Skip to contentSkip to conversation

btrfs-tools source code

DISCUSSION Phillip Susi 3 participants 3 messages Oct 26, 2011 – Oct 27, 2011 Btrfs file system

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?

#1 lore raw
Quoted 2 lines · Phillip Susi

It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?

If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in
the next few weeks, I'm told), you'd be able to see that the latest version of the tools is actually available from

http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/

If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for browsing is at

http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary

Hugo.

Signature · 4 lines
=== Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk ===
  PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk
  --- The glass is neither half-full nor half-empty; it is twice as ---  
                        large as it needs to be.                         
#2 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Hugo Mills
Quoted 2 lines · Phillip Susi

It still doesn't appear to have returned to kernel.org. Should that happen sometime soon, or is it available somewhere else now?

If the wiki was up (which should be coming back to kernel.org in
the next few weeks, I'm told), you'd be able to see that the latest version of the tools is actually available from

http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git/

Though the check on the number of args has been changed with the following patch,

commit:f71210f87e0c684d8c76dfa2e19ea86256fc3d1f check number of args for btrfs sub snap correctly

however, in integration-20111012, I think that returning it to an original value is correct.

Thanks,
Tsutomu

btrfs_cmds.c +1 -1
diff -urNp a/btrfs_cmds.c b/btrfs_cmds.c
@@ -394,7 +394,7 @@ int do_clone(int argc, char **argv)
 			return 1;
 		}
 	}
-	if (argc - optind != 3) {
+	if (argc - optind != 2) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot\n");
 		free(argv);
 		return 1;
Quoted 9 lines

If you want something more recent than 6 months old, you will need either the for-chris branch (considered pretty stable), or the latest integration branch (which is the very latest bits). Gitweb access for browsing is at

http://git.darksatanic.net/cgi/gitweb.cgi?p=btrfs-progs-unstable.git;a=summary

Hugo.