linux-2.6.21: apm.c remove unused variables
Hello list,
this patch removes the unused variablesclock_cmos_diffgot_clock_diff
from apm.c
note:
an other clock_cmos_diff is defined (and used):
x86_64/kernel/time.c:static long clock_cmos_diff;
arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2007-05-11 15:25:47.000000000 +0200 renamed from arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.org 2007-05-11 15:25:06.000000000 +0200 +0 -8
@@ -383,14 +383,6 @@ static int ignore_sys_suspend; static int ignore_normal_resume; static int bounce_interval __read_mostly = DEFAULT_BOUNCE_INTERVAL; - -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT -# define clock_cmos_diff 0 -# define got_clock_diff 1 -#else -static long clock_cmos_diff; -static int got_clock_diff; -#endif static int debug __read_mostly; static int smp __read_mostly; static int apm_disabled = -1;
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
hi list,
i did not get any comment about this patch. does that mean everyone is happy ?
re,
wh
Quoted 32 lines · walter harms
Hello list,
this patch removes the unused variables
clock_cmos_diffgot_clock_diff
fromapm.cnote:
an otherclock_cmos_diffis defined (and used):
x86_64/kernel/time.c:static longclock_cmos_diff;Signed-off-by walter harms <[email protected]>arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2007-05-11 15:25:47.000000000 +0200 renamed from arch/i386/kernel/apm.c.org 2007-05-11 15:25:06.000000000 +0200 +0
-8@@ -383,14 +383,6 @@ static int ignore_sys_suspend; static int ignore_normal_resume; static int bounce_interval __read_mostly = DEFAULT_BOUNCE_INTERVAL; - -#ifdef CONFIG_APM_RTC_IS_GMT -# define clock_cmos_diff 0 -# define got_clock_diff 1 -#else -static long clock_cmos_diff; -static int got_clock_diff; -#endif static int debug __read_mostly; static int smp __read_mostly; static int apm_disabled = -1;
Quoted 7 lines
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
Quoted 1 line · walter harms
i did not get any comment about this patch. does that mean everyone is happy ?
These changes are already in Linus' tree (commit 78eea47ac3e256559d97f0c2434928be39cba524).
Florian
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
thx for info
Quoted 13 lines · Florian Westphal
Quoted 1 line · walter harms
i did not get any comment about this patch. does that mean everyone is happy ?
These changes are already in Linus' tree (commit
78eea47ac3e256559d97f0c2434928be39cba524).Florian
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors
_______________________________________________
Kernel-janitors mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/kernel-janitors