sunxi: Pine64: defconfig: enable SPL FIT support
PATCH v2 14/18 sunxi: Pine64: defconfig: enable SPL FIT support
Quoted 27 lines · 2017年3月29日 14:57于 Maxime Ripard <[email protected]>写道：
Quoted 25 lines · Andre Przywara
The Pine64 (and all other 64-bit Allwinner boards) need to load an ARM Trusted Firmware image beside the actual U-Boot proper. This can now be easily achieved by using the just extended SPL FIT loading support, so enable it in the Pine64 defconfig. Also add the FIT image as a build target to 64-bit sunxi board to trigger the respective
Makefilerules.Signed-off-by Andre Przywara <[email protected]>---
configs/pine64_plus_defconfig | 6 ++++++
include/configs/sunxi-common.h| 4 ++++2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)configs/pine64_plus_defconfig +0
-0@@ -3,9 +3,14 @@ CONFIG_ARCH_SUNXI=y
CONFIG_MACH_SUN50I=yCONFIG_RESERVE_ALLWINNER_BOOT0_HEADER=yCONFIG_DEFAULT_DEVICE_TREE="sun50i-a64-pine64-plus" +CONFIG_OF_LIST="sun50i-a64-pine64 sun50i-a64-pine64-plus" #CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_CLEAR_ON_INITis not setCONFIG_CONSOLE_MUX=y
CONFIG_SPL=y
Quoted 8 lines
configs/pine64_plus_defconfig
Quoted 4 lines
configs/pine64_plus_defconfig +4
-0+CONFIG_FIT=y +CONFIG_SPL_FIT=y +CONFIG_SPL_LOAD_FIT=y +CONFIG_SPL_OF_LIBFDT=yAgain, this doesn't make any sense to enable it in *all* our defconfigs. If this is something that should be enabled by default for the A64 support, then do so in
Kconfigdirectly.
Here it's "strongly recommended" to use SPL FIT support, but not "must", as someone may use U-Boot to execute their own code that wants EL3. In that situation SPL FIT support shouldn't be present. U-Boot is not Linux Loader, so we should give people the permission to disable it; however, U-Boot is mostly used to load and execute Linux, so this should be defaultly enabled -- is this correctly the meaning of defconfig?
Quoted 7 lines
Maxime
Signature · 3 lines
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com