Skip to contentSkip to conversation

staging: r8188eu: core: remove null check before vfree

PATCH Superseded Saurav Girepunje 2 participants 2 messages Aug 29, 2021 Staging

v2 of 4 Superseded Latest is v4 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH v2 1/1 staging: r8188eu: core: remove null check before vfree

Remove NULL check. NULL check before freeing function is not needed. Correct the indentation.

---
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c +2 -3
index f6dffed53a60..c3600cb1790a 100644
@@ -155,9 +155,8 @@ u32	_rtw_free_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 		spin_unlock_bh(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);
 		/*===============================*/
 
-		if (pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf)
-			vfree(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf);
-		}
+		vfree(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf);
+	}
 
 	return _SUCCESS;
 }

--
2.32.0

maintainer
#1 lore raw
Quoted 25 lines · Saurav Girepunje

Remove NULL check. NULL check before freeing function is not needed. Correct the indentation.

---
 drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c | 5 ++---
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
drivers/staging/r8188eu/core/rtw_sta_mgt.c +2 -4
index f6dffed53a60..c3600cb1790a 100644
@@ -155,9 +155,8 @@ u32	_rtw_free_sta_priv(struct	sta_priv *pstapriv)
 		spin_unlock_bh(&pstapriv->sta_hash_lock);
 		/*===============================*/
 
-		if (pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf)
-			vfree(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf);
-		}
+		vfree(pstapriv->pallocated_stainfo_buf);
+	}
 
 	return _SUCCESS;
 }
--
Quoted 3 lines

2.32.0

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s) as indicated below:

- This looks like a new version of a previously submitted patch, but you did not list below the --- line any changes from the previous version. Please read the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what needs to be done here to properly describe this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot