Skip to contentSkip to conversation

net: netrom: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

PATCH RESEND Superseded Gustavo A. R. Silva 2 participants 3 messages Mar 5, 2021 – May 17, 2021

Subsystems (2)

v1 of 3 Superseded Latest is v3 →

lore
Share & tools
lore
#0 lore raw

PATCH RESEND 1/1 net: netrom: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of letting the code fall through to the next case.

---
 net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
net/netrom/nr_route.c +4 -0
index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 		fallthrough;
 	case 2:
 		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
+		break;
 	case 1:
 		break;
 	}
@@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n
 					fallthrough;
 				case 1:
 					nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
+					break;
 				case 2:
 					break;
 				}
@@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void)
 					fallthrough;
 				case 1:
 					s->routes[1] = s->routes[2];
+					break;
 				case 2:
 					break;
 				}
@@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
 							fallthrough;
 						case 1:
 							t->routes[1] = t->routes[2];
+							break;
 						case 2:
 							break;
 						}
Signature · 1 line
2.27.0
#1 lore raw

Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Quoted 47 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of letting the code fall through to the next case.

---
 net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
net/netrom/nr_route.c +4 -0
index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 		fallthrough;
 	case 2:
 		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
+		break;
 	case 1:
 		break;
 	}
@@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n
 					fallthrough;
 				case 1:
 					nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
+					break;
 				case 2:
 					break;
 				}
@@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void)
 					fallthrough;
 				case 1:
 					s->routes[1] = s->routes[2];
+					break;
 				case 2:
 					break;
 				}
@@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
 							fallthrough;
 						case 1:
 							t->routes[1] = t->routes[2];
+							break;
 						case 2:
 							break;
 						}
#2 lore raw

Hi Dave,

I haven't received any feedback about these patches after resending them.

We had thousands of these warnings and now we are down to less than a hundred in linux-next. I'm planning to take these patches in my -next tree for 5.14 as I'm planning to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang for that release, too.

Are you OK with this?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Quoted 56 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

Quoted 47 lines · Gustavo A. R. Silva

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of letting the code fall through to the next case.

---
 net/netrom/nr_route.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
net/netrom/nr_route.c +4 -0
index 78da5eab252a..de9821b6a62a 100644
@@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static int __must_check nr_add_node(ax25_address *nr, const char *mnemonic,
 		fallthrough;
 	case 2:
 		re_sort_routes(nr_node, 0, 1);
+		break;
 	case 1:
 		break;
 	}
@@ -359,6 +360,7 @@ static int nr_del_node(ax25_address *callsign, ax25_address *neighbour, struct n
 					fallthrough;
 				case 1:
 					nr_node->routes[1] = nr_node->routes[2];
+					break;
 				case 2:
 					break;
 				}
@@ -482,6 +484,7 @@ static int nr_dec_obs(void)
 					fallthrough;
 				case 1:
 					s->routes[1] = s->routes[2];
+					break;
 				case 2:
 					break;
 				}
@@ -529,6 +532,7 @@ void nr_rt_device_down(struct net_device *dev)
 							fallthrough;
 						case 1:
 							t->routes[1] = t->routes[2];
+							break;
 						case 2:
 							break;
 						}