06 15:50 /sbin/insmod.modutils
Quoted 1 line
Looking at the size, insmod.modutils seems the 2.4 insmod loader.
That is Debian doing things differently again. The vanilla modules-init-tools will run insmod.old:
$ ls /sbin/insmod* /sbin/insmod /sbin/insmod.old /sbin/insmod.static /sbin/insmod_ksymoops_clean $
Anyhow, usually reading the documentation (*hint* README *hint*) should help.
Signature · 1 line
Martin Schlemmer
Quoted 10 lines · Fernando Sanchez
Hi,
I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but I get this error on my logs:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernelmodules not enabled.
Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x family?
Yes there is. Please read the Documentation/Changes file for this info.
(hint, you need to get the module-init-tools package.)
Good luck,
greg k-h
* Fernando Sanchez schrieb am 16.07.03 um 00:09 Uhr:
Quoted 15 lines
Hi,
I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but I get this error on my logs:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernelmodules not enabled.
Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x family?
The kernel does boot, but not having any modules I can't do much, and also, I never get to really see the messages on screen, on logs I have this line:
Quoted 8 lines
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: Video mode to be used for restore is ffffWhat does it mean?
I disabled all the framebuffer things so I can just use vga, on lilo, vga mode is set to normal, but still can't see anything.
Fernando,
read http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
(but hsving DNS problems from germany right now)
-Marc
Signature · 3 lines
BUGS My programs never have bugs. They just develop random
features. If you discover such a feature and you want it to
be removed: please send an email to bug at links2linux.de <quote sender="Marc Schiffbauer">
Quoted 20 lines
* Fernando Sanchez schrieb am 16.07.03 um 00:09 Uhr:
Quoted 19 lines
Hi,
I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but I get this error on my logs:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernelmodules not enabled.
Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x family?
The kernel does boot, but not having any modules I can't do much, and also, I never get to really see the messages on screen, on logs I have this line:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: Video mode to be used for restore is ffffWhat does it mean?
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
I disabled all the framebuffer things so I can just use vga, on lilo, vga mode is set to normal, but still can't see anything.
Fernando,
read http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
(but hsving DNS problems from germany right now)
If you are using debian, apt-get install module-init-tools.
Signature · 3 lines
Eugene TEO @ Linux Users Group, Singapore <[email protected]> GPG FP: D851 4574 E357 469C D308 A01E 7321 A38A 14A0 DDE5 main(i){putchar(182623909>>(i-1)*5&31|!!(i<7)<<6)&&main(++i);}
Quoted 20 lines · Eugene Teo
<quote sender="Marc Schiffbauer">
Quoted 18 lines
* Fernando Sanchez schrieb am 16.07.03 um 00:09 Uhr:
Quoted 15 lines
Hi,
I've been trying to get 2.6.0 to work, I've enabled modules support, but I get this error on my logs:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: No module symbols loaded - kernel modules not enabled.Is there any thing like a new modutils that should be used with 2.6.x family?
The kernel does boot, but not having any modules I can't do much, and also, I never get to really see the messages on screen, on logs I have this line:
Jul 15 15:38:36 Darakemba kernel: Video mode to be used for restore is ffffWhat does it mean?
I disabled all the framebuffer things so I can just use vga, on lilo, vga mode is set to normal, but still can't see anything.
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Fernando,
read http://www.codemonkey.org.uk/post-halloween-2.5.txt
(but hsving DNS problems from germany right now)If you are using debian, apt-get install module-init-tools.
Thanks, it seems to work better than the source I get, well, I actually screwed up something with the sources, and dpkg was able to fix it for me :)
Quoted 1 line
Signature · 2 lines
Fernando Sanchez Dpto. Sistemas USFQ