Skip to contentSkip to conversation

riscv: sophgo: add clock support for sg2042

PATCH Superseded Chen Wang 6 participants 16 messages Dec 8, 2023 – Dec 18, 2023

Subsystems (4)

v6 of 16 Superseded Latest is v16 →

lore
Share & tools
lore

Chen Wang

author
#0 lore raw

v6 cover riscv: sophgo: add clock support for sg2042

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

This series adds clock controller support for sophgo sg2042.

Thanks,
Chen

---

Changes in v6:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [7].
- fixed some warnings/errors reported by kernel test robot <[email protected]>.

Changes in v5:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [6].
- dt-bindings: improved yaml, such as:
- add vendor prefix for system-ctrl property for clock generator.
- Add explanation for system-ctrl property.
- move sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml to directly under clock folder.
- fixed bugs for driver Makefile/Kconfig
- continue cleaning-up debug print for driver code.

Changes in v4:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [5].
- dt-bindings: fixed a dt_binding_check error.

Changes in v3:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [3].
- DTS: don't use syscon but define sg2042 specific system control node. More background info can read [4].
- Updating minor issues in dt-bindings as per input from reviews.

Changes in v2:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [2].
- Squashed the patch adding clock definitions with the patch adding the binding for the clock controller.
- Updating dt-binding for syscon, remove oneOf for property compatible; define clock controller as child of syscon.
- DTS changes: merge sg2042-clock.dtsi into sg2042.dtsi; move clock-frequency property of osc to board devicethree due to the oscillator is outside the SoC.
- Fixed some bugs in driver code during testing, including removing warnings for rv32_defconfig.
- Updated MAINTAINERS info.

Changes in v1:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [1].

---

Chen Wang (4):
dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: Add Sophgo system control module
dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: support SG2042
clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver
riscv: dts: add clock generator for Sophgo SG2042 SoC

 .../bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml  |   53 +
 .../soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml     |   34 +
 MAINTAINERS                                   |    7 +
 .../boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-milkv-pioneer.dts  |    4 +
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        |   79 +
 drivers/clk/Kconfig                           |    1 +
 drivers/clk/Makefile                          |    1 +
 drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig                    |    8 +
 drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile                   |    2 +
 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c        | 1356 +++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h        |  226 +++
 .../dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h  |  169 ++
 12 files changed, 1940 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h

base-commit: b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
author
#1 lore raw

PATCH v6 1/4 dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: Add Sophgo system control module

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add documentation to describe Sophgo System Controller for SG2042.

---
 .../soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml     | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml new file +34 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1ec1eaa55598
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 SoC system controller
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+description:
+  The Sophgo SG2042 SoC system controller provides register information such
+  as offset, mask and shift that can be used by other modules, such as clocks.
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    system-controller@30010000 {
+        compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl";
+        reg = <0x30010000 0x1000>;
+    };
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
author
#2 lore raw

PATCH v6 2/4 dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: support SG2042

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add bindings for the clock generator on the SG2042 RISC-V SoC.

---
 .../bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml  |  53 ++++++
 .../dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h  | 169 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml
 create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml new file +53 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..f9935e66fc95
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sophgo SG2042 Clock Generator
+
+maintainers:
+  - Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+  compatible:
+    const: sophgo,sg2042-clkgen
+
+  reg:
+    maxItems: 1
+
+  sophgo,system-ctrl:
+    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle
+    description:
+      Phandle to SG2042 System Controller node. On SG2042, part of control
+      registers of Clock Controller are defined in System controller. Clock
+      driver will use this phandle to get the register map base to plus the
+      offset of the registers to access them.
+
+  clocks:
+    items:
+      - description: Clock Generation IC (25 MHz)
+
+  '#clock-cells':
+    const: 1
+    description:
+      See <dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h> for valid indices.
+
+required:
+  - compatible
+  - reg
+  - sophgo,system-ctrl
+  - clocks
+  - '#clock-cells'
+
+additionalProperties: false
+
+examples:
+  - |
+    clock-controller@30012000 {
+        compatible = "sophgo,sg2042-clkgen";
+        reg = <0x30012000 0x1000>;
+        sophgo,system-ctrl = <&sys_ctrl>;
+        clocks = <&cgi>;
+        #clock-cells = <1>;
+    };
include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h new file +169 -0

169 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
author
#4 lore raw

PATCH v6 3/4 clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add a driver for the SOPHGO SG2042 clock generator.

---
 MAINTAINERS                            |    7 +
 drivers/clk/Kconfig                    |    1 +
 drivers/clk/Makefile                   |    1 +
 drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig             |    8 +
 drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile            |    2 +
 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c | 1356 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h |  226 ++++
 7 files changed, 1601 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c
 create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h
MAINTAINERS +7 -0
index 97f51d5ec1cf..c9c75468f2cb 100644
@@ -20269,6 +20269,13 @@ S:	Maintained
 F:	arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/
 F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sophgo.yaml
 
+SOPHGO CLOCK DRIVER
+M:	Chen Wang <[email protected]>
+S:	Maintained
+F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo/
+F:	drivers/clk/sophgo/
+F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h
+
 SOUND
 M:	Jaroslav Kysela <[email protected]>
 M:	Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
drivers/clk/Kconfig +1 -0
index c30d0d396f7a..514343934fda 100644
@@ -499,6 +499,7 @@ source "drivers/clk/rockchip/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/clk/samsung/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/clk/sifive/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/clk/socfpga/Kconfig"
+source "drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/clk/sprd/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/clk/starfive/Kconfig"
 source "drivers/clk/sunxi/Kconfig"
drivers/clk/Makefile +1 -0
index ed71f2e0ee36..eeae7ae93f89 100644
@@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP)		+= rockchip/
 obj-$(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_SAMSUNG)	+= samsung/
 obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_SIFIVE)		+= sifive/
 obj-y					+= socfpga/
+obj-y					+= sophgo/
 obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_SPEAR)		+= spear/
 obj-y					+= sprd/
 obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_STI)			+= st/
drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig new file +8 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..feab0b805a29
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+config CLK_SOPHGO_SG2042
+	bool "Sophgo SG2042 clock support"
+	depends on ARCH_SOPHGO || COMPILE_TEST
+	default y
+	help
+	  Say yes here to support the clock controller on the Sophgo SG2042 SoC.
drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile new file +2 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..13834cce260c
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+obj-$(CONFIG_CLK_SOPHGO_SG2042)	+= clk-sophgo-sg2042.o
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +1356 -0

1,356 lines not on this page · raw message

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h new file +226 -0

226 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#5 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

Quoted 1 line · Chen Wang

+#define div_mask(width) ((1 << (width)) - 1)

Looks like this should be genmask.

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 19

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +2 -0
+#define ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(fbdiv, p1, p2, refdiv) \
+	(((fbdiv & 0xfff) << 16) | ((p2 & 0x7) << 12) | ((p1 & 0x7) << 8) | (refdiv & 0x3f))

IMO this should be a function not a macro.

Review

Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +2 -0
+
+static inline int __sg2042_pll_enable(struct sg2042_pll_clock *pll, bool en)

Why the __ prefixing of function names btw?

Quoted 4 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +4 -0
+{
+	unsigned int value = 0;
+	unsigned long enter;
+	struct regmap *map = pll->map;

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 35

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+
+	if (en) {
+		/* wait pll lock */
+		enter = jiffies;
+		regmap_read(map, pll->offset_status, &value);
+		while (!((value >> pll->shift_status_lock) & 0x1)) {
+			regmap_read(map, pll->shift_status_lock, &value);
+			if (time_after(jiffies, enter + HZ / 10))
+				pr_warn("%s not locked\n", pll->name);
+		}

Can't you just use read_poll_timeout()?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/iopoll.h#L16

Quoted 38 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +37 -0
+		/* wait pll updating */
+		enter = jiffies;
+		regmap_read(map, pll->shift_status_updating, &value);
+		while (((value >> pll->shift_status_updating) & 0x1)) {
+			regmap_read(map, pll->shift_status_updating, &value);
+			if (time_after(jiffies, enter + HZ / 10))
+				pr_warn("%s still updating\n", pll->name);
+		}
+		/* enable pll */
+		regmap_read(map, pll->offset_enable, &value);
+		regmap_write(map, pll->offset_enable, value | (1 << pll->shift_enable));
+	} else {
+		/* disable pll */
+		regmap_read(map, pll->offset_enable, &value);
+		regmap_write(map, pll->offset_enable, value & (~(1 << pll->shift_enable)));
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 
+static unsigned int __sg2042_get_table_div(
+	const struct clk_div_table *table,
+	unsigned int val)
+{
+	const struct clk_div_table *clkt;
+
+	for (clkt = table; clkt->div; clkt++)
+		if (clkt->val == val)
+			return clkt->div;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int __sg2042_get_div(
+	const struct clk_div_table *table,
+	unsigned int val,
+	unsigned long flags, u8 width)
+{

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 82

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+	if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
+		return val;
+	if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
+		return 1 << val;
+	if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO)
+		return val ? val : div_mask(width) + 1;
+	if (table)
+		return __sg2042_get_table_div(table, val);
+	return val + 1;
+}

Are these not effectively the same as clk_divider's ops?

Quoted 11 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +11 -0
+
+/*
+ * @reg_value: current register value
+ * @parent_rate: parent frequency
+ *
+ * This function is used to calculate below "rate" in equation
+ * rate = (parent_rate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/POSTDIV1/POSTDIV2
+ *      = (parent_rate x FBDIV) / (REFDIV x POSTDIV1 x POSTDIV2)
+ */
+static unsigned long __sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(
+	unsigned int reg_value,

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 103

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	unsigned int fbdiv, refdiv;
+	unsigned int postdiv1, postdiv2;
+	u64 rate, numerator, denominator;
+
+	fbdiv = (reg_value >> 16) & 0xfff;
+	refdiv = reg_value & 0x3f;
+	postdiv1 = (reg_value >> 8) & 0x7;
+	postdiv2 = (reg_value >> 12) & 0x7;

IMO all of these are opportunities for GENMASK and defines.

Quoted 37 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +37 -0
+
+	numerator = parent_rate * fbdiv;
+	denominator = refdiv * postdiv1 * postdiv2;
+	do_div(numerator, denominator);
+	rate = numerator;
+
+	return rate;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Below array is the total combination lists of POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2
+ * for example:
+ * postdiv1_2[0] = {2, 4, 8}
+ *           ==> div1 = 2, div2 = 4 , div1 * div2 = 8
+ * And POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX point to 3rd element in the array
+ */
+#define	POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX	2
+static int postdiv1_2[][3] = {
+	{2, 4,  8}, {3, 3,  9}, {2, 5, 10}, {2, 6, 12},
+	{2, 7, 14}, {3, 5, 15}, {4, 4, 16}, {3, 6, 18},
+	{4, 5, 20}, {3, 7, 21}, {4, 6, 24}, {5, 5, 25},
+	{4, 7, 28}, {5, 6, 30}, {5, 7, 35}, {6, 6, 36},
+	{6, 7, 42}, {7, 7, 49}
+};
+
+/*
+ * Based on input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, look up the postdiv1_2 table
+ * to get the closest postdiiv combination.
+ * @rate: FOUTPOSTDIV
+ * @prate: parent rate, i.e. FREF
+ * @fbdiv: FBDIV
+ * @refdiv: REFDIV
+ * @postdiv1: POSTDIV1, output
+ * @postdiv2: POSTDIV2, output
+ * See TRM:
+ * FOUTPOSTDIV = FREF * FBDIV / REFDIV / (POSTDIV1 * POSTDIV2)
+ * So we get following formula to get POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2:

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 150

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+ * POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate
+ * above POSTDIV = POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2
+ */
+static int __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2(
+	unsigned long rate,
+	unsigned long prate,
+	unsigned int fbdiv,
+	unsigned int refdiv,
+	unsigned int *postdiv1,
+	unsigned int *postdiv2)

This is not the coding style btw.

Quoted 31 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +31 -0
+{
+	int index = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+	u64 tmp0;
+
+	/* prate/REFDIV and result save to tmp0 */
+	tmp0 = prate;
+	do_div(tmp0, refdiv);
+
+	/* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV) and result save to tmp0 */
+	tmp0 *= fbdiv;
+
+	/* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV)/rate and result save to tmp0 */
+	do_div(tmp0, rate);
+
+	/* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */
+	if (tmp0 <= 7) {
+		/* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
+		*postdiv1 = tmp0;
+		*postdiv2 = 1;
+	} else {
+		/* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */
+		for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
+			if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
+				continue;
+			} else {
+				/* found it */
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		if (index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2)) {

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 191

Quoted 10 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +10 -0
+			*postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
+			*postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
+		} else {
+			pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return ret;
+}

Reading this function it makes me wonder if (and I am far from the best person to comment, someone like Stephen is vastly more qualified) you should model this as several "stages", each implemented by the "standard" clocks - like clk_divider etc. The code here is quite complicated IMO as it seems to be trying to implement several stages of division in one go.

There's quite a lot in the driver and I will admit that I have not read it all my any means (I skimmed from here onwards), but in general my advice would be to try and reuse the generic code as much as possible.

Thanks,
Conor.

Quoted 1,400 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +1165 -0
+
+#define KHZ 1000UL
+#define MHZ (KHZ * KHZ)
+
+#define REFDIV_MIN 1
+#define REFDIV_MAX 63
+#define FBDIV_MIN 16
+#define FBDIV_MAX 320
+
+#define PLL_FREF_SG2042 (25 * MHZ)
+
+#define PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_MIN (16 * MHZ)
+#define PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_MAX (3200 * MHZ)
+
+#define PLL_FOUTVCO_MIN (800 * MHZ)
+#define PLL_FOUTVCO_MAX (3200 * MHZ)
+
+struct sg2042_pll_ctrl {
+	unsigned long freq;
+	unsigned int fbdiv;
+	unsigned int postdiv1;
+	unsigned int postdiv2;
+	unsigned int refdiv;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Based on the given FOUTPISTDIV and the input FREF to calculate
+ * the REFDIV/FBDIV/PSTDIV1/POSTDIV2 combination for pllctrl register.
+ * @req_rate: expected output clock rate, i.e. FOUTPISTDIV
+ * @parent_rate: input parent clock rate, i.e. FREF
+ * @best: output to hold calculated combination of REFDIV/FBDIV/PSTDIV1/POSTDIV2
+ */
+static int __sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(
+	struct sg2042_pll_ctrl *best,
+	unsigned long req_rate,
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	int ret;
+	unsigned int fbdiv, refdiv, postdiv1, postdiv2;
+	unsigned long foutpostdiv;
+	u64 tmp;
+	u64 foutvco;
+
+	if (parent_rate != PLL_FREF_SG2042) {
+		pr_alert("INVALID FREF: %ld\n", parent_rate);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	if (req_rate < PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_MIN || req_rate > PLL_FOUTPOSTDIV_MAX) {
+		pr_alert("INVALID FOUTPOSTDIV: %ld\n", req_rate);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	memset(best, 0, sizeof(struct sg2042_pll_ctrl));
+
+	for (refdiv = REFDIV_MIN; refdiv < REFDIV_MAX + 1; refdiv++) {
+		/* required by hardware: FREF/REFDIV must > 10 */
+		tmp = parent_rate;
+		do_div(tmp, refdiv);
+		if (tmp <= 10)
+			continue;
+
+		for (fbdiv = FBDIV_MIN; fbdiv < FBDIV_MAX + 1; fbdiv++) {
+			/*
+			 * FOUTVCO = FREF*FBDIV/REFDIV validation
+			 * required by hardware, FOUTVCO must [800MHz, 3200MHz]
+			 */
+			foutvco = parent_rate * fbdiv;
+			do_div(foutvco, refdiv);
+			if (foutvco < PLL_FOUTVCO_MIN || foutvco > PLL_FOUTVCO_MAX)
+				continue;
+
+			ret = __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2(
+				req_rate, parent_rate, fbdiv, refdiv,
+				&postdiv1, &postdiv2);
+			if (ret)
+				continue;
+
+			/*
+			 * FOUTPOSTDIV = FREF*FBDIV/REFDIV/(POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2)
+			 *             = FOUTVCO/(POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2)
+			 */
+			tmp = foutvco;
+			do_div(tmp, (postdiv1 * postdiv2));
+			foutpostdiv = (unsigned long)tmp;
+			/* Iterative to approach the expected value */
+			if (abs_diff(foutpostdiv, req_rate) <
+			    abs_diff(best->freq, req_rate)) {
+				best->freq = foutpostdiv;
+				best->refdiv = refdiv;
+				best->fbdiv = fbdiv;
+				best->postdiv1 = postdiv1;
+				best->postdiv2 = postdiv2;
+				if (foutpostdiv == req_rate)
+					return 0;
+			}
+			continue;
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (best->freq == 0)
+		return -EINVAL;
+	else
+		return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * @hw: ccf use to hook get sg2042_pll_clock
+ * @parent_rate: parent rate
+ *
+ * The is function will be called through clk_get_rate
+ * and return current rate after decoding reg value
+ */
+static unsigned long sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	unsigned int value;
+	unsigned long rate;
+	struct sg2042_pll_clock *pll = to_sg2042_pll_clk(hw);
+
+	regmap_read(pll->map, pll->offset_ctrl, &value);
+	rate = __sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(value, parent_rate);
+
+	pr_debug("--> %s: pll_recalc_rate: val = %ld\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), rate);
+	return rate;
+}
+
+static long sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	unsigned long req_rate,
+	unsigned long *prate)
+{
+	unsigned int value;
+	struct sg2042_pll_ctrl pctrl_table;
+	long proper_rate;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(&pctrl_table, req_rate, *prate);
+	if (ret) {
+		proper_rate = 0;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	value = ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(pctrl_table.fbdiv, pctrl_table.postdiv1,
+			     pctrl_table.postdiv2, pctrl_table.refdiv);
+	proper_rate = (long)__sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(value, *prate);
+
+out:
+	pr_debug("--> %s: pll_round_rate: val = %ld\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), proper_rate);
+	return proper_rate;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	struct clk_rate_request *req)
+{
+	req->rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate(hw, min(req->rate, req->max_rate),
+					  &req->best_parent_rate);
+	pr_debug("--> %s: pll_determine_rate: val = %ld\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), req->rate);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_clk_pll_set_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	unsigned long rate,
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned int value;
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct sg2042_pll_ctrl pctrl_table;
+	struct sg2042_pll_clock *pll = to_sg2042_pll_clk(hw);
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(pll->lock, flags);
+	if (__sg2042_pll_enable(pll, 0)) {
+		pr_warn("Can't disable pll(%s), status error\n", pll->name);
+		goto out;
+	}
+	ret = __sg2042_get_pll_ctl_setting(&pctrl_table, rate, parent_rate);
+	if (ret) {
+		pr_warn("%s: Can't find a proper pll setting\n", pll->name);
+		goto out2;
+	}
+
+	value = ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(pctrl_table.fbdiv, pctrl_table.postdiv1,
+			     pctrl_table.postdiv2, pctrl_table.refdiv);
+
+	/* write the value to top register */
+	regmap_write(pll->map, pll->offset_ctrl, value);
+
+out2:
+	__sg2042_pll_enable(pll, 1);
+out:
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(pll->lock, flags);
+
+	pr_debug("--> %s: pll_set_rate: val = 0x%x\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), value);
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static unsigned long sg2042_clk_divider_recalc_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	struct sg2042_divider_clock *divider = to_sg2042_clk_divider(hw);
+	unsigned int val;
+	unsigned long ret_rate;
+
+	val = readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift;
+	val &= div_mask(divider->width);
+
+	ret_rate = divider_recalc_rate(hw, parent_rate, val, divider->table,
+				   divider->div_flags, divider->width);
+
+	pr_debug("--> %s: divider_recalc_rate: val = %ld\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), ret_rate);
+	return ret_rate;
+}
+
+static long sg2042_clk_divider_round_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	unsigned long rate,
+	unsigned long *prate)
+{
+	int bestdiv;
+	unsigned long ret_rate;
+	struct sg2042_divider_clock *divider = to_sg2042_clk_divider(hw);
+
+	/* if read only, just return current value */
+	if (divider->div_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY) {
+		bestdiv = readl(divider->reg) >> divider->shift;
+		bestdiv &= div_mask(divider->width);
+		bestdiv = __sg2042_get_div(divider->table, bestdiv, divider->div_flags,
+				   divider->width);
+		ret_rate = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL((u64)*prate, bestdiv);
+	} else {
+		ret_rate = divider_round_rate(hw, rate, prate, divider->table,
+				  divider->width, divider->div_flags);
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("--> %s: divider_round_rate: val = %ld\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), ret_rate);
+	return ret_rate;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_clk_divider_set_rate(
+	struct clk_hw *hw,
+	unsigned long rate,
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	unsigned int value;
+	unsigned int val, val2;
+	unsigned long flags = 0;
+	struct sg2042_divider_clock *divider = to_sg2042_clk_divider(hw);
+
+	value = divider_get_val(rate, parent_rate, divider->table,
+				divider->width, divider->div_flags);
+
+	if (divider->lock)
+		spin_lock_irqsave(divider->lock, flags);
+	else
+		__acquire(divider->lock);
+
+	/* div assert */
+	val = readl(divider->reg);
+	val &= ~0x1;
+	writel(val, divider->reg);
+
+	if (divider->div_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK) {
+		val = div_mask(divider->width) << (divider->shift + 16);
+	} else {
+		val = readl(divider->reg);
+		val &= ~(div_mask(divider->width) << divider->shift);
+	}
+
+	val |= value << divider->shift;
+	writel(val, divider->reg);
+	val2 = val;
+
+	if (!(divider->div_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY))
+		val |= 1 << 3;
+
+	/* de-assert */
+	val |= 1;
+	writel(val, divider->reg);
+	if (divider->lock)
+		spin_unlock_irqrestore(divider->lock, flags);
+	else
+		__release(divider->lock);
+
+	pr_debug("--> %s: divider_set_rate: register val = 0x%x\n",
+		clk_hw_get_name(hw), val2);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_divider_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_divider_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = sg2042_clk_divider_round_rate,
+	.set_rate = sg2042_clk_divider_set_rate,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_divider_ro_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_divider_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = sg2042_clk_divider_round_rate,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_pll_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate,
+	.determine_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_determine_rate,
+	.set_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_set_rate,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_ops sg2042_clk_pll_ro_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = sg2042_clk_pll_round_rate,
+};
+
+#define SG2042_PLL(_id, _name, _parent_name, _r_stat, _r_enable, _r_ctrl, _shift) \
+	{								\
+		.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS(				\
+				_name,					\
+				(const char *[]){_parent_name},		\
+				&sg2042_clk_pll_ops,			\
+				CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE | CLK_GET_ACCURACY_NOCACHE),\
+		.id = _id,						\
+		.name = _name,						\
+		.offset_ctrl = _r_ctrl,					\
+		.offset_status = _r_stat,				\
+		.offset_enable = _r_enable,				\
+		.shift_status_lock = 8 + _shift,			\
+		.shift_status_updating = _shift,			\
+		.shift_enable = _shift,					\
+	}
+
+#define SG2042_PLL_RO(_id, _name, _parent_name, _r_stat, _r_enable, _r_ctrl, _shift) \
+	{								\
+		.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS(				\
+				_name,					\
+				(const char *[]){_parent_name},		\
+				&sg2042_clk_pll_ro_ops,			\
+				CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE | CLK_GET_ACCURACY_NOCACHE),\
+		.id = _id,						\
+		.name = _name,						\
+		.offset_ctrl = _r_ctrl,					\
+		.offset_status = _r_stat,				\
+		.offset_enable = _r_enable,				\
+		.shift_status_lock = 8 + _shift,			\
+		.shift_status_updating = _shift,			\
+		.shift_enable = _shift,					\
+	}
+
+static struct sg2042_pll_clock sg2042_pll_clks[] = {
+	SG2042_PLL_RO(FPLL_CLK, "fpll_clock", "cgi",
+		R_PLL_STAT, R_PLL_CLKEN_CONTROL, R_FPLL_CONTROL, 3),
+	SG2042_PLL_RO(DPLL0_CLK, "dpll0_clock", "cgi",
+		R_PLL_STAT, R_PLL_CLKEN_CONTROL, R_DPLL0_CONTROL, 4),
+	SG2042_PLL_RO(DPLL1_CLK, "dpll1_clock", "cgi",
+		R_PLL_STAT, R_PLL_CLKEN_CONTROL, R_DPLL1_CONTROL, 5),
+	SG2042_PLL(MPLL_CLK, "mpll_clock", "cgi",
+		R_PLL_STAT, R_PLL_CLKEN_CONTROL, R_MPLL_CONTROL, 0),
+};
+
+#define SG2042_DIV(_id, _name, _parent_name,				\
+		  _r_ctrl, _shift, _width,				\
+		  _div_flag, _init_val) {				\
+		.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS(				\
+				_name,					\
+				(const char *[]){_parent_name},		\
+				&sg2042_clk_divider_ops,		\
+				0),					\
+		.id = _id,						\
+		.name = _name,						\
+		.offset_ctrl = _r_ctrl,					\
+		.shift = _shift,					\
+		.width = _width,					\
+		.div_flags = _div_flag,					\
+		.initial_val = _init_val,				\
+		.table = NULL,						\
+	}
+
+#define SG2042_DIV_RO(_id, _name, _parent_name,				\
+		  _r_ctrl, _shift, _width,				\
+		  _div_flag, _init_val) {				\
+		.hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT_PARENTS(				\
+				_name,					\
+				(const char *[]){_parent_name},		\
+				&sg2042_clk_divider_ro_ops,		\
+				0),					\
+		.id = _id,						\
+		.name = _name,						\
+		.offset_ctrl = _r_ctrl,					\
+		.shift = _shift,					\
+		.width = _width,					\
+		.div_flags = _div_flag,					\
+		.initial_val = _init_val,				\
+		.table = NULL,						\
+	}
+
+/*
+ * DIV items in the array are sorted according to the clock-tree diagram,
+ * from top to bottom, from upstream to downstream. Read TRM for details.
+ */
+#define DEF_DIVFLAG (CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED | CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO)
+static struct sg2042_divider_clock sg2042_div_clks[] = {
+	SG2042_DIV_RO(DIV_CLK_DPLL0_DDR01_0,
+		"clk_div_ddr01_0", "clk_gate_ddr01_div0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG27, 16, 5,
+		DEF_DIVFLAG | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY, -1),
+	SG2042_DIV_RO(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DDR01_1,
+		"clk_div_ddr01_1", "clk_gate_ddr01_div1",
+		R_CLKDIVREG28, 16, 5,
+		DEF_DIVFLAG | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY, -1),
+
+	SG2042_DIV_RO(DIV_CLK_DPLL1_DDR23_0,
+		"clk_div_ddr23_0", "clk_gate_ddr23_div0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG29, 16, 5,
+		DEF_DIVFLAG | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY, -1),
+	SG2042_DIV_RO(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DDR23_1,
+		"clk_div_ddr23_1", "clk_gate_ddr23_div1",
+		R_CLKDIVREG30, 16, 5,
+		DEF_DIVFLAG | CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY, -1),
+
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_MPLL_RP_CPU_NORMAL_0,
+		"clk_div_rp_cpu_normal_0", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal_div0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG0, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_RP_CPU_NORMAL_1,
+		"clk_div_rp_cpu_normal_1", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal_div1",
+		R_CLKDIVREG1, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_MPLL_AXI_DDR_0,
+		"clk_div_axi_ddr_0", "clk_gate_axi_ddr_div0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG25, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 5),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_AXI_DDR_1,
+		"clk_div_axi_ddr_1", "clk_gate_axi_ddr_div1",
+		R_CLKDIVREG26, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 5),
+
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_TOP_RP_CMN_DIV2,
+		"clk_div_top_rp_cmn_div2", "clk_mux_rp_cpu_normal",
+		R_CLKDIVREG3, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_50M_A53, "clk_div_50m_a53", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG2, 16, 8, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	/* downstream of div_50m_a53 */
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER1, "clk_div_timer1", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG6, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER2, "clk_div_timer2", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG7, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER3, "clk_div_timer3", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG8, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER4, "clk_div_timer4", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG9, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER5, "clk_div_timer5", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG10, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER6, "clk_div_timer6", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG11, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER7, "clk_div_timer7", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG12, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_DIV_TIMER8, "clk_div_timer8", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		R_CLKDIVREG13, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+
+	SG2042_DIV_RO(DIV_CLK_FPLL_UART_500M, "clk_div_uart_500m", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG4, 16, 7,
+		CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_AHB_LPC, "clk_div_ahb_lpc", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG5, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_EFUSE, "clk_div_efuse", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG14, 16, 7, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_TX_ETH0, "clk_div_tx_eth0", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG16, 16, 11, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_PTP_REF_I_ETH0,
+		"clk_div_ptp_ref_i_eth0", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG17, 16, 8, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_REF_ETH0, "clk_div_ref_eth0", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG18, 16, 8, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_EMMC, "clk_div_emmc", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG19, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_SD, "clk_div_sd", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG21, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_TOP_AXI0, "clk_div_top_axi0", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG23, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	/* downstream of div_top_axi0 */
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_100K_EMMC, "clk_div_100k_emmc", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG20, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_100K_SD, "clk_div_100k_sd", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG22, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_GPIO_DB, "clk_div_gpio_db", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		R_CLKDIVREG15, 16, 16, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+
+	SG2042_DIV(DIV_CLK_FPLL_TOP_AXI_HSPERI,
+		"clk_div_top_axi_hsperi", "fpll_clock",
+		R_CLKDIVREG24, 16, 5, DEF_DIVFLAG, 0),
+};
+
+#define SG2042_GATE(_id, _name, _parent_name, _flags, \
+		    _r_enable, _bit_idx, _flag_r) { \
+		.id = _id,			\
+		.name = _name,			\
+		.parent_name = _parent_name,	\
+		.flags = _flags,		\
+		.offset_enable = _r_enable,	\
+		.bit_idx = _bit_idx,		\
+		.flag_sysctrl = _flag_r,	\
+	}
+
+/*
+ * GATE items in the array are sorted according to the clock-tree diagram,
+ * from top to bottom, from upstream to downstream. Read TRM for details.
+ */
+static const struct sg2042_gate_clock sg2042_gate_clks[] = {
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_DDR01_DIV0, "clk_gate_ddr01_div0", "dpll0_clock",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
+		R_CLKDIVREG27, 4, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_DDR01_DIV1, "clk_gate_ddr01_div1", "fpll_clock",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKDIVREG28, 4, 0),
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_DDR23_DIV0, "clk_gate_ddr23_div0", "dpll1_clock",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED,
+		R_CLKDIVREG29, 4, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_DDR23_DIV1, "clk_gate_ddr23_div1", "fpll_clock",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKDIVREG30, 4, 0),
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RP_CPU_NORMAL_DIV0, "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal_div0", "mpll_clock",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKDIVREG0, 4, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RP_CPU_NORMAL_DIV1,
+		"clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal_div1", "fpll_clock",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKDIVREG1, 4, 0),
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_DDR_DIV0, "clk_gate_axi_ddr_div0", "mpll_clock",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKDIVREG25, 4, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_DDR_DIV1, "clk_gate_axi_ddr_div1", "fpll_clock",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKDIVREG26, 4, 0),
+
+	/* upon are gate clocks as input source for the muxes */
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_DDR01, "clk_gate_ddr01", "clk_mux_ddr01",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKENREG1, 14, 0),
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_DDR23, "clk_gate_ddr23", "clk_mux_ddr23",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKENREG1, 15, 0),
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RP_CPU_NORMAL,
+		"clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal", "clk_mux_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKENREG0, 0, 0),
+
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_DDR, "clk_gate_axi_ddr", "clk_mux_axi_ddr",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKENREG1, 13, 0),
+
+	/* upon are gate clocks directly downstream of muxes */
+
+	/* downstream of clk_div_top_rp_cmn_div2 */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TOP_RP_CMN_DIV2,
+		"clk_gate_top_rp_cmn_div2", "clk_div_top_rp_cmn_div2",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG0, 2, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_HSDMA, "clk_gate_hsdma", "clk_gate_top_rp_cmn_div2",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 10, 0),
+
+	/*
+	 * downstream of clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal
+	 *
+	 * FIXME: there should be one 1/2 DIV between clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal
+	 * and clk_gate_axi_pcie0/clk_gate_axi_pcie1.
+	 * But the 1/2 DIV is fixed and no configurable register exported, so
+	 * when reading from these two clocks, the rate value are still the
+	 * same as that of clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal, it's not correct.
+	 * This just affects the value read.
+	 */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_PCIE0,
+		"clk_gate_axi_pcie0", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG1, 8, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_PCIE1,
+		"clk_gate_axi_pcie1", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG1, 9, 0),
+
+	/* downstream of div_50m_a53 */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_A53_50M, "clk_gate_a53_50m", "clk_div_50m_a53",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG0, 1, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER1, "clk_gate_timer1", "clk_div_timer1",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 12, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER2, "clk_gate_timer2", "clk_div_timer2",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 13, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER3, "clk_gate_timer3", "clk_div_timer3",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 14, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER4, "clk_gate_timer4", "clk_div_timer4",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 15, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER5, "clk_gate_timer5", "clk_div_timer5",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 16, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER6, "clk_gate_timer6", "clk_div_timer6",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 17, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER7, "clk_gate_timer7", "clk_div_timer7",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 18, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TIMER8, "clk_gate_timer8", "clk_div_timer8",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 19, 0),
+
+	/* gate clocks downstream from div clocks one-to-one */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_UART_500M, "clk_gate_uart_500m", "clk_div_uart_500m",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG0, 4, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AHB_LPC, "clk_gate_ahb_lpc", "clk_div_ahb_lpc",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 7, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_EFUSE, "clk_gate_efuse", "clk_div_efuse",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 20, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TX_ETH0, "clk_gate_tx_eth0", "clk_div_tx_eth0",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 30, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_PTP_REF_I_ETH0,
+		"clk_gate_ptp_ref_i_eth0", "clk_div_ptp_ref_i_eth0",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 0, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_REF_ETH0, "clk_gate_ref_eth0", "clk_div_ref_eth0",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 1, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_EMMC_100M, "clk_gate_emmc", "clk_div_emmc",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 3, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_SD_100M, "clk_gate_sd", "clk_div_sd",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 6, 0),
+
+	/* downstream of clk_div_top_axi0 */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AHB_ROM, "clk_gate_ahb_rom", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		 0, R_CLKENREG0, 8, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AHB_SF, "clk_gate_ahb_sf", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 9, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_SRAM, "clk_gate_axi_sram", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG0, 10, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_TIMER, "clk_gate_apb_timer", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED, R_CLKENREG0, 11, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_EFUSE, "clk_gate_apb_efuse", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 21, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_GPIO, "clk_gate_apb_gpio", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 22, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_GPIO_INTR,
+		"clk_gate_apb_gpio_intr", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 23, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_I2C, "clk_gate_apb_i2c", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 26, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_WDT, "clk_gate_apb_wdt", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 27, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_PWM, "clk_gate_apb_pwm", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 28, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_RTC, "clk_gate_apb_rtc", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		0, R_CLKENREG0, 29, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TOP_AXI0, "clk_gate_top_axi0", "clk_div_top_axi0",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_CLKENREG1, 11, 0),
+	/* downstream of DIV clocks which are sourced from clk_div_top_axi0 */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_GPIO_DB, "clk_gate_gpio_db", "clk_div_gpio_db",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 24, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_100K_EMMC, "clk_gate_100k_emmc", "clk_div_100k_emmc",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 4, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_100K_SD, "clk_gate_100k_sd", "clk_div_100k_sd",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 7, 0),
+
+	/* downstream of clk_div_top_axi_hsperi */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_SYSDMA_AXI,
+		"clk_gate_sysdma_axi", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 3, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_UART,
+		"clk_gate_apb_uart", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 5, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_DBG_I2C,
+		"clk_gate_axi_dbg_i2c", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 6, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_APB_SPI,
+		"clk_gate_apb_spi", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 25, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_ETH0,
+		"clk_gate_axi_eth0", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG0, 31, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_EMMC,
+		"clk_gate_axi_emmc", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 2, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_AXI_SD,
+		"clk_gate_axi_sd", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT, R_CLKENREG1, 5, 0),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_TOP_AXI_HSPERI,
+		"clk_gate_top_axi_hsperi", "clk_div_top_axi_hsperi",
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL,
+		R_CLKENREG1, 12, 0),
+
+	/* downstream of clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal about rxu */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU0, "clk_gate_rxu0", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU1, "clk_gate_rxu1", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 1, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU2, "clk_gate_rxu2", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 2, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU3, "clk_gate_rxu3", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 3, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU4, "clk_gate_rxu4", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 4, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU5, "clk_gate_rxu5", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 5, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU6, "clk_gate_rxu6", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 6, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU7, "clk_gate_rxu7", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 7, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU8, "clk_gate_rxu8", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 8, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU9, "clk_gate_rxu9", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 9, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU10, "clk_gate_rxu10", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 10, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU11, "clk_gate_rxu11", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 11, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU12, "clk_gate_rxu12", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 12, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU13, "clk_gate_rxu13", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 13, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU14, "clk_gate_rxu14", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 14, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU15, "clk_gate_rxu15", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 15, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU16, "clk_gate_rxu16", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 16, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU17, "clk_gate_rxu17", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 17, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU18, "clk_gate_rxu18", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 18, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU19, "clk_gate_rxu19", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 19, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU20, "clk_gate_rxu20", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 20, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU21, "clk_gate_rxu21", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 21, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU22, "clk_gate_rxu22", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 22, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU23, "clk_gate_rxu23", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 23, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU24, "clk_gate_rxu24", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 24, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU25, "clk_gate_rxu25", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 25, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU26, "clk_gate_rxu26", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 26, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU27, "clk_gate_rxu27", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 27, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU28, "clk_gate_rxu28", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 28, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU29, "clk_gate_rxu29", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 29, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU30, "clk_gate_rxu30", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 30, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_RXU31, "clk_gate_rxu31", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		0, R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE, 31, 1),
+
+	/* downstream of clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal about mp */
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP0, "clk_gate_mp0", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP0_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP1, "clk_gate_mp1", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP1_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP2, "clk_gate_mp2", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP2_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP3, "clk_gate_mp3", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP3_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP4, "clk_gate_mp4", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP4_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP5, "clk_gate_mp5", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP5_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP6, "clk_gate_mp6", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP6_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP7, "clk_gate_mp7", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP7_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP8, "clk_gate_mp8", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP8_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP9, "clk_gate_mp9", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP9_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP10, "clk_gate_mp10", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP10_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP11, "clk_gate_mp11", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP11_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP12, "clk_gate_mp12", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP12_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP13, "clk_gate_mp13", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP13_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP14, "clk_gate_mp14", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP14_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_GATE(GATE_CLK_MP15, "clk_gate_mp15", "clk_gate_rp_cpu_normal",
+		CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED | CLK_IS_CRITICAL, R_MP15_CONTROL_REG, 0, 1),
+};
+
+#define SG2042_MUX(_id, _name, _parent_names, _flags, _r_select, _shift, _width) { \
+		.id = _id,					\
+		.name = _name,					\
+		.parent_names = _parent_names,			\
+		.num_parents = ARRAY_SIZE(_parent_names),	\
+		.flags = _flags,				\
+		.offset_select = _r_select,			\
+		.shift = _shift,				\
+		.width = _width,				\
+	}
+
+/*
+ * Note: regarding names for mux clock, "0/1" or "div0/div1" means the
+ * first/second parent input source, not the register value.
+ * For example:
+ * "clk_div_ddr01_0" is the name of Clock divider 0 control of DDR01, and
+ * "clk_gate_ddr01_div0" is the gate clock in front of the "clk_div_ddr01_0",
+ * they are both controlled by register CLKDIVREG27;
+ * "clk_div_ddr01_1" is the name of Clock divider 1 control of DDR01, and
+ * "clk_gate_ddr01_div1" is the gate clock in front of the "clk_div_ddr01_1",
+ * they are both controlled by register CLKDIVREG28;
+ * While for register value of mux selection, use Clock Select for DDR01’s clock
+ * as example, see CLKSELREG0, bit[2].
+ * 1: Select in_dpll0_clk as clock source, correspondng to the parent input
+ *    source from "clk_div_ddr01_0".
+ * 0: Select in_fpll_clk as clock source, corresponding to the parent input
+ *    source from "clk_div_ddr01_1".
+ * So we need a table to define the array of register values corresponding to
+ * the parent index and tell CCF about this when registering mux clock.
+ */
+static const u32 sg2042_mux_table[] = {1, 0};
+
+static const char *const clk_mux_ddr01_p[] = {
+			"clk_div_ddr01_0", "clk_div_ddr01_1"};
+static const char *const clk_mux_ddr23_p[] = {
+			"clk_div_ddr23_0", "clk_div_ddr23_1"};
+static const char *const clk_mux_rp_cpu_normal_p[] = {
+			"clk_div_rp_cpu_normal_0", "clk_div_rp_cpu_normal_1"};
+static const char *const clk_mux_axi_ddr_p[] = {
+			"clk_div_axi_ddr_0", "clk_div_axi_ddr_1"};
+
+static struct sg2042_mux_clock sg2042_mux_clks[] = {
+	SG2042_MUX(MUX_CLK_DDR01, "clk_mux_ddr01", clk_mux_ddr01_p,
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY,
+		R_CLKSELREG0, 2, 1),
+	SG2042_MUX(MUX_CLK_DDR23, "clk_mux_ddr23", clk_mux_ddr23_p,
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT | CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY,
+		R_CLKSELREG0, 3, 1),
+	SG2042_MUX(MUX_CLK_RP_CPU_NORMAL, "clk_mux_rp_cpu_normal", clk_mux_rp_cpu_normal_p,
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
+		R_CLKSELREG0, 0, 1),
+	SG2042_MUX(MUX_CLK_AXI_DDR, "clk_mux_axi_ddr", clk_mux_axi_ddr_p,
+		CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT | CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
+		R_CLKSELREG0, 1, 1),
+};
+
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(sg2042_clk_lock);
+
+static int sg2042_clk_register_plls(struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data,
+				   struct sg2042_pll_clock pll_clks[],
+				   int num_pll_clks)
+{
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	struct sg2042_pll_clock *pll;
+	int i, ret = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_pll_clks; i++) {
+		pll = &(pll_clks[i]);
+		/* assign these for ops usage during registration */
+		pll->map = clk_data->regmap_syscon;
+		pll->lock = &sg2042_clk_lock;
+
+		hw = &pll->hw;
+		ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, hw);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("failed to register clock %s\n", pll->name);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		clk_data->onecell_data.hws[pll->id] = hw;
+	}
+
+	/* leave unregister to outside if failed */
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_clk_register_divs(struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data,
+				   struct sg2042_divider_clock div_clks[],
+				   int num_div_clks)
+{
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	struct sg2042_divider_clock *div;
+	int i, val, ret = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_div_clks; i++) {
+		div = &(div_clks[i]);
+
+		if (div->div_flags & CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK) {
+			if (div->width + div->shift > 16) {
+				pr_warn("divider value exceeds LOWORD field\n");
+				ret = -EINVAL;
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+
+		div->reg = clk_data->iobase + div->offset_ctrl;
+		div->lock = &sg2042_clk_lock;
+
+		hw = &div->hw;
+		ret = clk_hw_register(NULL, hw);
+		if (ret) {
+			pr_err("failed to register clock %s\n", div->name);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		clk_data->onecell_data.hws[div->id] = hw;
+
+		if (div->initial_val >= 0) {
+			val = readl(div->reg);
+
+			/*
+			 * set a default divider factor,
+			 * clk driver should not select divider clock as the
+			 * clock source, before set the divider by right process
+			 * (assert div, set div factor, de assert div).
+			 */
+			if (div->initial_val > 0)
+				val |= (div->initial_val << 16 | 1 << 3);
+			else {
+				/*
+				 * the div register is config to use divider
+				 * factor, don't change divider
+				 */
+				if (!(val >> 3 & 0x1))
+					val |= 1 << 16;
+			}
+
+			writel(val, div->reg);
+		}
+	}
+
+	/* leave unregister to outside if failed */
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_clk_register_gates(struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data,
+				    const struct sg2042_gate_clock gate_clks[],
+				    int num_gate_clks)
+{
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	const struct sg2042_gate_clock *gate;
+	int i, ret = 0;
+	void __iomem *reg;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_gate_clks; i++) {
+		gate = &(gate_clks[i]);
+		if (gate->flag_sysctrl)
+			reg = clk_data->iobase_syscon + gate->offset_enable;
+		else
+			reg = clk_data->iobase + gate->offset_enable;
+		hw = clk_hw_register_gate(
+			NULL,
+			gate->name,
+			gate->parent_name,
+			gate->flags,
+			reg,
+			gate->bit_idx,
+			0,
+			&sg2042_clk_lock);
+		if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+			pr_err("failed to register clock %s\n", gate->name);
+			ret = PTR_ERR(hw);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		clk_data->onecell_data.hws[gate->id] = hw;
+	}
+
+	/* leave unregister to outside if failed */
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int sg2042_mux_notifier_cb(struct notifier_block *nb,
+				unsigned long event, void *data)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct clk_notifier_data *ndata = data;
+	struct clk_hw *hw = __clk_get_hw(ndata->clk);
+	const struct clk_ops *ops = &clk_mux_ops;
+	struct sg2042_mux_clock *mux = to_sg2042_mux_nb(nb);
+
+	/* To switch to fpll before changing rate and restore after that */
+	if (event == PRE_RATE_CHANGE) {
+		mux->original_index = ops->get_parent(hw);
+
+		/*
+		 * "1" is the array index of the second parent input source of
+		 * mux. For SG2042, it's fpll for all mux clocks.
+		 * "0" is the array index of the frist parent input source of
+		 * mux, For SG2042, it's mpll.
+		 * FIXME, any good idea to avoid magic number?
+		 */
+		if (mux->original_index == 0)
+			ret = ops->set_parent(hw, 1);
+	} else if (event == POST_RATE_CHANGE) {
+		ret = ops->set_parent(hw, mux->original_index);
+	}
+
+	return notifier_from_errno(ret);
+}
+
+static int sg2042_clk_register_muxs(struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data,
+				   struct sg2042_mux_clock mux_clks[],
+				   int num_mux_clks)
+{
+	struct clk_hw *hw;
+	struct sg2042_mux_clock *mux;
+	int i, ret = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < num_mux_clks; i++) {
+		mux = &(mux_clks[i]);
+
+		hw = clk_hw_register_mux_table(
+			NULL,
+			mux->name,
+			mux->parent_names,
+			mux->num_parents,
+			mux->flags,
+			clk_data->iobase + mux->offset_select,
+			mux->shift,
+			BIT(mux->width) - 1,
+			0,
+			sg2042_mux_table,
+			&sg2042_clk_lock);
+		if (IS_ERR(hw)) {
+			pr_err("failed to register clock %s\n", mux->name);
+			ret = PTR_ERR(hw);
+			break;
+		}
+
+		clk_data->onecell_data.hws[mux->id] = hw;
+
+		/*
+		 * FIXME: Theoretically, we should set parent for the
+		 * mux, but seems hardware has done this for us with
+		 * default value, so we don't set parent again here.
+		 */
+
+		if (!(mux->flags & CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY)) {
+			mux->clk_nb.notifier_call = sg2042_mux_notifier_cb;
+			ret = clk_notifier_register(hw->clk, &(mux->clk_nb));
+			if (ret) {
+				pr_err("failed to register clock notifier for %s\n",
+					mux->name);
+				goto error_cleanup;
+			}
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+
+error_cleanup:
+	/* unregister notifier and release the memory allocated */
+	for (i = 0; i < num_mux_clks; i++) {
+		mux = &(mux_clks[i]);
+
+		hw = clk_data->onecell_data.hws[mux->id];
+
+		if (hw != NULL)
+			clk_notifier_unregister(hw->clk, &(mux->clk_nb));
+	}
+
+	/* leave clk unregister to outside if failed */
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int __init sg2042_clk_init_clk_data(
+	struct device_node *node,
+	int num_clks,
+	struct sg2042_clk_data **pp_clk_data)
+{
+	int ret = 0;
+	struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data = NULL;
+	struct device_node *np_syscon;
+
+	np_syscon = of_parse_phandle(node, "sophgo,system-ctrl", 0);
+	if (!np_syscon) {
+		pr_err("failed to get system-ctrl node\n");
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto error_out;
+	}
+
+	clk_data = kzalloc(struct_size(clk_data, onecell_data.hws, num_clks), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!clk_data) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto error_out;
+	}
+
+	clk_data->regmap_syscon = device_node_to_regmap(np_syscon);
+	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->regmap_syscon)) {
+		pr_err("cannot get regmap_syscon %ld\n", PTR_ERR(clk_data->regmap_syscon));
+		ret = -ENODEV;
+		goto cleanup;
+	}
+	clk_data->iobase_syscon = of_iomap(np_syscon, 0);
+	clk_data->iobase = of_iomap(node, 0);
+	clk_data->onecell_data.num = num_clks;
+
+	*pp_clk_data = clk_data;
+	return ret;
+
+cleanup:
+	kfree(clk_data);
+
+error_out:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void __init sg2042_clk_init(struct device_node *node)
+{
+	struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data = NULL;
+	int i, ret = 0;
+	int num_clks = 0;
+
+	num_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_pll_clks) +
+		   ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_div_clks) +
+		   ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_gate_clks) +
+		   ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_mux_clks);
+	if (num_clks == 0) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto error_out;
+	}
+
+	ret = sg2042_clk_init_clk_data(node, num_clks, &clk_data);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		goto error_out;
+
+	ret = sg2042_clk_register_plls(clk_data, sg2042_pll_clks,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_pll_clks));
+	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ret = sg2042_clk_register_divs(clk_data, sg2042_div_clks,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_div_clks));
+	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ret = sg2042_clk_register_gates(clk_data, sg2042_gate_clks,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_gate_clks));
+	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ret = sg2042_clk_register_muxs(clk_data, sg2042_mux_clks,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(sg2042_mux_clks));
+	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	ret = of_clk_add_hw_provider(node, of_clk_hw_onecell_get, &clk_data->onecell_data);
+	if (ret)
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	return;
+
+cleanup:
+	for (i = 0; i < num_clks; i++) {
+		if (clk_data->onecell_data.hws[i] != NULL)
+			clk_hw_unregister(clk_data->onecell_data.hws[i]);
+	}
+	kfree(clk_data);
+
+error_out:
+	pr_err("%s failed error number %d\n", __func__, ret);
+}
+
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(sg2042_clk, "sophgo,sg2042-clkgen", sg2042_clk_init);
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h new file +226 -0
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..651d93033547
@@ -0,0 +1,226 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+#ifndef __CLK_SOPHGO_SG2042_H
+#define __CLK_SOPHGO_SG2042_H
+
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
+
+/* Registers defined in SYS_CTRL */
+#define R_PLL_STAT		0xC0
+#define R_PLL_CLKEN_CONTROL	0xC4
+#define R_MPLL_CONTROL		0xE8
+#define R_FPLL_CONTROL		0xF4
+#define R_DPLL0_CONTROL		0xF8
+#define R_DPLL1_CONTROL		0xFC
+
+#define R_RP_RXU_CLK_ENABLE	0x0368
+#define R_MP0_STATUS_REG	0x0380
+#define R_MP0_CONTROL_REG	0x0384
+#define R_MP1_STATUS_REG	0x0388
+#define R_MP1_CONTROL_REG	0x038C
+#define R_MP2_STATUS_REG	0x0390
+#define R_MP2_CONTROL_REG	0x0394
+#define R_MP3_STATUS_REG	0x0398
+#define R_MP3_CONTROL_REG	0x039C
+#define R_MP4_STATUS_REG	0x03A0
+#define R_MP4_CONTROL_REG	0x03A4
+#define R_MP5_STATUS_REG	0x03A8
+#define R_MP5_CONTROL_REG	0x03AC
+#define R_MP6_STATUS_REG	0x03B0
+#define R_MP6_CONTROL_REG	0x03B4
+#define R_MP7_STATUS_REG	0x03B8
+#define R_MP7_CONTROL_REG	0x03BC
+#define R_MP8_STATUS_REG	0x03C0
+#define R_MP8_CONTROL_REG	0x03C4
+#define R_MP9_STATUS_REG	0x03C8
+#define R_MP9_CONTROL_REG	0x03CC
+#define R_MP10_STATUS_REG	0x03D0
+#define R_MP10_CONTROL_REG	0x03D4
+#define R_MP11_STATUS_REG	0x03D8
+#define R_MP11_CONTROL_REG	0x03DC
+#define R_MP12_STATUS_REG	0x03E0
+#define R_MP12_CONTROL_REG	0x03E4
+#define R_MP13_STATUS_REG	0x03E8
+#define R_MP13_CONTROL_REG	0x03EC
+#define R_MP14_STATUS_REG	0x03F0
+#define R_MP14_CONTROL_REG	0x03F4
+#define R_MP15_STATUS_REG	0x03F8
+#define R_MP15_CONTROL_REG	0x03FC
+
+/* Registers defined in CLOCK */
+#define R_CLKENREG0		0x00
+#define R_CLKENREG1		0x04
+#define R_CLKSELREG0		0x20
+#define R_CLKDIVREG0		0x40
+#define R_CLKDIVREG1		0x44
+#define R_CLKDIVREG2		0x48
+#define R_CLKDIVREG3		0x4C
+#define R_CLKDIVREG4		0x50
+#define R_CLKDIVREG5		0x54
+#define R_CLKDIVREG6		0x58
+#define R_CLKDIVREG7		0x5C
+#define R_CLKDIVREG8		0x60
+#define R_CLKDIVREG9		0x64
+#define R_CLKDIVREG10		0x68
+#define R_CLKDIVREG11		0x6C
+#define R_CLKDIVREG12		0x70
+#define R_CLKDIVREG13		0x74
+#define R_CLKDIVREG14		0x78
+#define R_CLKDIVREG15		0x7C
+#define R_CLKDIVREG16		0x80
+#define R_CLKDIVREG17		0x84
+#define R_CLKDIVREG18		0x88
+#define R_CLKDIVREG19		0x8C
+#define R_CLKDIVREG20		0x90
+#define R_CLKDIVREG21		0x94
+#define R_CLKDIVREG22		0x98
+#define R_CLKDIVREG23		0x9C
+#define R_CLKDIVREG24		0xA0
+#define R_CLKDIVREG25		0xA4
+#define R_CLKDIVREG26		0xA8
+#define R_CLKDIVREG27		0xAC
+#define R_CLKDIVREG28		0xB0
+#define R_CLKDIVREG29		0xB4
+#define R_CLKDIVREG30		0xB8
+
+/*
+ * clock common data
+ * @iobase: address of clock-controller
+ * @iobase_syscon & @regmap_syscon: point to the same address of system-controller,
+ *  the reason we use two different type of pointer just due to PLL uses
+ *  regmap while others use iomem.
+ * @lock: clock register access lock
+ * @onecell_data: used for adding providers.
+ */
+struct sg2042_clk_data {
+	void __iomem *iobase;
+	void __iomem *iobase_syscon;
+	struct regmap *regmap_syscon;
+	struct clk_hw_onecell_data onecell_data;
+};
+
+/*
+ * PLL clock
+ * @id:				used to map clk_onecell_data
+ * @name:			used for print even when clk registration failed
+ * @map:			used for regmap read/write, regmap is more useful
+ *				then iomem address when we have multiple offsets
+ *				for different registers.
+ *				NOTE: PLL registers are all in SYS_CTRL!
+ * @lock:			spinlock to protect register access
+ * @offset_status:		offset of pll status registers
+ * @offset_enable:		offset of pll enable registers
+ * @offset_ctrl:		offset of pll control registers
+ * @shift_status_lock:		shift of XXX_LOCK in pll status register
+ * @shift_status_updating:	shift of UPDATING_XXX in pll status register
+ * @shift_enable:		shift of XXX_CLK_EN in pll enable register
+ */
+struct sg2042_pll_clock {
+	struct clk_hw	hw;
+
+	/* private data */
+	unsigned int id;
+	const char *name;
+
+	struct regmap *map;
+	spinlock_t *lock;
+
+	u32 offset_status;
+	u32 offset_enable;
+	u32 offset_ctrl;
+	u8 shift_status_lock;
+	u8 shift_status_updating;
+	u8 shift_enable;
+};
+
+#define to_sg2042_pll_clk(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct sg2042_pll_clock, hw)
+
+/*
+ * Divider clock
+ * @id:			used to map clk_onecell_data
+ * @name:		used for print even when clk registration failed
+ * @reg:		used for readl/writel.
+ *			NOTE: DIV registers are ALL in CLOCK!
+ * @lock:		spinlock to protect register access
+ * @offset_ctrl:	offset of divider control registers
+ * @shift:		shift of "Clock Divider Factor" in divider control register
+ * @width:		width of "Clock Divider Factor" in divider control register
+ * @div_flags:		private flags for this clock, not for framework-specific
+ * @initial_val:	initial value of the divider, a value < 0 means ignoring
+ *			setting of initial value.
+ * @table:		the div table that the divider supports
+ */
+struct sg2042_divider_clock {
+	struct clk_hw	hw;
+
+	/* private data */
+	unsigned int id;
+	const char *name;
+
+	void __iomem *reg;
+	spinlock_t *lock;
+
+	unsigned long offset_ctrl;
+	u8 shift;
+	u8 width;
+	u8 div_flags;
+	s32 initial_val;
+	struct clk_div_table *table;
+};
+
+#define to_sg2042_clk_divider(_hw)	\
+	container_of(_hw, struct sg2042_divider_clock, hw)
+
+/*
+ * Gate clock
+ * @id:			used to map clk_onecell_data
+ * @name:		string of this clock name
+ * @parent_name:	string of parent clock name
+ * @flags:		framework-specific flags for this clock
+ * @offset_enable:	offset of gate enable registers
+ * @bit_idx:		which bit in the register controls gating of this clock
+ * @flag_sysctrl:	flag if this clock is controlled by registers defined
+ *			in SYS_CTRL, 1: yes, 0: no, it's in CLOCK.
+ *			NOTE: Gate registers are scattered in SYS_CTRL and CLOCK!
+ */
+struct sg2042_gate_clock {
+	unsigned int id;
+	const char *name;
+	const char *parent_name;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long offset_enable;
+	u8 bit_idx;
+	u8 flag_sysctrl;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Mux clock
+ * @id:			used to map clk_onecell_data
+ * @name:		string of this clock name
+ * @parent_name:	string array of parents' clock name
+ * @flags:		framework-specific flags for this clock
+ * @offset_select:	offset of mux selection registers
+ *			NOTE: MUX registers are ALL in CLOCK!
+ * @shift:		shift of "Clock Select" in mux selection register
+ * @width:		width of "Clock Select" in mux selection register
+ * @clk_nb:		used for notification
+ * @original_index:	set by notifier callback
+ */
+struct sg2042_mux_clock {
+	unsigned int id;
+	const char *name;
+	const char * const *parent_names;
+	u8 num_parents;
+	unsigned long flags;
+	unsigned long offset_select;
+	u8 shift;
+	u8 width;
+	struct notifier_block clk_nb;
+	u8 original_index;
+};
+
+#define to_sg2042_mux_nb(_nb) container_of(_nb, struct sg2042_mux_clock, clk_nb)
+
+#endif /* __CLK_SOPHGO_SG2042_H */
Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#6 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

hi,

Thank you Conor for your carefully review, I need some time to digest your comments. While I have some quick questions embeded.

Quoted 4 lines · Conor Dooley
Quoted 1 line · Chen Wang

+#define div_mask(width) ((1 << (width)) - 1)

Looks like this should be genmask.

Yes, I will improve this.

Quoted 4 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 19

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +2 -0
+#define ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(fbdiv, p1, p2, refdiv) \
+	(((fbdiv & 0xfff) << 16) | ((p2 & 0x7) << 12) | ((p1 & 0x7) << 8) | (refdiv & 0x3f))

IMO this should be a function not a macro.

Would like to listen why it should be a function instead of a macro? Any experiences you can share with me?

Quoted 4 lines

Review

Quoted 3 lines
(quoted diff) +2 -0
+
+static inline int __sg2042_pll_enable(struct sg2042_pll_clock *pll, bool en)

Why the __ prefixing of function names btw?

:) I just want to differ/highlight these functions agaist those clk operators. Anyway, this is indeed confusing, I will remove this ugly "__".

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +8 -0
+{
+	unsigned int value = 0;
+	unsigned long enter;
+	struct regmap *map = pll->map;
+
+	if (en) {
+		/* wait pll lock */
+		enter = jiffies;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 35

Quoted 6 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+		regmap_read(map, pll->offset_status, &value);
+		while (!((value >> pll->shift_status_lock) & 0x1)) {
+			regmap_read(map, pll->shift_status_lock, &value);
+			if (time_after(jiffies, enter + HZ / 10))
+				pr_warn("%s not locked\n", pll->name);
+		}

Can't you just use read_poll_timeout()?
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/include/linux/iopoll.h#L16

It looks like this, will check more.

Quoted 39 lines
Quoted 39 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +39 -0
+		/* wait pll updating */
+		enter = jiffies;
+		regmap_read(map, pll->shift_status_updating, &value);
+		while (((value >> pll->shift_status_updating) & 0x1)) {
+			regmap_read(map, pll->shift_status_updating, &value);
+			if (time_after(jiffies, enter + HZ / 10))
+				pr_warn("%s still updating\n", pll->name);
+		}
+		/* enable pll */
+		regmap_read(map, pll->offset_enable, &value);
+		regmap_write(map, pll->offset_enable, value | (1 << pll->shift_enable));
+	} else {
+		/* disable pll */
+		regmap_read(map, pll->offset_enable, &value);
+		regmap_write(map, pll->offset_enable, value & (~(1 << pll->shift_enable)));
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+ +static unsigned int __sg2042_get_table_div(
+	const struct clk_div_table *table,
+	unsigned int val)
+{
+	const struct clk_div_table *clkt;
+
+	for (clkt = table; clkt->div; clkt++)
+		if (clkt->val == val)
+			return clkt->div;
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static unsigned int __sg2042_get_div(
+	const struct clk_div_table *table,
+	unsigned int val,
+	unsigned long flags, u8 width)
+{
+	if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED)
+		return val;
+	if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 82

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+		return 1 << val;
+	if (flags & CLK_DIVIDER_MAX_AT_ZERO)
+		return val ? val : div_mask(width) + 1;
+	if (table)
+		return __sg2042_get_table_div(table, val);
+	return val + 1;
+}

Are these not effectively the same as clk_divider's ops?

Will double check.

Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +14 -0
+
+/*
+ * @reg_value: current register value
+ * @parent_rate: parent frequency
+ *
+ * This function is used to calculate below "rate" in equation
+ * rate = (parent_rate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/POSTDIV1/POSTDIV2
+ *      = (parent_rate x FBDIV) / (REFDIV x POSTDIV1 x POSTDIV2)
+ */
+static unsigned long __sg2042_pll_recalc_rate(
+	unsigned int reg_value,
+	unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	unsigned int fbdiv, refdiv;
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 103

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+	unsigned int postdiv1, postdiv2;
+	u64 rate, numerator, denominator;
+
+	fbdiv = (reg_value >> 16) & 0xfff;
+	refdiv = reg_value & 0x3f;
+	postdiv1 = (reg_value >> 8) & 0x7;
+	postdiv2 = (reg_value >> 12) & 0x7;

IMO all of these are opportunities for GENMASK and defines.

Looks like this, will double check.

Quoted 40 lines
Quoted 40 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +40 -0
+
+	numerator = parent_rate * fbdiv;
+	denominator = refdiv * postdiv1 * postdiv2;
+	do_div(numerator, denominator);
+	rate = numerator;
+
+	return rate;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Below array is the total combination lists of POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2
+ * for example:
+ * postdiv1_2[0] = {2, 4, 8}
+ *           ==> div1 = 2, div2 = 4 , div1 * div2 = 8
+ * And POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX point to 3rd element in the array
+ */
+#define	POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX	2
+static int postdiv1_2[][3] = {
+	{2, 4,  8}, {3, 3,  9}, {2, 5, 10}, {2, 6, 12},
+	{2, 7, 14}, {3, 5, 15}, {4, 4, 16}, {3, 6, 18},
+	{4, 5, 20}, {3, 7, 21}, {4, 6, 24}, {5, 5, 25},
+	{4, 7, 28}, {5, 6, 30}, {5, 7, 35}, {6, 6, 36},
+	{6, 7, 42}, {7, 7, 49}
+};
+
+/*
+ * Based on input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, look up the postdiv1_2 table
+ * to get the closest postdiiv combination.
+ * @rate: FOUTPOSTDIV
+ * @prate: parent rate, i.e. FREF
+ * @fbdiv: FBDIV
+ * @refdiv: REFDIV
+ * @postdiv1: POSTDIV1, output
+ * @postdiv2: POSTDIV2, output
+ * See TRM:
+ * FOUTPOSTDIV = FREF * FBDIV / REFDIV / (POSTDIV1 * POSTDIV2)
+ * So we get following formula to get POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2:
+ * POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate
+ * above POSTDIV = POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2
+ */
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 150

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+static int __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2(
+	unsigned long rate,
+	unsigned long prate,
+	unsigned int fbdiv,
+	unsigned int refdiv,
+	unsigned int *postdiv1,
+	unsigned int *postdiv2)

This is not the coding style btw.

Agree, will fix this.

Quoted 39 lines
Quoted 39 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +39 -0
+{
+	int index = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+	u64 tmp0;
+
+	/* prate/REFDIV and result save to tmp0 */
+	tmp0 = prate;
+	do_div(tmp0, refdiv);
+
+	/* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV) and result save to tmp0 */
+	tmp0 *= fbdiv;
+
+	/* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV)/rate and result save to tmp0 */
+	do_div(tmp0, rate);
+
+	/* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */
+	if (tmp0 <= 7) {
+		/* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
+		*postdiv1 = tmp0;
+		*postdiv2 = 1;
+	} else {
+		/* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */
+		for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
+			if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
+				continue;
+			} else {
+				/* found it */
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		if (index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2)) {
+			*postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
+			*postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
+		} else {
+			pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
Quoted 8 lines

Review

Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +2 -0
+	return ret;
+}

Reading this function it makes me wonder if (and I am far from the best person to comment, someone like Stephen is vastly more qualified) you should model this as several "stages", each implemented by the "standard" clocks - like clk_divider etc. The code here is quite complicated IMO as it seems to be trying to implement several stages of division in one go.

The objective of __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2() is straightforward: based on the formula defined by the TRM, with input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, we can get the possiblle combination of POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2 by looking up the table of postdiv1_2. We will later use it to setup the clock register.

Though the codes looks a bit complicated, but accually it is calculate with the formula : POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate, I just separate it into several steps to make it easy to understand, I have listed the formula in the comment on top of the function.

Quoted 4 lines

There's quite a lot in the driver and I will admit that I have not read it all my any means (I skimmed from here onwards), but in general my advice would be to try and reuse the generic code as much as possible.

Agree, I will double check and try to optimize the code in next revision.

Quoted 4 lines

Thanks,
Conor.

......

#7 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

Quoted 9 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 5 lines · Conor Dooley

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 19

Quoted 2 lines · Chen Wang
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +2 -0
+#define ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(fbdiv, p1, p2, refdiv) \
+	(((fbdiv & 0xfff) << 16) | ((p2 & 0x7) << 12) | ((p1 & 0x7) << 8) | (refdiv & 0x3f))

IMO this should be a function not a macro.

Would like to listen why it should be a function instead of a macro? Any experiences you can share with me?

Readability. A function, which could be inlined allows you to break this up and make it easier to read.

Quoted 77 lines
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines

+/*
+ * Based on input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, look up the postdiv1_2 table
+ * to get the closest postdiiv combination.
+ * @rate: FOUTPOSTDIV
+ * @prate: parent rate, i.e. FREF
+ * @fbdiv: FBDIV
+ * @refdiv: REFDIV
+ * @postdiv1: POSTDIV1, output
+ * @postdiv2: POSTDIV2, output
+ * See TRM:
+ * FOUTPOSTDIV = FREF * FBDIV / REFDIV / (POSTDIV1 * POSTDIV2)
+ * So we get following formula to get POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2:
+ * POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate
+ * above POSTDIV = POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2
+ */

Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 150

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+static int __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2(
+	unsigned long rate,
+	unsigned long prate,
+	unsigned int fbdiv,
+	unsigned int refdiv,
+	unsigned int *postdiv1,
+	unsigned int *postdiv2)

This is not the coding style btw.

Agree, will fix this.

Quoted 39 lines
Quoted 39 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +39 -0
+{
+	int index = 0;
+	int ret = 0;
+	u64 tmp0;
+
+	/* prate/REFDIV and result save to tmp0 */
+	tmp0 = prate;
+	do_div(tmp0, refdiv);
+
+	/* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV) and result save to tmp0 */
+	tmp0 *= fbdiv;
+
+	/* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV)/rate and result save to tmp0 */
+	do_div(tmp0, rate);
+
+	/* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */
+	if (tmp0 <= 7) {
+		/* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
+		*postdiv1 = tmp0;
+		*postdiv2 = 1;
+	} else {
+		/* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */
+		for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
+			if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
+				continue;
+			} else {
+				/* found it */
+				break;
+			}
+		}
+		if (index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2)) {
+			*postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
+			*postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
+		} else {
+			pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__);
+			ret = -EINVAL;
+		}
+	}
+
Quoted 8 lines

Review

Quoted 2 lines
(quoted diff) +2 -0
+	return ret;
+}

Reading this function it makes me wonder if (and I am far from the best person to comment, someone like Stephen is vastly more qualified) you should model this as several "stages", each implemented by the "standard" clocks - like clk_divider etc. The code here is quite complicated IMO as it seems to be trying to implement several stages of division in one go.

The objective of __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2() is straightforward: based on the formula defined by the TRM, with input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, we can get the possiblle combination of POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2 by looking up the table of postdiv1_2. We will later use it to setup the clock register.

Quoted 4 lines

Though the codes looks a bit complicated, but accually it is calculate with the formula : POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate, I just separate it into several steps to make it easy to understand, I have listed the formula in the comment on top of the function.

I understand what you are doing, I did something similar myself previously. My suggestion/question was about using the "standard" types of clock that the core provides to represent as many of the clocks in this driver as is feasible.

Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 3 lines

There's quite a lot in the driver and I will admit that I have not read it all my any means (I skimmed from here onwards), but in general my advice would be to try and reuse the generic code as much as possible.

Agree, I will double check and try to optimize the code in next revision.

maintainer
#8 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

Quoting Conor Dooley (2023-12-12 00:37:39)

Quoted 51 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 10 lines · Conor Dooley
Quoted 5 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 3 lines

+#define ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(fbdiv, p1, p2, refdiv) \
+ (((fbdiv & 0xfff) << 16) | ((p2 & 0x7) << 12) | ((p1 & 0x7) << 8) | (refdiv & 0x3f))

IMO this should be a function not a macro.

Would like to listen why it should be a function instead of a macro? Any experiences you can share with me?

Readability. A function, which could be inlined allows you to break this up and make it easier to read.

Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines

+/*
+ * Based on input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, look up the postdiv1_2 table
+ * to get the closest postdiiv combination.
+ * @rate: FOUTPOSTDIV
+ * @prate: parent rate, i.e. FREF
+ * @fbdiv: FBDIV
+ * @refdiv: REFDIV
+ * @postdiv1: POSTDIV1, output
+ * @postdiv2: POSTDIV2, output
+ * See TRM:
+ * FOUTPOSTDIV = FREF * FBDIV / REFDIV / (POSTDIV1 * POSTDIV2)
+ * So we get following formula to get POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2:
+ * POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate
+ * above POSTDIV = POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2
+ */

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines

+static int __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2(
+ unsigned long rate,
+ unsigned long prate,
+ unsigned int fbdiv,
+ unsigned int refdiv,
+ unsigned int *postdiv1,
+ unsigned int *postdiv2)

This is not the coding style btw.

Agree, will fix this.

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +12 -0
+{
+ int index = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+ u64 tmp0;
+
+ /* prate/REFDIV and result save to tmp0 */
+ tmp0 = prate;
+ do_div(tmp0, refdiv);
+
+ /* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV) and result save to tmp0 */
+ tmp0 *= fbdiv;
+
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 170

Quoted 8 lines

+ /* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV)/rate and result save to tmp0 */
+ do_div(tmp0, rate);

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+
+ /* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */
+ if (tmp0 <= 7) {
+         /* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
+         *postdiv1 = tmp0;
+         *postdiv2 = 1;

why not return 0 here?

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

+ } else {

And then de-indent this?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 178

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+         /* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */
+         for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
+                 if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
+                         continue;
+                 } else {
+                         /* found it */
+                         break;

This can also return?

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 181

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +3 -0
+                 }
+         }
+         if (index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2)) {

And this condition can be removed.

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 184

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +3 -0
+                 *postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
+                 *postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
+         } else {

This can be the default after the loop.

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 186

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +2 -0
+                 pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__);
+                 ret = -EINVAL;

/* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */

 if (tmp0 <= 7) {
         /* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
         *postdiv1 = tmp0;
         *postdiv2 = 1;
	 return 0;

}

/* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */

 for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
	 if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
		 continue;
	 } else {
		 *postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
		 *postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
		 return 0;
	 }

}
pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__); return -EINVAL;

Quoted 17 lines
Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 6 lines

Reading this function it makes me wonder if (and I am far from the best person to comment, someone like Stephen is vastly more qualified) you should model this as several "stages", each implemented by the "standard" clocks - like clk_divider etc. The code here is quite complicated IMO as it seems to be trying to implement several stages of division in one go.

The objective of __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2() is straightforward: based on the formula defined by the TRM, with input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, we can get the possiblle combination of POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2 by looking up the table of postdiv1_2. We will later use it to setup the clock register.

Quoted 4 lines

Though the codes looks a bit complicated, but accually it is calculate with the formula : POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate, I just separate it into several steps to make it easy to understand, I have listed the formula in the comment on top of the function.

Quoted 4 lines

I understand what you are doing, I did something similar myself previously. My suggestion/question was about using the "standard" types of clock that the core provides to represent as many of the clocks in this driver as is feasible.

I would not twist the code to conform with the basic clk types. If possible it would be good to use the helpers for these things, but I wouldn't split up a clk that is a complex divider with multiple stages of division into the basic types just to make it fit. I say this because every clk takes more effort to maintain in the clk tree, it has a name, pointers, etc. If you can keep that self contained and logically it is really one clk, then go for it.

#9 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

Quoted 101 lines · Stephen Boyd

Quoting Conor Dooley (2023-12-12 00:37:39)

Quoted 48 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 8 lines · Conor Dooley
Quoted 4 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 2 lines

+#define ENCODE_PLL_CTRL(fbdiv, p1, p2, refdiv) \
+ (((fbdiv & 0xfff) << 16) | ((p2 & 0x7) << 12) | ((p1 & 0x7) << 8) | (refdiv & 0x3f))

IMO this should be a function not a macro.

Would like to listen why it should be a function instead of a macro? Any experiences you can share with me?

Readability. A function, which could be inlined allows you to break this up and make it easier to read.

Quoted 36 lines
Quoted 15 lines
Quoted 15 lines

+/*
+ * Based on input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, look up the postdiv1_2 table
+ * to get the closest postdiiv combination.
+ * @rate: FOUTPOSTDIV
+ * @prate: parent rate, i.e. FREF
+ * @fbdiv: FBDIV
+ * @refdiv: REFDIV
+ * @postdiv1: POSTDIV1, output
+ * @postdiv2: POSTDIV2, output
+ * See TRM:
+ * FOUTPOSTDIV = FREF * FBDIV / REFDIV / (POSTDIV1 * POSTDIV2)
+ * So we get following formula to get POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2:
+ * POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate
+ * above POSTDIV = POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2
+ */

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 7 lines

+static int __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2(
+ unsigned long rate,
+ unsigned long prate,
+ unsigned int fbdiv,
+ unsigned int refdiv,
+ unsigned int *postdiv1,
+ unsigned int *postdiv2)

This is not the coding style btw.

Agree, will fix this.

Quoted 12 lines
Quoted 12 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +12 -0
+{
+ int index = 0;
+ int ret = 0;
+ u64 tmp0;
+
+ /* prate/REFDIV and result save to tmp0 */
+ tmp0 = prate;
+ do_div(tmp0, refdiv);
+
+ /* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV) and result save to tmp0 */
+ tmp0 *= fbdiv;
+
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 8 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 170

Quoted 8 lines

+ /* ((prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV)/rate and result save to tmp0 */
+ do_div(tmp0, rate);

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +6 -0
+
+ /* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */
+ if (tmp0 <= 7) {
+         /* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
+         *postdiv1 = tmp0;
+         *postdiv2 = 1;

why not return 0 here?

Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line
Quoted 1 line

+ } else {

And then de-indent this?

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 7 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 178

Quoted 7 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +7 -0
+         /* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */
+         for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
+                 if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
+                         continue;
+                 } else {
+                         /* found it */
+                         break;

This can also return?

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 181

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +3 -0
+                 }
+         }
+         if (index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2)) {

And this condition can be removed.

Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines
Quoted 3 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 184

Quoted 3 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +3 -0
+                 *postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
+                 *postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
+         } else {

This can be the default after the loop.

Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines
Quoted 2 lines

drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c line 186

Quoted 2 lines
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c new file +2 -0
+                 pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__);
+                 ret = -EINVAL;

/* tmp0 is POSTDIV1*POSTDIV2, now we calculate div1 and div2 value */

  if (tmp0 <= 7) {
          /* (div1 * div2) <= 7, no need to use array search */
          *postdiv1 = tmp0;
          *postdiv2 = 1;
	 return 0;

}

/* (div1 * div2) > 7, use array search */

  for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(postdiv1_2); index++) {
	 if (tmp0 > postdiv1_2[index][POSTDIV_RESULT_INDEX]) {
		 continue;
	 } else {
		 *postdiv1 = postdiv1_2[index][1];
		 *postdiv2 = postdiv1_2[index][0];
		 return 0;
	 }
Quoted 3 lines

}
pr_debug("%s can not find in postdiv array!\n", __func__); return -EINVAL;

Thanks, Stephen, I will improve this.

Quoted 19 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 11 lines
Quoted 6 lines

Reading this function it makes me wonder if (and I am far from the best person to comment, someone like Stephen is vastly more qualified) you should model this as several "stages", each implemented by the "standard" clocks - like clk_divider etc. The code here is quite complicated IMO as it seems to be trying to implement several stages of division in one go.

The objective of __sg2042_pll_get_postdiv_1_2() is straightforward: based on the formula defined by the TRM, with input rate/prate/fbdiv/refdiv, we can get the possiblle combination of POSTDIV1 and POSTDIV2 by looking up the table of postdiv1_2. We will later use it to setup the clock register.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Though the codes looks a bit complicated, but accually it is calculate with the formula : POSTDIV = (prate/REFDIV) x FBDIV/rate, I just separate it into several steps to make it easy to understand, I have listed the formula in the comment on top of the function.

I understand what you are doing, I did something similar myself previously. My suggestion/question was about using the "standard" types of clock that the core provides to represent as many of the clocks in this driver as is feasible.

Quoted 7 lines

I would not twist the code to conform with the basic clk types. If possible it would be good to use the helpers for these things, but I wouldn't split up a clk that is a complex divider with multiple stages of division into the basic types just to make it fit. I say this because every clk takes more effort to maintain in the clk tree, it has a name, pointers, etc. If you can keep that self contained and logically it is really one clk, then go for it.

Thanks, I will double check if we can reuse "standard" types of clock as much as possible, or just keep current way.

#10 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

In reply to Chen Wang

Hi Chen,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Wang/dt-bindings-soc-sophgo-Add-Sophgo-system-control-module/20231208-091702
base:   b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/d1aa4f76f360ebd7b790a4786641f1b0188dbba8.1701997033.git.unicorn_wang%40outlook.com
patch subject: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver
config: xtensa-randconfig-r071-20231208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231208/[email protected]/config)
compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231208/[email protected]/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags

| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/

smatch warnings:
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c:1282 sg2042_clk_init_clk_data() warn: passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'

vim +/PTR_ERR +1282 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c

7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1258  static int __init sg2042_clk_init_clk_data(
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1259  	struct device_node *node,
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1260  	int num_clks,
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1261  	struct sg2042_clk_data **pp_clk_data)
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1262  {
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1263  	int ret = 0;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1264  	struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data = NULL;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1265  	struct device_node *np_syscon;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1266  
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1267  	np_syscon = of_parse_phandle(node, "sophgo,system-ctrl", 0);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1268  	if (!np_syscon) {
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1269  		pr_err("failed to get system-ctrl node\n");
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1270  		ret = -EINVAL;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1271  		goto error_out;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1272  	}
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1273  
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1274  	clk_data = kzalloc(struct_size(clk_data, onecell_data.hws, num_clks), GFP_KERNEL);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1275  	if (!clk_data) {
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1276  		ret = -ENOMEM;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1277  		goto error_out;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1278  	}
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1279  
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1280  	clk_data->regmap_syscon = device_node_to_regmap(np_syscon);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1281  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->regmap_syscon)) {

7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08 @1282 pr_err("cannot get regmap_syscon %ld\n", PTR_ERR(clk_data->regmap_syscon));

I don't think device_node_to_regmap() can return NULL, but if it could then it shouldn't be handled like this:

https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/08/01/mixing-error-pointers-and-null/

7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1283  		ret = -ENODEV;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1284  		goto cleanup;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1285  	}
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1286  	clk_data->iobase_syscon = of_iomap(np_syscon, 0);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1287  	clk_data->iobase = of_iomap(node, 0);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1288  	clk_data->onecell_data.num = num_clks;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1289  
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1290  	*pp_clk_data = clk_data;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1291  	return ret;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1292  
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1293  cleanup:
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1294  	kfree(clk_data);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1295  
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1296  error_out:
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1297  	return ret;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1298  }
Signature · 2 lines
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
#11 lore raw

Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver

Quoted 12 lines · Dan Carpenter

Hi Chen,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Chen-Wang/dt-bindings-soc-sophgo-Add-Sophgo-system-control-module/20231208-091702
base:   b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/d1aa4f76f360ebd7b790a4786641f1b0188dbba8.1701997033.git.unicorn_wang%40outlook.com
patch subject: [PATCH v6 3/4] clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver
config: xtensa-randconfig-r071-20231208 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231208/[email protected]/config)
compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231208/[email protected]/reproduce)
Quoted 8 lines

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags

| Reported-by: kernel test robot <[email protected]>
| Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/[email protected]/

smatch warnings:
drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c:1282 sg2042_clk_init_clk_data() warn: passing zero to 'PTR_ERR'

Thank you, Dan. I will try to remove this warning in next revision.

Quoted 52 lines

vim +/PTR_ERR +1282 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c

7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1258  static int __init sg2042_clk_init_clk_data(
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1259  	struct device_node *node,
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1260  	int num_clks,
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1261  	struct sg2042_clk_data **pp_clk_data)
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1262  {
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1263  	int ret = 0;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1264  	struct sg2042_clk_data *clk_data = NULL;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1265  	struct device_node *np_syscon;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1266
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1267  	np_syscon = of_parse_phandle(node, "sophgo,system-ctrl", 0);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1268  	if (!np_syscon) {
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1269  		pr_err("failed to get system-ctrl node\n");
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1270  		ret = -EINVAL;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1271  		goto error_out;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1272  	}
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1273
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1274  	clk_data = kzalloc(struct_size(clk_data, onecell_data.hws, num_clks), GFP_KERNEL);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1275  	if (!clk_data) {
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1276  		ret = -ENOMEM;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1277  		goto error_out;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1278  	}
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1279
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1280  	clk_data->regmap_syscon = device_node_to_regmap(np_syscon);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1281  	if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->regmap_syscon)) {

7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08 @1282 pr_err("cannot get regmap_syscon %ld\n", PTR_ERR(clk_data->regmap_syscon));

I don't think device_node_to_regmap() can return NULL, but if it could then it shouldn't be handled like this:

https://staticthinking.wordpress.com/2022/08/01/mixing-error-pointers-and-null/

7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1283  		ret = -ENODEV;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1284  		goto cleanup;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1285  	}
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1286  	clk_data->iobase_syscon = of_iomap(np_syscon, 0);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1287  	clk_data->iobase = of_iomap(node, 0);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1288  	clk_data->onecell_data.num = num_clks;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1289
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1290  	*pp_clk_data = clk_data;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1291  	return ret;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1292
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1293  cleanup:
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1294  	kfree(clk_data);
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1295
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1296  error_out:
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1297  	return ret;
7c68ebea1041f9 Chen Wang 2023-12-08  1298  }
author
#12 lore raw

PATCH v6 4/4 riscv: dts: add clock generator for Sophgo SG2042 SoC

In reply to Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

Add clock generator node to device tree for SG2042, and enable clock for uart.

---
 .../boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-milkv-pioneer.dts  |  4 +
 arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 83 insertions(+)
arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-milkv-pioneer.dts +4 -0
index 49b4b9c2c101..0b3b3b2b0c64 100644
@@ -14,6 +14,10 @@ chosen {
 	};
 };
 
+&cgi {
+	clock-frequency = <25000000>;
+};
+
 &uart0 {
 	status = "okay";
 };
arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi +79 -0

103 lines not on this page · raw message

Signature · 1 line
2.25.1
#13 lore raw
In reply to Chen Wang
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

This series adds clock controller support for sophgo sg2042.

Thanks,
Chen

---

Hi,Conor,

Can you please have a review of this patch?
And I'm not sure if you are ok to pick up this patch so it can be merged into the next v6.8?

Thanks,

Chen

Quoted 84 lines

Changes in v6:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [7].
- fixed some warnings/errors reported by kernel test robot <[email protected]>.

Changes in v5:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [6].
- dt-bindings: improved yaml, such as:
- add vendor prefix for system-ctrl property for clock generator.
- Add explanation for system-ctrl property.
- move sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml to directly under clock folder.
- fixed bugs for driver Makefile/Kconfig
- continue cleaning-up debug print for driver code.

Changes in v4:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [5].
- dt-bindings: fixed a dt_binding_check error.

Changes in v3:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [3].
- DTS: don't use syscon but define sg2042 specific system control node. More background info can read [4].
- Updating minor issues in dt-bindings as per input from reviews.

Changes in v2:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [2].
- Squashed the patch adding clock definitions with the patch adding the binding for the clock controller.
- Updating dt-binding for syscon, remove oneOf for property compatible; define clock controller as child of syscon.
- DTS changes: merge sg2042-clock.dtsi into sg2042.dtsi; move clock-frequency property of osc to board devicethree due to the oscillator is outside the SoC.
- Fixed some bugs in driver code during testing, including removing warnings for rv32_defconfig.
- Updated MAINTAINERS info.

Changes in v1:
The patch series is based on v6.7-rc1. You can simply review or test the patches at the link [1].

---

Chen Wang (4):
dt-bindings: soc: sophgo: Add Sophgo system control module
dt-bindings: clock: sophgo: support SG2042
clk: sophgo: Add SG2042 clock generator driver
riscv: dts: add clock generator for Sophgo SG2042 SoC

  .../bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml  |   53 +
  .../soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml     |   34 +
  MAINTAINERS                                   |    7 +
  .../boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042-milkv-pioneer.dts  |    4 +
  arch/riscv/boot/dts/sophgo/sg2042.dtsi        |   79 +
  drivers/clk/Kconfig                           |    1 +
  drivers/clk/Makefile                          |    1 +
  drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig                    |    8 +
  drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile                   |    2 +
  drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c        | 1356 +++++++++++++++++
  drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h        |  226 +++
  .../dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h  |  169 ++
  12 files changed, 1940 insertions(+)

create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.yaml create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/sophgo/sophgo,sg2042-sysctrl.yaml create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.c
create mode 100644 drivers/clk/sophgo/clk-sophgo-sg2042.h
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/sophgo,sg2042-clkgen.h

base-commit: b85ea95d086471afb4ad062012a4d73cd328fa86

#14 lore raw
Quoted 5 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 4 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

This series adds clock controller support for sophgo sg2042.

Quoted 8 lines
Quoted 4 lines

Thanks,
Chen

---

Hi,Conor,

Can you please have a review of this patch?

Chief, you sent this patch only the other day, please give people some time. I, at least, have an MMO addiction to feed in my spare time alongside reviewing patches.

Quoted 2 lines

And I'm not sure if you are ok to pick up this patch so it can be merged into the next v6.8?

Stephen is the maintainer for clock drivers. I do pick things up and send them to him as PRs when it makes life easier, but usually that's after other people have reviewed the clock driver itself.

Thanks,
Conor.

#15 lore raw
Quoted 9 lines · Conor Dooley
Quoted 8 lines · Chen Wang
Quoted 7 lines · Chen Wang

From: Chen Wang <[email protected]>

This series adds clock controller support for sophgo sg2042.

Thanks,
Chen

Quoted 7 lines
Quoted 4 lines
Quoted 1 line

---

Hi,Conor,

Can you please have a review of this patch?

Chief, you sent this patch only the other day, please give people some time. I, at least, have an MMO addiction to feed in my spare time alongside reviewing patches.

Okay, no rush. :)

Christmas is coming soon. I wish you a happy holiday in advance.

Quoted 9 lines
Quoted 2 lines

And I'm not sure if you are ok to pick up this patch so it can be merged into the next v6.8?

Stephen is the maintainer for clock drivers. I do pick things up and send them to him as PRs when it makes life easier, but usually that's after other people have reviewed the clock driver itself.

Thanks,
Conor.