x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume
Subsystems (4)
PATCH 1/1 x86/pvclock-xen: zero last_value on resume
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h +1 -0
@@ -11,5 +11,6 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);void pvclock_read_wallclock (struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,struct timespec *ts); +void pvclock_resume (void );#endif /* _ASM_X86_PVCLOCK_H */
arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +5 -0
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)static atomic64_t last_value =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 ); +void pvclock_resume (void ) +{ +atomic64_set (&last_value,0 ); +} +cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read (struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src) {struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;
arch/x86/xen/time.c +2 -0
@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void) {int cpu; +pvclock_resume (); +if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)return ;
From 29acbb4e1d93e719250648db1ce8c7a24144fd86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:53:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h +1 -0
@@ -11,5 +11,6 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);void pvclock_read_wallclock (struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,struct timespec *ts); +void pvclock_resume (void );#endif /* _ASM_X86_PVCLOCK_H */
arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +5 -0
@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)static atomic64_t last_value =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 ); +void pvclock_resume (void ) +{ +atomic64_set (&last_value,0 ); +} +cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read (struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src) {struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;
arch/x86/xen/time.c +2 -0
@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void) {int cpu; +pvclock_resume (); +if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)return ;
Quoted 8 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees monotonicity.
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Quoted 8 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees monotonicity.
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Quoted 7 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 6 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees monotonicity.
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Thanks.
HPA, do you want to take this, or shall I send it on?
Thanks,
J
Quoted 7 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 6 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees monotonicity.
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Thanks.
HPA, do you want to take this, or shall I send it on?
Thanks,
J
H. Peter Anvin
reviewerI'll check it this evening when I'm at a working network again :(
Quoted 21 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 10 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 7 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees
monotonicity.
Quoted 2 lines
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Thanks.
HPA, do you want to take this, or shall I send it on?
Thanks,
J
Signature · 1 line
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
H. Peter Anvin
reviewerI'll check it this evening when I'm at a working network again :(
Quoted 21 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 10 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 7 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees
monotonicity.
Quoted 2 lines
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Thanks.
HPA, do you want to take this, or shall I send it on?
Thanks,
J
Signature · 1 line
Sent from my mobile phone. Please pardon any lack of formatting.
Quoted 1 line · H. Peter Anvin
I'll check it this evening when I'm at a working network again :(
Did this get applied? It seems to affect 2.6.32.x too
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602273) so can we tag it for stable as well?
Thanks,
Ian.
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 21 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 10 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 7 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees
monotonicity.
Quoted 2 lines
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Thanks.
HPA, do you want to take this, or shall I send it on?
Thanks,
J
Signature · 5 lines
Ian Campbell BOFH excuse #191: Just type 'mv * /dev/null'.
Quoted 1 line · H. Peter Anvin
I'll check it this evening when I'm at a working network again :(
Did this get applied? It seems to affect 2.6.32.x too
(http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=602273) so can we tag it for stable as well?
Thanks,
Ian.
Quoted 25 lines
Quoted 21 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 10 lines · Glauber Costa
Quoted 7 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
After migration, save/restore, etc, we issue an ioctl where we tell the host the last clock value. That (in theory) guarantees
monotonicity.
Quoted 2 lines
I am not opposed to this patch in any way, however.
Thanks.
HPA, do you want to take this, or shall I send it on?
Thanks,
J
Signature · 5 lines
Ian Campbell BOFH excuse #191: Just type 'mv * /dev/null'.
Quoted 6 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
J
Quoted 57 lines
[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
Signed-off-by Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>Cc Stable Kernel <[email protected]>Reported-by Eelco Dolstra <[email protected]>Reported-by Olivier Hanesse <[email protected]>Bisected-by Cédric Schieli <[email protected]>Tested-by Cédric Schieli <[email protected]>arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h +1
-0@@ -11,5 +11,6 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);void pvclock_read_wallclock (struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,struct timespec *ts); +void pvclock_resume (void );#endif /* _ASM_X86_PVCLOCK_H */ arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +5
-0@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)static atomic64_t last_value =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 ); +void pvclock_resume (void ) +{ +atomic64_set (&last_value,0 ); +} +cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read (struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src) {struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;arch/x86/xen/time.c +2
-0@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void) {int cpu; +pvclock_resume (); +if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)return ;_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Quoted 6 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
J
Quoted 53 lines
[ I don't know if kvm needs an analogous fix or not. ]
Signed-off-by Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>Cc Stable Kernel <[email protected]>Reported-by Eelco Dolstra <[email protected]>Reported-by Olivier Hanesse <[email protected]>Bisected-by Cédric Schieli <[email protected]>Tested-by Cédric Schieli <[email protected]>arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h +1
-0@@ -11,5 +11,6 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);void pvclock_read_wallclock (struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,struct timespec *ts); +void pvclock_resume (void );#endif /* _ASM_X86_PVCLOCK_H */ arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +5
-0@@ -120,6 +120,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)static atomic64_t last_value =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 ); +void pvclock_resume (void ) +{ +atomic64_set (&last_value,0 ); +} +cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read (struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src) {struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;arch/x86/xen/time.c +2
-0@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void) {int cpu; +pvclock_resume (); +if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)return ;
Quoted 4 lines
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
_______________________________________________
Virtualization mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/virtualization
Quoted 9 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 6 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
Does not apply cleanly here - mind resending the latest version?
Thanks,
Ingo
Quoted 9 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 6 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
Does not apply cleanly here - mind resending the latest version?
Thanks,
Ingo
Quoted 10 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 7 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 5 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
Does not apply cleanly here - mind resending the latest version?
It rebased cleanly to 2.6.37-rc3. You can pull it from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git pvclock-resume
Jeremy Fitzhardinge (1):
x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c | 5 +++++ arch/x86/xen/time.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Thanks,
J
Subject: [PATCH] x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h +1 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);void pvclock_read_wallclock (struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,struct timespec *ts); +void pvclock_resume (void );/* * Scale a 64-bit delta by scaling and multiplying by a 32-bit fraction,
arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +5 -0
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)static atomic64_t last_value =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 ); +void pvclock_resume (void ) +{ +atomic64_set (&last_value,0 ); +} +cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read (struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src) {struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;
arch/x86/xen/time.c +2 -0
@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void) {int cpu; +pvclock_resume (); +if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)return ;
Quoted 10 lines · Ingo Molnar
Quoted 7 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Quoted 5 lines · Jeremy Fitzhardinge
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero
last_valuein that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.Ping? Looks like this fell through the gaps.
Does not apply cleanly here - mind resending the latest version?
It rebased cleanly to 2.6.37-rc3. You can pull it from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git pvclock-resume
Jeremy Fitzhardinge (1):
x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c | 5 +++++ arch/x86/xen/time.c | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Thanks,
J
Subject: [PATCH] x86/pvclock: zero last_value on resume
If the guest domain has been suspend/resumed or migrated, then the system clock backing the pvclock clocksource may revert to a smaller value (ie, can be non-monotonic across the migration/save-restore). Make sure we zero last_value in that case so that the domain continues to see clock updates.
arch/x86/include/asm/pvclock.h +1 -0
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src);void pvclock_read_wallclock (struct pvclock_wall_clock *wall,struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *vcpu,struct timespec *ts); +void pvclock_resume (void );/* * Scale a 64-bit delta by scaling and multiplying by a 32-bit fraction,
arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +5 -0
@@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ unsigned long pvclock_tsc_khz(struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src)static atomic64_t last_value =ATOMIC64_INIT (0 ); +void pvclock_resume (void ) +{ +atomic64_set (&last_value,0 ); +} +cycle_t pvclock_clocksource_read (struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *src) {struct pvclock_shadow_time shadow;
arch/x86/xen/time.c +2 -0
@@ -426,6 +426,8 @@ void xen_timer_resume(void) {int cpu; +pvclock_resume (); +if (xen_clockevent != &xen_vcpuop_clockevent)return ;