Enable IPQ9574 TSENS support
Subsystems (5)
v3 cover Enable IPQ9574 TSENS support
This patch set enables tsens in IPQ9574
Depends on
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
[v3]:
Fix make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check and make dtbs_check errors
[v2]:
Drop the driver change (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/b45d33d38a334aabbd52c83b0d6028af1f4c74c8.1682682753.git.quic_varada@quicinc.com/)
since the tsens device is compatible with 8074's tsens
and use 8074's compatible itself
Rename clusterX nodes as cpussX
[v1]:
Fix DT node names
[v0]:
Initial patch introducing TSENS support
Praveenkumar I (1):
dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Varadarajan Narayanan (3):
dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Fix "make dtbs_check" error
arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: add tsens node
arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: add thermal zone nodes
.../devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 15 +- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v3 1/4 dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Fix "make dtbs_check" error
While verifying make dtbs_check for ipq9574, qcm2290-tsens and sm6375-tsens threw the following errors.
['qcom,qcm2290-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long ... ['qcom,sm6375-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long
Fix them by adding their entries.
---
[v3]:
Fix the following 'make dtbs_check' error ['qcom,qcm2290-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long ['qcom,sm6375-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +2 -0
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ properties: - qcom,msm8953-tsens - qcom,msm8996-tsens - qcom,msm8998-tsens + - qcom,qcm2290-tsens - qcom,sc7180-tsens - qcom,sc7280-tsens - qcom,sc8180x-tsens
@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sdm845-tsens - qcom,sm6115-tsens - qcom,sm6350-tsens + - qcom,sm6375-tsens - qcom,sm8150-tsens - qcom,sm8250-tsens - qcom,sm8350-tsens
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Fix "make dtbs_check" error
Quoted 5 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
While verifying make
dtbs_checkfor ipq9574, qcm2290-tsens and sm6375-tsens threw the following errors.['qcom,qcm2290-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long ... ['qcom,sm6375-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long
Subject: Fix error can be anything, so this should be specific, e.g. Document missing QCM2290
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Fix "make dtbs_check" error
In reply to Varadarajan NarayananQuoted 10 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
While verifying make
dtbs_checkfor ipq9574, qcm2290-tsens and sm6375-tsens threw the following errors.['qcom,qcm2290-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long ... ['qcom,sm6375-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too longFix them by adding their entries.
Signed-off-by Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>---
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/[email protected]/
These never got picked up..
I'll bump them.
Konrad
Quoted 28 lines
[v3]:
Fix the following 'make dtbs_check' error ['qcom,qcm2290-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long ['qcom,sm6375-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] is too long --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +2
-0@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ properties: - qcom,msm8953-tsens - qcom,msm8996-tsens - qcom,msm8998-tsens + - qcom,qcm2290-tsens - qcom,sc7180-tsens - qcom,sc7280-tsens - qcom,sc8180x-tsens@@ -56,6 +57,7 @@ properties: - qcom,sdm845-tsens - qcom,sm6115-tsens - qcom,sm6350-tsens + - qcom,sm6375-tsens - qcom,sm8150-tsens - qcom,sm8250-tsens - qcom,sm8350-tsens
PATCH v3 2/4 dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
In reply to Varadarajan NarayananFrom: Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
Qualcomm IPQ9574 has tsens v2.3.1 block, which is similar to IPQ8074 tsens.
---
[v3]:
Fix dt_binding_check & dtbs_check errors (Used Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yaml as reference/example)
Drop 'Acked-by: Rob Herring' as suggested in review
[v2]:
Thanks to Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> for the tip to make qcom,ipq8074-tsens as fallback.
--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +11 -2
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ description: | properties: compatible: oneOf: + - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - description: msm8960 TSENS based items: - enum:
@@ -66,8 +71,10 @@ properties: - const: qcom,tsens-v2 - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt - enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + items: + - enum: + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens reg: items:
@@ -279,6 +286,7 @@ allOf: contains: enum: - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens then: properties: interrupts:
@@ -294,6 +302,7 @@ allOf: contains: enum: - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens - qcom,tsens-v0_1 - qcom,tsens-v1 - qcom,tsens-v2
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 26 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
From: Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
Qualcomm IPQ9574 has tsens v2.3.1 block, which is similar to IPQ8074 tsens.
Signed-off-by Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>---
[v3]:
Fixdt_binding_check&dtbs_checkerrors (UsedDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yamlas reference/example)Drop 'Acked-by: Rob Herring' as suggested in review
[v2]:
Thanks to Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> for the tip to make qcom,ipq8074-tsens as fallback.--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-0
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 24
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +3
-0@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ description: | properties: compatible: oneOf: + - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2
Nope, these are not correct.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 25
Quoted 1 line
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Also nope, this is already there.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml properties: · line 70
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-2+ - description: msm8960 TSENS based items: - enum:@@ -66,8 +71,10 @@ properties: - const: qcom,tsens-v2 - description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt - enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Why?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml allOf: · line 289
Quoted 12 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +5
-0+ items: + - enum: + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens reg: items:@@ -279,6 +286,7 @@ allOf: contains: enum: - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
Not needed, drop.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml allOf: · line 305
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0then: properties: interrupts:@@ -294,6 +302,7 @@ allOf: contains: enum: - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
Ditto.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 47 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 26 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
From: Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
Qualcomm IPQ9574 has tsens v2.3.1 block, which is similar to IPQ8074 tsens.
Signed-off-by Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>---
[v3]:
Fixdt_binding_check&dtbs_checkerrors (UsedDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yamlas reference/example)Drop 'Acked-by: Rob Herring' as suggested in review
[v2]:
Thanks to Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> for the tip to make qcom,ipq8074-tsens as fallback.--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-0Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 24
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +3
-0@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ description: | properties: compatible: oneOf: + - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2Nope, these are not correct.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 25
Quoted 1 line
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensAlso nope, this is already there.
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - description: msm8960 TSENS based items: - enum:@@ -66,8 +71,10 @@ properties: - const: qcom,tsens-v2
Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml properties: · line 70
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-2- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt - enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsensWhy?
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +4
-0+ items: + - enum: + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Without changing it like this either dtbs_check or dt_binding_check kept failing.
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
dtbs_check gave this kind of error
['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
After changing it like in https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ope.yaml#L31
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
dt_binding_check gives the following error
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: did not find expected key
and dtbs_check gives
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: [error] syntax error: expected <block end>, but found '-' (syntax)
CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq8064.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8064.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: did not find expected key
SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
/local/mnt/workspace/varada/v3/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml: ignoring, error parsing file
If i change it like below,
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
dt_binding_check and dtbs_check gives same error as above.
Looked around and found Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yaml which seemed to do something similar to what is wanted in this
case. Hence changed qcom-tsens.yaml similar to the allwinner yaml
file. After which dt_binding_check and dtbs_check passed. Please
let me know if there is a better way to solve this. Will go with
that.
Thanks
Varada
Quoted 26 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml allOf: · line 289
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0reg: items:@@ -279,6 +286,7 @@ allOf: contains: enum: - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - qcom,ipq9574-tsensNot needed, drop.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml allOf: · line 305
Quoted 8 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0then: properties: interrupts:@@ -294,6 +302,7 @@ allOf: contains: enum: - qcom,ipq8074-tsens + - qcom,ipq9574-tsensDitto.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 59 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 47 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 26 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
From: Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
Qualcomm IPQ9574 has tsens v2.3.1 block, which is similar to IPQ8074 tsens.
Signed-off-by Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>---
[v3]:
Fixdt_binding_check&dtbs_checkerrors (UsedDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yamlas reference/example)Drop 'Acked-by: Rob Herring' as suggested in review
[v2]:
Thanks to Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> for the tip to make qcom,ipq8074-tsens as fallback.--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-0Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 24
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +3
-0@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ description: | properties: compatible: oneOf: + - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2Nope, these are not correct.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 25
Quoted 1 line
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensAlso nope, this is already there.
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - description: msm8960 TSENS based items: - enum:@@ -66,8 +71,10 @@ properties: - const: qcom,tsens-v2Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml properties: · line 70
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-2- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt - enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsensWhy?
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +4
-0+ items: + - enum: + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Quoted 7 lines
Without changing it like this either
dtbs_checkordt_binding_checkkept failing.- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
But we do not talk about this... Look, I commented out under specific hunks which are not correct. Not under the hunk which is correct.
Quoted 12 lines
dtbs_checkgave this kind of error['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too longAfter changing it like in https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ope.yaml#L31
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Quoted 3 lines
dt_binding_checkgives the following error
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: did not find expected key
Because it is not even valid syntax.
Quoted 18 lines
and
dtbs_checkgives
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: [error] syntax error: expected <block end>, but found '-' (syntax)
CHKDTDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq8064.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8064.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: did not find expected key
SCHEMADocumentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
/local/mnt/workspace/varada/v3/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml: ignoring, error parsing fileIf i change it like below,
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Quoted 7 lines
dt_binding_checkanddtbs_checkgives same error as above.Looked around and found
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yamlwhich seemed to do something similar to what is wanted in this
case. Hence changedqcom-tsens.yamlsimilar to the allwinner yaml
file. After whichdt_binding_checkanddtbs_checkpassed. Please
let me know if there is a better way to solve this. Will go with
Changing one valid syntax to another valid syntax is not related to the patch. If you think such change as reasonable, please split it, but to me it does not look justified. As for actual change, so adding new compatible, it's not really related to the others. Why you cannot add the proper list (so the only valid hunk) and that's it?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 115 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 59 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 47 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 26 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
From: Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>
Qualcomm IPQ9574 has tsens v2.3.1 block, which is similar to IPQ8074 tsens.
Signed-off-by Praveenkumar I <[email protected]>Signed-off-by Varadarajan Narayanan <[email protected]>---
[v3]:
Fixdt_binding_check&dtbs_checkerrors (UsedDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yamlas reference/example)Drop 'Acked-by: Rob Herring' as suggested in review
[v2]:
Thanks to Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]> for the tip to make qcom,ipq8074-tsens as fallback.--- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml | 13 +++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-0Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 24
Quoted 6 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +3
-0@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ description: | properties: compatible: oneOf: + - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2Nope, these are not correct.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml description: | · line 25
Quoted 1 line
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensAlso nope, this is already there.
Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +1
-0+ - description: msm8960 TSENS based items: - enum:@@ -66,8 +71,10 @@ properties: - const: qcom,tsens-v2Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml properties: · line 70
Quoted 3 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +0
-2- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt - enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsensWhy?
Quoted 4 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml +4
-0+ items: + - enum: + - qcom,ipq9574-tsens + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensQuoted 7 lines
Without changing it like this either
dtbs_checkordt_binding_checkkept failing.- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- qcom,ipq9574-tsensBut we do not talk about this... Look, I commented out under specific hunks which are not correct. Not under the hunk which is correct.
Quoted 12 lines
dtbs_checkgave this kind of error['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too longAfter changing it like in https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ope.yaml#L31
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensQuoted 3 lines
dt_binding_checkgives the following error
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: did not find expected keyBecause it is not even valid syntax.
Quoted 18 lines
and
dtbs_checkgives
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: [error] syntax error: expected <block end>, but found '-' (syntax)
CHKDTDocumentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-ipq8064.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8064.yaml: Unable to find schema file matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml
./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml:70:9: did not find expected key
SCHEMADocumentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema.json
/local/mnt/workspace/varada/v3/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml: ignoring, error parsing fileIf i change it like below,
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensQuoted 7 lines
dt_binding_checkanddtbs_checkgives same error as above.Looked around and found
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/allwinner,sun4i-a10-tcon.yamlwhich seemed to do something similar to what is wanted in this
case. Hence changedqcom-tsens.yamlsimilar to the allwinner yaml
file. After whichdt_binding_checkanddtbs_checkpassed. Please
let me know if there is a better way to solve this. Will go with
Quoted 5 lines
Changing one valid syntax to another valid syntax is not related to the patch. If you think such change as reasonable, please split it, but to me it does not look justified. As for actual change, so adding new compatible, it's not really related to the others. Why you cannot add the proper list (so the only valid hunk) and that's it?
Not sure if I didn't express properly. There are two parts to this patch.
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Part-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Without both of the above changes, either or both of dtbs_check & dt_binding_check fails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
Thanks
Varada
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 19 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.
Quoted 6 lines
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
For the other compatibles, the enum entries and const/fallback entries are different. For the 9574 & 8074 case, we want to have qcom,ipq8074-tsens as both enum and const/fallback entry. Hence, if we don't have the first hunk, dtbs_check fails for 8074 related dtbs
ipq8074-hk01.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short
I'm not sure of the correct solution. Having the first hunk solves the above dtbs_check errors, so went with it. I'm able to avoid dtbs_check errors with just one entry in the first hunk.
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Please let me know if there is a better way to resolve this or we can have just the 8074 entry in the first hunk.
Thanks
Varada
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 27 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 19 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.Quoted 6 lines
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
Quoted 8 lines
For the other compatibles, the enum entries and const/fallback entries are different. For the 9574 & 8074 case, we want to have qcom,ipq8074-tsens as both enum and const/fallback entry. Hence, if we don't have the first hunk,
dtbs_checkfails for 8074 related dtbsipq8074-hk01.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short
Why? It is already there. Open the file and you will see that this is already covered.
If you remove it, then yes, you will see errors and the answer is: do not remove it.
Quoted 10 lines
ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortI'm not sure of the correct solution. Having the first hunk solves the above
dtbs_checkerrors, so went with it. I'm able to avoiddtbs_checkerrors with just one entry in the first hunk.
You made multiple changes in one patch which is not correct. Your goal is to add only one change - ipq9574 followed by ipq8074. Add this one. Don't touch others.
Quoted 5 lines
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Please let me know if there is a better way to resolve this or we can have just the 8074 entry in the first hunk.
You only need to add new item on the oneOf list:
- enum
- ipq9574
- const: ipq8074
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 34 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 33 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 19 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.Quoted 6 lines
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
For the other compatibles, the enum entries and const/fallback entries are different. For the 9574 & 8074 case, we want to have qcom,ipq8074-tsens as both enum and const/fallback entry. Hence, if we don't have the first hunk,
dtbs_checkfails for 8074 related dtbs
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
ipq8074-hk01.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortWhy? It is already there. Open the file and you will see that this is already covered.
I guess dtbs_check doesn't like the same value being a const and a oneof entry. Have attached the file, please see if something is not in order.
Quoted 2 lines
If you remove it, then yes, you will see errors and the answer is: do not remove it.
I haven't removed it. For this patch, ipq8074-tsens changed from being an oneof enum entry to a const entry. Probably, that is why dtbs_check is giving these errors.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
I'm not sure of the correct solution. Having the first hunk solves the above
dtbs_checkerrors, so went with it. I'm able to avoiddtbs_checkerrors with just one entry in the first hunk.You made multiple changes in one patch which is not correct. Your goal is to add only one change - ipq9574 followed by ipq8074. Add this one. Don't touch others.
But that breaks dtbs_check.
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Please let me know if there is a better way to resolve this or we can have just the 8074 entry in the first hunk.
You only need to add new item on the oneOf list:
- enum
- ipq9574
- const: ipq8074
The "['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short" errors were generated with the above snippet only. Please see the attachment
Thanks
Varada
# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
# Copyright 2019 Linaro Ltd.
%YAML 1.2
---
$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/thermal/qcom-tsens.yaml#
$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
title: QCOM SoC Temperature Sensor (TSENS)
maintainers:
- Amit Kucheria <[email protected]>
description: |
QCOM SoCs have TSENS IP to allow temperature measurement. There are currently three distinct major versions of the IP that is supported by a single driver. The IP versions are named v0.1, v1 and v2 in the driver, where v0.1 captures everything before v1 when there was no versioning information.
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
- description: msm8960 TSENS based
items:
- enum:
- qcom,ipq8064-tsens
- qcom,msm8960-tsens
- description: v0.1 of TSENS
items:
- enum:
- qcom,mdm9607-tsens
- qcom,msm8916-tsens
- qcom,msm8939-tsens
- qcom,msm8974-tsens
- const: qcom,tsens-v0_1
- description: v1 of TSENS
items:
- enum:
- qcom,msm8956-tsens
- qcom,msm8976-tsens
- qcom,qcs404-tsens
- const: qcom,tsens-v1
- description: v2 of TSENS
items:
- enum:
- qcom,msm8953-tsens
- qcom,msm8996-tsens
- qcom,msm8998-tsens
- qcom,sc7180-tsens
- qcom,sc7280-tsens
- qcom,sc8180x-tsens
- qcom,sc8280xp-tsens
- qcom,sdm630-tsens
- qcom,sdm845-tsens
- qcom,sm6115-tsens
- qcom,sm6350-tsens
- qcom,sm8150-tsens
- qcom,sm8250-tsens
- qcom,sm8350-tsens
- qcom,sm8450-tsens
- qcom,sm8550-tsens
- const: qcom,tsens-v2
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt items:
- enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
reg:
items:
- description: TM registers
- description: SROT registers
interrupts:
minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
interrupt-names:
minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
nvmem-cells:
oneOf:
- minItems: 1
maxItems: 2
description:
Reference to an nvmem node for the calibration data
- minItems: 5
maxItems: 35
description: |
Reference to nvmem cells for the calibration mode, two calibration bases and two cells per each sensor
# special case for msm8974 / apq8084
- maxItems: 51
description: |
Reference to nvmem cells for the calibration mode, two calibration bases and two cells per each sensor, main and backup copies, plus use_backup cell
nvmem-cell-names:
oneOf:
- minItems: 1
items:
- const: calib
- enum:
- calib_backup
- calib_sel
- minItems: 5
items:
- const: mode
- const: base1
- const: base2
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p1$'
- pattern: '^s[0-9]+_p2$'
# special case for msm8974 / apq8084
- items:
- const: mode
- const: base1
- const: base2
- const: use_backup
- const: mode_backup
- const: base1_backup
- const: base2_backup
- const: s0_p1
- const: s0_p2
- const: s1_p1
- const: s1_p2
- const: s2_p1
- const: s2_p2
- const: s3_p1
- const: s3_p2
- const: s4_p1
- const: s4_p2
- const: s5_p1
- const: s5_p2
- const: s6_p1
- const: s6_p2
- const: s7_p1
- const: s7_p2
- const: s8_p1
- const: s8_p2
- const: s9_p1
- const: s9_p2
- const: s10_p1
- const: s10_p2
- const: s0_p1_backup
- const: s0_p2_backup
- const: s1_p1_backup
- const: s1_p2_backup
- const: s2_p1_backup
- const: s2_p2_backup
- const: s3_p1_backup
- const: s3_p2_backup
- const: s4_p1_backup
- const: s4_p2_backup
- const: s5_p1_backup
- const: s5_p2_backup
- const: s6_p1_backup
- const: s6_p2_backup
- const: s7_p1_backup
- const: s7_p2_backup
- const: s8_p1_backup
- const: s8_p2_backup
- const: s9_p1_backup
- const: s9_p2_backup
- const: s10_p1_backup
- const: s10_p2_backup
"#qcom,sensors":
description:
Number of sensors enabled on this platform
$ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
minimum: 1
maximum: 16
"#thermal-sensor-cells":
const: 1
description:
Number of cells required to uniquely identify the thermal sensors. Since we have multiple sensors this is set to 1
required:
- compatible
- interrupts
- interrupt-names
- "#thermal-sensor-cells"
- "#qcom,sensors"
allOf:
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- qcom,ipq8064-tsens
- qcom,mdm9607-tsens
- qcom,msm8916-tsens
- qcom,msm8960-tsens
- qcom,msm8974-tsens
- qcom,msm8976-tsens
- qcom,qcs404-tsens
- qcom,tsens-v0_1
- qcom,tsens-v1
then:
properties:
interrupts:
items:
- description: Combined interrupt if upper or lower threshold crossed
interrupt-names:
items:
- const: uplow
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- qcom,msm8953-tsens
- qcom,msm8996-tsens
- qcom,msm8998-tsens
- qcom,sc7180-tsens
- qcom,sc7280-tsens
- qcom,sc8180x-tsens
- qcom,sc8280xp-tsens
- qcom,sdm630-tsens
- qcom,sdm845-tsens
- qcom,sm6350-tsens
- qcom,sm8150-tsens
- qcom,sm8250-tsens
- qcom,sm8350-tsens
- qcom,sm8450-tsens
- qcom,tsens-v2
then:
properties:
interrupts:
items:
- description: Combined interrupt if upper or lower threshold crossed
- description: Interrupt if critical threshold crossed
interrupt-names:
items:
- const: uplow
- const: critical
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
then:
properties:
interrupts:
items:
- description: Combined interrupt if upper, lower or critical thresholds crossed
interrupt-names:
items:
- const: combined
- if:
properties:
compatible:
contains:
enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- qcom,tsens-v0_1
- qcom,tsens-v1
- qcom,tsens-v2
then:
required:
- reg
additionalProperties: false
examples:
- |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
// Example msm9860 based SoC (ipq8064):
gcc: clock-controller {
/* ... */
tsens: thermal-sensor {
compatible = "qcom,ipq8064-tsens";
nvmem-cells = <&tsens_calib>, <&tsens_calib_backup>;
nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "calib_backup";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 178 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "uplow";
#qcom,sensors = <11>;
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
};
}; - |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
// Example 1 (new calbiration data: for pre v1 IP):
thermal-sensor@900000 {
compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v0_1";
reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
<0x4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */ nvmem-cells = <&tsens_mode>,
<&tsens_base1>, <&tsens_base2>,
<&tsens_s0_p1>, <&tsens_s0_p2>,
<&tsens_s1_p1>, <&tsens_s1_p2>,
<&tsens_s2_p1>, <&tsens_s2_p2>,
<&tsens_s4_p1>, <&tsens_s4_p2>,
<&tsens_s5_p1>, <&tsens_s5_p2>;
nvmem-cell-names = "mode",
"base1", "base2",
"s0_p1", "s0_p2",
"s1_p1", "s1_p2",
"s2_p1", "s2_p2",
"s4_p1", "s4_p2",
"s5_p1", "s5_p2";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 184 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "uplow";
#qcom,sensors = <5>;
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
}; - |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
// Example 1 (legacy: for pre v1 IP):
tsens1: thermal-sensor@900000 {
compatible = "qcom,msm8916-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v0_1";
reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
<0x4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */ nvmem-cells = <&tsens_caldata>, <&tsens_calsel>;
nvmem-cell-names = "calib", "calib_sel";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 184 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "uplow";
#qcom,sensors = <5>;
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
}; - |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
// Example 2 (for any platform containing v1 of the TSENS IP):
tsens2: thermal-sensor@4a9000 {
compatible = "qcom,qcs404-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v1";
reg = <0x004a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */
<0x004a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */ nvmem-cells = <&tsens_caldata>;
nvmem-cell-names = "calib";
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 506 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "uplow";
#qcom,sensors = <10>;
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
};- |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
// Example 3 (for any platform containing v2 of the TSENS IP):
tsens3: thermal-sensor@c263000 {
compatible = "qcom,sdm845-tsens", "qcom,tsens-v2";
reg = <0xc263000 0x1ff>,
<0xc222000 0x1ff>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 506 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
<GIC_SPI 508 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "uplow", "critical";
#qcom,sensors = <13>;
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
};- |
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
// Example 4 (for any IPQ8074 based SoC-s):
tsens4: thermal-sensor@4a9000 {
compatible = "qcom,ipq8074-tsens";
reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>,
<0x4a8000 0x1000>;
interrupts = <GIC_SPI 184 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
interrupt-names = "combined";
#qcom,sensors = <16>;
#thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
};...
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 35 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 34 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 33 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 19 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.Quoted 6 lines
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
For the other compatibles, the enum entries and const/fallback entries are different. For the 9574 & 8074 case, we want to have qcom,ipq8074-tsens as both enum and const/fallback entry. Hence, if we don't have the first hunk,
dtbs_checkfails for 8074 related dtbs
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
ipq8074-hk01.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortWhy? It is already there. Open the file and you will see that this is already covered.
I guess
dtbs_checkdoesn't like the same value being a const and a oneof entry.
I don't understand.
Quoted 2 lines
Have attached the file, please see if something is
not in order.
I don't know what changed there. Please work on patches.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If you remove it, then yes, you will see errors and the answer is: do not remove it.
I haven't removed it.
You did. Look:
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
- enum:
- - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
The first character in the diff (-) means removal.
Quoted 3 lines
For this patch, ipq8074-tsens changed from
being an oneof enum entry to a const entry. Probably, that is whydtbs_checkis giving these errors.
You removed the entry which you should not have touched.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortI'm not sure of the correct solution. Having the first hunk solves the above
dtbs_checkerrors, so went with it. I'm able to avoiddtbs_checkerrors with just one entry in the first hunk.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
You made multiple changes in one patch which is not correct. Your goal is to add only one change - ipq9574 followed by ipq8074. Add this one. Don't touch others.
But that breaks
dtbs_check.
All other cases, hundreds of other binding files, do not have problem. Only this one "breaks dtbs_check". No, it does not.
Whatever is broken is result of your removal of unrelated pieces.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 5 lines
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Please let me know if there is a better way to resolve this or we can have just the 8074 entry in the first hunk.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
You only need to add new item on the oneOf list:
- enum
- ipq9574
- const: ipq8074The "['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short" errors were generated with the above snippet only. Please see the attachment
It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating - "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 39 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 38 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 35 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 19 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.Quoted 6 lines
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
For the other compatibles, the enum entries and const/fallback entries are different. For the 9574 & 8074 case, we want to have qcom,ipq8074-tsens as both enum and const/fallback entry. Hence, if we don't have the first hunk,
dtbs_checkfails for 8074 related dtbsipq8074-hk01.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why? It is already there. Open the file and you will see that this is already covered.
I guess
dtbs_checkdoesn't like the same value being a const and a oneof entry.I don't understand.
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt items:
- enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens <--- one of the compatible entries
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens <--- fallback entry
In this patch, we want 8074 to act as a compatible entry for ipq8074*.dts and fallback entry for ipq9574.dtsi. That is why I believe we are not able to just add 9574 and get it to pass dtbs_check and dt_binding_check.
Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Have attached the file, please see if something is
not in order.I don't know what changed there. Please work on patches.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If you remove it, then yes, you will see errors and the answer is: do not remove it.
I haven't removed it.
You did. Look:
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
(quoted diff) +0
-2- enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Quoted 1 line
The first character in the diff (-) means removal.
It changed from 'enum' to 'const', that is why I said it is not removed.
Quoted 21 lines
Quoted 3 lines
For this patch, ipq8074-tsens changed from
being an oneof enum entry to a const entry. Probably, that is whydtbs_checkis giving these errors.You removed the entry which you should not have touched.
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 10 lines
ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortI'm not sure of the correct solution. Having the first hunk solves the above
dtbs_checkerrors, so went with it. I'm able to avoiddtbs_checkerrors with just one entry in the first hunk.You made multiple changes in one patch which is not correct. Your goal is to add only one change - ipq9574 followed by ipq8074. Add this one. Don't touch others.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
But that breaks
dtbs_check.All other cases, hundreds of other binding files, do not have problem. Only this one "breaks
dtbs_check". No, it does not.Whatever is broken is result of your removal of unrelated pieces.
Not sure about other binding files. Probably they don't have the same value for fallback and normal compatible. If there is such an example binding file, will replicate that syntax/structure for ipq9574 too.
In the 'nvidia,tegra210-ope' example (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ope.yaml#L25)
too 'nvidia,tegra210-ope' is listed twice
- const: nvidia,tegra210-ope <===
- items:
- enum:
- nvidia,tegra234-ope
- nvidia,tegra194-ope
- nvidia,tegra186-ope
- const: nvidia,tegra210-ope <===
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Please let me know if there is a better way to resolve this or we can have just the 8074 entry in the first hunk.
You only need to add new item on the oneOf list:
- enum
- ipq9574
- const: ipq8074
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The "['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short" errors were generated with the above snippet only. Please see the attachment
It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating - "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
(1) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check :
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
(2) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check : Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']
(3) No lines removed
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based items:
- enum:
@@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: Same as above
dtbs_check : Same as above
(4) Change 8074 from enum to const
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based
items:
- enum:
@@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
- const: qcom,tsens-v2
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
- enum:
- - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check : No errors
But (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
Thanks
Varada
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 21 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 9 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 4 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 3 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 2 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 1 line · Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 17/05/2023 07:57, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating - "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
(1) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
Quoted 8 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
Which I figure you understand makes sense.
Quoted 12 lines
(2) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensreg:
items:
Quoted 6 lines
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check: Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1']arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']
I think you've missed an earlier error that points out the entire binding is invalid.
Quoted 16 lines
(3) No lines removed
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based items:
- enum:
@@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Quoted 6 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: Same as above
dtbs_check: Same as above
Ditto here.
Quoted 20 lines
(4) Change 8074 from enum to const
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based
items:
- enum:
@@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
- const: qcom,tsens-v2- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
- enum:
- - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Quoted 8 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check: No errorsBut (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
It now has a "random" entry up at the top w/ no description, not matching the existing style. Can you just fix that up & send a v(N+1) so that the discussion can restart in a less confusing way? I am trying to fill in for Krzysztof but I am struggling to follow the thread.
Thanks,
Conor.
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
Quoted 105 lines · Conor Dooley
Quoted 21 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 9 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 4 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 3 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 2 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 1 line · Krzysztof Kozlowski
On 17/05/2023 07:57, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating - "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
(1) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsensQuoted 8 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too longWhich I figure you understand makes sense.
Quoted 12 lines
(2) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensreg:
items:Quoted 6 lines
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check: Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1']arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2']arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']I think you've missed an earlier error that points out the entire binding is invalid.
Quoted 16 lines
(3) No lines removed
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based items:
- enum:
@@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensQuoted 6 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: Same as above
dtbs_check: Same as aboveDitto here.
Quoted 25 lines
(4) Change 8074 from enum to const
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based
items:
- enum:
@@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
- const: qcom,tsens-v2- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
- enum:
- - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensreg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
dtbs_check: No errorsBut (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
It now has a "random" entry up at the top w/ no description, not matching the existing style. Can you just fix that up & send a v(N+1) so that the discussion can restart in a less confusing way? I am trying to fill in for Krzysztof but I am struggling to follow the thread.
Sure. Will post the next version.
Thanks
Varada
Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] dt-bindings: thermal: tsens: Add ipq9574 compatible
In reply to Varadarajan NarayananQuoted 54 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 39 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 38 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 37 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 35 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Quoted 19 lines · Krzysztof Kozlowski
Quoted 9 lines · Varadarajan Narayanan
Part-1 is adding the 'const' entries at the beginning i.e.
+ - const: qcom,tsens-v0_1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v1 + - const: qcom,tsens-v2 + - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensPart-2 is changing from one valid syntax to another i.e.
Quoted 8 lines
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsensWithout both of the above changes, either or both of
dtbs_check&dt_binding_checkfails. So, it is not possible to just add the "valid hunk" (part-2) alone.Quoted 6 lines
Of course it is. All schema files work like that...
Quoted 3 lines
If having both part-1 and part-2 in the same patch is not acceptable, shall I split them into two patches? Please let me know.
No, hunk one is not justified.
For the other compatibles, the enum entries and const/fallback entries are different. For the 9574 & 8074 case, we want to have qcom,ipq8074-tsens as both enum and const/fallback entry. Hence, if we don't have the first hunk,
dtbs_checkfails for 8074 related dtbsipq8074-hk01.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortQuoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Why? It is already there. Open the file and you will see that this is already covered.
I guess
dtbs_checkdoesn't like the same value being a const and a oneof entry.I don't understand.
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt items:
- enum:
- qcom,ipq9574-tsens <--- one of the compatible entries
- const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens <--- fallback entry
Quoted 4 lines
In this patch, we want 8074 to act as a compatible entry for ipq8074*.dts and fallback entry for
ipq9574.dtsi. That is why I believe we are not able to just add 9574 and get it to passdtbs_checkanddt_binding_check.
Nope, no other bindings have any problems with that. Fix your syntax as I said.
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 14 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Have attached the file, please see if something is
not in order.I don't know what changed there. Please work on patches.
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
If you remove it, then yes, you will see errors and the answer is: do not remove it.
I haven't removed it.
You did. Look:
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
(quoted diff) +0
-2- enum: - - qcom,ipq8074-tsensThe first character in the diff (-) means removal.
It changed from 'enum' to 'const', that is why I said it is not removed.
You removed that hunk. Diff hunk. It does not matter that you added similar one in different place. You removed this one. Don't.
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 27 lines
Quoted 4 lines
For this patch, ipq8074-tsens changed from
being an oneof enum entry to a const entry. Probably, that is whydtbs_checkis giving these errors.You removed the entry which you should not have touched.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 10 lines
ipq8074-hk10-c2.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short ipq8074-hk10-c1.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' condition ['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too shortI'm not sure of the correct solution. Having the first hunk solves the above
dtbs_checkerrors, so went with it. I'm able to avoiddtbs_checkerrors with just one entry in the first hunk.Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines
You made multiple changes in one patch which is not correct. Your goal is to add only one change - ipq9574 followed by ipq8074. Add this one. Don't touch others.
But that breaks
dtbs_check.All other cases, hundreds of other binding files, do not have problem. Only this one "breaks
dtbs_check". No, it does not.
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 1 line
Whatever is broken is result of your removal of unrelated pieces.
Not sure about other binding files. Probably they don't have the same value for fallback and normal compatible. If there is such an example binding file, will replicate that syntax/structure for ipq9574 too.
No. There are many examples of other bindings which do not have any problems with it and what we talk here is common pattern. You created some fake problem of wrong syntax and then fixed it with different approach...
Quoted 31 lines
In the 'nvidia,tegra210-ope' example (https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.3-rc6/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/nvidia,tegra210-ope.yaml#L25)
too 'nvidia,tegra210-ope' is listed twice- const: nvidia,tegra210-ope <===
- items:
- enum:
- nvidia,tegra234-ope
- nvidia,tegra194-ope
- nvidia,tegra186-ope
- const: nvidia,tegra210-ope <===Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 4 lines
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Please let me know if there is a better way to resolve this or we can have just the 8074 entry in the first hunk.
You only need to add new item on the oneOf list:
- enum
- ipq9574
- const: ipq8074Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 2 lines
The "['qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too short" errors were generated with the above snippet only. Please see the attachment
It's not true. The error you see is result because you removed something you should not. I did not ask you to remove anything. So repeating - "add new item". Adding is not "removal and adding". Adding is just "adding".
See below for the changes that were tried and the corresponding errors.
Quoted 7 lines
(1) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
This does not make sense, right? Let's not discuss solutions which do not make sense...
Quoted 10 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574-rdp433.dtb: thermal-sensor@4a9000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
['qcom,ipq9574-tsens', 'qcom,ipq8074-tsens'] is too long
Quoted 8 lines
(2) No lines removed
@@ -66,6 +66,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
You change existing entry, which breaks it. Don't.
Quoted 12 lines
reg: items: dt_binding_check: No errors dtbs_check : Gives errors for all the DTS files that have tsens-v0_1, tsens-v2, tsens-v1. Copy pasted a sample for each one of them arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916-huawei-g7.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8916-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v0_1'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953-xiaomi-tissot.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8953-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v2'] arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8956-sony-xperia-loire-suzu.dtb: /soc@0/thermal-sensor@4a9000: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['qcom,msm8956-tsens', 'qcom,tsens-v1']
Quoted 15 lines
(3) No lines removed
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based items:
- enum:
@@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt enum:
- qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Don't change existing entry.
Quoted 20 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: Same as above
dtbs_check: Same as above(4) Change 8074 from enum to const
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
properties:
compatible:
oneOf:
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
- description: msm8960 TSENS based
items:
- enum:
@@ -64,8 +65,10 @@
- const: qcom,tsens-v2
Quoted 7 lines
- description: v2 of TSENS with combined interrupt
- enum:
- - qcom,ipq8074-tsens
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - qcom,ipq9574-tsens
+ - const: qcom,ipq8074-tsens
Don't touch existing entry. Third time.
Quoted 9 lines
reg:
items:
dt_binding_check: No errors
dtbs_check: No errorsBut (4) doesn't seem acceptable. Any other alternative to resolve this?
Don't touch existing entry. Fourth time. Add a new one matching your combination.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
PATCH v3 3/4 arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: add tsens node
In reply to Varadarajan NarayananIPQ9574 has a tsens v2.3.1 peripheral which monitors temperatures around the various subsystems on the die.
---
[v2]:
Add "qcom,ipq8074-tsens" as fallback compatible
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi +9 -0
@@ -1056,6 +1056,15 @@ status = "disabled"; }; + tsens: thermal-sensor@4a9000 { + compatible = "qcom,ipq9574-tsens", "qcom,ipq8074-tsens"; + reg = <0x4a9000 0x1000>, /* TM */ + <0x4a8000 0x1000>; /* SROT */ + interrupts = <GIC_SPI 184 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>; + interrupt-names = "combined"; + #qcom,sensors = <16>; + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>; + }; }; timer {
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4
PATCH v3 4/4 arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: add thermal zone nodes
In reply to Varadarajan NarayananThis patch adds thermal zone nodes for the various sensors present in IPQ9574
---
[v2]:
Rename clusterX nodes as cpussX nodes
[v1]:
Fix node names
--- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 208 insertions(+)
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq9574.dtsi +208 -0
@@ -1067,6 +1067,214 @@ }; }; + thermal-zones { + nss-top-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 3>; + + trips { + nss-top-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + ubi-0-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 4>; + + trips { + ubi_0-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + ubi-1-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 5>; + + trips { + ubi_1-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + ubi-2-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 6>; + + trips { + ubi_2-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + ubi-3-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 7>; + + trips { + ubi_3-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + cpuss0-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 8>; + + trips { + cpu-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + cpuss1-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 9>; + + trips { + cpu-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + cpu0-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 10>; + + trips { + cpu-critical { + temperature = <120000>; + hysteresis = <10000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + + cpu-passive { + temperature = <110000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "passive"; + }; + }; + }; + + cpu1-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 11>; + + trips { + cpu-critical { + temperature = <120000>; + hysteresis = <10000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + + cpu-passive { + temperature = <110000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "passive"; + }; + }; + }; + + cpu2-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 12>; + + trips { + cpu-critical { + temperature = <120000>; + hysteresis = <10000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + + cpu-passive { + temperature = <110000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "passive"; + }; + }; + }; + + cpu3-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 13>; + + trips { + cpu-critical { + temperature = <120000>; + hysteresis = <10000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + + cpu-passive { + temperature = <110000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "passive"; + }; + }; + }; + + wcss-phyb-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 14>; + + trips { + wcss_phyb-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + + top-glue-thermal { + polling-delay-passive = <0>; + polling-delay = <0>; + thermal-sensors = <&tsens 15>; + + trips { + top_glue-critical { + temperature = <125000>; + hysteresis = <1000>; + type = "critical"; + }; + }; + }; + }; + timer { compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; interrupts = <GIC_PPI 2 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(4) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>,
Signature · 1 line
2.7.4