RISC-V Smstateen support
v6 cover RISC-V Smstateen support
This series adds support for the Smstateen specification which provides a mechanism plug potential covert channels which are opened by extensions
that add to processor state that may not get context-switched. Currently access to AIA registers, *envcfg registers and floating point(fcsr) is controlled via smstateen.
These patches can also be found on riscv_smstateen_v6 branch at:
https://github.com/mdchitale/qemu.git
The patch 4/5 (AIA) can be reviewed but not merged until the bits reserved for AIA get re-defined.
Changes in v6:
- Sync with latest riscv-to-apply.next
- Make separate read/write ops for m/h/s/stateen1/2/3 regs
- Add check for mstateen.staten when reading or using h/s/stateen regs
- Add smstateen fcsr check for all floating point operations
- Move knobs to enable smstateen in a separate patch.
Changes in v5:
- Fix the order in which smstateen extension is added to the isa_edata_arr as
described in rule #3 the comment.
Changes in v4:
- Fix build issue with riscv32/riscv64-linux-user targets
Changes in v3:
- Fix coding style issues
- Fix *stateen0h index calculation
Changes in v2:
- Make h/s/envcfg bits in m/h/stateen registers as writeable by default.
Anup Patel (1):
target/riscv: Force disable extensions if priv spec version does not
match
*** BLURB HERE ***
Mayuresh Chitale (5):
target/riscv: Add smstateen support
target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg
target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
target/riscv: smstateen check for AIA/IMSIC
target/riscv: smstateen knobs
target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 + target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 + target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 37 ++ target/riscv/csr.c | 703 +++++++++++++++++++++- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 + target/riscv/machine.c | 21 + 7 files changed, 804 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
PATCH v6 1/5 target/riscv: Add smstateen support
Smstateen extension specifies a mechanism to close the potential covert channels that could cause security issues.
This patch adds the CSRs defined in the specification and the corresponding predicates and read/write functions.
--- target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 + target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 37 ++++ target/riscv/csr.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/riscv/machine.c | 21 +++ 4 files changed, 432 insertions(+)
target/riscv/cpu.h +4 -0
@@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ struct CPUArchState {/* CSRs for execution enviornment configuration */ uint64_t menvcfg; +uint64_t mstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t hstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t sstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ];target_ulong senvcfg;uint64_t henvcfg;#endif
@@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {bool ext_zkt;bool ext_ifencei;bool ext_icsr; +bool ext_smstateen;bool ext_svinval;bool ext_svnapot;bool ext_svpbmt;
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +37 -0
@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@/* Supervisor Configuration CSRs */ #define CSR_SENVCFG 0x10A +/* Supervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_SSTATEEN0 0x10C +#define CSR_SSTATEEN1 0x10D +#define CSR_SSTATEEN2 0x10E +#define CSR_SSTATEEN3 0x10F +/* Supervisor Trap Handling */ #define CSR_SSCRATCH 0x140#define CSR_SEPC 0x141
@@ -242,6 +248,16 @@#define CSR_HENVCFG 0x60A#define CSR_HENVCFGH 0x61A +/* Hypervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0 0x60C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0H 0x61C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1 0x60D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1H 0x61D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2 0x60E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2H 0x61E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3 0x60F +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3H 0x61F +/* Virtual CSRs */ #define CSR_VSSTATUS 0x200#define CSR_VSIE 0x204
@@ -283,6 +299,27 @@#define CSR_MENVCFG 0x30A#define CSR_MENVCFGH 0x31A +/* Machine state CSRs */ +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0 0x30C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0H 0x31C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1 0x30D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1H 0x31D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2 0x30E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2H 0x31E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3 0x30F +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3H 0x31F + +/* Common defines for all smstateen */ +#define SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT 4 +#define SMSTATEEN0_CS (1ULL << 0) +#define SMSTATEEN0_FCSR (1ULL << 1) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSCONTXT (1ULL << 57) +#define SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC (1ULL << 58) +#define SMSTATEEN0_AIA (1ULL << 59) +#define SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT (1ULL << 60) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG (1ULL << 62) +#define SMSTATEEN_STATEN (1ULL << 63) +/* Enhanced Physical Memory Protection (ePMP) */ #define CSR_MSECCFG 0x747#define CSR_MSECCFGH 0x757
target/riscv/csr.c +370 -0
388 lines not on this page · raw message
target/riscv/machine.c +21 -0
@@ -262,6 +262,26 @@ static int riscv_cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)return 0 ; } +static bool smstateen_needed (void *opaque) +{ +RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque; + +return cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen; +} + +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_smstateen = { + .name ="cpu/smtateen" , + .version_id =1 , + .minimum_version_id =1 , + .needed = smstateen_needed, + .fields = (VMStateField []) { +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.mstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.hstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.sstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST () + } +}; +static bool envcfg_needed (void *opaque) {RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque;
@@ -372,6 +392,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = { &vmstate_kvmtimer, &vmstate_envcfg, &vmstate_debug, + &vmstate_smstateen, NULL } };
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] target/riscv: Add smstateen support
Quoted 84 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Smstateen extension specifies a mechanism to close the potential covert channels that could cause security issues.
This patch adds the CSRs defined in the specification and the corresponding predicates and read/write functions.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 + target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 37 ++++ target/riscv/csr.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/riscv/machine.c | 21 +++ 4 files changed, 432 insertions(+)target/riscv/cpu.h +4
-0@@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ struct CPUArchState {/* CSRs for execution enviornment configuration */ uint64_t menvcfg; +uint64_t mstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t hstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t sstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ];target_ulong senvcfg;uint64_t henvcfg;#endif @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {bool ext_zkt;bool ext_ifencei;bool ext_icsr; +bool ext_smstateen;bool ext_svinval;bool ext_svnapot;bool ext_svpbmt;target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +26
-0@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@/* Supervisor Configuration CSRs */ #define CSR_SENVCFG 0x10A +/* Supervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_SSTATEEN0 0x10C +#define CSR_SSTATEEN1 0x10D +#define CSR_SSTATEEN2 0x10E +#define CSR_SSTATEEN3 0x10F +/* Supervisor Trap Handling */ #define CSR_SSCRATCH 0x140#define CSR_SEPC 0x141@@ -242,6 +248,16 @@#define CSR_HENVCFG 0x60A#define CSR_HENVCFGH 0x61A +/* Hypervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0 0x60C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0H 0x61C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1 0x60D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1H 0x61D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2 0x60E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2H 0x61E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3 0x60F +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3H 0x61F +/* Virtual CSRs */ #define CSR_VSSTATUS 0x200#define CSR_VSIE 0x204@@ -283,6 +299,27 @@#define CSR_MENVCFG 0x30A#define CSR_MENVCFGH 0x31A +/* Machine state CSRs */ +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0 0x30C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0H 0x31C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1 0x30D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1H 0x31D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2 0x30E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2H 0x31E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3 0x30F +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3H 0x31F +
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h line 321
Quoted 10 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +10
-0+/* Common defines for all smstateen */ +#define SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT 4 +#define SMSTATEEN0_CS (1ULL << 0) +#define SMSTATEEN0_FCSR (1ULL << 1) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSCONTXT (1ULL << 57) +#define SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC (1ULL << 58) +#define SMSTATEEN0_AIA (1ULL << 59) +#define SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT (1ULL << 60) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG (1ULL << 62) +#define SMSTATEEN_STATEN (1ULL << 63)
Maybe SMSTATEEN_STATEEN better.
Quoted 122 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +1
-0+/* Enhanced Physical Memory Protection (ePMP) */ #define CSR_MSECCFG 0x747#define CSR_MSECCFGH 0x757target/riscv/csr.c +103
-0@@ -339,6 +339,68 @@ static RISCVException hmode32(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) } +static RISCVException mstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return any (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen_pred (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,int base) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[csrno - base] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return hmode (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0 ); +} + +static RISCVException hstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0H ); +} + +static RISCVException sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(env->hstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } + } + +return smode (env, csrno); +} +/* Checks if PointerMasking registers could be accessed */ static RISCVException pointer_masking (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) {@@ -1699,6 +1761,263 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; } +static inline void write_smstateen (CPURISCVState *env,uint64_t *reg, +uint64_t wr_mask,uint64_t new_val) +{ + *reg = (*reg & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & wr_mask); +} + +static RISCVException read_mstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +uint64_t wr_mask,target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t *reg; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val)
target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, · line 1814
Quoted 10 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +10
-0+{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} +
Mstateen1~3 can share the same write function currently. The same to h/sstateen1~3.
Quoted 210 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +206
-0+static RISCVException read_mstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ] >>32 ; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +uint64_t wr_mask,target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t *reg, val; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->hstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +uint64_t mask,target_ulong new_val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_hstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; + + *val = (env->hstateen[index] >>32 ) & (env->mstateen[index] >>32 ); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +uint64_t mask,target_ulong new_val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask, val; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->sstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; +if (virt) { + *val &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +uint64_t mask,target_ulong new_val) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t wr_mask; +uint64_t *reg; + + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +if (virt) { + wr_mask &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + + reg = &env->sstateen[index]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen3 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} +static RISCVException rmw_mip64 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,uint64_t *ret_val,uint64_t new_val,uint64_t wr_mask)
target/riscv/csr.c riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = { · line 3882
Quoted 6 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0@@ -3558,6 +3877,57 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = { [CSR_HENVCFGH] = { "henvcfgh", hmode32, read_henvcfgh, write_henvcfgh, .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + /* Smstateen extension CSRs */ + [CSR_MSTATEEN0] = { "mstateen0", mstateen, read_mstateen, write_mstateen0, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },
The new lines have been updated to align with the last line in my previous patchset(accepted).
So it's better to make ' . ' align with ' " '.
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 90 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +48
-0+ [CSR_MSTATEEN0H] = { "mstateen0h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN1] = { "mstateen1", mstateen, read_mstateen, write_mstateen1, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN1H] = { "mstateen1h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN2] = { "mstateen2", mstateen, read_mstateen, write_mstateen2, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN2H] = { "mstateen2h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN3] = { "mstateen3", mstateen, read_mstateen, write_mstateen3, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN3H] = { "mstateen3h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + + [CSR_HSTATEEN0] = { "hstateen0", hstateen, read_hstateen, write_hstateen0, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN0H] = { "hstateen0h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN1] = { "hstateen1", hstateen, read_hstateen, write_hstateen1, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN1H] = { "hstateen1h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN2] = { "hstateen2", hstateen, read_hstateen, write_hstateen2, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN2H] = { "hstateen2h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN3] = { "hstateen3", hstateen, read_hstateen, write_hstateen3, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN3H] = { "hstateen3h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + + [CSR_SSTATEEN0] = { "sstateen0", sstateen, read_sstateen, write_sstateen0, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN1] = { "sstateen1", sstateen, read_sstateen, write_sstateen1, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN2] = { "sstateen2", sstateen, read_sstateen, write_sstateen2, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN3] = { "sstateen3", sstateen, read_sstateen, write_sstateen3, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, /* Supervisor Trap Setup */ [CSR_SSTATUS] = { "sstatus", smode, read_sstatus, write_sstatus, NULL, read_sstatus_i128 },target/riscv/machine.c +21
-0@@ -262,6 +262,26 @@ static int riscv_cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)return 0 ; } +static bool smstateen_needed (void *opaque) +{ +RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque; + +return cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen; +} + +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_smstateen = { + .name ="cpu/smtateen" , + .version_id =1 , + .minimum_version_id =1 , + .needed = smstateen_needed, + .fields = (VMStateField []) { +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.mstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.hstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.sstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST () + } +}; +static bool envcfg_needed (void *opaque) {RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque;@@ -372,6 +392,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = { &vmstate_kvmtimer, &vmstate_envcfg, &vmstate_debug, + &vmstate_smstateen, NULL } };
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] target/riscv: Add smstateen support
Quoted 89 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 88 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Smstateen extension specifies a mechanism to close the potential covert channels that could cause security issues.
This patch adds the CSRs defined in the specification and the corresponding predicates and read/write functions.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 + target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 37 ++++ target/riscv/csr.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/riscv/machine.c | 21 +++ 4 files changed, 432 insertions(+)target/riscv/cpu.h +4
-0@@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ struct CPUArchState {/* CSRs for execution enviornment configuration */ uint64_t menvcfg; +uint64_t mstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t hstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t sstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ];target_ulong senvcfg;uint64_t henvcfg;#endif @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {bool ext_zkt;bool ext_ifencei;bool ext_icsr; +bool ext_smstateen;bool ext_svinval;bool ext_svnapot;bool ext_svpbmt;target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +29
-0@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@/* Supervisor Configuration CSRs */ #define CSR_SENVCFG 0x10A +/* Supervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_SSTATEEN0 0x10C +#define CSR_SSTATEEN1 0x10D +#define CSR_SSTATEEN2 0x10E +#define CSR_SSTATEEN3 0x10F +/* Supervisor Trap Handling */ #define CSR_SSCRATCH 0x140#define CSR_SEPC 0x141@@ -242,6 +248,16 @@#define CSR_HENVCFG 0x60A#define CSR_HENVCFGH 0x61A +/* Hypervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0 0x60C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0H 0x61C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1 0x60D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1H 0x61D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2 0x60E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2H 0x61E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3 0x60F +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3H 0x61F +/* Virtual CSRs */ #define CSR_VSSTATUS 0x200#define CSR_VSIE 0x204@@ -283,6 +299,27 @@#define CSR_MENVCFG 0x30A#define CSR_MENVCFGH 0x31A +/* Machine state CSRs */ +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0 0x30C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0H 0x31C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1 0x30D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1H 0x31D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2 0x30E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2H 0x31E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3 0x30F +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3H 0x31F + +/* Common defines for all smstateen */ +#define SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT 4 +#define SMSTATEEN0_CS (1ULL << 0)
Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h line 321
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +7
-0+#define SMSTATEEN0_FCSR (1ULL << 1) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSCONTXT (1ULL << 57) +#define SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC (1ULL << 58) +#define SMSTATEEN0_AIA (1ULL << 59) +#define SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT (1ULL << 60) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG (1ULL << 62) +#define SMSTATEEN_STATEN (1ULL << 63)Maybe
SMSTATEEN_STATEENbetter.
ok. Will update in the next version.
Quoted 139 lines
Quoted 139 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +1
-0+/* Enhanced Physical Memory Protection (ePMP) */ #define CSR_MSECCFG 0x747#define CSR_MSECCFGH 0x757target/riscv/csr.c +62
-0@@ -339,6 +339,68 @@ static RISCVException hmode32(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) } +static RISCVException mstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return any (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen_pred (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,int base) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[csrno - base] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return hmode (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0 ); +} + +static RISCVException hstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0H ); +} + +static RISCVException sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(env->hstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } + } + +return smode (env, csrno); +} +/* Checks if PointerMasking registers could be accessed */ static RISCVException pointer_masking(CPURISCVState *env, int
csrno)
{target/riscv/csr.c +15
-0@@ -1699,6 +1761,263 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } +static inline void write_smstateen(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t *reg, + uint64_t wr_mask, uint64_t new_val) +{ + *reg = (*reg & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & wr_mask); +} + +static RISCVException read_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, + target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_twr_mask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +10
-0+{ +uint64_t *reg; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, · line 1802
Quoted 5 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} +Mstateen1~3 can share the same write function currently. The same to
h/sstateen1~3.
I think its better to keep them separate as it will anyway be required once they are defined.
Quoted 252 lines
Quoted 246 lines
+static RISCVException read_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ] >>32 ; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_twr_mask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +12
-0+{ +uint64_t *reg, val; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +16
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->hstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +12
-0+{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; + + *val = (env->hstateen[index] >> 32) & (env->mstateen[index] >>32);
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +14
-0+{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask, val; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +20
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->sstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; +if (virt) { + *val &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +18
-0+{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t wr_mask; +uint64_t *reg; + + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +if (virt) { + wr_mask &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + + reg = &env->sstateen[index]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} +static RISCVException rmw_mip64 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,uint64_t *ret_val, uint64_t new_val, uint64_t
wr_mask)target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0@@ -3558,6 +3877,57 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = { [CSR_HENVCFGH] = { "henvcfgh", hmode32, read_henvcfgh, write_henvcfgh, .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + /* Smstateen extension CSRs */ + [CSR_MSTATEEN0] = { "mstateen0", mstateen, read_mstateen,Quoted 2 lines
write_mstateen0,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},The new lines have been updated to align with the last line in my previous patchset(accepted).
Quoted 1 line
So it's better to make ' . ' align with ' " '.
ok. Will update in the next version.
Quoted 110 lines
Quoted 1 line
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 104 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0+ [CSR_MSTATEEN0H] = { "mstateen0h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN1] = { "mstateen1", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen1,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN1H] = { "mstateen1h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN2] = { "mstateen2", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen2,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN2H] = { "mstateen2h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN3] = { "mstateen3", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen3,target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN3H] = { "mstateen3h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + + [CSR_HSTATEEN0] = { "hstateen0", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen0,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN0H] = { "hstateen0h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN1] = { "hstateen1", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen1,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN1H] = { "hstateen1h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN2] = { "hstateen2", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen2,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN2H] = { "hstateen2h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN3] = { "hstateen3", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen3,target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN3H] = { "hstateen3h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + + [CSR_SSTATEEN0] = { "sstateen0", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen0,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN1] = { "sstateen1", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen1,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN2] = { "sstateen2", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen2,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN3] = { "sstateen3", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen3,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
/* Supervisor Trap Setup */
[CSR_SSTATUS] = { "sstatus", smode,read_sstatus,write_sstatus, NULL,read_sstatus_i128 },target/riscv/machine.c +20
-0@@ -262,6 +262,26 @@ static int riscv_cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)return 0 ; } +static bool smstateen_needed (void *opaque) +{ +RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque; + +return cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen; +} + +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_smstateen = { + .name ="cpu/smtateen" , + .version_id =1 , + .minimum_version_id =1 , + .needed = smstateen_needed, + .fields = (VMStateField []) { +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.mstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.hstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.sstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST () + } +}; +static bool envcfg_needed (void *opaque) {RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque;target/riscv/machine.c +1
-0@@ -372,6 +392,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = { &vmstate_kvmtimer, &vmstate_envcfg, &vmstate_debug, + &vmstate_smstateen, NULL } };
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] target/riscv: Add smstateen support
Quoted 246 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 89 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 88 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Smstateen extension specifies a mechanism to close the potential covert channels that could cause security issues.
This patch adds the CSRs defined in the specification and the corresponding predicates and read/write functions.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 + target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 37 ++++ target/riscv/csr.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/riscv/machine.c | 21 +++ 4 files changed, 432 insertions(+)target/riscv/cpu.h +4
-0@@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ struct CPUArchState {/* CSRs for execution enviornment configuration */ uint64_t menvcfg; +uint64_t mstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t hstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t sstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ];target_ulong senvcfg;uint64_t henvcfg;#endif @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {bool ext_zkt;bool ext_ifencei;bool ext_icsr; +bool ext_smstateen;bool ext_svinval;bool ext_svnapot;bool ext_svpbmt;target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +29
-0@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@/* Supervisor Configuration CSRs */ #define CSR_SENVCFG 0x10A +/* Supervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_SSTATEEN0 0x10C +#define CSR_SSTATEEN1 0x10D +#define CSR_SSTATEEN2 0x10E +#define CSR_SSTATEEN3 0x10F +/* Supervisor Trap Handling */ #define CSR_SSCRATCH 0x140#define CSR_SEPC 0x141@@ -242,6 +248,16 @@#define CSR_HENVCFG 0x60A#define CSR_HENVCFGH 0x61A +/* Hypervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0 0x60C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0H 0x61C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1 0x60D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1H 0x61D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2 0x60E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2H 0x61E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3 0x60F +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3H 0x61F +/* Virtual CSRs */ #define CSR_VSSTATUS 0x200#define CSR_VSIE 0x204@@ -283,6 +299,27 @@#define CSR_MENVCFG 0x30A#define CSR_MENVCFGH 0x31A +/* Machine state CSRs */ +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0 0x30C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0H 0x31C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1 0x30D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1H 0x31D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2 0x30E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2H 0x31E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3 0x30F +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3H 0x31F + +/* Common defines for all smstateen */ +#define SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT 4 +#define SMSTATEEN0_CS (1ULL << 0)Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h line 321
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +7
-0+#define SMSTATEEN0_FCSR (1ULL << 1) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSCONTXT (1ULL << 57) +#define SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC (1ULL << 58) +#define SMSTATEEN0_AIA (1ULL << 59) +#define SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT (1ULL << 60) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG (1ULL << 62) +#define SMSTATEEN_STATEN (1ULL << 63)Maybe
SMSTATEEN_STATEENbetter.ok. Will update in the next version.
Quoted 139 lines
Quoted 139 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +1
-0+/* Enhanced Physical Memory Protection (ePMP) */ #define CSR_MSECCFG 0x747#define CSR_MSECCFGH 0x757target/riscv/csr.c +62
-0@@ -339,6 +339,68 @@ static RISCVException hmode32(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) } +static RISCVException mstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return any (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen_pred (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,int base) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[csrno - base] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return hmode (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0 ); +} + +static RISCVException hstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0H ); +} + +static RISCVException sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(env->hstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } + } + +return smode (env, csrno); +} +/* Checks if PointerMasking registers could be accessed */ static RISCVException pointer_masking(CPURISCVState *env, int
csrno)
{target/riscv/csr.c +15
-0@@ -1699,6 +1761,263 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } +static inline void write_smstateen(CPURISCVState *env, uint64_t *reg, + uint64_t wr_mask, uint64_t new_val) +{ + *reg = (*reg & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & wr_mask); +} + +static RISCVException read_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, + target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_twr_mask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +10
-0+{ +uint64_t *reg; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, · line 1802
Quoted 5 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} +Mstateen1~3 can share the same write function currently. The same to
h/sstateen1~3.
Quoted 2 lines
I think its better to keep them separate as it will anyway be required once they are defined.
Only a few bits in mstateen0 is used currently. It may need a long time before mstateen1~3 to be used.
And it's very easy to separate it out if required. So it seems unnecessary to copy two times to prepare
for future use currently.
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 361 lines
Quoted 244 lines
Quoted 244 lines
+static RISCVException read_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ] >>32 ; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_twr_mask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +12
-0+{ +uint64_t *reg, val; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +16
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->hstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +12
-0+{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; + + *val = (env->hstateen[index] >> 32) & (env->mstateen[index] >>32);
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +14
-0+{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask, val; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +20
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException read_sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno, +target_ulong *val) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->sstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; +if (virt) { + *val &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +18
-0+{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t wr_mask; +uint64_t *reg; + + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +if (virt) { + wr_mask &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + + reg = &env->sstateen[index]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +return write_sstateen (env, csrno,SMSTATEEN_STATEN , new_val); +} +static RISCVException rmw_mip64 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,uint64_t *ret_val, uint64_t new_val, uint64_t
wr_mask)target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -3558,6 +3877,57 @@ riscv_csr_operations csr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE] = { [CSR_HENVCFGH] = { "henvcfgh", hmode32, read_henvcfgh, write_henvcfgh, .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 },Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ /* Smstateen extension CSRs */ + [CSR_MSTATEEN0] = { "mstateen0", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen0,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},The new lines have been updated to align with the last line in my previous patchset(accepted).
So it's better to make ' . ' align with ' " '.
ok. Will update in the next version.
Quoted 108 lines
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 104 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0+ [CSR_MSTATEEN0H] = { "mstateen0h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN1] = { "mstateen1", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen1,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN1H] = { "mstateen1h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN2] = { "mstateen2", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen2,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN2H] = { "mstateen2h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN3] = { "mstateen3", mstateen, read_mstateen,
write_mstateen3,target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_MSTATEEN3H] = { "mstateen3h", mstateen, read_mstateenh, + write_mstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + + [CSR_HSTATEEN0] = { "hstateen0", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen0,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN0H] = { "hstateen0h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN1] = { "hstateen1", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen1,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN1H] = { "hstateen1h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN2] = { "hstateen2", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen2,target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN2H] = { "hstateen2h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN3] = { "hstateen3", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen3,target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_HSTATEEN3H] = { "hstateen3h", hstateenh, read_hstateenh, + write_hstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + + [CSR_SSTATEEN0] = { "sstateen0", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen0,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN1] = { "sstateen1", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen1,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN2] = { "sstateen2", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen2,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 }, + [CSR_SSTATEEN3] = { "sstateen3", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen3,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
/* Supervisor Trap Setup */
[CSR_SSTATUS] = { "sstatus", smode,read_sstatus,write_sstatus, NULL,read_sstatus_i128 },target/riscv/machine.c +20
-0@@ -262,6 +262,26 @@ static int riscv_cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)return 0 ; } +static bool smstateen_needed (void *opaque) +{ +RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque; + +return cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen; +} + +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_smstateen = { + .name ="cpu/smtateen" , + .version_id =1 , + .minimum_version_id =1 , + .needed = smstateen_needed, + .fields = (VMStateField []) { +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.mstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.hstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.sstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST () + } +}; +static bool envcfg_needed (void *opaque) {RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque;target/riscv/machine.c +1
-0@@ -372,6 +392,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = { &vmstate_kvmtimer, &vmstate_envcfg, &vmstate_debug, + &vmstate_smstateen, NULL } };
Re: [PATCH v6 1/5] target/riscv: Add smstateen support
Quoted 260 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 255 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 89 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 88 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Smstateen extension specifies a mechanism to close the potential covert channels that could cause security issues.
This patch adds the CSRs defined in the specification and the corresponding predicates and read/write functions.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/cpu.h | 4 + target/riscv/cpu_bits.h | 37 ++++ target/riscv/csr.c | 370 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ target/riscv/machine.c | 21 +++ 4 files changed, 432 insertions(+)target/riscv/cpu.h +4
-0@@ -354,6 +354,9 @@ struct CPUArchState {/* CSRs for execution enviornment configuration */ uint64_t menvcfg; +uint64_t mstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t hstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ]; +uint64_t sstateen[SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT ];target_ulong senvcfg;uint64_t henvcfg;#endif @@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ struct RISCVCPUConfig {bool ext_zkt;bool ext_ifencei;bool ext_icsr; +bool ext_smstateen;bool ext_svinval;bool ext_svnapot;bool ext_svpbmt;target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +29
-0@@ -199,6 +199,12 @@/* Supervisor Configuration CSRs */ #define CSR_SENVCFG 0x10A +/* Supervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_SSTATEEN0 0x10C +#define CSR_SSTATEEN1 0x10D +#define CSR_SSTATEEN2 0x10E +#define CSR_SSTATEEN3 0x10F +/* Supervisor Trap Handling */ #define CSR_SSCRATCH 0x140#define CSR_SEPC 0x141@@ -242,6 +248,16 @@#define CSR_HENVCFG 0x60A#define CSR_HENVCFGH 0x61A +/* Hypervisor state CSRs */ +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0 0x60C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN0H 0x61C +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1 0x60D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN1H 0x61D +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2 0x60E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN2H 0x61E +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3 0x60F +#define CSR_HSTATEEN3H 0x61F +/* Virtual CSRs */ #define CSR_VSSTATUS 0x200#define CSR_VSIE 0x204@@ -283,6 +299,27 @@#define CSR_MENVCFG 0x30A#define CSR_MENVCFGH 0x31A +/* Machine state CSRs */ +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0 0x30C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN0H 0x31C +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1 0x30D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN1H 0x31D +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2 0x30E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN2H 0x31E +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3 0x30F +#define CSR_MSTATEEN3H 0x31F + +/* Common defines for all smstateen */ +#define SMSTATEEN_MAX_COUNT 4 +#define SMSTATEEN0_CS (1ULL << 0)Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h line 321
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +7
-0+#define SMSTATEEN0_FCSR (1ULL << 1) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSCONTXT (1ULL << 57) +#define SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC (1ULL << 58) +#define SMSTATEEN0_AIA (1ULL << 59) +#define SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT (1ULL << 60) +#define SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG (1ULL << 62) +#define SMSTATEEN_STATEN (1ULL << 63)Maybe
SMSTATEEN_STATEENbetter.ok. Will update in the next version.
Quoted 148 lines
Quoted 148 lines
target/riscv/cpu_bits.h +1
-0+/* Enhanced Physical Memory Protection (ePMP) */ #define CSR_MSECCFG 0x747#define CSR_MSECCFGH 0x757target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -339,6 +339,68 @@ static RISCVExceptionhmode32(CPURISCVState
*env, int csrno)}target/riscv/csr.c +13
-0+static RISCVException mstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return any (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen_pred(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
int base)target/riscv/csr.c +49
-0+{ +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[csrno - base] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +return hmode (env, csrno); +} + +static RISCVException hstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0 ); +} + +static RISCVException hstateenh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +return hstateen_pred (env, csrno,CSR_HSTATEEN0H ); +} + +static RISCVException sstateen (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); + +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(env->hstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } + } + +return smode (env, csrno); +} +/* Checks if PointerMasking registers could be accessed */ static RISCVException pointer_masking(CPURISCVState *env,int
csrno)
{target/riscv/csr.c +1
-0@@ -1699,6 +1761,263 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } +static inline void write_smstateen(CPURISCVState *env,
uint64_t
*reg,
+uint64_twr_mask,uint64_tnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+{ + *reg = (*reg & ~wr_mask) | (new_val & wr_mask); +} + +static RISCVException read_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_twr_mask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +10
-0+{ +uint64_t *reg; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0 ]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_mstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_mstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/csr.c
Quoted 4 lines
+ return write_mstateen(env, csrno,
SMSTATEEN_STATEN,new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+} +Mstateen1~3 can share the same write function currently. The same
to
h/sstateen1~3.Quoted 3 lines
I think its better to keep them separate as it will anyway be required
once they are defined.
Quoted 9 lines
Only a few bits in mstateen0 is used currently. It may need a long time
before mstateen1~3 to be used.And it's very easy to separate it out if required. So it seems unnecessary to copy two times to prepare
for future use currently.
I think its better to separate now and then modify the functions for mstateen1-3 as and when required.
Quoted 416 lines
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 412 lines
Quoted 272 lines
Quoted 266 lines
+static RISCVException read_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ + *val = env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ] >>32 ; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_twr_mask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +12
-0+{ +uint64_t *reg, val; + + reg = &env->mstateen[csrno -CSR_MSTATEEN0H ]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen1h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen2h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_mstateen3h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException read_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +10
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->hstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +12
-0+{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException read_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; + + *val = (env->hstateen[index] >> 32) & (env-Quoted 1 line
mstateen[index] >>
32);
target/riscv/csr.c +5
-0+ +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +14
-0+{ +int index = csrno -CSR_HSTATEEN0H ; +uint64_t *reg, wr_mask, val; + + reg = &env->hstateen[index]; + val = (uint64_t )new_val <<32 ; + val |= *reg &0xFFFFFFFF ; + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen1h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen2h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_hstateen3h(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException read_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +14
-0+ target_ulong *val) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; + + *val = env->sstateen[index] & env->mstateen[index]; +if (virt) { + *val &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
+uint64_tmask,target_ulongnew_val)target/riscv/csr.c +18
-0+{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +int index = csrno -CSR_SSTATEEN0 ; +uint64_t wr_mask; +uint64_t *reg; + + wr_mask = env->mstateen[index] & mask; +if (virt) { + wr_mask &= env->hstateen[index]; + } + + reg = &env->sstateen[index]; +write_smstateen (env, reg, wr_mask, new_val); + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +8
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; + +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); +} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen1(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen2(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+} + +static RISCVException write_sstateen3(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0+ target_ulong new_val) +{ + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, SMSTATEEN_STATEN,
new_val);target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+} + static RISCVException rmw_mip64(CPURISCVState *env, intcsrno,
uint64_t *ret_val, uint64_t new_val, uint64_t
wr_mask)target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -3558,6 +3877,57 @@ riscv_csr_operationscsr_ops[CSR_TABLE_SIZE]
= {
[CSR_HENVCFGH] = { "henvcfgh", hmode32,read_henvcfgh,write_henvcfgh,.min_priv_ver =
PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ /* Smstateen extension CSRs */ + [CSR_MSTATEEN0] = { "mstateen0", mstateen, read_mstateen,Quoted 3 lines
write_mstateen0,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},The new lines have been updated to align with the last line in my previous patchset(accepted).
Quoted 1 line
So it's better to make ' . ' align with ' " '.
ok. Will update in the next version.
Quoted 138 lines
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 134 lines
+ [
CSR_MSTATEEN0H] = { "mstateen0h", mstateen,read_mstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_mstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
+ [CSR_MSTATEEN1] = { "mstateen1", mstateen,read_mstateen,write_mstateen1,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_MSTATEEN1H] = { "mstateen1h", mstateen,read_mstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_mstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
+ [CSR_MSTATEEN2] = { "mstateen2", mstateen,read_mstateen,write_mstateen2,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_MSTATEEN2H] = { "mstateen2h", mstateen,read_mstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_mstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
+ [CSR_MSTATEEN3] = { "mstateen3", mstateen,read_mstateen,write_mstateen3,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_MSTATEEN3H] = { "mstateen3h", mstateen,read_mstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_mstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ + [CSR_HSTATEEN0] = { "hstateen0", hstateen, read_hstateen,
write_hstateen0,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN0H] = { "hstateen0h", hstateenh,read_hstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_hstateen0h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN1] = { "hstateen1", hstateen,read_hstateen,write_hstateen1,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN1H] = { "hstateen1h", hstateenh,read_hstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_hstateen1h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN2] = { "hstateen2", hstateen,read_hstateen,write_hstateen2,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN2H] = { "hstateen2h", hstateenh,read_hstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_hstateen2h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN3] = { "hstateen3", hstateen,read_hstateen,write_hstateen3,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_HSTATEEN3H] = { "hstateen3h", hstateenh,read_hstateenh,target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ write_hstateen3h, + .min_priv_ver = PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0},
target/riscv/csr.c +2
-0+ + [CSR_SSTATEEN0] = { "sstateen0", sstateen, read_sstateen,
write_sstateen0,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_SSTATEEN1] = { "sstateen1", sstateen,read_sstateen,write_sstateen1,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_SSTATEEN2] = { "sstateen2", sstateen,read_sstateen,write_sstateen2,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
+ [CSR_SSTATEEN3] = { "sstateen3", sstateen,read_sstateen,write_sstateen3,
+ .min_priv_ver =PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0
},
/* Supervisor Trap Setup */
[CSR_SSTATUS] = { "sstatus", smode,read_sstatus,write_sstatus, NULL,
read_sstatus_i
128},target/riscv/machine.c +20
-0@@ -262,6 +262,26 @@ static int riscv_cpu_post_load(void *opaque, int version_id)return 0 ; } +static bool smstateen_needed (void *opaque) +{ +RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque; + +return cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen; +} + +static const VMStateDescription vmstate_smstateen = { + .name ="cpu/smtateen" , + .version_id =1 , + .minimum_version_id =1 , + .needed = smstateen_needed, + .fields = (VMStateField []) { +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.mstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.hstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_UINT64_ARRAY (env.sstateen,RISCVCPU ,4 ), +VMSTATE_END_OF_LIST () + } +}; +static bool envcfg_needed (void *opaque){ RISCVCPU *cpu = opaque;target/riscv/machine.c +1
-0@@ -372,6 +392,7 @@ const VMStateDescription vmstate_riscv_cpu = { &vmstate_kvmtimer, &vmstate_envcfg, &vmstate_debug, + &vmstate_smstateen,NULL }};
PATCH v6 2/5 target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg
In reply to Mayuresh ChitaleAccesses to henvcfg, henvcfgh and senvcfg are allowed only if corresponding bit in mstateen0/hstateen0 is enabled. Otherwise an illegal instruction trap is generated.
--- target/riscv/csr.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
target/riscv/csr.c +93 -7
@@ -40,6 +40,55 @@ void riscv_set_csr_ops(int csrno, riscv_csr_operations *ops) }/* Predicates */ +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY ) +static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok (CPURISCVState *env,int index, +uint64_t bit) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); +uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[index]; +uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[index]; + +if (env->priv ==PRV_M || !cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +/* +* Treat hstateen and sstateen as read-only zero if mstateen0.staten +* is clear. +*/ +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + hstateen =0 ; + sstateen =0 ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(hstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } +/* +* Treat sstateen as read-only zero if hstateen0.staten is clear. +*/ +if (!(hstateen &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + sstateen =0 ; + } + } + +if (env->priv ==PRV_U &&riscv_has_ext (env,RVS )) { +if (!(sstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} +#endif +static RISCVException fs (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) {#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY )
@@ -1708,6 +1757,13 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_senvcfg (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->senvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }
@@ -1716,15 +1772,27 @@ static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =SENVCFG_FIOM |SENVCFG_CBIE |SENVCFG_CBCFE |SENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; - env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }static RISCVException read_henvcfg (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }
@@ -1733,6 +1801,12 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_FIOM |HENVCFG_CBIE |HENVCFG_CBCFE |HENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + }if (riscv_cpu_mxl (env) ==MXL_RV64 ) { mask |=HENVCFG_PBMTE |HENVCFG_STCE ;
@@ -1746,6 +1820,13 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_henvcfgh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg >>32 ;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }
@@ -1755,9 +1836,14 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_PBMTE |HENVCFG_STCE ;uint64_t valh = (uint64_t )val <<32 ; +RISCVException ret; - env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }
@@ -1789,7 +1875,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_mstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1836,7 +1922,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_mstateen0h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1885,7 +1971,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1936,7 +2022,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hstateen0h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1995,7 +2081,7 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_sstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg
Quoted 70 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Accesses to henvcfg, henvcfgh and senvcfg are allowed only if corresponding bit in mstateen0/hstateen0 is enabled. Otherwise an illegal instruction trap is generated.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +49
-0@@ -40,6 +40,55 @@ void riscv_set_csr_ops(int csrno, riscv_csr_operations *ops) }/* Predicates */ +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY ) +static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok (CPURISCVState *env,int index, +uint64_t bit) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); +uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[index]; +uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[index]; + +if (env->priv ==PRV_M || !cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +/* +* Treat hstateen and sstateen as read-only zero if mstateen0.staten +* is clear. +*/ +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + hstateen =0 ; + sstateen =0 ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(hstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } +/* +* Treat sstateen as read-only zero if hstateen0.staten is clear. +*/ +if (!(hstateen &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + sstateen =0 ; + } + } + +if (env->priv ==PRV_U &&riscv_has_ext (env,RVS )) { +if (!(sstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} +#endif +static RISCVException fs (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) {#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY )
target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, · line 1762
Quoted 6 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0@@ -1708,6 +1757,13 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_senvcfg (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG );
I think it's better to add this check into the predicate.
By the way, sharing the same function for all related csrs is easily misunderstood. However, It seems correct.
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 124 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +41
-7+if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->senvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1716,15 +1772,27 @@ static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =SENVCFG_FIOM |SENVCFG_CBIE |SENVCFG_CBCFE |SENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; - env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }static RISCVException read_henvcfg (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1733,6 +1801,12 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_FIOM |HENVCFG_CBIE |HENVCFG_CBCFE |HENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + }if (riscv_cpu_mxl (env) ==MXL_RV64 ) { mask |=HENVCFG_PBMTE |HENVCFG_STCE ;@@ -1746,6 +1820,13 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_henvcfgh (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg >>32 ;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1755,9 +1836,14 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_PBMTE |HENVCFG_STCE ;uint64_t valh = (uint64_t )val <<32 ; +RISCVException ret; - env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1789,7 +1875,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_mstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1836,7 +1922,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_mstateen0h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1885,7 +1971,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1936,7 +2022,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hstateen0h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1995,7 +2081,7 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_sstateen0 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong new_val) { -uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN ; +uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ;return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
Re: [PATCH v6 2/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg
Quoted 86 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 75 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Accesses to henvcfg, henvcfgh and senvcfg are allowed only if corresponding bit in mstateen0/hstateen0 is enabled. Otherwise an illegal instruction trap is generated.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +20
-0@@ -40,6 +40,55 @@ void riscv_set_csr_ops(int csrno, riscv_csr_operations *ops) }/* Predicates */ +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY ) +static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok (CPURISCVState *env,int index, +uint64_t bit) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); +uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[index]; +uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[index]; + +if (env->priv ==PRV_M || !cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +/* +* Treat hstateen and sstateen as read-only zero if mstateen0.staten
target/riscv/csr.c +13
-0+* is clear. +*/ +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + hstateen =0 ; + sstateen =0 ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(hstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } +/* +* Treat sstateen as read-only zero if hstateen0.staten is clear.
target/riscv/csr.c +16
-0+*/ +if (!(hstateen &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + sstateen =0 ; + } + } + +if (env->priv ==PRV_U &&riscv_has_ext (env,RVS )) { +if (!(sstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} +#endif +static RISCVException fs (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) {#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY )target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException · line 1763
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0@@ -1708,6 +1757,13 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException read_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val) { + RISCVException ret; + + ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);I think it's better to add this check into the predicate.
Quoted 3 lines
By the way, sharing the same function for all related csrs is easily
misunderstood. However, It seems correct.
We use the default global predicates ie hmode/smode etc for the envcfg registers and the global predicates cant be modified to include additional checks for envcfg registers. We could implement new predicates for envcfg but I think the current approach is simpler.
Quoted 146 lines
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 141 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0+if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->senvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ;}target/riscv/csr.c +13
-1@@ -1716,15 +1772,27 @@ static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =SENVCFG_FIOM |SENVCFG_CBIE |SENVCFG_CBCFE |SENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; - env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }static RISCVException read_henvcfg (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;}
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0@@ -1733,6 +1801,12 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_FIOM |HENVCFG_CBIE |HENVCFG_CBCFE |HENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + }if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) { mask |= HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE;target/riscv/csr.c +7
-0@@ -1746,6 +1820,13 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val) { + RISCVException ret; + + ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG); + if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) { + return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg >> 32;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;}
target/riscv/csr.c +7
-2@@ -1755,9 +1836,14 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_PBMTE |HENVCFG_STCE ;uint64_t valh = (uint64_t )val <<32 ; +RISCVException ret; - env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1789,7 +1875,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1836,7 +1922,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1885,7 +1971,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1936,7 +2022,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1995,7 +2081,7 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
Weiwei Li
Reviewed-byRe: [PATCH v6 2/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg
Quoted 86 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 85 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 75 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Accesses to henvcfg, henvcfgh and senvcfg are allowed only if corresponding bit in mstateen0/hstateen0 is enabled. Otherwise an illegal instruction trap is generated.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 100 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 93 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +20
-0@@ -40,6 +40,55 @@ void riscv_set_csr_ops(int csrno, riscv_csr_operations *ops) }/* Predicates */ +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY ) +static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok (CPURISCVState *env,int index, +uint64_t bit) +{ +bool virt =riscv_cpu_virt_enabled (env); +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs); +uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[index]; +uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[index]; + +if (env->priv ==PRV_M || !cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) { +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + } + +if (!(env->mstateen[index] & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + +/* +* Treat hstateen and sstateen as read-only zero if mstateen0.staten
target/riscv/csr.c +13
-0+* is clear. +*/ +if (!(env->mstateen[index] &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + hstateen =0 ; + sstateen =0 ; + } + +if (virt) { +if (!(hstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT ; + } +/* +* Treat sstateen as read-only zero if hstateen0.staten is clear.
target/riscv/csr.c +16
-0+*/ +if (!(hstateen &SMSTATEEN_STATEN )) { + sstateen =0 ; + } + } + +if (env->priv ==PRV_U &&riscv_has_ext (env,RVS )) { +if (!(sstateen & bit)) { +return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; + } + } + +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; +} +#endif +static RISCVException fs (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) {#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY )target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException · line 1763
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0@@ -1708,6 +1757,13 @@ static RISCVException write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException read_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val) { + RISCVException ret; + + ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);I think it's better to add this check into the predicate.
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 3 lines
By the way, sharing the same function for all related csrs is easily
misunderstood. However, It seems correct.We use the default global predicates ie hmode/smode etc for the envcfg registers and the global predicates cant be modified to include additional checks for envcfg registers. We could implement new predicates for envcfg but I think the current approach is simpler.
OK. It's acceptable to me.
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 145 lines
Quoted 145 lines
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 141 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0+if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->senvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ;}target/riscv/csr.c +13
-1@@ -1716,15 +1772,27 @@ static RISCVException write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =SENVCFG_FIOM |SENVCFG_CBIE |SENVCFG_CBCFE |SENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; - env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }static RISCVException read_henvcfg (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;}
target/riscv/csr.c +6
-0@@ -1733,6 +1801,12 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong val) {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_FIOM |HENVCFG_CBIE |HENVCFG_CBCFE |HENVCFG_CBZE ; +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + }if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) { mask |= HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE;target/riscv/csr.c +7
-0@@ -1746,6 +1820,13 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val) { + RISCVException ret; + + ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG); + if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) { + return ret; + } + *val = env->henvcfg >> 32;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;}
target/riscv/csr.c +7
-2@@ -1755,9 +1836,14 @@ static RISCVException write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t mask =HENVCFG_PBMTE |HENVCFG_STCE ;uint64_t valh = (uint64_t )val <<32 ; +RISCVException ret; - env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask); + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask);return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1789,7 +1875,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1836,7 +1922,7 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1885,7 +1971,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1936,7 +2022,7 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +1
-1@@ -1995,7 +2081,7 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) { - uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN; + uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
PATCH v6 3/5 target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
In reply to Mayuresh ChitaleIf smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.
--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
target/riscv/csr.c +23 -0
@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) !RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) {return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; } + +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }
@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +36 -2
@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)) {\ + stateen &= sstateen; \ + } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \ +} while (0) +#else +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) +#endif + #define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\ - if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ - REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \ + if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ + return false; \ + } \ } \ } while (0)
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc +4 -0
@@ -17,24 +17,28 @@ */ #define REQUIRE_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin || \ ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinxmin)) { \ return false; \
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Quoted 104 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +23
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) !RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) {return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; } + +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +17
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 53
Quoted 10 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +10
-0+ } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)) {\ + stateen &= sstateen; \ + } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \ +} while (0)
It's better to add a space before '\'.
Quoted 4 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +4
-0+#else +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) +#endif +
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 65
Quoted 10 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +5
-2#define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\ - if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ - REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \ + if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ + return false; \ + } \ } \ } while (0)
SMSTATEEN_CHECK is for CSR. and REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F is for Extension.
I think It's better to separate them. By the way, if we want the smallest modification for current code, adding it to REQUIRE_FPU seems better.
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 34 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc +4
-0@@ -17,24 +17,28 @@ */ #define REQUIRE_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin || \ ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinxmin)) { \ return false; \
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Quoted 119 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 118 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) !RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) {return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; } + +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ;}target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +16
-0@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +20
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)) {\eventuallymeaning
+ stateen &= sstateen; \
Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 53
Quoted 6 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +6
-0+ } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \ +} while (0)It's better to add a space before '\'.
ok. will modify in the next version.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +8
-2+#else +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) +#endif + #define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\ - if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ - REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \ + if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ + return false; \
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
+ } \ } \} while (0)
SMSTATEEN_CHECKis for CSR. andREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_Fis for Extension. I think It's better to separate them. By the way, if we want the smallest modification
for current code, adding it toREQUIRE_FPUseems better.
Actually REQUIRE_FPU is checking for mstatus.fs but as per smstateen spec we need to check for misa.f which is done in REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F.
Quoted 40 lines
Regards,
Weiwei LiQuoted 37 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc +4
-0@@ -17,24 +17,28 @@ */ #define REQUIRE_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin || \ ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinxmin)){ \ return false; \
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Quoted 146 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 118 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 117 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno) !RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) {return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST ; } + +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ;}target/riscv/csr.c +3
-0@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +16
-0@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + } +return write_sstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +20
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)) {\eventuallymeaning
Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 53
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +7
-0+ stateen &= sstateen; \ + } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \ +} while (0)It's better to add a space before '\'.
ok. will modify in the next version.
Quoted 10 lines
Quoted 10 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +7
-2+#else +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) +#endif + #define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\ - if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ - REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \ + if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 65
Quoted 4 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +2
-0+ return false; \ + } \ } \ } while (0)
SMSTATEEN_CHECKis for CSR. andREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_Fis for Extension. I think It's better to separate them. By the way, if we want the smallest modification
for current code, adding it toREQUIRE_FPUseems better.
Quoted 2 lines
Actually
REQUIRE_FPUis checking for mstatus.fs but as per smstateen spec we need to check for misa.f which is done inREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F.
OK. It's acceptable to me even though I prefer separating them.
However, I find another question in SMSTATEEN_CHECK: when access is disallowed by Xstateen.FCSR,
it's always return false which will trigger illegal instruction exception finally.
However, this exception is triggered by accessing fcsr CSR which may trigger illegal instruction trap and virtual instruction trap in different situation.
/"For convenience, when the stateen CSRs are implemented and misa.F = 0, then if bit 1 of a// //controlling stateen0 CSR is zero, all floating-point instructions cause an illegal instruction trap (or virtual// //instruction trap, if relevant), as though they all access fcsr, regardless of whether they really do."/
And stateen.fcsr is only work when zfinx is enabled, so it's better to SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) after check for
"!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx"
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 40 lines
Regards,
Weiwei LiQuoted 37 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc +4
-0@@ -17,24 +17,28 @@ */ #define REQUIRE_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin || \ ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinxmin)){ \ return false; \
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Quoted 185 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 159 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 127 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 126 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the
floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env,int
csrno)!RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) { return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST; }target/riscv/csr.c +7
-0+ +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +20
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)){\eventually
meaning
+ stateen &= sstateen; \Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 53
Quoted 6 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +6
-0+ } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \ +} while (0)It's better to add a space before '\'.
ok. will modify in the next version.
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +9
-2+#else +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) +#endif + #define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\ - if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ - REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \ + if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ + return false; \ + } \Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 2 lines
} \} while (0)
SMSTATEEN_CHECKis for CSR. andREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_Fis for Extension.
I think It's better to separate them. By the way, if we want the smallest modification
for current code, adding it toREQUIRE_FPUseems better.Quoted 4 lines
Actually
REQUIRE_FPUis checking for mstatus.fs but as per smstateen
spec we need to check for misa.f which is done inREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F.OK. It's acceptable to me even though I prefer separating them.
However, I find another question in
SMSTATEEN_CHECK: when access is disallowed by Xstateen.FCSR,it's always return false which will trigger illegal instruction exception finally.
However, this exception is triggered by accessing fcsr CSR which may trigger illegal instruction trap and virtual
instruction trap in different situation."For convenience, when the stateen CSRs are implemented and misa.F = 0, then if bit 1 of a
controlling stateen0 CSR is zero, all floating-point instructions cause an illegal instruction trap (or virtual
instruction trap, if relevant), as though they all access fcsr, regardless of whether they really do."
Quoted 4 lines
And stateen.fcsr is only work when zfinx is enabled, so it's better to
SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx)after check for"!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx"
Actually the spec refers only to misa.F and not zfinx and regarding the fcsr its :
"as though they all access fcsr, regardless of whether they really do"
Quoted 47 lines
Regards,
Weiwei LiQuoted 45 lines
Quoted 45 lines
Regards,
Weiwei LiQuoted 42 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc +4
-0@@ -17,24 +17,28 @@ */ #define REQUIRE_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin || \ ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr-Quoted 1 line
ext_zhinxmin)){ \
return
false; \
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Quoted 180 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 179 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 155 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 126 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 125 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the
floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env,int
csrno)!RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) { return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST; }target/riscv/csr.c +7
-0+ +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +20
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)){\eventually
meaningQuoted 8 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 53
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +7
-0+ stateen &= sstateen; \ + } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \ +} while (0)It's better to add a space before '\'.
ok. will modify in the next version.
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +8
-2+#else +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) +#endif + #define REQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F(ctx) do {\ - if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ - REQUIRE_EXT(ctx, RVF); \ + if (!has_ext(ctx, RVF)) { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ + if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx) { \ + return false; \Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 3 lines
+ } \ } \} while (0)
SMSTATEEN_CHECKis for CSR. andREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_Fis for Extension.
I think It's better to separate them. By the way, if we want the smallest modification
for current code, adding it toREQUIRE_FPUseems better.Quoted 4 lines
Actually
REQUIRE_FPUis checking for mstatus.fs but as per smstateen
spec we need to check for misa.f which is done inREQUIRE_ZFINX_OR_F.OK. It's acceptable to me even though I prefer separating them.
However, I find another question in
SMSTATEEN_CHECK: when access is disallowed by Xstateen.FCSR,it's always return false which will trigger illegal instruction exception finally.
However, this exception is triggered by accessing fcsr CSR which may trigger illegal instruction trap and virtual
instruction trap in different situation."For convenience, when the stateen CSRs are implemented and misa.F = 0, then if bit 1 of a
controlling stateen0 CSR is zero, all floating-point instructions cause an illegal instruction trap (or virtual
instruction trap, if relevant), as though they all access fcsr, regardless of whether they really do."
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
And stateen.fcsr is only work when zfinx is enabled, so it's better to
SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx)after check for"!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfinx"
Actually the spec refers only to misa.F and not zfinx and regarding the fcsr its :
"as though they all access fcsr, regardless of whether they really do"
Yeah, they are triggered by accessing fcsr. So they should take the same check as accessing fcsr here.
In above predicate fs for fcsr, if misa.F is zero and zfinx is not supported,illegal instruction fault is triggered.
Otherwise, stateen related check is done when misa.F is zero and may trigger illegal/virtual instruction fault.
both of this two cases are different in above check.
I also sent related questions in https://github.com/riscv/riscv-state-enable/issues/9.
Any comments are welcome.
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 48 lines
Quoted 48 lines
Regards,
Weiwei LiQuoted 45 lines
Quoted 45 lines
Regards,
Weiwei LiQuoted 42 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc +4
-0@@ -17,24 +17,28 @@ */ #define REQUIRE_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZHINX_OR_ZFH(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx && !ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \ if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin)) { \ return false; \ } \ } while (0) #define REQUIRE_ZFH_OR_ZFHMIN_OR_ZHINX_OR_ZHINXMIN(ctx) do { \ + SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx); \if (!(ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfh || ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zfhmin || \ ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_zhinx || ctx->cfg_ptr-Quoted 1 line
ext_zhinxmin)){ \
return
false; \
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
In reply to Mayuresh ChitaleQuoted 128 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 127 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 125 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 124 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 123 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then the
floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env,int
csrno)!RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) { return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST; }target/riscv/csr.c +7
-0+ +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +20
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS))
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 52
Quoted 8 lines
{\eventually
meaningtarget/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +6
-0+ stateen &= sstateen; \ + } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \
given the size of that I would have thought an "static inline" function would be easier to write and maintain for SMSTATEEN_CHECK
Signature · 4 lines
Ben Dooks http://www.codethink.co.uk/ Senior Engineer Codethink - Providing Genius https://www.codethink.co.uk/privacy.html
Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for fcsr
Quoted 137 lines · Ben Dooks
Quoted 136 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 135 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 134 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Quoted 133 lines · Weiwei Li
Quoted 132 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented and sstateen0.fcsr is clear then
the
floating point operations must return illegal instruction exception.Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 23 ++++++++++++++ target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++-- target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvzfh.c.inc | 4 +++ 3 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +0
-0@@ -96,6 +96,10 @@ static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env,int
csrno)!RISCV_CPU(env_cpu(env))->cfg.ext_zfinx) { return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST; }target/riscv/csr.c +7
-0+ +if (!env->debugger && !riscv_cpu_fp_enabled (env)) { +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ); + }#endif return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -1876,6 +1880,9 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong new_val) {uint64_t wr_mask =SMSTATEEN_STATEN |SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG ; +if (!riscv_has_ext (env,RVF )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; + }return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1924,6 +1931,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask,new_val); }target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -1973,6 +1984,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2024,6 +2039,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask,new_val); }target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2083,6 +2102,10 @@ static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, { uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG; + if (!riscv_has_ext(env, RVF)) { + wr_mask |= SMSTATEEN0_FCSR; + } + return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);}target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +20
-0@@ -24,9 +24,43 @@ return false; \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_USER_ONLY +#define SMSTATEEN_CHECK(ctx) do {\ + CPUState *cpu = ctx->cs; \ + CPURISCVState *env = cpu->env_ptr; \ + if (ctx->cfg_ptr->ext_smstateen && \ + (env->priv < PRV_M)) { \ + uint64_t stateen = env->mstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t hstateen = env->hstateen[0]; \ + uint64_t sstateen = env->sstateen[0]; \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + hstateen = 0; \ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + if (ctx->virt_enabled) { \ + stateen &= hstateen; \ + if (!(hstateen & SMSTATEEN_STATEN)) {\ + sstateen = 0; \ + } \ + } \ + if (env->priv == PRV_U && has_ext(ctx, RVS)){\eventually
meaning
+ stateen &= sstateen; \
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
Quoted 5 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc line 52
Quoted 5 lines
target/riscv/insn_trans/trans_rvf.c.inc +5
-0+ } \ + if (!(stateen & SMSTATEEN0_FCSR)) { \ + return false; \ + } \ + } \given the size of that I would have thought an "static inline" function would be easier to write and maintain for
SMSTATEEN_CHECK
Ok. I will update in the next version.
Quoted 2 lines
PATCH v6 4/5 target/riscv: smstateen check for AIA/IMSIC
In reply to Mayuresh ChitaleIf smstateen is implemented then accesses to AIA registers CSRS, IMSIC CSRs and other IMSIC registers is controlled by setting of corresponding bits in mstateen/hstateen registers. Otherwise an illegal instruction trap or virtual instruction trap is generated.
--- target/riscv/csr.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 220 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
target/riscv/csr.c +220 -2
@@ -87,6 +87,42 @@ static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok(CPURISCVState *env, int index, return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } + +static RISCVException smstateen_aia_acc_ok (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +uint64_t bit; + +switch (csrno) { +case CSR_STOPEI : +case CSR_VSTOPEI : +case CSR_HSTATUS : + bit =SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ; +break ; + +case CSR_SIEH : +case CSR_SIPH : +case CSR_HVIPH : +case CSR_HVICTL : +case CSR_HVIPRIO1 : +case CSR_HVIPRIO2 : +case CSR_HVIPRIO1H : +case CSR_HVIPRIO2H : +case CSR_VSIEH : +case CSR_VSIPH : + bit =SMSTATEEN0_AIA ; +break ; + +case CSR_SISELECT : +case CSR_VSISELECT : + bit =SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ; +break ; + +default : +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + } + +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 , bit); +}#endif static RISCVException fs (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno)
@@ -1383,6 +1419,13 @@ static int rmw_xiselect(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val, target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask) {target_ulong *iselect; +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + }/* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */ csrno =aia_xlate_vs_csrno (env, csrno);
@@ -1465,7 +1508,9 @@ static int rmw_xireg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val,bool virt;uint8_t *iprio;int ret = -EINVAL ; -target_ulong priv, isel, vgein; +target_ulong priv, isel, vgein =0 ; +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs);/* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */ csrno =aia_xlate_vs_csrno (env, csrno);
@@ -1494,11 +1539,20 @@ static int rmw_xireg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val, };/* Find the selected guest interrupt file */ - vgein = (virt) ?get_field (env->hstatus,HSTATUS_VGEIN ) :0 ; +if (virt) { +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen || + (env->hstateen[0 ] &SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC )) { + vgein =get_field (env->hstatus,HSTATUS_VGEIN ); + } + }if (ISELECT_IPRIO0 <= isel && isel <=ISELECT_IPRIO15 ) {/* Local interrupt priority registers not available for VS-mode */ if (!virt) { +if (priv ==PRV_S && cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen && + !(env->hstateen[0 ] &SMSTATEEN0_AIA )) { + goto done; + } ret =rmw_iprio (riscv_cpu_mxl_bits (env), isel, iprio, val, new_val, wr_mask, (priv ==PRV_M ) ?IRQ_M_EXT :IRQ_S_EXT );
@@ -1532,6 +1586,13 @@ static int rmw_xtopei(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val,bool virt;int ret = -EINVAL ;target_ulong priv, vgein; +RISCVException excp; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + excp =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (excp !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return excp; + }/* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */ csrno =aia_xlate_vs_csrno (env, csrno);
@@ -1884,6 +1945,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |= (SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ); + } +return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1935,6 +2000,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |= (SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ); + } +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -1988,6 +2057,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |= (SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ); + } +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -2043,6 +2116,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ; + } +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }
@@ -2277,6 +2354,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_vsieh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_vsie64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
@@ -2331,6 +2414,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_sieh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_sie64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
@@ -2493,6 +2582,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_vsiph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_vsip64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
@@ -2547,6 +2642,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_siph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_sip64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
@@ -2739,6 +2840,10 @@ static RISCVException read_hstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hstatus (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +if (smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno) !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { + val &= ~HSTATUS_VGEIN ; + } + env->hstatus = val;if (riscv_cpu_mxl (env) !=MXL_RV32 &&get_field (val,HSTATUS_VSXL ) !=2 ) {qemu_log_mask (LOG_UNIMP ,"QEMU does not support mixed HSXLEN options." );
@@ -2799,6 +2904,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_hidelegh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_hideleg64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
@@ -2845,6 +2956,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_hviph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_hvip64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
@@ -2899,6 +3016,13 @@ static RISCVException write_hcounteren(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_hgeie (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +if (val) { *val = env->hgeie; }
@@ -2908,6 +3032,13 @@ static RISCVException read_hgeie(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hgeie (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +/* Only GEILEN:1 bits implemented and BIT0 is never implemented */ val &= ((((target_ulong )1 ) << env->geilen) -1 ) <<1 ; env->hgeie = val;
@@ -2947,6 +3078,13 @@ static RISCVException write_htinst(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_hgeip (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +if (val) { *val = env->hgeip; }
@@ -3017,12 +3155,28 @@ static RISCVException write_htimedeltah(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static int read_hvictl (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->hvictl;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }static int write_hvictl (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret =RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->hvictl = val &HVICTL_VALID_MASK ;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }
@@ -3081,41 +3235,105 @@ static int write_hvipriox(CPURISCVState *env, int first_index,static int read_hviprio1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,0 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,0 , env->hviprio, val); }static int read_hviprio1h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,4 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio1h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,4 , env->hviprio, val); }static int read_hviprio2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,8 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,8 , env->hviprio, val); }static int read_hviprio2h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,12 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio2h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,12 , env->hviprio, val); }
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] target/riscv: smstateen check for AIA/IMSIC
Quoted 6 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
If smstateen is implemented then accesses to AIA registers CSRS, IMSIC CSRs and other IMSIC registers is controlled by setting of corresponding bits in mstateen/hstateen registers. Otherwise an illegal instruction trap or virtual instruction trap is generated.
Is there any spec for this?
I found only two sentences for this in smstateen spec:
" bits 60:58 - Reserved for the RISC-V Advanced Interrupt Architecture"
" Setting hstateen0 bit 58 to zero prevents a virtual machine from accessing the hart’s IMSIC the same as setting hstatus.VGEIN = 0"
Quoted 210 lines
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/csr.c | 222 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 220 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)target/riscv/csr.c +103
-2@@ -87,6 +87,42 @@ static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok(CPURISCVState *env, int index, return RISCV_EXCP_NONE; } + +static RISCVException smstateen_aia_acc_ok (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno) +{ +uint64_t bit; + +switch (csrno) { +case CSR_STOPEI : +case CSR_VSTOPEI : +case CSR_HSTATUS : + bit =SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ; +break ; + +case CSR_SIEH : +case CSR_SIPH : +case CSR_HVIPH : +case CSR_HVICTL : +case CSR_HVIPRIO1 : +case CSR_HVIPRIO2 : +case CSR_HVIPRIO1H : +case CSR_HVIPRIO2H : +case CSR_VSIEH : +case CSR_VSIPH : + bit =SMSTATEEN0_AIA ; +break ; + +case CSR_SISELECT : +case CSR_VSISELECT : + bit =SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ; +break ; + +default : +return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + } + +return smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 , bit); +}#endif static RISCVException fs (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno)@@ -1383,6 +1419,13 @@ static int rmw_xiselect(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val, target_ulong new_val, target_ulong wr_mask) {target_ulong *iselect; +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + }/* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */ csrno =aia_xlate_vs_csrno (env, csrno);@@ -1465,7 +1508,9 @@ static int rmw_xireg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val,bool virt;uint8_t *iprio;int ret = -EINVAL ; -target_ulong priv, isel, vgein; +target_ulong priv, isel, vgein =0 ; +CPUState *cs =env_cpu (env); +RISCVCPU *cpu =RISCV_CPU (cs);/* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */ csrno =aia_xlate_vs_csrno (env, csrno);@@ -1494,11 +1539,20 @@ static int rmw_xireg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val, };/* Find the selected guest interrupt file */ - vgein = (virt) ?get_field (env->hstatus,HSTATUS_VGEIN ) :0 ; +if (virt) { +if (!cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen || + (env->hstateen[0 ] &SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC )) { + vgein =get_field (env->hstatus,HSTATUS_VGEIN ); + } + }if (ISELECT_IPRIO0 <= isel && isel <=ISELECT_IPRIO15 ) {/* Local interrupt priority registers not available for VS-mode */ if (!virt) { +if (priv ==PRV_S && cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen && + !(env->hstateen[0 ] &SMSTATEEN0_AIA )) { + goto done; + } ret =rmw_iprio (riscv_cpu_mxl_bits (env), isel, iprio, val, new_val, wr_mask, (priv ==PRV_M ) ?IRQ_M_EXT :IRQ_S_EXT );@@ -1532,6 +1586,13 @@ static int rmw_xtopei(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, target_ulong *val,bool virt;int ret = -EINVAL ;target_ulong priv, vgein; +RISCVException excp; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + excp =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (excp !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return excp; + }/* Translate CSR number for VS-mode */ csrno =aia_xlate_vs_csrno (env, csrno);@@ -1884,6 +1945,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |= (SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ); + } +return write_mstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1935,6 +2000,10 @@ static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |= (SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ); + } +return write_mstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -1988,6 +2057,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |= (SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ); + } +return write_hstateen (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2043,6 +2116,10 @@ static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_FCSR ; } +if (riscv_feature (env,RISCV_FEATURE_AIA )) { + wr_mask |=SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC |SMSTATEEN0_AIA |SMSTATEEN0_SVSLCT ; + } +return write_hstateenh (env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val); }@@ -2277,6 +2354,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_vsieh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_vsie64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {@@ -2331,6 +2414,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_sieh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_sie64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {@@ -2493,6 +2582,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_vsiph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_vsip64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {@@ -2547,6 +2642,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_siph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_sip64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {
target/riscv/csr.c static RISCVException read_hstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno, · line 2846
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +4
-0@@ -2739,6 +2840,10 @@ static RISCVException read_hstatus(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hstatus (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +if (smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno) !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { + val &= ~HSTATUS_VGEIN ; + } +
Why this? For the statement
"Setting hstateen0 bit 58 to zero prevents a virtual machine from accessing the hart’s IMSIC the same as setting hstatus.VGEIN = 0"
I think it means "setting hstateen0 bit 58 to zero" and "setting hstatus.VGEIN = 0" have the same function:
" prevents a virtual machine from accessing the hart’s IMSIC", not "setting hstateen0 bit 58 to zero" is to
"setting hstatus.VGEIN = 0".
Or any other statement about this ?
Regards,
Weiwei Li
Quoted 206 lines
target/riscv/csr.c +113
-0env->hstatus = val;if (riscv_cpu_mxl (env) !=MXL_RV32 &&get_field (val,HSTATUS_VSXL ) !=2 ) {qemu_log_mask (LOG_UNIMP ,"QEMU does not support mixed HSXLEN options." );@@ -2799,6 +2904,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_hidelegh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_hideleg64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {@@ -2845,6 +2956,12 @@ static RISCVException rmw_hviph(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,uint64_t rval;RISCVException ret; +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + ret =rmw_hvip64 (env, csrno, &rval, ((uint64_t )new_val) <<32 , ((uint64_t )wr_mask) <<32 );if (ret_val) {@@ -2899,6 +3016,13 @@ static RISCVException write_hcounteren(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_hgeie (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +if (val) { *val = env->hgeie; }@@ -2908,6 +3032,13 @@ static RISCVException read_hgeie(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException write_hgeie (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +/* Only GEILEN:1 bits implemented and BIT0 is never implemented */ val &= ((((target_ulong )1 ) << env->geilen) -1 ) <<1 ; env->hgeie = val;@@ -2947,6 +3078,13 @@ static RISCVException write_htinst(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static RISCVException read_hgeip (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + + ret =smstateen_acc_ok (env,0 ,SMSTATEEN0_IMSIC ); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +if (val) { *val = env->hgeip; }@@ -3017,12 +3155,28 @@ static RISCVException write_htimedeltah(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,static int read_hvictl (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + *val = env->hvictl;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }static int write_hvictl (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret =RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } + env->hvictl = val &HVICTL_VALID_MASK ;return RISCV_EXCP_NONE ; }@@ -3081,41 +3235,105 @@ static int write_hvipriox(CPURISCVState *env, int first_index,static int read_hviprio1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,0 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio1 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,0 , env->hviprio, val); }static int read_hviprio1h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,4 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio1h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,4 , env->hviprio, val); }static int read_hviprio2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,8 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio2 (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,8 , env->hviprio, val); }static int read_hviprio2h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong *val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return read_hvipriox (env,12 , env->hviprio, val); }static int write_hviprio2h (CPURISCVState *env,int csrno,target_ulong val) { +RISCVException ret; + +/* Check if smstateen is enabled and this access is allowed */ + ret =smstateen_aia_acc_ok (env, csrno); +if (ret !=RISCV_EXCP_NONE ) { +return ret; + } +return write_hvipriox (env,12 , env->hviprio, val); }
PATCH v6 5/5 target/riscv: smstateen knobs
In reply to Mayuresh ChitaleAdd knobs to allow users to enable smstateen and also export it via the ISA extension string.
--- target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
target/riscv/cpu.c +2 -0
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static const struct isa_ext_data isa_edata_arr[] = {ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (zve64f, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_zve64f),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (zhinx, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_zhinx),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (zhinxmin, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_zhinxmin), +ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (smstateen, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_smstateen),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (svinval, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_svinval),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (svnapot, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_svnapot), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, true, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
@@ -987,6 +988,7 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {DEFINE_PROP_UINT16 ("vlen" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.vlen,128 ),DEFINE_PROP_UINT16 ("elen" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.elen,64 ), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL ("smstateen" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.ext_smstateen, false),DEFINE_PROP_BOOL ("svinval" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.ext_svinval, false),DEFINE_PROP_BOOL ("svnapot" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.ext_svnapot, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svpbmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svpbmt, false),
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
Re: [PATCH v6 5/5] target/riscv: smstateen knobs
Quoted 21 lines · Mayuresh Chitale
Add knobs to allow users to enable smstateen and also export it via the ISA extension string.
Signed-off-by Mayuresh Chitale <[email protected]>--- target/riscv/cpu.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)target/riscv/cpu.c +1
-0@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static const struct isa_ext_data isa_edata_arr[] = {ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (zve64f, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_zve64f),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (zhinx, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_zhinx),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (zhinxmin, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_zhinxmin), +ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (smstateen, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_smstateen),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (svinval, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_svinval),ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY (svnapot, true,PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0 , ext_svnapot), ISA_EXT_DATA_ENTRY(svpbmt, true, PRIV_VERSION_1_12_0, ext_svpbmt),
target/riscv/cpu.c static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = { · line 994
Quoted 7 lines
target/riscv/cpu.c +1
-0@@ -987,6 +988,7 @@ static Property riscv_cpu_extensions[] = {DEFINE_PROP_UINT16 ("vlen" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.vlen,128 ),DEFINE_PROP_UINT16 ("elen" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.elen,64 ), +DEFINE_PROP_BOOL ("smstateen" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.ext_smstateen, false),DEFINE_PROP_BOOL ("svinval" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.ext_svinval, false),DEFINE_PROP_BOOL ("svnapot" ,RISCVCPU , cfg.ext_svnapot, false), DEFINE_PROP_BOOL("svpbmt", RISCVCPU, cfg.ext_svpbmt, false),
Regards,
Weiwei Li