btrfs-tools source code
It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?
Quoted 2 lines · Phillip Susi
It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?
If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in
the next few weeks, I'm told), you'd be able to see that the latest version of the tools is actually available from
http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/
If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for browsing is at
http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary
Hugo.
Signature · 4 lines
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
--- The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty; it is twice as ---
large as it needs to be. Quoted 9 lines · Hugo Mills
Quoted 2 lines · Phillip Susi
It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?
If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in
the next few weeks, I'm told), you'd be able to see that the latest version of the tools is actually available from
Though the check on the number of args has been changed with the following patch,
commit:f71210f87e0c684d8c76dfa2e19ea86256fc3d1f check number of args for btrfs sub snap correctly
however, in integration-20111012, I think that returning it to an original value is correct.
Thanks,
Tsutomu
btrfs_cmds.c +1 -1
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv)return 1 ; } } -if (argc - optind !=3 ) { +if (argc - optind !=2 ) {fprintf (stderr,"Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n" );free (argv);return 1 ;
Quoted 9 lines
If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for browsing is at
http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary
Hugo.