Skip to contentSkip to conversation

irqchip: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI controller

PATCH Superseded Chen Wang 4 participants 15 messages Jan 15, 2025 – Feb 18, 2025

Subsystems (4)

v3 of 5 Superseded Latest is v5 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Chen Wang

author
#0 lore raw

v3 cover irqchip: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI controller

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

This controller is on the Sophgo SG2042 SoC to transform interrupts from PCIe MSI to PLIC interrupts.

Thanks,
Chen

---

Changes in v3:
The patch series is based on v6.13-rc7.

Fixed following issues as per comments from Krzysztof Kozlowski, Samuel Holland, Christophe JAILLET, Inochi Amaoto, thanks.

- bindings: use reg for doorbell, fixed wrong usage of additionalProperties and misc.
- Improve driver code:
- Fixed potentional memory leak issues.
- Fixed some build warnings reported by test robot.
- Optimize and simplify the code when allocating hwirq.
- Use DECLARE_BITMAP instead of kzalloc.
- Some other coding style improvements.

Changes in v2:
The patch series is based on v6.13-rc2. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [2].

Fixed following issues as per comments from Rob Herring, Thomas Gleixner, thanks.

- Improve driver binding description, use msi-ranges instread.
- Improve driver code:
- Improve coding style.
- Fixed bug that possible memory leak of bitmap when sg2042_msi_init_domains returns error.
- Use guard(mutex).
- Use the MSI parent model.

Changes in v1:
The patch series is based on v6.12-rc7. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [1].

---

Chen Wang (3):
dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI
irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller
riscv: sophgo: dts: add msi controller for SG2042

 .../sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml                    |  58 ++++
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        |  10 +
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig                       |  12 +
 drivers/irqchip/Makefile                      |   1 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c              | 268 ++++++++++++++++++
 5 files changed, 349 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c

base-commit: 5bc55a333a2f7316b58edc7573e8e893f7acb532

Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v3 1/3 dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add binding for Sophgo SG2042 MSI controller.

---
 .../sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml                    | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +58 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f641df191787
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  This interrupt controller is in Sophgo SG2042 for transforming interrupts from
+  PCIe MSI to PLIC interrupts.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupts.yaml#
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller/msi-controller.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-msi
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr
+
+  msi-controller: true
+
+  msi-ranges:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - msi-controller
+  - msi-ranges
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+    msi-controller@30000000 {
+      compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-msi";
+      reg = <0x30000000 0x4>, <0x30000008 0x4>;
+      reg-names = "doorbell", "clr";
+      msi-controller;
+      msi-ranges = <&plic 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 32>;
+      interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
+    };
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
maintainer
#2 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

Quoted 39 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add binding for Sophgo SG2042 MSI controller.

---
 .../sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml                    | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +23 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f641df191787
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  This interrupt controller is in Sophgo SG2042 for transforming interrupts from
+  PCIe MSI to PLIC interrupts.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupts.yaml#
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller/msi-controller.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-msi
+

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml line 32

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +9 -0
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
 
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr

please reverse the items order, the clr addr is more suitable as the MMIO device address when writing device node. doorbeel address is just a IO address and can not be seen from CPU.

Quoted 34 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +26 -0
+
+  msi-controller: true
+
+  msi-ranges:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - msi-controller
+  - msi-ranges
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+    msi-controller@30000000 {
+      compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-msi";
+      reg = <0x30000000 0x4>, <0x30000008 0x4>;
+      reg-names = "doorbell", "clr";
+      msi-controller;
+      msi-ranges = <&plic 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 32>;
+      interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
+    };
Signature · 7 lines
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
#3 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

Quoted 1 line · Inochi Amaoto

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:33:23PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:

[......]

Quoted 9 lines

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml line 32

Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +9 -0
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr
Quoted 3 lines

please reverse the items order, the clr addr is more suitable as the MMIO device address when writing device node. doorbeel address is just a IO address and can not be seen from CPU.

I find dtbcheck will report error if order is switched.

On SG2042, address of doorbell is ahead of clr.

Quoted 34 lines
Quoted 34 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +26 -0
+
+  msi-controller: true
+
+  msi-ranges:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - msi-controller
+  - msi-ranges
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+    msi-controller@30000000 {
+      compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-msi";
+      reg = <0x30000000 0x4>, <0x30000008 0x4>;
+      reg-names = "doorbell", "clr";
+      msi-controller;
+      msi-ranges = <&plic 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 32>;
+      interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
+    };
Signature · 7 lines
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
maintainer
#4 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

Quoted 13 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 1 line · Inochi Amaoto

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:33:23PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:

[......]

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +9 -0
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr
Quoted 6 lines
Quoted 3 lines

please reverse the items order, the clr addr is more suitable as the MMIO device address when writing device node. doorbeel address is just a IO address and can not be seen from CPU.

I find dtbcheck will report error if order is switched.

You should also change the unit address to avoid error. I think you forgot it.

Quoted 2 lines

On SG2042, address of doorbell is ahead of clr.

It is the same on SG2044, but there is a problem that the doorbell addr is a IO address and it is not suitable to represent the device addr in the dtb. It also lead to a weird unit address on SG2044 which is hard to understand.

Regards,
Inochi

#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

Quoted 13 lines · Inochi Amaoto
Quoted 12 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 1 line · Inochi Amaoto

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:33:23PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:

[......]

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 9 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +9 -0
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 3 lines

please reverse the items order, the clr addr is more suitable as the MMIO device address when writing device node. doorbeel address is just a IO address and can not be seen from CPU.

I find dtbcheck will report error if order is switched.

You should also change the unit address to avoid error. I think you forgot it.

I forgot it, thanks for your suggestion.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines

On SG2042, address of doorbell is ahead of clr.

It is the same on SG2044, but there is a problem that the doorbell addr is a IO address and it is not suitable to represent the device addr in the dtb. It also lead to a weird unit address on SG2044 which is hard to understand.

Regards,
Inochi

maintainer
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

In reply to Chen Wang
Quoted 23 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add binding for Sophgo SG2042 MSI controller.

---
 .../sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml                    | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +7 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f641df191787
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml line 17

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +10 -0
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  This interrupt controller is in Sophgo SG2042 for transforming interrupts from
+  PCIe MSI to PLIC interrupts.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupts.yaml#

Drop this.

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +10 -0
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller/msi-controller.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-msi
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml line 37

Quoted 10 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +10 -0
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr
+
+  msi-controller: true
+
+  msi-ranges:
+    maxItems: 1

You need #msi-cells.

Quoted 24 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +21 -0
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - msi-controller
+  - msi-ranges
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+    msi-controller@30000000 {
+      compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-msi";
+      reg = <0x30000000 0x4>, <0x30000008 0x4>;
+      reg-names = "doorbell", "clr";
+      msi-controller;
+      msi-ranges = <&plic 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 32>;
+      interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
+    };
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Sophgo SG2042 MSI

hello, Rob,

Quoted 27 lines · Rob Herring
Quoted 26 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add binding for Sophgo SG2042 MSI controller.

---
  .../sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml                    | 58 +++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +10 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f641df191787
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
Quoted 8 lines

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml line 17

Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +7 -0
+
+description:
+  This interrupt controller is in Sophgo SG2042 for transforming interrupts from
+  PCIe MSI to PLIC interrupts.
+
+allOf:
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupts.yaml#

Drop this.

I find if we drop this line, dtb check will report "Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('interrupt-parent' was unexpected)"

Do we still need to keep this?

Thanks,

Chen

Quoted 13 lines
Quoted 13 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +13 -0
+  - $ref: /schemas/interrupt-controller/msi-controller.yaml#
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-msi
+
+  reg:
+    items:
+      - description: msi doorbell address
+      - description: clear register
+
+  reg-names:
+    items:
Quoted 8 lines

Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml line 37

Quoted 7 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +7 -0
+      - const: doorbell
+      - const: clr
+
+  msi-controller: true
+
+  msi-ranges:
+    maxItems: 1

You need #msi-cells.

OK, will add this.

Quoted 24 lines
Quoted 24 lines
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/sophgo,sg2042-msi.yaml new file +21 -0
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - reg-names
+  - msi-controller
+  - msi-ranges
+
+unevaluatedProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/irq.h>
+    msi-controller@30000000 {
+      compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-msi";
+      reg = <0x30000000 0x4>, <0x30000008 0x4>;
+      reg-names = "doorbell", "clr";
+      msi-controller;
+      msi-ranges = <&plic 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 32>;
+      interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
+    };
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
author
#8 lore raw

PATCH v3 2/3 irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add driver for Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller.

---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig          |  12 ++
 drivers/irqchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 281 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +12 -0
index 9bee02db1643..161fb5df857f 100644
@@ -749,6 +749,18 @@ config MCHP_EIC
 	help
 	  Support for Microchip External Interrupt Controller.
 
+config SOPHGO_SG2042_MSI
+	bool "Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller"
+	depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on PCI
+	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
+	select IRQ_MSI_LIB
+	select PCI_MSI
+	help
+	  Support for the Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller.
+	  This on-chip interrupt controller enables MSI sources to be
+	  routed to the primary PLIC controller on SoC.
+
 config SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC
 	bool "Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller" if COMPILE_TEST
 	default SOC_SP7021
drivers/irqchip/Makefile +1 -0
index 25e9ad29b8c4..dd60e597491d 100644
@@ -128,4 +128,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_WPCM450_AIC)		+= irq-wpcm450-aic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_IDT3243X)		+= irq-idt3243x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_AIC)			+= irq-apple-aic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MCHP_EIC)			+= irq-mchp-eic.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOPHGO_SG2042_MSI)		+= irq-sg2042-msi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC)	+= irq-sp7021-intc.o
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +268 -0

268 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
maintainer
#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller

Quoted 200 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add driver for Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller.

---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig          |  12 ++
 drivers/irqchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 281 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +12 -0
index 9bee02db1643..161fb5df857f 100644
@@ -749,6 +749,18 @@ config MCHP_EIC
 	help
 	  Support for Microchip External Interrupt Controller.
 
+config SOPHGO_SG2042_MSI
+	bool "Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller"
+	depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on PCI
+	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
+	select IRQ_MSI_LIB
+	select PCI_MSI
+	help
+	  Support for the Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller.
+	  This on-chip interrupt controller enables MSI sources to be
+	  routed to the primary PLIC controller on SoC.
+
 config SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC
 	bool "Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller" if COMPILE_TEST
 	default SOC_SP7021
drivers/irqchip/Makefile +1 -0
index 25e9ad29b8c4..dd60e597491d 100644
@@ -128,4 +128,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_WPCM450_AIC)		+= irq-wpcm450-aic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_IDT3243X)		+= irq-idt3243x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_AIC)			+= irq-apple-aic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MCHP_EIC)			+= irq-mchp-eic.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOPHGO_SG2042_MSI)		+= irq-sg2042-msi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC)	+= irq-sp7021-intc.o
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +149 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f88e1671e5c
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * SG2042 MSI Controller
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Sophgo Technology Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/msi.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/of_pci.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "irq-msi-lib.h"
+
+#define SG2042_MAX_MSI_VECTOR	32
+
+struct sg2042_msi_chipdata {
+	void __iomem	*reg_clr;	// clear reg, see TRM, 10.1.33, GP_INTR0_CLR
+
+	phys_addr_t	doorbell_addr;	// see TRM, 10.1.32, GP_INTR0_SET
+
+	u32		irq_first;	// The vector number that MSIs starts
+	u32		num_irqs;	// The number of vectors for MSIs
+
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_map, SG2042_MAX_MSI_VECTOR);
+	struct mutex	msi_map_lock;	// lock for msi_map
+};
+
+static int sg2042_msi_allocate_hwirq(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data, int num_req)
+{
+	int first;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&data->msi_map_lock);
+	first = bitmap_find_free_region(data->msi_map, data->num_irqs,
+					get_count_order(num_req));
+	return first >= 0 ? first : -ENOSPC;
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_free_hwirq(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data,
+				  int hwirq, int num_req)
+{
+	guard(mutex)(&data->msi_map_lock);
+	bitmap_release_region(data->msi_map, hwirq, get_count_order(num_req));
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data  = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	int bit_off = d->hwirq;
+
+	writel(1 << bit_off, data->reg_clr);
+
+	irq_chip_ack_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *d,
+					   struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(data->doorbell_addr);
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(data->doorbell_addr);
+	msg->data = 1 << d->hwirq;
+}
+
+static const struct irq_chip sg2042_msi_middle_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "SG2042 MSI",
+	.irq_ack		= sg2042_msi_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask		= irq_chip_mask_parent,
+	.irq_unmask		= irq_chip_unmask_parent,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	.irq_set_affinity	= irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
+#endif
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= sg2042_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg,
+};
+
+static int sg2042_msi_parent_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
+					  unsigned int virq, int hwirq)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = domain->host_data;
+	struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
+	struct irq_data *d;
+	int ret;
+
+	fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
+	fwspec.param_count = 2;
+	fwspec.param[0] = data->irq_first + hwirq;
+	fwspec.param[1] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
+
+	ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, 1, &fwspec);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain->parent, virq);
+	return d->chip->irq_set_type(d, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
+}
+
+static int sg2042_msi_middle_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
+					  unsigned int virq,
+					  unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = domain->host_data;
+	int hwirq, err, i;
+
+	hwirq = sg2042_msi_allocate_hwirq(data, nr_irqs);
+	if (hwirq < 0)
+		return hwirq;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
+		err = sg2042_msi_parent_domain_alloc(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_hwirq;
+
+		irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
+					      &sg2042_msi_middle_irq_chip, data);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_hwirq:
+	sg2042_msi_free_hwirq(data, hwirq, nr_irqs);
+	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, i);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_middle_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
+					  unsigned int virq,
+					  unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
+	sg2042_msi_free_hwirq(data, d->hwirq, nr_irqs);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops sg2042_msi_middle_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc	= sg2042_msi_middle_domain_alloc,

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 158

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +9 -0
+	.free	= sg2042_msi_middle_domain_free,
+	.select	= msi_lib_irq_domain_select,
+};
+
 
+#define SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |	\
+				   MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS)
+
+#define SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED MSI_GENERIC_FLAGS_MASK
+

I think it is just OK to set the flag directly in the msi_parent_ops.

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 166

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +8 -0
+static struct msi_parent_ops sg2042_msi_parent_ops = {
+	.required_flags		= SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED,
+	.supported_flags	= SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED,
+	.bus_select_mask	= MATCH_PCI_MSI,
+	.bus_select_token	= DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS,
+	.prefix			= "SG2042-",
+	.init_dev_msi_info	= msi_lib_init_dev_msi_info,
+};

This struct should be const.

Quoted 105 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +102 -0
+
+static int sg2042_msi_init_domains(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data,
+				   struct device_node *node)
+{
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(node);
+	struct irq_domain *plic_domain, *middle_domain;
+	struct device_node *plic_node;
+
+	if (!of_find_property(node, "interrupt-parent", NULL)) {
+		pr_err("Can't find interrupt-parent!\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	plic_node = of_irq_find_parent(node);
+	if (!plic_node) {
+		pr_err("Failed to find the PLIC node!\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	plic_domain = irq_find_host(plic_node);
+	of_node_put(plic_node);
+	if (!plic_domain) {
+		pr_err("Failed to find the PLIC domain\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+
+	middle_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(plic_domain, 0, data->num_irqs,
+						    fwnode,
+						    &sg2042_msi_middle_domain_ops,
+						    data);
+	if (!middle_domain) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create the MSI middle domain\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	irq_domain_update_bus_token(middle_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
+
+	middle_domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT;
+	middle_domain->msi_parent_ops = &sg2042_msi_parent_ops;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data;
+	struct of_phandle_args args = {};
+	struct resource *res;
+	int ret;
+
+	data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	data->reg_clr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "clr");
+	if (IS_ERR(data->reg_clr)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map clear register\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(data->reg_clr);
+	}
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "doorbell");
+	if (!res) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed get resource from set\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	data->doorbell_addr = res->start;
+
+	ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(pdev->dev.of_node, "msi-ranges",
+					 "#interrupt-cells", 0, &args);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec base\n");
+		return ret;
+	}
+	data->irq_first = (u32)args.args[0];
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "msi-ranges",
+					 args.args_count + 1, &data->num_irqs);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec number\n");
+		of_node_put(args.np);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	of_node_put(args.np);
+
+	mutex_init(&data->msi_map_lock);
+
+	return sg2042_msi_init_domains(data, pdev->dev.of_node);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id sg2042_msi_of_match[] = {
+	{ .compatible	= "sophgo,sg2042-msi" },
+	{}
+};
+
+static struct platform_driver sg2042_msi_driver = {
+	.driver = {
+		.name		= "sg2042-msi",
+		.of_match_table	= sg2042_msi_of_match,
+	},
+	.probe = sg2042_msi_probe,
+};
+builtin_platform_driver(sg2042_msi_driver);
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1
#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller

Quoted 1 line · Inochi Amaoto

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:33:45PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:

[......]

Quoted 6 lines

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 158

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +5 -0
+#define SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |	\
+				   MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS)
+
+#define SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED MSI_GENERIC_FLAGS_MASK
+

I think it is just OK to set the flag directly in the msi_parent_ops.

This shouldn't be a big problem, maybe it will be convenient for future expansion.

Quoted 9 lines

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 166

Quoted 8 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +8 -0
+static struct msi_parent_ops sg2042_msi_parent_ops = {
+	.required_flags		= SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED,
+	.supported_flags	= SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED,
+	.bus_select_mask	= MATCH_PCI_MSI,
+	.bus_select_token	= DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS,
+	.prefix			= "SG2042-",
+	.init_dev_msi_info	= msi_lib_init_dev_msi_info,
+};

This struct should be const.

Yes, will fix this in next version.

Thanks,

Chen

[......]

maintainer
#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller

In reply to Chen Wang
Quoted 210 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add driver for Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller.

---
 drivers/irqchip/Kconfig          |  12 ++
 drivers/irqchip/Makefile         |   1 +
 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c | 268 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 281 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c
drivers/irqchip/Kconfig +12 -0
index 9bee02db1643..161fb5df857f 100644
@@ -749,6 +749,18 @@ config MCHP_EIC
 	help
 	  Support for Microchip External Interrupt Controller.
 
+config SOPHGO_SG2042_MSI
+	bool "Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller"
+	depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on PCI
+	select IRQ_DOMAIN_HIERARCHY
+	select IRQ_MSI_LIB
+	select PCI_MSI
+	help
+	  Support for the Sophgo SG2042 MSI Controller.
+	  This on-chip interrupt controller enables MSI sources to be
+	  routed to the primary PLIC controller on SoC.
+
 config SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC
 	bool "Sunplus SP7021 interrupt controller" if COMPILE_TEST
 	default SOC_SP7021
drivers/irqchip/Makefile +1 -0
index 25e9ad29b8c4..dd60e597491d 100644
@@ -128,4 +128,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_WPCM450_AIC)		+= irq-wpcm450-aic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IRQ_IDT3243X)		+= irq-idt3243x.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_APPLE_AIC)			+= irq-apple-aic.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_MCHP_EIC)			+= irq-mchp-eic.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SOPHGO_SG2042_MSI)		+= irq-sg2042-msi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SUNPLUS_SP7021_INTC)	+= irq-sp7021-intc.o
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +159 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1f88e1671e5c
@@ -0,0 +1,268 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * SG2042 MSI Controller
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Sophgo Technology Inc.
+ * Copyright (C) 2024 Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/irq.h>
+#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/msi.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/of_pci.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "irq-msi-lib.h"
+
+#define SG2042_MAX_MSI_VECTOR	32
+
+struct sg2042_msi_chipdata {
+	void __iomem	*reg_clr;	// clear reg, see TRM, 10.1.33, GP_INTR0_CLR
+
+	phys_addr_t	doorbell_addr;	// see TRM, 10.1.32, GP_INTR0_SET
+
+	u32		irq_first;	// The vector number that MSIs starts
+	u32		num_irqs;	// The number of vectors for MSIs
+
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(msi_map, SG2042_MAX_MSI_VECTOR);
+	struct mutex	msi_map_lock;	// lock for msi_map
+};
+
+static int sg2042_msi_allocate_hwirq(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data, int num_req)
+{
+	int first;
+
+	guard(mutex)(&data->msi_map_lock);
+	first = bitmap_find_free_region(data->msi_map, data->num_irqs,
+					get_count_order(num_req));
+	return first >= 0 ? first : -ENOSPC;
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_free_hwirq(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data,
+				  int hwirq, int num_req)
+{
+	guard(mutex)(&data->msi_map_lock);
+	bitmap_release_region(data->msi_map, hwirq, get_count_order(num_req));
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data  = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	int bit_off = d->hwirq;
+
+	writel(1 << bit_off, data->reg_clr);
+
+	irq_chip_ack_parent(d);
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg(struct irq_data *d,
+					   struct msi_msg *msg)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	msg->address_hi = upper_32_bits(data->doorbell_addr);
+	msg->address_lo = lower_32_bits(data->doorbell_addr);
+	msg->data = 1 << d->hwirq;
+}
+
+static const struct irq_chip sg2042_msi_middle_irq_chip = {
+	.name			= "SG2042 MSI",
+	.irq_ack		= sg2042_msi_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask		= irq_chip_mask_parent,
+	.irq_unmask		= irq_chip_unmask_parent,
+#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
+	.irq_set_affinity	= irq_chip_set_affinity_parent,
+#endif
+	.irq_compose_msi_msg	= sg2042_msi_irq_compose_msi_msg,
+};
+
+static int sg2042_msi_parent_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
+					  unsigned int virq, int hwirq)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = domain->host_data;
+	struct irq_fwspec fwspec;
+	struct irq_data *d;
+	int ret;
+
+	fwspec.fwnode = domain->parent->fwnode;
+	fwspec.param_count = 2;
+	fwspec.param[0] = data->irq_first + hwirq;
+	fwspec.param[1] = IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING;
+
+	ret = irq_domain_alloc_irqs_parent(domain, virq, 1, &fwspec);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain->parent, virq);
+	return d->chip->irq_set_type(d, IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING);
+}
+
+static int sg2042_msi_middle_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain,
+					  unsigned int virq,
+					  unsigned int nr_irqs, void *args)
+{
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = domain->host_data;
+	int hwirq, err, i;
+
+	hwirq = sg2042_msi_allocate_hwirq(data, nr_irqs);
+	if (hwirq < 0)
+		return hwirq;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++) {
+		err = sg2042_msi_parent_domain_alloc(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i);
+		if (err)
+			goto err_hwirq;
+
+		irq_domain_set_hwirq_and_chip(domain, virq + i, hwirq + i,
+					      &sg2042_msi_middle_irq_chip, data);
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+err_hwirq:
+	sg2042_msi_free_hwirq(data, hwirq, nr_irqs);
+	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, i);
+
+	return err;
+}
+
+static void sg2042_msi_middle_domain_free(struct irq_domain *domain,
+					  unsigned int virq,
+					  unsigned int nr_irqs)
+{
+	struct irq_data *d = irq_domain_get_irq_data(domain, virq);
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	irq_domain_free_irqs_parent(domain, virq, nr_irqs);
+	sg2042_msi_free_hwirq(data, d->hwirq, nr_irqs);
+}
+
+static const struct irq_domain_ops sg2042_msi_middle_domain_ops = {
+	.alloc	= sg2042_msi_middle_domain_alloc,
+	.free	= sg2042_msi_middle_domain_free,
+	.select	= msi_lib_irq_domain_select,
+};
+
+#define SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED (MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_DOM_OPS |	\
+				   MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS)
+
+#define SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED MSI_GENERIC_FLAGS_MASK
+
+static struct msi_parent_ops sg2042_msi_parent_ops = {

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 169

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +10 -0
+	.required_flags		= SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_REQUIRED,
+	.supported_flags	= SG2042_MSI_FLAGS_SUPPORTED,
+	.bus_select_mask	= MATCH_PCI_MSI,
+	.bus_select_token	= DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS,
+	.prefix			= "SG2042-",
+	.init_dev_msi_info	= msi_lib_init_dev_msi_info,
+};
+
+static int sg2042_msi_init_domains(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data,
+				   struct device_node *node)

For ACPI support, I prefer to use device instead of device_node The following suggestion is also for ACPI support

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +6 -0
+{
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = of_node_to_fwnode(node);
+	struct irq_domain *plic_domain, *middle_domain;
+	struct device_node *plic_node;
+
 
+	if (!of_find_property(node, "interrupt-parent", NULL)) {

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 185

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +10 -0
+		pr_err("Can't find interrupt-parent!\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	plic_node = of_irq_find_parent(node);
+	if (!plic_node) {
+		pr_err("Failed to find the PLIC node!\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+

This can be replace with fwnode_find_reference to support ACPI

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 192

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +7 -0
+	plic_domain = irq_find_host(plic_node);
+	of_node_put(plic_node);
+	if (!plic_domain) {
+		pr_err("Failed to find the PLIC domain\n");
+		return -ENXIO;
+	}
+

Replace irq_find_host with irq_find_matching_fwnode

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 196

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +4 -0
+	middle_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(plic_domain, 0, data->num_irqs,
+						    fwnode,
+						    &sg2042_msi_middle_domain_ops,
+						    data);

Use irq_domain_create_hierarchy

Quoted 5 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +5 -0
+	if (!middle_domain) {
+		pr_err("Failed to create the MSI middle domain\n");
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 211

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +10 -0
+	irq_domain_update_bus_token(middle_domain, DOMAIN_BUS_NEXUS);
+
+	middle_domain->flags |= IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_MSI_PARENT;
+	middle_domain->msi_parent_ops = &sg2042_msi_parent_ops;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_msi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{

add a "struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;" here and replace &pdev->dev with dev.

Quoted 29 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +28 -0
+	struct sg2042_msi_chipdata *data;
+	struct of_phandle_args args = {};
+	struct resource *res;
+	int ret;
+
+	data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct sg2042_msi_chipdata), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!data)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	data->reg_clr = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "clr");
+	if (IS_ERR(data->reg_clr)) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to map clear register\n");
+		return PTR_ERR(data->reg_clr);
+	}
+
+	res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "doorbell");
+	if (!res) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed get resource from set\n");
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+	data->doorbell_addr = res->start;
+
 
+	ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(pdev->dev.of_node, "msi-ranges",
+					 "#interrupt-cells", 0, &args);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec base\n");
+		return ret;
+	}

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 249

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +10 -0
+	data->irq_first = (u32)args.args[0];
+
+	ret = of_property_read_u32_index(pdev->dev.of_node, "msi-ranges",
+					 args.args_count + 1, &data->num_irqs);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec number\n");
+		of_node_put(args.np);
+		return ret;
+	}
+	of_node_put(args.np);

this can be replace by calling fwnode_property_get_reference_args twice. I have found a working example:

ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(dev_fwnode(dev), "msi-ranges",

					 "#interrupt-cells",
					 0, 0, &args);
if (ret) {
	dev_err(dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec base\n");
	return ret;
}

fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);

ret = fwnode_property_get_reference_args(dev_fwnode(dev), "msi-ranges",

					 NULL, args.nargs + 1,
					 0, &args);
if (ret) {
	dev_err(dev, "Unable to parse MSI vec number\n");
	return ret;
}

data->irq_first = (u32)args.args[0];
data->num_irqs = (u32)args.args[args.nargs - 1];

fwnode_handle_put(args.fwnode);

Regards,
Inochi

#12 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller

Quoted 1 line · Inochi Amaoto

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:33:45PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:

[......]

Quoted 5 lines

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 196

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +4 -0
+	middle_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(plic_domain, 0, data->num_irqs,
+						    fwnode,
+						    &sg2042_msi_middle_domain_ops,
+						    data);

Use irq_domain_create_hierarchy

What's the difference?

[......]

maintainer
#13 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] irqchip: Add the Sophgo SG2042 MSI interrupt controller

Quoted 12 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 1 line · Inochi Amaoto

On Wed, Jan 15, 2025 at 02:33:45PM +0800, Chen Wang wrote:

[......]

Quoted 5 lines

drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c line 196

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/irqchip/irq-sg2042-msi.c new file +4 -0
+	middle_domain = irq_domain_create_hierarchy(plic_domain, 0, data->num_irqs,
+						    fwnode,
+						    &sg2042_msi_middle_domain_ops,
+						    data);

Use irq_domain_create_hierarchy

What's the difference?

I made a mistake, just ignore it. The original is OK.

Regard,
Inochi

author
#14 lore raw

PATCH v3 3/3 riscv: sophgo: dts: add msi controller for SG2042

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add msi-controller node to dts for SG2042.

---
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi | 10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi +10 -0
index e62ac51ac55a..02fbb978973c 100644
@@ -173,6 +173,16 @@ pllclk: clock-controller@70300100c0 {
 			#clock-cells = <1>;
 		};
 
+		msi: msi-controller@7030010300 {
+			compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-msi";
+			reg = <0x70 0x30010300 0x0 0x4>,
+			      <0x70 0x30010304 0x0 0x4>;
+			reg-names = "doorbell", "clr";
+			msi-controller;
+			msi-ranges = <&intc 64 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH 32>;
+			interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
+		};
+
 		rpgate: clock-controller@7030010368 {
 			compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-rpgate";
 			reg = <0x70 0x30010368 0x0 0x98>;
Signature · 1 line
2.34.1