rework IRQ handling in mtk_eth_soc
Subsystems (4)
v5 cover rework IRQ handling in mtk_eth_soc
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
This series introduces named IRQs while keeping the index based way for older dts.
Further it makes some cleanup like adding consts for index access and avoids loading first IRQ which was not used on non SHARED_INT SoCs.
changes:
v5:
- fixed typo and add linebreak in description of patch 1
- moved comments from previous patch #3 to patch #1 with changes suggested by simon
- rename consts to be compatible with upcoming RSS/LRO changes MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED => MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED
MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX => MTK_FE_IRQ_TX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX => MTK_FE_IRQ_RX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX => MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM
- change commit title and description in patch 3
v4:
- calculate max from last (rx) irq index and use it for array size too
- drop >2 condition as max is already 2 and drop the else continue
- update comment to explain which IRQs are taken in legacy way
v3:
added patches
- #2 (add constants for irq index)
- #3 (skip first IRQ on ! MTK_SHARED_INT)
to the v2 non-series patch
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/patch/[email protected]/
Tested on BPI-R4/mt7988 with IRQ names and BPI-R2/mt7623 and BPI-R3/mt7986 with upstreamed dts via index-mode.
I do not have any MTK_SHARED_INT (mt7621/mt7628) boards to testing.
Frank Wunderlich (3):
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 62 +++++++++++++++------ drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 7 ++- 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v5 1/3 net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Add named interrupts and keep index based fallback for existing devicetrees.
Currently only rx and tx IRQs are defined to be used with mt7988, but later extended with RSS/LRO support.
---
v5:
- fix typo in description
- add comments from previous patch #3 with changes suggested by simon
v2:
- move irqs loading part into own helper function
- reduce indentation
- place mtk_get_irqs helper before the irq_handler (note for simon)
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +35 -11
@@ -3337,6 +3337,37 @@ static void mtk_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txqueue)schedule_work (ð->pending_work); } +static int mtk_get_irqs (struct platform_device *pdev,struct mtk_eth *eth) +{ +int i; + +/* future SoCs beginning with MT7988 should use named IRQs in dts */ + eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) +return 0 ; + +/* legacy way: +* On MTK_SHARED_INT SoCs (MT7621 + MT7628) the first IRQ is taken +* from devicetree and used for both RX and TX - it is shared. +* On SoCs with non-shared IRQs the first entry is not used, +* the second is for TX, and the third is for RX. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; +else + eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); + +if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i); +return -ENXIO ; + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +static irqreturn_t mtk_handle_irq_rx (int irq,void *_eth) {struct mtk_eth *eth = _eth;
@@ -5106,17 +5137,10 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } } -for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; -else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); -if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i); - err = -ENXIO ; - goto err_wed_exit; - } - } + err =mtk_get_irqs (pdev, eth); +if (err) + goto err_wed_exit; +for (i =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (eth->clks); i++) { eth->clks[i] =devm_clk_get (eth->dev, mtk_clks_source_name[i]);
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [net-next v5 1/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
Quoted 11 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Add named interrupts and keep index based fallback for existing devicetrees.
Currently only rx and tx IRQs are defined to be used with mt7988, but later extended with RSS/LRO support.
Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c static void mtk_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txqueue) · line 3348
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +9
-0+static int mtk_get_irqs (struct platform_device *pdev,struct mtk_eth *eth) +{ +int i; + +/* future SoCs beginning with MT7988 should use named IRQs in dts */ + eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) +return 0 ;
I'd rather extend that logic and fall back to the legacy way only in case of -ENXIO. Ie. add here:
if (eth->irq[1] != -ENXIO)
return eth->irq[1];
if (eth->irq[2] != -ENXIO)
return eth->irq[2];
Maybe also output a warning at this point in case MTK_SHARED_INT is no set, to recommend users to update their device tree to named interrupts.
Quoted 51 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +26
-11+ +/* legacy way: +* On MTK_SHARED_INT SoCs (MT7621 + MT7628) the first IRQ is taken +* from devicetree and used for both RX and TX - it is shared. +* On SoCs with non-shared IRQs the first entry is not used, +* the second is for TX, and the third is for RX. +*/ +for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; +else + eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); + +if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) { +dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i); +return -ENXIO ; + } + } + +return 0 ; +} +static irqreturn_t mtk_handle_irq_rx (int irq,void *_eth) {struct mtk_eth *eth = _eth;@@ -5106,17 +5137,10 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) } } -for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; -else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); -if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) { -dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i); - err = -ENXIO ; - goto err_wed_exit; - } - } + err =mtk_get_irqs (pdev, eth); +if (err) + goto err_wed_exit; +for (i =0 ; i <ARRAY_SIZE (eth->clks); i++) { eth->clks[i] =devm_clk_get (eth->dev, mtk_clks_source_name[i]);Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [net-next v5 1/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: support named IRQs
Am 18. Juni 2025 15:55:45 MESZ schrieb Daniel Golle <[email protected]>:
Quoted 25 lines · Frank Wunderlich
Quoted 11 lines
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Add named interrupts and keep index based fallback for existing devicetrees.
Currently only rx and tx IRQs are defined to be used with mt7988, but later extended with RSS/LRO support.
Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c static void mtk_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev, unsigned int txqueue) · line 3348
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +9
-0+static int mtk_get_irqs (struct platform_device *pdev,struct mtk_eth *eth) +{ +int i; + +/* future SoCs beginning with MT7988 should use named IRQs in dts */ + eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) +return 0 ;I'd rather extend that logic and fall back to the legacy way only in case of
-ENXIO. Ie. add here:
Quoted 5 lines
if (eth->irq[1] !=
-ENXIO)return eth->irq[1];if (eth->irq[2] !=
-ENXIO)return eth->irq[2];
I would do this later after the consts are used
instead of index numbers,just to not add lines
that are changed later again.Better adding the
lines already with the consts.
Quoted 2 lines
Maybe also output a warning at this point in case
MTK_SHARED_INTis no set, to recommend users to update their device tree to named interrupts.
I understand the reason behind (documentation
which irq is used for which purpose),but
previous devicetrees of non-shared SoCs using
at least the reserved irq 0. Mt7986 has 0 and 3
defined in dts. That could be tricky in binding,
so my way was starting with irq names now for
new additions and leaving existing dts as they
are.
Maybe i should add the mt7988 ethernet binding change from my dts series here...
regards Frank
PATCH v5 2/3 net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index
In reply to Frank WunderlichFrom: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Use consts instead of fixed integers for accessing IRQ array.
---
v5:
- rename consts to be compatible with upcoming RSS/LRO changes MTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED => MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED
MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX => MTK_FE_IRQ_TX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX => MTK_FE_IRQ_RX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX => MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM
v4:
- calculate max from last (rx) irq index and use it for array size too
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 22 ++++++++++----------- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +11 -11
@@ -3342,9 +3342,9 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)int i;/* future SoCs beginning with MT7988 should use named IRQs in dts */ - eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); - eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); -if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_TX ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_TX ] >=0 && eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ] >=0 )return 0 ;/* legacy way:
@@ -3353,9 +3353,9 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)* On SoCs with non-shared IRQs the first entry is not used, * the second is for TX, and the third is for RX. */ -for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { +for (i =0 ; i <MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM ; i++) {if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ];else eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i);
@@ -3421,7 +3421,7 @@ static void mtk_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)mtk_tx_irq_disable (eth,MTK_TX_DONE_INT );mtk_rx_irq_disable (eth, eth->soc->rx.irq_done_mask); -mtk_handle_irq_rx (eth->irq[2 ], dev); +mtk_handle_irq_rx (eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ], dev);mtk_tx_irq_enable (eth,MTK_TX_DONE_INT );mtk_rx_irq_enable (eth, eth->soc->rx.irq_done_mask); }
@@ -4907,7 +4907,7 @@ static int mtk_add_mac(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct device_node *np) eth->netdev[id]->features |= eth->soc->hw_features; eth->netdev[id]->ethtool_ops = &mtk_ethtool_ops; - eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[0 ]; + eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]; eth->netdev[id]->dev.of_node = np;if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SOC_MT7628 ))
@@ -5184,17 +5184,17 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[0 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ], mtk_handle_irq,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth); }else { - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[1 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_TX ], mtk_handle_irq_tx,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth);if (err) goto err_free_dev; - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[2 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ], mtk_handle_irq_rx,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth); }
@@ -5240,7 +5240,7 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }else netif_info (eth, probe, eth->netdev[i],"mediatek frame engine at 0x%08lx, irq %d\n" , - eth->netdev[i]->base_addr, eth->irq[0 ]); + eth->netdev[i]->base_addr, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]); }/* we run 2 devices on the same DMA ring so we need a dummy device
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +6 -1
@@ -642,6 +642,11 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100)) +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED 0 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_TX 1 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM (MTK_FE_IRQ_RX + 1) +struct mtk_rx_dma {unsigned int rxd1;unsigned int rxd2;
@@ -1292,7 +1297,7 @@ struct mtk_eth {struct net_device *dummy_dev;struct net_device *netdev[MTK_MAX_DEVS ];struct mtk_mac *mac[MTK_MAX_DEVS ]; -int irq[3 ]; +int irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM ];u32 msg_enable;unsigned long sysclk;struct regmap *ethsys;
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [net-next v5 2/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: add consts for irq index
Quoted 6 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
Use consts instead of fixed integers for accessing IRQ array.
Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>Reviewed-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>
Quoted 119 lines
---
v5:
- rename consts to be compatible with upcoming RSS/LRO changesMTK_ETH_IRQ_SHARED=>MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED
MTK_ETH_IRQ_TX=>MTK_FE_IRQ_TX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_RX=>MTK_FE_IRQ_RX
MTK_ETH_IRQ_MAX=>MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM
v4:
- calculate max from last (rx) irq index and use it for array size too--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 22 ++++++++++----------- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 7 ++++++- 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +11
-11@@ -3342,9 +3342,9 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)int i;/* future SoCs beginning with MT7988 should use named IRQs in dts */ - eth->irq[1 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); - eth->irq[2 ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); -if (eth->irq[1 ] >=0 && eth->irq[2 ] >=0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_TX ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"tx" ); + eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ] =platform_get_irq_byname (pdev,"rx" ); +if (eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_TX ] >=0 && eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ] >=0 )return 0 ;/* legacy way: @@ -3353,9 +3353,9 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)* On SoCs with non-shared IRQs the first entry is not used, * the second is for TX, and the third is for RX. */ -for (i =0 ; i <3 ; i++) { +for (i =0 ; i <MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM ; i++) {if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[0 ]; + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ];else eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i);@@ -3421,7 +3421,7 @@ static void mtk_poll_controller(struct net_device *dev)mtk_tx_irq_disable (eth,MTK_TX_DONE_INT );mtk_rx_irq_disable (eth, eth->soc->rx.irq_done_mask); -mtk_handle_irq_rx (eth->irq[2 ], dev); +mtk_handle_irq_rx (eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ], dev);mtk_tx_irq_enable (eth,MTK_TX_DONE_INT );mtk_rx_irq_enable (eth, eth->soc->rx.irq_done_mask); }@@ -4907,7 +4907,7 @@ static int mtk_add_mac(struct mtk_eth *eth, struct device_node *np) eth->netdev[id]->features |= eth->soc->hw_features; eth->netdev[id]->ethtool_ops = &mtk_ethtool_ops; - eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[0 ]; + eth->netdev[id]->irq = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]; eth->netdev[id]->dev.of_node = np;if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SOC_MT7628 ))@@ -5184,17 +5184,17 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[0 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ], mtk_handle_irq,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth); }else { - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[1 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_TX ], mtk_handle_irq_tx,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth);if (err) goto err_free_dev; - err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[2 ], + err =devm_request_irq (eth->dev, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_RX ], mtk_handle_irq_rx,0 ,dev_name (eth->dev), eth); }@@ -5240,7 +5240,7 @@ static int mtk_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) }else netif_info (eth, probe, eth->netdev[i],"mediatek frame engine at 0x%08lx, irq %d\n" , - eth->netdev[i]->base_addr, eth->irq[0 ]); + eth->netdev[i]->base_addr, eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]); }/* we run 2 devices on the same DMA ring so we need a dummy device drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +6
-1@@ -642,6 +642,11 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100)) +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED 0 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_TX 1 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM (MTK_FE_IRQ_RX + 1) +struct mtk_rx_dma {unsigned int rxd1;unsigned int rxd2;@@ -1292,7 +1297,7 @@ struct mtk_eth {struct net_device *dummy_dev;struct net_device *netdev[MTK_MAX_DEVS ];struct mtk_mac *mac[MTK_MAX_DEVS ]; -int irq[3 ]; +int irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM ];u32 msg_enable;unsigned long sysclk;struct regmap *ethsys;Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
PATCH v5 3/3 net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
In reply to Frank WunderlichFrom: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without MTK_SHARED_INT capability (all except mt7621 and mt7628) platform_get_irq() is called for the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) but it is never used.
Skip the first IRQ and reduce the IRQ-count to 2.
---
v5:
- change commit title and description
v4:
- drop >2 condition as max is already 2 and drop the else continue
- update comment to explain which IRQs are taken in legacy way
--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++---- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +8 -4
@@ -3354,10 +3354,14 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)* the second is for TX, and the third is for RX. */ for (i =0 ; i <MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]; -else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { +if (i ==0 ) + eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +else + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]; + }else { + eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i +1 ); + }if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i);
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +2 -2
@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))#define MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED 0 -#define MTK_FE_IRQ_TX 1 -#define MTK_FE_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_TX 0 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_RX 1#define MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM (MTK_FE_IRQ_RX + 1)struct mtk_rx_dma {
Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
Quoted 5 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without
MTK_SHARED_INTcapability (all except mt7621 and mt7628)platform_get_irq()is called for the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) but it is never used.
I know that technically MTK_SHARED_INT is a capability flag, but it's rather a non-capability. Hardware having dedicated interrupts for RX and TX is "more capable" than (older, legacy) hardware with just one shared interrupt for both...
So maybe better:
"On SoCs with dedicated RX and TX interrupts (all except MT7621 and MT7628) ..."
Reading the datasheet of some recent MediaTek SoC it is worth noting that there are 4 interrupts assigned to the frame engine and the FE_INT_GRP register can be used to assign functions to them.
So technically, calling them RX and TX in DT is wrong, becaues they are fe_int0, fe_int1, fe_int2 and fe_int3, which are then assigned one or more functions by the driver using that FE_INT_GRP register.
However, it's the driver then assigns QDMA TX to fe_int1 and RX to fe_int2 while leaving fe_int0 and fe_int3 unsued.
That's what the magic value 0x21021000 which is written to FE_INT_GRP register does.
On MT7988 and newer, in addition to those 4 frame engine interrupts there are **another 4** interrupts for PDMA, typically used to service 4 RX rings while one of the fe_int* is used to indicate TX done.
Quoted 19 lines
Skip the first IRQ and reduce the IRQ-count to 2.
Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>---
v5:
- change commit title and description
v4:
- drop >2 condition as max is already 2 and drop the else continue
- update comment to explain which IRQs are taken in legacy way--- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c | 12 ++++++++---- drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +0
-0
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth) · line 3358
Quoted 9 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +2
-4@@ -3354,10 +3354,14 @@ static int mtk_get_irqs(struct platform_device *pdev, struct mtk_eth *eth)* the second is for TX, and the third is for RX. */ for (i =0 ; i <MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM ; i++) { -if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT ) && i >0 ) - eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ]; -else - eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); +if (MTK_HAS_CAPS (eth->soc->caps,MTK_SHARED_INT )) { +if (i ==0 )
This would make it even more readable:
if (i == MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED)
Other than that looks good to me:
Quoted 28 lines
drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.c +6
-0+ eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED ] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i); + else + eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED]; + }else { + eth->irq[i] =platform_get_irq (pdev, i +1 ); + }if (eth->irq[i] <0 ) {dev_err (&pdev->dev,"no IRQ%d resource found\n" , i);drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/mtk_eth_soc.h +2
-2@@ -643,8 +643,8 @@#define MTK_MAC_FSM (x) (0x1010C + ((x) * 0x100))#define MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED 0 -#define MTK_FE_IRQ_TX 1 -#define MTK_FE_IRQ_RX 2 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_TX 0 +#define MTK_FE_IRQ_RX 1#define MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM (MTK_FE_IRQ_RX + 1)struct mtk_rx_dma {Signature · 1 line
2.43.0
Re: [net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
In reply to Frank WunderlichQuoted 7 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without
MTK_SHARED_INTcapability (all except mt7621 and mt7628)platform_get_irq()is called for the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) but it is never used.
Skip the first IRQ and reduce the IRQ-count to 2.
Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>---
v5:
- change commit title and description
v4:
- drop >2 condition as max is already 2 and drop the else continue
- update comment to explain which IRQs are taken in legacy way
Aw: Re: [net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
Hi Simon
Quoted 20 lines
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2025 um 12:03
Von: "Simon Horman" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet:mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not usedQuoted 7 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without
MTK_SHARED_INTcapability (all except mt7621 and mt7628)platform_get_irq()is called for the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) but it is never used.
Skip the first IRQ and reduce the IRQ-count to 2.Quoted 7 lines
Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>---
v5:
- change commit title and description
v4:
- drop >2 condition as max is already 2 and drop the else continue
- update comment to explain which IRQs are taken in legacy way
Quoted 1 line
Reviewed-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>
thank you very much
i guess RB is still valid with changes requested by Daniel?
net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
On SoCs with dedicated RX and TX interrupts (all except MT7621 and MT7628) platform_get_irq() is called for the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) but it is never used.
Skip the first IRQ and reduce the IRQ-count to 2.
code (changed condition "if (i == MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED)")
for (i = 0; i < MTK_FE_IRQ_NUM; i++) {- if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT) && i > 0)
- eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED];
- else
- eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ if (MTK_HAS_CAPS(eth->soc->caps, MTK_SHARED_INT)) {
+ if (i == MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED)
+ eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
+ else
+ eth->irq[i] = eth->irq[MTK_FE_IRQ_SHARED];
+ } else {
+ eth->irq[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i + 1);
+ }
regards Frank
Simon Horman
reviewerRe: Re: [net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet: mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not used
Quoted 22 lines · Frank Wunderlich
Hi Simon
Quoted 20 lines
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Juni 2025 um 12:03
Von: "Simon Horman" <[email protected]>
Betreff: Re: [net-next v5 3/3] net: ethernet:mtk_eth_soc: skip first IRQ if not usedQuoted 14 lines · Frank Wunderlich
From: Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>
On SoCs without
MTK_SHARED_INTcapability (all except mt7621 and mt7628)platform_get_irq()is called for the first IRQ (eth->irq[0]) but it is never used.
Skip the first IRQ and reduce the IRQ-count to 2.Signed-off-by Frank Wunderlich <[email protected]>---
v5:
- change commit title and description
v4:
- drop >2 condition as max is already 2 and drop the else continue
- update comment to explain which IRQs are taken in legacy way
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 1 line
Reviewed-by Simon Horman <[email protected]>thank you very much
i guess RB is still valid with changes requested by Daniel?
Yes, thanks for asking.