Skip to contentSkip to conversation

continuous mode driver for spi device with interrupt

DISCUSSION Lo 2 participants 3 messages Jul 30, 2013 – Jul 31, 2013 IIO

lore
Share & tools
lore

Lo

author
#0 lore raw

Hello,

using the iio driver framework I wrote a driver for an eight channel ADC, connected via SPI and a interrupt line.
In polling mode (reading /sys/bus/iio/..../in_voltageX_raw) everything works fine, but this access is obviously not way I'd want to use to read lots of data. Looking at other drivers (in staging/ kernel v3.2) I think the most appropriate way is to use the provided sw ring buffer ring_sw.c I'm not sure if my ring setup is correct, can someone please comment on this?

My _probe function does the basic setup, inits a waitqueue and requests the irq line (a gpio):
iio->buffer = iio_sw_rb_allocate(iio);
iio->buffer->access = &ring_sw_access_funcs;
iio->pollfunc = iio_alloc_pollfunc(&iio_pollfunc_store_time,

	&my_poll_handler,
	IRQF_ONESHOT, //<-not sure about this flag
	iio,
	"my_consumer%d",//<-where is this for?
	iio->id);

iio->buffer->setup_ops = &my_ring_setup_ops; iio->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;//<-correct mode?

Where my access funcs are:
.preenable = &my_buffer_preenable,
.postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable, .predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable, .postdisable = &my_buffer_postdisable
where:
preenable just sets iio->buffer->access->set_bytes_per_datum(iio->buffer, 19); and enables the irq
postenable disables the irq

My irq handler does basically this:

	disable_irq_nosync(irq);
	iio_trigger_poll(adc->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
	return IRQ_HANDLED;

My poll handler does this:

	ring->access->store_to(ring, (u8 *)data, pf->timestamp);
	iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
	enable_irq(adc->spi->irq);
	return IRQ_HANDLED;

Is the approach of using the sw ring and the interrupt & poll_func more or less correct?
I've read ring.txt but still I get most of my kernel panics somewhere in ring of buffer management, so I must be doing something wrong there. Is any (simple) driver recommended as reference? I see different approaches in different drivers and I can't test them.

--Lo

maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Lo

Hello,

using the iio driver framework I wrote a driver for an eight channel ADC, connected via SPI and a interrupt line. In polling mode (reading /sys/bus/iio/..../in_voltageX_raw) everything works fine, but this access is obviously not way I'd want to use to read lots of data.
Looking at other drivers (in staging/ kernel v3.2) I think the most appropriate way is to use the provided sw ring buffer ring_sw.c
I'm not sure if my ring setup is correct, can someone please comment on this?

Quoted 8 lines

My _probe function does the basic setup, inits a waitqueue and requests the irq line (a gpio):
iio->buffer = iio_sw_rb_allocate(iio);
iio->buffer->access = &ring_sw_access_funcs;
iio->pollfunc = iio_alloc_pollfunc(&iio_pollfunc_store_time,
&my_poll_handler,
IRQF_ONESHOT, //<-not sure about this flag
iio,
"my_consumer%d",//<-where is this for?

Naming for the interrupt. Basically this is a variable number of arguements function so you can roll in creating the naming string with this call (in this case the iio->id is the only additional arguement afte the formatting.

Quoted 3 lines
    iio->id);

iio->buffer->setup_ops = &my_ring_setup_ops; iio->modes |= INDIO_BUFFER_TRIGGERED;//<-correct mode?

yes

Quoted 8 lines

Where my access funcs are:
.preenable = &my_buffer_preenable,
.postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable,
.predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable,
.postdisable = &my_buffer_postdisable
where:
preenable just sets iio->buffer->access->set_bytes_per_datum(iio->buffer, 19);

The kfifo always contains aligned data. Hence it will be padded to the largest sized element. The only way it would correctly be 19 would be to have 19 8 bit or lower channels. Seems unlikely. Also why doesn't the generic function work for your case?

Quoted 5 lines

and enables the irq
postenable disables the irq

My irq handler does basically this:

    disable_irq_nosync(irq);

Don't think you should need this if using the ONESHOT flag as it should be masked until handled. It's late here though so I might be completly wrong :)

Quoted 8 lines
    iio_trigger_poll(adc->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
    return IRQ_HANDLED;

My poll handler does this:

    ring->access->store_to(ring, (u8 *)data, pf->timestamp);
    iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
    enable_irq(adc->spi->irq);
    return IRQ_HANDLED;

Looks fine.

Quoted 5 lines

Is the approach of using the sw ring and the interrupt & poll_func more or less correct?
I've read ring.txt but still I get most of my kernel panics somewhere in ring of buffer management, so I must be doing something wrong there.
Is any (simple) driver recommended as reference? I see different approaches in different drivers and I can't test them.

Take a look at the dummy driver (still in drivers/staging/iio) as that can be tested without any hardware. (iio_simple_dummy

Quoted 6 lines

--Lo

Signature · 3 lines
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
author
#2 lore raw

Hello Jonathan,

Quoted 1 line · Jonathan Cameron

On 07/30/13 20:55, Lo wrote:

[snip]

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 8 lines

Where my access funcs are:
.preenable = &my_buffer_preenable,
.postenable = &iio_triggered_buffer_postenable,
.predisable = &iio_triggered_buffer_predisable,
.postdisable = &my_buffer_postdisable
where:
preenable just sets iio->buffer->access->set_bytes_per_datum(iio->buffer, 19);

Quoted 5 lines

The kfifo always contains aligned data. Hence it will be padded to the largest sized element. The only way it would correctly be 19 would be to have 19 8 bit or lower channels. Seems unlikely. Also why doesn't the generic function work for your case?

I took a look at the dummy driver, I switched to the generic function.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines

and enables the irq
postenable disables the irq

My irq handler does basically this:

     disable_irq_nosync(irq);

Don't think you should need this if using the ONESHOT flag as it should be masked until handled. It's late here though so I might be completly wrong :)

Then I assume my irq handler should not return IRQ_HANDLED, but IRQ_WAKE_THREAD instead, right?

Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 8 lines
     iio_trigger_poll(adc->trig, iio_get_time_ns());
     return IRQ_HANDLED;

My poll handler does this:

     ring->access->store_to(ring, (u8 *)data, pf->timestamp);
     iio_trigger_notify_done(iio->trig);
     enable_irq(adc->spi->irq);
     return IRQ_HANDLED;

Looks fine.
Take a look at the dummy driver (still in drivers/staging/iio) as that can be tested without any hardware. (iio_simple_dummy)

Thanks! that's what I need, but I kept looking in the adc related stuff.
I've compiled the dummy driver, but apparently my assumed way of using the buffer mode is wrong. My buffer length is 0, bytes per datum also.
I compiled the generic_buffer.c but don't know how to use that on the dummy device either. I can run it and by reading the source I saw I must pass the iiodevice name (./buftest -n iio_dummy_part_no ), but I've got no idea what I should pass as trigger argument. Btw: which arguments are required/optional?

--Lo